Ubuntu, not worth a dime. No wonder they don't charge.

[DanS]

> Your lips are moving...again!

So are yours !!!!!!!

Up & down....up & down......up & down.....

Can everyone guess what Frank's doing ?

 

[Alias]

Dave wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:hkusog$m0b$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Dave wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Frank" <fb@wme.esa> wrote in message
>>> news:4b72dbfc$1@news.x-privat.org...
>>> snip
>>>
>>> Frank,
>>> I don't intend to respond to bashings anymore or arguments over L....
>>> vs W.... in hopes it will eliminate some of the trash-postings in
>>> this NG. For the sake of the group, will you for a while, stop
>>> responding to any bashers postings or killfile them? It only
>>> continues the thread, takes up bandwidth and adds to the problem. If
>>> none of us respond the fun goes away and so do they.
>>> Dave
>>
>> Neither Frank nor the Nymshifter have any self control. You're pissing
>> in the wind. Both Frank and the Nymshifter are trolls and you're
>> asking them to behave!? LOL!
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>
> How about you and I agree to rise above this and stop the bashing?
> Dave

I don't bash anything. I use both Windows and Ubuntu and both have good
and bad points.

--
Alias

 

[Alias]

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Dave wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:hkulj5$oc2$1@news.eternal-september.org... snip
>>>>
>>>> and that really gets their goat so they make up stories about
>>>> me, say my mother is a cheap whore and other third grade
>>>> insults.
>>>>
>>> snip
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> You're putting words in my mouth, I never insulted your mother. I
>>> was insulting you by insinuating you are a third-grader on your
>>> computer posting trash, your mother is coming to your bedroom
>>> door and you're going to get caught. I don't think I needed to
>>> explain that. Dave
>>
>> I wasn't talking about you. You are satisfied with hurling other
>> insults like saying my deceased mother is coming to my bedroom
>> room. How, pray tell, does that happen, LIAR?
>>
>
> Careful you son of a cheap whore, or else I'll post all the lies I
> made up about all of my family members along with the threats of
> physical violence you made against us, to be carried out inside our
> home at 3AM. Remember? Best you just STFU while you can, you arrogant
> bastard!

Make me.

--
Alias

 

[Alias]

