J
JEDIDIAH
Flightless Bird
On 2010-01-25, Ezekiel <not-zeke@the-zeke.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote in message
> news:slrnhlq7ci.nes.jedi@nomad.mishnet...
>> On 2010-01-25, Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 2010-01-25, Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2010-01-24, Terry Porter <linux-2@netspace.net.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:127 -0600, Ignoramus12856 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2010-01-24, JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2010-01-24, Ignoramus12856 <ignoramus12856@NOSPAM.12856.invalid>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2010-01-24, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:56:19 -0600, Ignoramus27518 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2010-01-24, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 009:51 -0600, Ignoramus27518 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [deletia]
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, so you know about the resolution -- and yet you claim that
>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>> is "zero chance of resolution." Not very convincing, WinTroll.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have used Linux since 1995. So I know a few things.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You are certainly good at hiding this fact.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [deletia]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Perhaps you used Linux once in 1995. It would certainly
>>>>>>>>> explain
>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> rather dated view on things.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I used it as my main OS since 1995 when I bought my first PC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You still sound like someone that hasn't used Linux since 1998.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps you should specifically avoid commenting about more
>>>>>> modern
>>>>>> forms of Linux and make sure you don't cross post in the fora for
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [deletia]
>>>>>
>>>>> Says the man who doesnt thing multiple monitors and x screens have a
>>>>> use
>>>>
>>>> ...and assuming this, and also assuming that I have PC hardware typical
>>>> for your typical Windows user: How much money would it take in order for
>>>> me to find out?
>>>>
>>>> [deletia]
>>>>
>>>> How much money would an average Windows user need to waste in order
>>>> to dabble in this sort of thing in order to have a clue about it?
>>>>
>>>> I just realized that you didn't answer this the last time I brought
>>>> it up so I will ask again...
>>>
>>> Pretty much nothing. Why do you ask? Another monitor and dual head is so
>>> common its not funny on modern video cards.
>>>
>>> Jed, you're a clueless fossil. Wake up.
>>
>> No. You are just totally full of it.
>
> Pot. Kettle. Black.
>
>
>> You won't even acknowledge the cost of an extra monitor.
>
> That cost of the extra monitor is less than buying a very large monitor. Or
That's assuming that 9 out of 10 Windows user would buy the large monitor.
> to make this "simple math" for lemmings like you - one can get more
> resolution and screen real estate for less by using two cheaper monitors
> than one very expensive monitor.
...assuming that is your intent.
...assuming that's the intent of 9 or 10 actual Windows users.
>
>
>> Nevermind your obvious lack of touch with reality when it comes to typical
>> PC hardware.
>
> If anyone is out of touch it's the lemmings like you.
Out of touch with what exactly? The latest in conspicous consumption or
the latest in what real people actually do with computers?
>
>
>> No, dual headed cards are not typical.
>
> Easily proven to be false. Got to NewEgg.com where they have a total of 455
> video cards in stock.
This is a geek computing store. What any random number extracted from
it may or may not have any particular significance.
What I asked about was cost relative to what you can expect the typical
Windows user to have. The fact that there a lot of upgrades available if you
know what you are doing and try real hard really doesn't say much and doesn't
answer the original question.
>
> 302 have single DVI.
> 148 have dual DVI.
> 5 have quad DVI.
>
> Roughly 1 out of every 3 video cards is dual headed. Yet idiots like you
> claim that these are not common.
You have no clue what those numbers mean.
--
If some college kid can replicate your "invention" without seeing |||
any of the details of your patent then you have been granted a patent / | \
on the "idea" and not the actual implementation.
>
>
>
> "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote in message
> news:slrnhlq7ci.nes.jedi@nomad.mishnet...
>> On 2010-01-25, Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 2010-01-25, Hadron <hadronquark@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2010-01-24, Terry Porter <linux-2@netspace.net.au> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:127 -0600, Ignoramus12856 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2010-01-24, JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2010-01-24, Ignoramus12856 <ignoramus12856@NOSPAM.12856.invalid>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2010-01-24, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:56:19 -0600, Ignoramus27518 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2010-01-24, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 009:51 -0600, Ignoramus27518 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [deletia]
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, so you know about the resolution -- and yet you claim that
>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>> is "zero chance of resolution." Not very convincing, WinTroll.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have used Linux since 1995. So I know a few things.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You are certainly good at hiding this fact.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [deletia]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Perhaps you used Linux once in 1995. It would certainly
>>>>>>>>> explain
>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>> rather dated view on things.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I used it as my main OS since 1995 when I bought my first PC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You still sound like someone that hasn't used Linux since 1998.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps you should specifically avoid commenting about more
>>>>>> modern
>>>>>> forms of Linux and make sure you don't cross post in the fora for
>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [deletia]
>>>>>
>>>>> Says the man who doesnt thing multiple monitors and x screens have a
>>>>> use
>>>>
>>>> ...and assuming this, and also assuming that I have PC hardware typical
>>>> for your typical Windows user: How much money would it take in order for
>>>> me to find out?
>>>>
>>>> [deletia]
>>>>
>>>> How much money would an average Windows user need to waste in order
>>>> to dabble in this sort of thing in order to have a clue about it?
>>>>
>>>> I just realized that you didn't answer this the last time I brought
>>>> it up so I will ask again...
>>>
>>> Pretty much nothing. Why do you ask? Another monitor and dual head is so
>>> common its not funny on modern video cards.
>>>
>>> Jed, you're a clueless fossil. Wake up.
>>
>> No. You are just totally full of it.
>
> Pot. Kettle. Black.
>
>
>> You won't even acknowledge the cost of an extra monitor.
>
> That cost of the extra monitor is less than buying a very large monitor. Or
That's assuming that 9 out of 10 Windows user would buy the large monitor.
> to make this "simple math" for lemmings like you - one can get more
> resolution and screen real estate for less by using two cheaper monitors
> than one very expensive monitor.
...assuming that is your intent.
...assuming that's the intent of 9 or 10 actual Windows users.
>
>
>> Nevermind your obvious lack of touch with reality when it comes to typical
>> PC hardware.
>
> If anyone is out of touch it's the lemmings like you.
Out of touch with what exactly? The latest in conspicous consumption or
the latest in what real people actually do with computers?
>
>
>> No, dual headed cards are not typical.
>
> Easily proven to be false. Got to NewEgg.com where they have a total of 455
> video cards in stock.
This is a geek computing store. What any random number extracted from
it may or may not have any particular significance.
What I asked about was cost relative to what you can expect the typical
Windows user to have. The fact that there a lot of upgrades available if you
know what you are doing and try real hard really doesn't say much and doesn't
answer the original question.
>
> 302 have single DVI.
> 148 have dual DVI.
> 5 have quad DVI.
>
> Roughly 1 out of every 3 video cards is dual headed. Yet idiots like you
> claim that these are not common.
You have no clue what those numbers mean.
--
If some college kid can replicate your "invention" without seeing |||
any of the details of your patent then you have been granted a patent / | \
on the "idea" and not the actual implementation.