WIN 7

[Alias]

On 05/18/2010 12:17 AM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message
> news:hsp1eb$tid$3@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>
>>> In other words, you are simply enforcing my statement that "At least
>>> the problems that they seem to post..."
>>>
>>> Alias, no one needs to discredit you. You do such a complete job of it
>>> all by your self.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John B. Slocomb
>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>
>> Do you even read what you post?
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>
> Do you even understand what you read?
>
>

Better than you ever will but that's not hard.

--
Alias

 

[Alias]

On 05/18/2010 04:12 PM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hsr4c5$rto$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>
>>> IT Facts
>>> Alex Moskalyuk
>>>
>>> Home / News& Blogs / IT Facts
>>> Linux servers hacked more frequently than Windows
>>>
>>> By ZDNet Research | February 19, 2004, 8:21am PST
>>> Summary
>>> A more specific analysis of government servers also found Linux more
>>> susceptible, accounting for 57% of all breaches. The research did not
>>> include other methods of intrusion such as viruses and worms.
>>>
>>> John B. Slocomb
>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>
>> Six year old article that is obviously biased. You *really* are
>> desperate.
>> --
>> Alias
>
> Why don't you stick with being the Ubuntu Marketing Department, take
> 10,000 Ubuntu CDs to Nigeria and try to convince people to get on board
> with Ubuntu. Just think, if you pass out all 10,000 CDs, you may get
> another 7 users!
>
>
>

Just curious, why do you suggest Nigeria instead of, say, Peru or Indonesia?

--
Alias

 

[Alias]

On 05/18/2010 04:21 PM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message
> news:hsm0c8$lkp$6@news.eternal-september.org...
>> On 05/15/2010 05:47 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 09:11:08 -0700, "Heywood Jablowme"
>>> <heywood@jablowme.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias"<aka@masked&anonymous.com.¡nvalido> wrote in message
>>>> news:hsjodi$p72$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> On 05/14/2010 02:55 PM, Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps) wrote:
>>>>>>>> And running softwares developped [sic] for Windows.
>>>>>>> Yeah, like malware.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No.. DirectX 3D games and HDTV viewer!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So what?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't you go to the Ubuntu forums and help out those sorry sacks
>>>> who
>>>> believe they have a decent OS when in reality they have SHIT?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No he shouldn't!
>>
>> I've been there since 2006. Oops.
>>
> And you still can't figure out how to post!
>
>
>

And the nym you think I use is? Don't know? Everyone act really surprised.

--
Alias

 

[Alias]

On 05/18/2010 124 AM, Mocassin Joe wrote:
> "Heywood Jablowme"<heywood@jablowme.gov> wrote in message
> news:4bf1b248$1@news.x-privat.org...
>>
>>
>> "Mocassin Joe"<joemocasanto@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:GNeIn.12010$Gx2.6820@newsfe20.iad...
>>>
>>> "Heywood Jablowme"<heywood@jablowme.gov> wrote in message
>>> news:4beb0c74@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <no_one@no_where.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:hdkmu59pdkha3inpite9bgcsenrjtspvsu@4ax.com...
>>>>> Well after working with Vista II, otherwise known as Windows 7, for
>>>>> three months I can see that Microsoft is still incapable of producing
>>>>> a quality OS. So I need to look at some other system to switch to,
>>>>> likely one of the Linux distros.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill - MN
>>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> So you can't figure out Windows 7? Windows 7 is much better than Vista
>>>> and is very stable. You are probably incompetent and therefore you
>>>> should migrate to Ubuntu. Get with our resident Ubuntu idiot, Alias
>>>> and he will help you out.
>>>>
>>>> Don't let the screen door hit your ass on the way out. LOL!
>>>
>>> Uncalled for. You sound like some of the MacFreaks on CSMA.
>>>
>>
>> You don't like the message? Ignore it. Just FYI.
>
> I didn't say that. You should buy a Mac.
>
>

It can't afford one.