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Dave" <davidj92@wowway.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:M5mdncnczLP0U-zWnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@sigecom.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns9D198F2DF968Bthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dave" <davidj92@wowway.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news8SdnSCQXsN9yu3WnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@sigecom.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns9D197CDAEABCEthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No problem. And the KDE thing is just recent, as earlier
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were significantly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slower than GNOME.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I digress................ I'm not here to agitate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something to do. I use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both Linux and Windows and my comments regarding Linux
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are mostly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just correcting misinformation being spread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice if you could correct a misinformed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alias. ;-p
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No answer to my other post Dave ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lf you are referring to my tirade on you I apologized. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> referring to something else I'm not aware what it is.
>>>>>>>>>>>> If I would correct a misinformed Alias....
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And I asked what misinfomation about Liux is Alias spreading ?
>>>>>>>>>>> What I was so vague in my reference was the that the most
>>>>>>>>>>> misinformation Alias spreads is the fact he's in a Windows NG
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> continuously posting about Linux--mostly barbs, insults and
>>>>>>>>>>> attempts
>>>>>>>>>>> to flame, no real content or information NO ONE HERE CARES,
>>>>>>>>>>> and he
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't get it, he's not going to change anyone's thoughts on
>>>>>>>>>>> Linux or
>>>>>>>>>>> Windows. They are what they are, warts and all, it's just a
>>>>>>>>>>> matter of
>>>>>>>>>>> your personal choice, do you want a wart here or a wart there.
>>>>>>>>>>> If you give him credit for being rational, which I did for a
>>>>>>>>>>> while but
>>>>>>>>>>> have changed my mind after trying to poke him back in a foolish
>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to get him to stop, you then have to consider him
>>>>>>>>>>> misinformed
>>>>>>>>>>> as he thinks he can change peoples minds with his postings.
>>>>>>>>>>> On the other hand, if you consider him irrational and therefore
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't intend to inform about the virtues of Linux and/or
>>>>>>>>>>> help with
>>>>>>>>>>> any shortcomings he proclaims are in Windows, then he's only an
>>>>>>>>>>> instigator and truly fits the fools definition. (It's like
>>>>>>>>>>> the analogy
>>>>>>>>>>> of arguing with a fool; "If you argue with a fool, you will
>>>>>>>>>>> leave the
>>>>>>>>>>> argument feeling like a fool.") I think we can agree a fool is
>>>>>>>>>>> misinformed can't we?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not really. So, to answer my own question, there really isn't
>>>>>>>>>> any specific misinformation being spread by Alias about Linux.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm not sure what category you would
>>>>>>>>>>> consider him in, but because of his actions I consider him
>>>>>>>>>>> misinformed
>>>>>>>>>>> either way you consider him and I think that's being
>>>>>>>>>>> generous. Either
>>>>>>>>>>> way, I'm done with contributing to the problem and have made him
>>>>>>>>>>> invisible so I don't have to see his foolishness.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My guess is it wouldn't bother you anywhere near the way it
>>>>>>>>>> does now if the other two or three people that are constantly
>>>>>>>>>> replying to him, to attack him, didn't. I'm sure you know of
>>>>>>>>>> who I speak.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course you totally ignore the fucking lies and FUD that
>>>>>>>>> lying POS spreads about MS products. He is a POS lying linux
>>>>>>>>> troll. That dan-o is the cock sucking son of cheap whore you
>>>>>>>>> chose to defend.
>>>>>>>>> Now fuck-off asshole!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course the only "lies" that Frank can cite about *anything*
>>>>>>>> are personal things he makes up about me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LIAR!
>>>>>>> You just don't get it do you? You are a classic example of an
>>>>>>> arrogant, pathological liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Name calling is not citing a lie. You can't and your usual
>>>>>> template is exactly what I said above.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Keep lying asshole. As you yourself stated..."I'm only here to make
>>>>> this ng unusable".
>>>>> That is the only truth you've ever told. You are a real POS!
>>>>
>>>> You can't cite one lie...
>>>
>>> You know how to tell when you're lying? Your lips are moving!
>>
>> Like I said, you can't.
>
> Oops! You're lips are moving!

I don't type with my lips. Do you?

Oh, and you can't cite one lie.

--
Alias

 

[DanS]

GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote in
news:E_OdncDLv5paYe_WnZ2dnUVZ_hJi4p2d@bresnan.com:

> DanS wrote:
>> GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote in
>> news:tMadnbXGdY6llfTWnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@bresnan.com:
>>
>>
>>> I've paid for the dvds so why can't I play them on Linux?
>>> I don't see what the big legal deal is.
>>
>> Here...read about it...
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/05/05/linux_users_protest_dvd_regs/
>
> Looks like fear and greed on the industries part.

That's *EXACTLY* what it is....greed.....

And that article was dated 2000, so 10 years later, it's still the exact
same situation, and in that time 0 people have been arrested and charged
with playing DVD's and/or MP3s on their Linux PCs.....so, making a big deal
over it, like the anti-Linux crowd does is, and saying you're a criminal if
you do, is quite ludicrous, especially since the laws convering all this
stuff contradict each other.

Of course, if you did want to go the legit way, Canonical DOES offer
commercial players/codecs on their website, if you (not you specifically)
wanted to purchase them.

