A
Alias
Flightless Bird
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>> DanS wrote:
>>>> "Dave" <davidj92@wowway.com> wrote in
>>>> news:M5mdncnczLP0U-zWnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@sigecom.net:
>>>>>
>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
>>>>> message news:Xns9D198F2DF968Bthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>> "Dave" <davidj92@wowway.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news8SdnSCQXsN9yu3WnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@sigecom.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
>>>>>>> message news:Xns9D197CDAEABCEthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>>>>>> No problem. And the KDE thing is just recent, as earlier versions
>>>>>>>>>> were significantly
>>>>>>>>>> slower than GNOME.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But I digress................ I'm not here to agitate. Just for
>>>>>>>>>> something to do. I use
>>>>>>>>>> both Linux and Windows and my comments regarding Linux are mostly
>>>>>>>>>> just correcting misinformation being spread.
>>>>>>>>> It would be nice if you could correct a misinformed alias. ;-p
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No answer to my other post Dave ?
>>>>>>> lf you are referring to my tirade on you I apologized. If you are
>>>>>>> referring to something else I'm not aware what it is.
>>>>>> If I would correct a misinformed Alias....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And I asked what misinfomation about Liux is Alias spreading ?
>>>>> What I was so vague in my reference was the that the most
>>>>> misinformation Alias spreads is the fact he's in a Windows NG and
>>>>> continuously posting about Linux--mostly barbs, insults and attempts
>>>>> to flame, no real content or information NO ONE HERE CARES, and he
>>>>> doesn't get it, he's not going to change anyone's thoughts on Linux or
>>>>> Windows. They are what they are, warts and all, it's just a matter of
>>>>> your personal choice, do you want a wart here or a wart there.
>>>>> If you give him credit for being rational, which I did for a while but
>>>>> have changed my mind after trying to poke him back in a foolish
>>>>> attempt to get him to stop, you then have to consider him misinformed
>>>>> as he thinks he can change peoples minds with his postings.
>>>>> On the other hand, if you consider him irrational and therefore
>>>>> doesn't intend to inform about the virtues of Linux and/or help with
>>>>> any shortcomings he proclaims are in Windows, then he's only an
>>>>> instigator and truly fits the fools definition. (It's like the analogy
>>>>> of arguing with a fool; "If you argue with a fool, you will leave the
>>>>> argument feeling like a fool.") I think we can agree a fool is
>>>>> misinformed can't we?
>>>>
>>>> Not really. So, to answer my own question, there really isn't any
>>>> specific misinformation being spread by Alias about Linux.
>>>>
>>>>> So, I'm not sure what category you would
>>>>> consider him in, but because of his actions I consider him misinformed
>>>>> either way you consider him and I think that's being generous. Either
>>>>> way, I'm done with contributing to the problem and have made him
>>>>> invisible so I don't have to see his foolishness.
>>>>
>>>> My guess is it wouldn't bother you anywhere near the way it does now
>>>> if the other two or three people that are constantly replying to
>>>> him, to attack him, didn't. I'm sure you know of who I speak.
>>>
>>> Of course you totally ignore the fucking lies and FUD that lying POS
>>> spreads about MS products. He is a POS lying linux troll. That dan-o
>>> is the cock sucking son of cheap whore you chose to defend.
>>> Now fuck-off asshole!
>>
>> Of course the only "lies" that Frank can cite about *anything* are
>> personal things he makes up about me.
>>
> LIAR!
> You just don't get it do you? You are a classic example of an arrogant,
> pathological liar.
Name calling is not citing a lie. You can't and your usual template is
exactly what I said above.
--
Alias
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>> DanS wrote:
>>>> "Dave" <davidj92@wowway.com> wrote in
>>>> news:M5mdncnczLP0U-zWnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@sigecom.net:
>>>>>
>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
>>>>> message news:Xns9D198F2DF968Bthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>> "Dave" <davidj92@wowway.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news8SdnSCQXsN9yu3WnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@sigecom.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
>>>>>>> message news:Xns9D197CDAEABCEthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>>>>>> No problem. And the KDE thing is just recent, as earlier versions
>>>>>>>>>> were significantly
>>>>>>>>>> slower than GNOME.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But I digress................ I'm not here to agitate. Just for
>>>>>>>>>> something to do. I use
>>>>>>>>>> both Linux and Windows and my comments regarding Linux are mostly
>>>>>>>>>> just correcting misinformation being spread.
>>>>>>>>> It would be nice if you could correct a misinformed alias. ;-p
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No answer to my other post Dave ?
>>>>>>> lf you are referring to my tirade on you I apologized. If you are
>>>>>>> referring to something else I'm not aware what it is.
>>>>>> If I would correct a misinformed Alias....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And I asked what misinfomation about Liux is Alias spreading ?
>>>>> What I was so vague in my reference was the that the most
>>>>> misinformation Alias spreads is the fact he's in a Windows NG and
>>>>> continuously posting about Linux--mostly barbs, insults and attempts
>>>>> to flame, no real content or information NO ONE HERE CARES, and he
>>>>> doesn't get it, he's not going to change anyone's thoughts on Linux or
>>>>> Windows. They are what they are, warts and all, it's just a matter of
>>>>> your personal choice, do you want a wart here or a wart there.
>>>>> If you give him credit for being rational, which I did for a while but
>>>>> have changed my mind after trying to poke him back in a foolish
>>>>> attempt to get him to stop, you then have to consider him misinformed
>>>>> as he thinks he can change peoples minds with his postings.
>>>>> On the other hand, if you consider him irrational and therefore
>>>>> doesn't intend to inform about the virtues of Linux and/or help with
>>>>> any shortcomings he proclaims are in Windows, then he's only an
>>>>> instigator and truly fits the fools definition. (It's like the analogy
>>>>> of arguing with a fool; "If you argue with a fool, you will leave the
>>>>> argument feeling like a fool.") I think we can agree a fool is
>>>>> misinformed can't we?
>>>>
>>>> Not really. So, to answer my own question, there really isn't any
>>>> specific misinformation being spread by Alias about Linux.
>>>>
>>>>> So, I'm not sure what category you would
>>>>> consider him in, but because of his actions I consider him misinformed
>>>>> either way you consider him and I think that's being generous. Either
>>>>> way, I'm done with contributing to the problem and have made him
>>>>> invisible so I don't have to see his foolishness.
>>>>
>>>> My guess is it wouldn't bother you anywhere near the way it does now
>>>> if the other two or three people that are constantly replying to
>>>> him, to attack him, didn't. I'm sure you know of who I speak.
>>>
>>> Of course you totally ignore the fucking lies and FUD that lying POS
>>> spreads about MS products. He is a POS lying linux troll. That dan-o
>>> is the cock sucking son of cheap whore you chose to defend.
>>> Now fuck-off asshole!
>>
>> Of course the only "lies" that Frank can cite about *anything* are
>> personal things he makes up about me.
>>
> LIAR!
> You just don't get it do you? You are a classic example of an arrogant,
> pathological liar.
Name calling is not citing a lie. You can't and your usual template is
exactly what I said above.
--
Alias