--
Alias

 

[Frank]

On 5/18/2010 93 AM, Alias wrote:
> On 05/18/2010 12:03 AM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hsmacj$cb7$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Death wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 15 May 2010 13:18:44 +0200, Alias
>>>>>> <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/15/2010 05:40 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 18:53:28 +0200, Jackie<Jackie@an.on> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/14/2010 18:10, Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who the hell wants to run Windows applications in Ubuntu and
>>>>>>>>>> who the
>>>>>>>>>> hell would want to run them under WHINE? If you need Microsoft
>>>>>>>>>> applications, and most people want MS apps, then use Windows.
>>>>>>>>>> No need to
>>>>>>>>>> use that INFERIOR Ubuntu that nobody wants.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu was written by geeks for geeks who can't get laid.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Having *options* is a very good thing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It can be nice if you want to use Ubuntu and you actually have
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> option to use them via an emulator (Wine, CXGames, Cedega).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Having used Windows since Windows 95 up until present version
>>>>>>>>> and not
>>>>>>>>> much Linux, I wouldn't exactly say that Ubuntu is bad. Overall, I
>>>>>>>>> personally feel that Windows is more complete. But... Windows
>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>> lacks essential features that Ubuntu has pre-installed. I, for
>>>>>>>>> one,
>>>>>>>>> think that finding and installing applications and the best
>>>>>>>>> drivers
>>>>>>>>> could (and should) be easier in Windows. There's a potential
>>>>>>>>> solution
>>>>>>>>> for this if you could gather developers and their products into
>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>> place. There were no good solution in Windows as early as in
>>>>>>>>> (most?)
>>>>>>>>> Linux distros (and still not now). I believe that is why
>>>>>>>>> applications
>>>>>>>>> for Windows are so spread without a good, easy, built-in way to
>>>>>>>>> find,
>>>>>>>>> browse and install them from one single place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think that one of the reasons for the "Oh! Linux can do anything
>>>>>>>> that Windows can" fiction is that most of the people using either
>>>>>>>> system aren't using it professionally.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One of the major reasons is that the vast majority of the business
>>>>>>>> world uses Windows and the associated applications. If you do a job
>>>>>>>> for most companies you will run head on into the fact that your
>>>>>>>> Linux
>>>>>>>> system doesn't match their Windows.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Almost every project I have been on used Auto-Cad and during
>>>>>>>> construction of a project there are innumerable changes in the
>>>>>>>> drawings. The normal practice is to e-mail complete drawings back
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> forth between the Engineering Office and the Field. Up-dated
>>>>>>>> drawing
>>>>>>>> going out to the Field and marked up drawings showing the
>>>>>>>> "As-builts"
>>>>>>>> sent back.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frequently if one writes a report the company will request that
>>>>>>>> both a
>>>>>>>> printed report and a disk copy be furnished, particularly if any
>>>>>>>> form
>>>>>>>> of legal problems are anticipated. And, with extremely rare
>>>>>>>> exceptions
>>>>>>>> they want the disks in "Word format".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is all well and good to say "Well, Open Office can do the
>>>>>>>> job", but
>>>>>>>> if you deliver a Linux formatted disk with a OO document on it you
>>>>>>>> will probably be told in no uncertain terms that it is not what you
>>>>>>>> contracted to do.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Of course Auto-Cad will run on Linux using Wine but how big a data
>>>>>>>> file can it handle? Are you sure that it can edit the largest
>>>>>>>> drawing
>>>>>>>> that the Engineers want to send? If you are out in the middle of
>>>>>>>> a 100
>>>>>>>> Sq. Km. sugar cane plantation in the middle of Java building a gas
>>>>>>>> plant for the National Oil Company it is not really a good time to
>>>>>>>> discover that you can't do your job because Linux won't do it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, as long as windows is the dominant computer operating system
>>>>>>>> Linux
>>>>>>>> is never going to be a wholly acceptable system..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're right. Some things can only be done with Windows, at least
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> now. My point is that most HOME USERS can do everything they do with
>>>>>>> Windows but more securely if they use Ubuntu or another Linux
>>>>>>> distro.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just installed Fedora 13 (beta) on my Granddaughter's game computer
>>>>>> - dual boot, Win 7 and Fedora - and set up Clamav to do periodic
>>>>>> virus
>>>>>> scans on the Linux partition. Thought I'd give the kid a fighting
>>>>>> chance so changed things around a bit so that Linux could see the
>>>>>> windows directory and set up Clamav to scan that partition too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a machine that a 7 year old girl uses and has the installed
>>>>>> Win 7 firewall and whatever they call it that won't let you run a
>>>>>> program without clicking on yet another permission box. Probably not
>>>>>> earth shaking protection.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Results - no virus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, I have had one serious virus in something like 20 years and
>>>>>> I got that one from a bootleg copied disk. I use a firewall and do
>>>>>> periodic virus scans but frankly I have never had a problem with
>>>>>> mal-ware or virus that effected the operations of the computer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My own suspicions are that these people who have massive problems
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> mal-ware or virus are very likely not using a decent firewall or are
>>>>>> downloading a lot of porn and warz.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>>>
>>>>> You're forgetting about not updating Windows, Java, Flash, etc. as
>>>>> causes. That's the beautiful thing about Linux: the updates update
>>>>> everything you have installed if you configure it properly.
>>>>
>>>> Windows,java,Flash,whatever-your-heart-desires gets updated in Windows
>>>> automatically,dummy.
>>>> Do you actual run Windows, or do you just despise it?
>>>
>>> You're wrong on all counts.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Once I had
>>>>> to clean up an XP machine that had never been defragged (customer:
>>>>> what's that?) or updated (customer: what's that?). It took over ten
>>>>> minutes to boot up and once it booted, pop up Windows had a fucking
>>>>> field day. I ended up reinstalling XP because there was just too much
>>>>> malware to deal with and there was no guarantee that the AV and other
>>>>> anti malware programs would completely remove all malware.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You re-installed XP cause that is your skill level...stick a
>>>> DVD/live-CD
>>>> in a tray, call it "support".
>>>
>>> You obviously know nothing about cleaning up Windows machines.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> So you are a PC tech in Spain.
>
> Not exactly. It's a very small part of our business. I don't do much of
> the work. We leave that for grunts like you who will work for minimum wage.