 

[Frank]

Alias wrote:
> Dave wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:hkusog$m0b$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Dave wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Frank" <fb@wme.esa> wrote in message
>>>> news:4b72dbfc$1@news.x-privat.org...
>>>> snip
>>>>
>>>> Frank,
>>>> I don't intend to respond to bashings anymore or arguments over
>>>> L.... vs W.... in hopes it will eliminate some of the trash-postings
>>>> in this NG. For the sake of the group, will you for a while, stop
>>>> responding to any bashers postings or killfile them? It only
>>>> continues the thread, takes up bandwidth and adds to the problem. If
>>>> none of us respond the fun goes away and so do they.
>>>> Dave
>>>
>>> Neither Frank nor the Nymshifter have any self control. You're
>>> pissing in the wind. Both Frank and the Nymshifter are trolls and
>>> you're asking them to behave!? LOL!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> How about you and I agree to rise above this and stop the bashing?
>> Dave
>
> I don't bash anything.

Lie #1!

I use both Windows and Ubuntu and both have good
> and bad points.

Lie #2.

 

[Frank]

DanS wrote:
>>>> You're putting words in my mouth, I never insulted your mother. I
>>>> was insulting you by insinuating you are a third-grader on your
>>>> computer posting trash, your mother is coming to your bedroom door
>>>> and you're going to get caught.
>>>> I don't think I needed to explain that.
>>>> Dave
>>> I wasn't talking about you. You are satisfied with hurling other
>>> insults like saying my deceased mother is coming to my bedroom room.
>>> How, pray tell, does that happen, LIAR?
>>>
>> Careful you son of a cheap whore, or else I'll post all the insults
>> you made about all of my family members along with the threats of
>> physical violence you made against us, to be carried out inside our
>> home at 3AM. Remember?
>
> Yes, that would be "Frank's Infantile Diatribe #491"....

Apparently you think its ok to post disgusting sexual remarks about
others family members...their wife, daughter & sons and then threaten
them with physical violence?
How telling of you. You're a fucking degenerate son of a bitch just like
alias is huh?
>
> .....and you've posted it over 782 times in the Vista group and probably
> several times here already, and everyone here has already kf'd you, or
> don't read you anyway, so who cares.

Go fuck yourself dan-o. You son of a bitch!
>

 

[Frank]

Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Dave wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:hkulj5$oc2$1@news.eternal-september.org... snip
>>>>>
>>>>> and that really gets their goat so they make up stories about
>>>>> me, say my mother is a cheap whore and other third grade
>>>>> insults.
>>>>>
>>>> snip
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> You're putting words in my mouth, I never insulted your mother. I
>>>> was insulting you by insinuating you are a third-grader on your
>>>> computer posting trash, your mother is coming to your bedroom
>>>> door and you're going to get caught. I don't think I needed to
>>>> explain that. Dave
>>>
>>> I wasn't talking about you. You are satisfied with hurling other
>>> insults like saying my deceased mother is coming to my bedroom
>>> room. How, pray tell, does that happen, LIAR?
>>>
>>
>> Careful you son of a cheap whore, or else I'll post all the lies I
>> made up about all of my family members along with the threats of
>> physical violence you made against us, to be carried out inside our
>> home at 3AM. Remember? Best you just STFU while you can, you arrogant
>> bastard!
>
> Make me.
>
I've told you many, many times in the past to just give me your real
name and addy and I'll have you doing things you never thought possible.

But you're a fucking POS *COWARD* AS WE ALL HAVE SEEN!
Oops!

 

[Frank]

Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "Dave" <davidj92@wowway.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:M5mdncnczLP0U-zWnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@sigecom.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns9D198F2DF968Bthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dave" <davidj92@wowway.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news8SdnSCQXsN9yu3WnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@sigecom.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:Xns9D197CDAEABCEthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No problem. And the KDE thing is just recent, as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earlier versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were significantly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slower than GNOME.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I digress................ I'm not here to agitate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something to do. I use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both Linux and Windows and my comments regarding Linux
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are mostly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just correcting misinformation being spread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice if you could correct a misinformed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alias. ;-p
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No answer to my other post Dave ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lf you are referring to my tirade on you I apologized. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> referring to something else I'm not aware what it is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I would correct a misinformed Alias....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I asked what misinfomation about Liux is Alias spreading ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> What I was so vague in my reference was the that the most
>>>>>>>>>>>> misinformation Alias spreads is the fact he's in a Windows
>>>>>>>>>>>> NG and
>>>>>>>>>>>> continuously posting about Linux--mostly barbs, insults and
>>>>>>>>>>>> attempts
>>>>>>>>>>>> to flame, no real content or information NO ONE HERE CARES,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and he
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't get it, he's not going to change anyone's thoughts
>>>>>>>>>>>> on Linux or
>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows. They are what they are, warts and all, it's just a
>>>>>>>>>>>> matter of
>>>>>>>>>>>> your personal choice, do you want a wart here or a wart there.
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you give him credit for being rational, which I did for a
>>>>>>>>>>>> while but
>>>>>>>>>>>> have changed my mind after trying to poke him back in a foolish
>>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to get him to stop, you then have to consider him
>>>>>>>>>>>> misinformed
>>>>>>>>>>>> as he thinks he can change peoples minds with his postings.
>>>>>>>>>>>> On the other hand, if you consider him irrational and therefore
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't intend to inform about the virtues of Linux and/or
>>>>>>>>>>>> help with
>>>>>>>>>>>> any shortcomings he proclaims are in Windows, then he's only an
>>>>>>>>>>>> instigator and truly fits the fools definition. (It's like
>>>>>>>>>>>> the analogy
>>>>>>>>>>>> of arguing with a fool; "If you argue with a fool, you will
>>>>>>>>>>>> leave the
>>>>>>>>>>>> argument feeling like a fool.") I think we can agree a fool is
>>>>>>>>>>>> misinformed can't we?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Not really. So, to answer my own question, there really isn't
>>>>>>>>>>> any specific misinformation being spread by Alias about Linux.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm not sure what category you would
>>>>>>>>>>>> consider him in, but because of his actions I consider him
>>>>>>>>>>>> misinformed
>>>>>>>>>>>> either way you consider him and I think that's being
>>>>>>>>>>>> generous. Either
>>>>>>>>>>>> way, I'm done with contributing to the problem and have made
>>>>>>>>>>>> him
>>>>>>>>>>>> invisible so I don't have to see his foolishness.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> My guess is it wouldn't bother you anywhere near the way it
>>>>>>>>>>> does now if the other two or three people that are constantly
>>>>>>>>>>> replying to him, to attack him, didn't. I'm sure you know of
>>>>>>>>>>> who I speak.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course you totally ignore the fucking lies and FUD that
>>>>>>>>>> lying POS spreads about MS products. He is a POS lying linux
>>>>>>>>>> troll. That dan-o is the cock sucking son of cheap whore you
>>>>>>>>>> chose to defend.
>>>>>>>>>> Now fuck-off asshole!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course the only "lies" that Frank can cite about *anything*
>>>>>>>>> are personal things he makes up about me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LIAR!
>>>>>>>> You just don't get it do you? You are a classic example of an
>>>>>>>> arrogant, pathological liar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Name calling is not citing a lie. You can't and your usual
>>>>>>> template is exactly what I said above.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Keep lying asshole. As you yourself stated..."I'm only here to
>>>>>> make this ng unusable".
>>>>>> That is the only truth you've ever told. You are a real POS!
>>>>>
>>>>> You can't cite one lie...
>>>>
>>>> You know how to tell when you're lying? Your lips are moving!
>>>
>>> Like I said, you can't.
>>
>> Oops! You're lips are moving!
>
> I don't type with my lips. Do you?
>
> Oh, and you can't cite one lie.
>
You lips are moving...again...LOL!
Oops!

