60.5 F
Los Angeles
Sunday, October 1, 2023

ASUS Announces 2023 Vivobook Classic Series

On April 7, 2023, ASUS introduced five new models in the 2023 Vivobook Classic series of laptops. The top laptops in the series use the 13th Gen Intel® Core™...

Airman Arrested In Case of Leaked Classified Documents

Massachusetts Air National Guardsman Jack Teixeira has been arrested in the latest case of leaked classified documents. Teixeira, 21, is the head of Thug Shaker Central, an online gaming...

Microsoft OneNote to Gain Copilot

Microsoft 365 Copilot is coming to OneNote.

2000 Articles

Broughman, S.P., & Rollefson, M.R. (2000). Teacher supply in the United States, Sources of newly hired teachers in public and private schools: 1987-88 to 1994-94. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Benner, A. D. (2000). The cost of teacher turnover. Austin, TX: Texas Center for Educational Research. Retrieved May 16, 2006, from http://www.sbec.state.tx.us/SBECOnline/txbess/turnoverrpt.pdf

Benner (2000) described five cost models for teacher turnover. Separation, hiring, and training costs are common elements of all the models. Conservative costs are 25% of the teacher’s salary. In contrast, pragmatic costs are 150% of the teacher’s salary. Therefore, the range of costs for teacher turnover in Texas is between $480 million and $1.59 billion.

 

Chaika, G. (2000). The teacher shortage: Apply, please! Education World. Retrieved December 10, 2006, from http://www.educationworld.com/a_admin/admin/admin155.shtml

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. Retrieved June 18, 2006, from http://www.nctaf.org/documents/nctaf/solving.pdf

Davis, J., & Wilson, S. M. (2000). Principals’ efforts to empower teachers: Effects on teacher motivation and job satisfaction and stress. The Clearing House, 73(6), 349-353.

Finn, C. E. Jr., & Kanstoroom, M. (2000). Improving, empowering, dismantling. Public Interest, 140, 64-73.

Humphrey, D. C., Adelman, N., Esch, C. E., Riehl, L. M., Shields, P. M., & Tiffany, J. (2000). Preparing and supporting new teachers: A literature review. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

Ingersoll, R. M. (2000, February). Turnover among mathematics and science teachers in the U.S. Washington, DC: National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/inits/Math/glenn/Ingersollp.doc

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). Principal and teacher leadership effects: a replication. School Leadership & Management, 20(4), 415-434.

Wayne, A. J. (2000). Teacher supply and demand: Surprises from primary research. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(47), 1-8.

One in 20 teachers leaves each year and novice teachers quit for family reasons, not job dissatisfaction.

 

Williams, H. S. (2000). Teacher’s perceptions of principal effectiveness in selected secondary schools in Tennessee. Education, 121(2), 264-275.