Translation: alias is the "grunt salesperson" and he has an old retired
"engineer" doing the real work.
>
>> I guess that $14k a week you claim to get
>> just doesn't go very far! LOL!
>
> I make Euros and lately the Euro has been taking a beating so, in
> dollars, I am making less but more than enough to meet my needs.

Real translation: alias has thoroughly had his stupid, arrogant, lying
ass kicked in here by everyone, yet he continues to post.
Obvious conclusion: the dumb fuck has no shame!

 

[Frank]

On 5/18/2010 96 AM, Alias wrote:
> On 05/18/2010 04:12 PM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hsr4c5$rto$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>
>>>> IT Facts
>>>> Alex Moskalyuk
>>>>
>>>> Home / News& Blogs / IT Facts
>>>> Linux servers hacked more frequently than Windows
>>>>
>>>> By ZDNet Research | February 19, 2004, 8:21am PST
>>>> Summary
>>>> A more specific analysis of government servers also found Linux more
>>>> susceptible, accounting for 57% of all breaches. The research did not
>>>> include other methods of intrusion such as viruses and worms.
>>>>
>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>
>>> Six year old article that is obviously biased. You *really* are
>>> desperate.
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> Why don't you stick with being the Ubuntu Marketing Department, take
>> 10,000 Ubuntu CDs to Nigeria and try to convince people to get on board
>> with Ubuntu. Just think, if you pass out all 10,000 CDs, you may get
>> another 7 users!
>>
>>
>>
>
> Just curious, why do you suggest Nigeria instead of, say, Peru or
> Indonesia?
>
That went right over your stupid empty head and you didn't even have to
duck in order to miss it.