 

[Frank]

DanS wrote:
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b72f844$1@news.x-privat.org:
>
>> DanS wrote:
>>>> Of course you totally ignore the fucking lies and FUD that lying POS
>>>> spreads about MS products.
>>> Such as ? Can you name *any* ? (.....that are not plainly and
>>> obviously an opinion.)
>>>
>> Try google..if you know how. His FUD is all over the Internet.
>
> You expect me to do the work to prove one of *your* claims ?
>
> OOPS!!!!! LOL!!!!!!!
>
> That's not how it works....anywhere....except in your little pea-brain.
>
> I'll just chalk this up as me kicking your a**.
>
> That is how *you* classify it right ? (No matter how lame it sounds.)

You can tell ones character by the company one keeps.
You and alias...how telling.

 

[DanS]

Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b730451$1@news.x-privat.org:

> DanS wrote:
>>>>> You're putting words in my mouth, I never insulted your mother. I
>>>>> was insulting you by insinuating you are a third-grader on your
>>>>> computer posting trash, your mother is coming to your bedroom door
>>>>> and you're going to get caught.
>>>>> I don't think I needed to explain that.
>>>>> Dave
>>>> I wasn't talking about you. You are satisfied with hurling other
>>>> insults like saying my deceased mother is coming to my bedroom
>>>> room. How, pray tell, does that happen, LIAR?
>>>>
>>> Careful you son of a cheap whore, or else I'll post all the insults
>>> you made about all of my family members along with the threats of
>>> physical violence you made against us, to be carried out inside our
>>> home at 3AM. Remember?
>>
>> Yes, that would be "Frank's Infantile Diatribe #491"....
>
> Apparently you think its ok to post disgusting sexual remarks about
> others family members...their wife, daughter & sons and then threaten
> them with physical violence?

I didn't say that, not at all. But for you to infer that out of what I
said, well, you are a wacko.

I don't see anyone else here saying they like you, and agree with what
you post here. (Other than the nymshifter that is, but that doesn't
count.)


> How telling of you. You're a fucking degenerate son of a bitch just
> like alias is huh?
>>
>> .....and you've posted it over 782 times in the Vista group and
>> probably several times here already, and everyone here has already
>> kf'd you, or don't read you anyway, so who cares.
>
> Go fuck yourself dan-o. You son of a bitch!

I say jump....and you say how high !!!

 

[DanS]

Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b73054d@news.x-privat.org:

> DanS wrote:
>> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b72f844$1@news.x-privat.org:
>>
>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>> Of course you totally ignore the fucking lies and FUD that lying POS
>>>>> spreads about MS products.
>>>> Such as ? Can you name *any* ? (.....that are not plainly and
>>>> obviously an opinion.)
>>>>
>>> Try google..if you know how. His FUD is all over the Internet.
>>
>> You expect me to do the work to prove one of *your* claims ?
>>
>> OOPS!!!!! LOL!!!!!!!
>>
>> That's not how it works....anywhere....except in your little pea-brain.
>>
>> I'll just chalk this up as me kicking your a**.
>>
>> That is how *you* classify it right ? (No matter how lame it sounds.)
>
> You can tell ones character by the company one keeps.
> You and alias...how telling.

I keep company with no one.

You don't either, but that's because no one will have you, except your
nymshifting lover.....and even he/she/it's been distancing his/herself form
you as late.....

It looks like you're losing the last 'friend' you have here.

 

[Frank]

DanS wrote:
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b730451$1@news.x-privat.org:
>
>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>> You're putting words in my mouth, I never insulted your mother. I
>>>>>> was insulting you by insinuating you are a third-grader on your
>>>>>> computer posting trash, your mother is coming to your bedroom door
>>>>>> and you're going to get caught.
>>>>>> I don't think I needed to explain that.
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>> I wasn't talking about you. You are satisfied with hurling other
>>>>> insults like saying my deceased mother is coming to my bedroom
>>>>> room. How, pray tell, does that happen, LIAR?
>>>>>
>>>> Careful you son of a cheap whore, or else I'll post all the insults
>>>> you made about all of my family members along with the threats of
>>>> physical violence you made against us, to be carried out inside our
>>>> home at 3AM. Remember?
>>> Yes, that would be "Frank's Infantile Diatribe #491"....
>> Apparently you think its ok to post disgusting sexual remarks about
>> others family members...their wife, daughter & sons and then threaten
>> them with physical violence?
>
> I didn't say that, not at all.