 

[Heywood Jablowme]

"Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:hsufpj$kdu$5@news.eternal-september.org...
> On 05/18/2010 124 AM, Mocassin Joe wrote:
>> "Heywood Jablowme"<heywood@jablowme.gov> wrote in message
>> news:4bf1b248$1@news.x-privat.org...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Mocassin Joe"<joemocasanto@aol.com> wrote in message
>>> news:GNeIn.12010$Gx2.6820@newsfe20.iad...
>>>>
>>>> "Heywood Jablowme"<heywood@jablowme.gov> wrote in message
>>>> news:4beb0c74@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <no_one@no_where.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hdkmu59pdkha3inpite9bgcsenrjtspvsu@4ax.com...
>>>>>> Well after working with Vista II, otherwise known as Windows 7, for
>>>>>> three months I can see that Microsoft is still incapable of producing
>>>>>> a quality OS. So I need to look at some other system to switch to,
>>>>>> likely one of the Linux distros.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill - MN
>>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> So you can't figure out Windows 7? Windows 7 is much better than
>>>>> Vista
>>>>> and is very stable. You are probably incompetent and therefore you
>>>>> should migrate to Ubuntu. Get with our resident Ubuntu idiot, Alias
>>>>> and he will help you out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't let the screen door hit your ass on the way out. LOL!
>>>>
>>>> Uncalled for. You sound like some of the MacFreaks on CSMA.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You don't like the message? Ignore it. Just FYI.
>>
>> I didn't say that. You should buy a Mac.
>>
>>
>
> It can't afford one.
>
> --
> Alias

Lying sack of shit.

 

[Frank]

On 5/18/2010 94 AM, Alias wrote:
> On 05/18/2010 12:17 AM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message
>> news:hsp1eb$tid$3@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>
>>>> In other words, you are simply enforcing my statement that "At least
>>>> the problems that they seem to post..."
>>>>
>>>> Alias, no one needs to discredit you. You do such a complete job of it
>>>> all by your self.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>
>>> Do you even read what you post?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> Do you even understand what you read?
>>
>>
>
> Better than you ever will but that's not hard.
>
You are the unmitigated idiot you appear to be.

 

[Frank]

On 5/18/2010 8:58 AM, Alias wrote:
> Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message
>> news:hsm0am$lkp$5@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> On 05/15/2010 04:50 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 15:47:21 +0200, Alias
>>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 124:58 +0200, Alias
>>>>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 May 2010 15:07:43 +0200, Jackie<Jackie@an.on> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/13/2010 14:48, Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Nor do I. I use both Windows and Linux.
>>>>>>>>> Do you have anything to say about the other things I said? You
>>>>>>>>> quoted
>>>>>>>>> everything in my post.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ah Jackie, you are learning about Alias. He posts some unsupported
>>>>>>>> slander about Windows and when someone rebuts his post complete
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> quotes and references to demonstrate validity he replies with
>>>>>>>> irrelevancies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Given that Alias seems to know very little about computers, witness
>>>>>>>> his assertion that the Windows kernel is the Registry and that a
>>>>>>>> certain compilation of Linux is a version based on the desktop
>>>>>>>> environment, it seems likely that he is one of these "instant
>>>>>>>> experts", that finally learned enough to turn the computer on and
>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>> and now portrays himself as the all knowing pundit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wrong, I have *never* claimed to be a computer expert.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really, really, need to take some remedial reading classes as you
>>>>>> are either unable to understand simple English, or perhaps you don't
>>>>>> want to believe that you are wrong, yet again..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In any event, the term I used in reference to you was "instant
>>>>>> expert", used as a form of ridicule for those who, with little or no
>>>>>> knowledge, run about telling everyone how to do their job. Or in your
>>>>>> case what the best computer system is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Indians had a folk story about a rat that found a lump of
>>>>>> turmeric
>>>>>> and started a provisions shop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>>>
>>>>> Triple yawn.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't think that you'd "get it".
>>>>
>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>
>>> Oh, I got it. It's just boring to see you flailing around trying paint
>>> yourself as Mr Perfect Computer Expert and and hurling ad hominem
>>> attacks at me. Do you get that?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> You don't get it and you never will. You get your ass kicked on a daily
>> basis and keep coming back for more.
>
> You wish.
>
>> Why not go to the Ubuntu forum and
>> help out those sorry sacks who believe they have a decent OS when in
>> reality they have shit.
>>
>>
>
> Why don't you? I'm sure your comments will go over really well there.
>
Because he doesn't use that POS toy os you moron.

 

[Frank]

On 5/18/2010 97 AM, Alias wrote:
> On 05/18/2010 04:21 PM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message
>> news:hsm0c8$lkp$6@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> On 05/15/2010 05:47 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 14 May 2010 09:11:08 -0700, "Heywood Jablowme"
>>>> <heywood@jablowme.gov> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Alias"<aka@masked&anonymous.com.¡nvalido> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hsjodi$p72$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>> On 05/14/2010 02:55 PM, Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps) wrote:
>>>>>>>>> And running softwares developped [sic] for Windows.
>>>>>>>> Yeah, like malware.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No.. DirectX 3D games and HDTV viewer!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn't you go to the Ubuntu forums and help out those sorry sacks
>>>>> who
>>>>> believe they have a decent OS when in reality they have SHIT?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No he shouldn't!
>>>
>>> I've been there since 2006. Oops.
>>>
>> And you still can't figure out how to post!
>>
>>
>>
>
> And the nym you think I use is? Don't know? Everyone act really surprised.
>
You have banned from every moderated ng you've ever posted to. The only
places where you can get by with your bullshit is in unmoderated ng's
like this one. You are the POS you appear to be.

 

[Heywood Jablowme]

"Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
news:hsudcm$rap$2@news.eternal-september.org...
> Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hsoipq$pog$3@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Death wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns9D79D2D15CF9Fthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>> Bob I <birelan@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:H6GHn.4871$yx.324@newsfe13.iad:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason that "Linux" isn't targeted is that there aren't
>>>>>> enough installations to bother with. Lets face it, if the
>>>>>> Mariposa botnet was counted as separate OS, it would have
>>>>>> more users than Linux!
>>>>>
>>>>> You are confirming is that Windows is the imminent target of
>>>>> spyware/malware writers ? (Which was the original point of this
>>>>> thread branch.)
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't matter why. At this time, Windows is more susceptible
>>>>> than Linux.
>>>>
>>>> People with money are more likely to be robbed.
>>>
>>> Are you saying that all Windows users are rich and all Linux users are
>>> poor or what?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> No. He is saying that you are an idiot.
>>
>>
>
> Actually, if you read what he wrote, he isn't.
>
> --
> Alias

Actually, he really is saying that you are an idiot. So is everyone else!
LOL!

 

[Death]

"DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in message
news:Xns9D7C5204D1D24thisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>> So, all my replies to you in the future
>> will be to STFU Loser.
>
> So you are moving up blah, blah, blah

STFU Loser

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:48:45 +0200, Alias
<aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:

>John B. Slocomb wrote:
>
>>> You are putting words in my mouth again. Not only have I posted that I
>>> am not a computer expert, I have never claimed to know everything about
>>> computers.
>>
>> O.K., I'll go along with you - you don't know anything about
>> computers.
>
>> John B. Slocomb
>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)
>
>Do you really think don't know anything?


"Do you really think don't know anything?"

As I have written many times, you really do need to take a remedial
English course.

John B. Slocomb
(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Tue, 18 May 2010 17:56:16 +0200, Alias
<aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:

>Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hsu2be$tiq$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You are putting words in my mouth again. Not only have I posted that I
>>>>> am not a computer expert, I have never claimed to know everything about
>>>>> computers.
>>>>
>>>> O.K., I'll go along with you - you don't know anything about
>>>> computers.
>>>
>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)
>>>
>>> Do you really think don't know anything?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> You really are clueless aren't you?
>
>No.
>
>> You can answer any of his questions
>> and with good reason.
>
>Read what you wrote again, speaking of clueless.
>
>> You are a complete idiot.
>>
>>
>>
>
>I know the answers to some and I don't know the answers to others just
>like anyone else. Oh, and if I were "a complete idiot", I wouldn't be
>able to use a computer, much less post here.