You have clearly implied the same.

But for you to infer that out of what I
> said, well, you are a wacko.

I'm not the one supporting alias, the real sicko in this ng like you are.
>
> I don't see anyone else here saying they like you, and agree with what
> you post here. (Other than the nymshifter that is, but that doesn't
> count.)
>
Like I give a shit.
>
>> How telling of you. You're a fucking degenerate son of a bitch just
>> like alias is huh?
>>> .....and you've posted it over 782 times in the Vista group and
>>> probably several times here already, and everyone here has already
>>> kf'd you, or don't read you anyway, so who cares.
>> Go fuck yourself dan-o. You son of a bitch!
>
> I say jump....and you say how high !!!

I say you're just like alias.
>

 

[Frank]

DanS wrote:
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b73054d@news.x-privat.org:
>
>> DanS wrote:
>>> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b72f844$1@news.x-privat.org:
>>>
>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>> Of course you totally ignore the fucking lies and FUD that lying POS
>>>>>> spreads about MS products.
>>>>> Such as ? Can you name *any* ? (.....that are not plainly and
>>>>> obviously an opinion.)
>>>>>
>>>> Try google..if you know how. His FUD is all over the Internet.
>>> You expect me to do the work to prove one of *your* claims ?
>>>
>>> OOPS!!!!! LOL!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> That's not how it works....anywhere....except in your little pea-brain.
>>>
>>> I'll just chalk this up as me kicking your a**.
>>>
>>> That is how *you* classify it right ? (No matter how lame it sounds.)
>> You can tell ones character by the company one keeps.
>> You and alias...how telling.
>
> I keep company with no one.

Now you're lying...just like your butt-buddy alias does.
>
> You don't either, but that's because no one will have you, except your
> nymshifting lover.....and even he/she/it's been distancing his/herself form
> you as late.....

Yawn.

>
> It looks like you're losing the last 'friend' you have here.

Want a friend...get a dog, you dumb ass.
>

 

[GreyCloud]

DanS wrote:
> GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote in
> news:E_OdncDLv5paYe_WnZ2dnUVZ_hJi4p2d@bresnan.com:
>
>> DanS wrote:
>>> GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote in
>>> news:tMadnbXGdY6llfTWnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@bresnan.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I've paid for the dvds so why can't I play them on Linux?
>>>> I don't see what the big legal deal is.
>>> Here...read about it...
>>>
>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/05/05/linux_users_protest_dvd_regs/
>> Looks like fear and greed on the industries part.
>
> That's *EXACTLY* what it is....greed.....
>
> And that article was dated 2000, so 10 years later, it's still the exact
> same situation, and in that time 0 people have been arrested and charged
> with playing DVD's and/or MP3s on their Linux PCs.....so, making a big deal
> over it, like the anti-Linux crowd does is, and saying you're a criminal if
> you do, is quite ludicrous, especially since the laws convering all this
> stuff contradict each other.
>
> Of course, if you did want to go the legit way, Canonical DOES offer
> commercial players/codecs on their website, if you (not you specifically)
> wanted to purchase them.

I can't remember who it was that posted the url to Ubuntus web site that
examines what one needs to get dvd playback running, but I did find one
other library that was needed in order to get it running, which I
downloaded from a german website where it is legal to do so. After all,
I did purchase the hardware (the dvd drive) so I should legally have the
right to play any dvd. From what I read of your provided url, the legal
aspects of what Hollywood is doing appears to be nothing more than a
weasel move trying to scare off people. So for those that are more
legally inclined, how come one can buy hardware like a mac or a windows
PC can play these, yet linux isn't supposed to? Weird world we live in.
Both mac and PC platforms are capable of copying dvds anyway.

 

[DanS]

Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b733109@news.x-privat.org:

> DanS wrote:
>> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b730451$1@news.x-privat.org:
>>
>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>>> You're putting words in my mouth, I never insulted your mother.
>>>>>>> I was insulting you by insinuating you are a third-grader on
>>>>>>> your computer posting trash, your mother is coming to your
>>>>>>> bedroom door and you're going to get caught.
>>>>>>> I don't think I needed to explain that.
>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>> I wasn't talking about you. You are satisfied with hurling other
>>>>>> insults like saying my deceased mother is coming to my bedroom
>>>>>> room. How, pray tell, does that happen, LIAR?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Careful you son of a cheap whore, or else I'll post all the
>>>>> insults you made about all of my family members along with the
>>>>> threats of physical violence you made against us, to be carried
>>>>> out inside our home at 3AM. Remember?


>>>> Yes, that would be "Frank's Infantile Diatribe #491"....

You forgot to quote this part of my post

......and you've posted it over 782 times in the Vista group andprobably
several times here already, and everyone here has already kf'd you, or
don't read you anyway, so who cares.



>>> Apparently you think its ok to post disgusting sexual remarks about
>>> others family members...their wife, daughter & sons and then
>>> threaten them with physical violence?
>>
>> I didn't say that, not at all.
>
> You have clearly implied the same.

No. I have not. you may have infered it, but I in no way implied it.

What I implied was that you have 1000 or more of your cut & paste
childish immature attacks.

And that I'm tired of hearing about them.

That's it.

 

[DanS]

>> Of course, if you did want to go the legit way, Canonical DOES offer
>> commercial players/codecs on their website, if you (not you
>> specifically) wanted to purchase them.
>
> I can't remember who it was that posted the url to Ubuntus web site
> that examines what one needs to get dvd playback running, but I did
> find one other library that was needed in order to get it running,
> which I downloaded from a german website where it is legal to do so.
> After all, I did purchase the hardware (the dvd drive) so I should
> legally have the right to play any dvd. From what I read of your
> provided url, the legal aspects of what Hollywood is doing appears to
> be nothing more than a weasel move trying to scare off people.

Yes, that is what Hollywood & the music companies do each time some new
type of media comes out.

Look at how the VCR was supposed to kill Hollywood, both movies and TV. Did
it ? Nope. As a matter of fact, Hollywood got a new huge stream of revenue
based on the sale of pre-recorded video tapes.

> So for
> those that are more legally inclined, how come one can buy hardware
> like a mac or a windows PC can play these, yet linux isn't supposed
> to?

Because MS & Apple supposedly pay whomever owns the patent on the
technology a licensing fee per each OS license.

 

[Frank]

DanS wrote:
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b733109@news.x-privat.org:
>
>> DanS wrote:
>>> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b730451$1@news.x-privat.org:
>>>
>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>>>> You're putting words in my mouth, I never insulted your mother.
>>>>>>>> I was insulting you by insinuating you are a third-grader on
>>>>>>>> your computer posting trash, your mother is coming to your
>>>>>>>> bedroom door and you're going to get caught.
>>>>>>>> I don't think I needed to explain that.
>>>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>>> I wasn't talking about you. You are satisfied with hurling other
>>>>>>> insults like saying my deceased mother is coming to my bedroom
>>>>>>> room. How, pray tell, does that happen, LIAR?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Careful you son of a cheap whore, or else I'll post all the
>>>>>> insults you made about all of my family members along with the
>>>>>> threats of physical violence you made against us, to be carried
>>>>>> out inside our home at 3AM. Remember?
>
>
>>>>> Yes, that would be "Frank's Infantile Diatribe #491"....
>
> You forgot to quote this part of my post
>
> .....and you've posted it over 782 times in the Vista group andprobably
> several times here already, and everyone here has already kf'd you, or
> don't read you anyway, so who cares.
>
So? What is your excuse?
>
>>>> Apparently you think its ok to post disgusting sexual remarks about
>>>> others family members...their wife, daughter & sons and then
>>>> threaten them with physical violence?
>>> I didn't say that, not at all.
>> You have clearly implied the same.
>
> No. I have not.