Alias, they have taught a chimpanzee to operate a computer so your
claim is hardly an achievement and the Chimp knew enough to give
correct answers... a trait that you are hardly capable of.

John B. Slocomb
(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

[Muad'Dib]

On 05/14/2010 06:56 AM, Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps) wrote:
>> Yeah, it's not nearly as good as Windows is in running viruses, root
>> kits, trojans and other malware.
>
> NO... DirectX games and HDTV viewer!
>

BFD dude, if on the very rare occasion I want to play a DirectX game I
boot to Windows. That's one of the reasons I use BOTH OS's, to get the
best of BOTH worlds. Why I would want to watch an HD program on a
pathetic small screen compared to 60" of pure joy with 7.1 surround and
an awesome sub, is beyond me. Not a friggen chance even IF I can/could
in Win7 or Linux! What a waste of time that would be, not to mention the
disappointment of features! For those with just a 19" - 24" computer
screen being their only mode of viewing movies, then so what, boot to
Winders and do the viewing, then boot back to Linux for a more secure
email and surfing experience. Get off this bit of putting one or the
other down, use them both for a complete experience. This
narrow-mindedness bit is astounding! What's the F'ing point?

G'day

 

[Alias]

On 05/18/2010 07:23 PM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@hewhoismasked&anonymous.com> wrote in message
> news:hsufpj$kdu$5@news.eternal-september.org...
>> On 05/18/2010 124 AM, Mocassin Joe wrote:
>>> "Heywood Jablowme"<heywood@jablowme.gov> wrote in message
>>> news:4bf1b248$1@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Mocassin Joe"<joemocasanto@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:GNeIn.12010$Gx2.6820@newsfe20.iad...
>>>>>
>>>>> "Heywood Jablowme"<heywood@jablowme.gov> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4beb0c74@news.x-privat.org...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <no_one@no_where.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:hdkmu59pdkha3inpite9bgcsenrjtspvsu@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> Well after working with Vista II, otherwise known as Windows 7, for
>>>>>>> three months I can see that Microsoft is still incapable of
>>>>>>> producing
>>>>>>> a quality OS. So I need to look at some other system to switch to,
>>>>>>> likely one of the Linux distros.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bill - MN
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you can't figure out Windows 7? Windows 7 is much better than
>>>>>> Vista
>>>>>> and is very stable. You are probably incompetent and therefore you
>>>>>> should migrate to Ubuntu. Get with our resident Ubuntu idiot, Alias
>>>>>> and he will help you out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't let the screen door hit your ass on the way out. LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>> Uncalled for. You sound like some of the MacFreaks on CSMA.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You don't like the message? Ignore it. Just FYI.
>>>
>>> I didn't say that. You should buy a Mac.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It can't afford one.
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>
> Lying sack of shit.

Post from one then, hot shot.

--
Alias

 

[Alias]

On 05/19/2010 04:27 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2010 17:56:16 +0200, Alias
> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>
>> Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias"<aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
>>> news:hsu2be$tiq$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> You are putting words in my mouth again. Not only have I posted that I
>>>>>> am not a computer expert, I have never claimed to know everything about
>>>>>> computers.
>>>>>
>>>>> O.K., I'll go along with you - you don't know anything about
>>>>> computers.
>>>>
>>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)
>>>>
>>>> Do you really think don't know anything?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> You really are clueless aren't you?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> You can answer any of his questions
>>> and with good reason.
>>
>> Read what you wrote again, speaking of clueless.
>>
>>> You are a complete idiot.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I know the answers to some and I don't know the answers to others just
>> like anyone else. Oh, and if I were "a complete idiot", I wouldn't be
>> able to use a computer, much less post here.
>
> Alias, they have taught a chimpanzee to operate a computer so your
> claim is hardly an achievement and the Chimp knew enough to give
> correct answers... a trait that you are hardly capable of.
>
> John B. Slocomb
> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Did you think up this little infantile insult all by yourself or did
your nine year old lend you a hand?