Yes, you have.

you may have infered it, but I in no way implied it.

Yes, you did.
>
> What I implied was that you have 1000 or more of your cut & paste
> childish immature attacks.

No, your wrong. You made an explicit statement (see above).
>
> And that I'm tired of hearing about them.

Do you know how to use kill file? I'll post what I want and when I want.
If you don't like it, and clearly I upset your ignorant ass, then get
lost or use kill file or else just ignore me...if you can.

>
> That's it.

No, that is not "it". That is what you want to be "it', but that is not
really 'it".
Keep it up dan-o and I'll keep kicking your stupid, arrogant ass just
like I do with alias, your butt-buddy. You're two peas in a pot or in a
room!...LOL!
Oops!

 

[Roy Smith]

On 2/10/2010 5:08 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
> DanS wrote:
>> GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote in
>> news:E_OdncDLv5paYe_WnZ2dnUVZ_hJi4p2d@bresnan.com:
>>
>>> DanS wrote:
>>>> GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote in
>>>> news:tMadnbXGdY6llfTWnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@bresnan.com:
>>>>
>>>>> I've paid for the dvds so why can't I play them on Linux?
>>>>> I don't see what the big legal deal is.
>>>> Here...read about it...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/05/05/linux_users_protest_dvd_regs/
>>> Looks like fear and greed on the industries part.
>>
>> That's *EXACTLY* what it is....greed.....
>>
>> And that article was dated 2000, so 10 years later, it's still the
>> exact same situation, and in that time 0 people have been arrested and
>> charged with playing DVD's and/or MP3s on their Linux PCs.....so,
>> making a big deal over it, like the anti-Linux crowd does is, and
>> saying you're a criminal if you do, is quite ludicrous, especially
>> since the laws convering all this stuff contradict each other.
>>
>> Of course, if you did want to go the legit way, Canonical DOES offer
>> commercial players/codecs on their website, if you (not you
>> specifically) wanted to purchase them.
>
> I can't remember who it was that posted the url to Ubuntus web site that
> examines what one needs to get dvd playback running, but I did find one
> other library that was needed in order to get it running, which I
> downloaded from a german website where it is legal to do so. After all,
> I did purchase the hardware (the dvd drive) so I should legally have the
> right to play any dvd. From what I read of your provided url, the legal
> aspects of what Hollywood is doing appears to be nothing more than a
> weasel move trying to scare off people. So for those that are more
> legally inclined, how come one can buy hardware like a mac or a windows
> PC can play these, yet linux isn't supposed to? Weird world we live in.
> Both mac and PC platforms are capable of copying dvds anyway.

I know that his is off topic, but here's a link for a complete how-to on
getting Ubuntu to play DVD's.

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=766683

 

[Roy Smith]

On 2/10/2010 12:07 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>
> "Frank" <fb@wme.esa> wrote in message news:4b72dbfc$1@news.x-privat.org...
> snip
>
> Frank,
> I don't intend to respond to bashings anymore or arguments over L.... vs
> W.... in hopes it will eliminate some of the trash-postings in this NG.
> For the sake of the group, will you for a while, stop responding to any
> bashers postings or killfile them? It only continues the thread, takes
> up bandwidth and adds to the problem. If none of us respond the fun goes
> away and so do they.

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

--

Roy Smith
Windows 7 Home Premium

Timestamp: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 84:43 PM