--
Alias

 

[Alias]

On 05/19/2010 04:21 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:48:45 +0200, Alias
> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>
>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>
>>>> You are putting words in my mouth again. Not only have I posted that I
>>>> am not a computer expert, I have never claimed to know everything about
>>>> computers.
>>>
>>> O.K., I'll go along with you - you don't know anything about
>>> computers.
>>
>>> John B. Slocomb
>>> (johnbslocomb@gmail.com)
>>
>> Do you really think don't know anything?
>
>
> "Do you really think don't know anything?"
>
> As I have written many times, you really do need to take a remedial
> English course.
>
> John B. Slocomb
> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

OK, Mr Perfect who never makes mistakes and is an expert on English,
when does one use "a" and when does one use "an"?

BTW, a typo does not indicate that one needs to take a remedial English
class, asshole.

--
Alias

 

[Alias]

On 05/19/2010 103 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
> On 05/14/2010 06:56 AM, Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps) wrote:
>>> Yeah, it's not nearly as good as Windows is in running viruses, root
>>> kits, trojans and other malware.
>>
>> NO... DirectX games and HDTV viewer!
>>
>
> BFD dude, if on the very rare occasion I want to play a DirectX game I
> boot to Windows. That's one of the reasons I use BOTH OS's, to get the
> best of BOTH worlds. Why I would want to watch an HD program on a
> pathetic small screen compared to 60" of pure joy with 7.1 surround and
> an awesome sub, is beyond me. Not a friggen chance even IF I can/could
> in Win7 or Linux! What a waste of time that would be, not to mention the
> disappointment of features! For those with just a 19" - 24" computer
> screen being their only mode of viewing movies, then so what, boot to
> Winders and do the viewing, then boot back to Linux for a more secure
> email and surfing experience. Get off this bit of putting one or the
> other down, use them both for a complete experience. This
> narrow-mindedness bit is astounding! What's the F'ing point?
>
> G'day

To the Windroids of the world, one has to choose. Ya know, like Bush
told other countries when he became a war criminal and attacked Iraq:
"You're either we us or against us".

I agree with you 100 per cent. Why not have both?

--
Alias

 

[Alias]

On 05/19/2010 11:18 AM, Alias wrote:
> On 05/19/2010 103 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>> On 05/14/2010 06:56 AM, Man-wai Chang to The Door (33600bps) wrote:
>>>> Yeah, it's not nearly as good as Windows is in running viruses, root
>>>> kits, trojans and other malware.
>>>
>>> NO... DirectX games and HDTV viewer!
>>>
>>
>> BFD dude, if on the very rare occasion I want to play a DirectX game I
>> boot to Windows. That's one of the reasons I use BOTH OS's, to get the
>> best of BOTH worlds. Why I would want to watch an HD program on a
>> pathetic small screen compared to 60" of pure joy with 7.1 surround and
>> an awesome sub, is beyond me. Not a friggen chance even IF I can/could
>> in Win7 or Linux! What a waste of time that would be, not to mention the
>> disappointment of features! For those with just a 19" - 24" computer
>> screen being their only mode of viewing movies, then so what, boot to
>> Winders and do the viewing, then boot back to Linux for a more secure
>> email and surfing experience. Get off this bit of putting one or the
>> other down, use them both for a complete experience. This
>> narrow-mindedness bit is astounding! What's the F'ing point?
>>
>> G'day
>
> To the Windroids of the world, one has to choose. Ya know, like Bush
> told other countries when he became a war criminal and attacked Iraq:
> "You're either we us or against us".
>
> I agree with you 100 per cent. Why not have both?
>

Before our grammar cop John Slowcome gets his knickers all in a twist, I
should have written "You're either with us or against us".

--
Alias