F
Frank
Flightless Bird
Alias wrote:
> Joel wrote:
>> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote:
>>> Char Jackson wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:52:43 -0500, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They have a point. Maybe it's simply social responsibility, to "begin
>>>>> to" (if that TV lingo means anything will actually change - I'm not
>>>>> holding my breath, to be clear) put a stop to this warez trash on the
>>>>> Net. It can't get rid of it, to be sure, but what's wrong with giving
>>>>> people the option to demonstrate their commitment to safe computing?
>>>> Didn't those people demonstrate all the necessary commitment when they
>>>> bought a copy of Windows?
>>> Of course not because Windows and safe computing just don't compute.
>>
>>
>> No, *WAREZ* (including that from *counterfeiters*, which is what this
>> software is targeting) and safe computing don't compute.
>>
>
> I hate to bring the truth up but both pirated or genuine Windows and
> safe computing don't compute. There is no difference between a good
> pirated copy of Windows and a "genuine" copy other than the activation
> crap has been disabled.
>
Oh? And you must be speaking from experience, right? You're broke and
only use pirated copies of Windows is that what you're saying, right? So
you don't really have any way to compare a Genuine copy of Windows 7
with the one you pirated, is that correct?
Makes sense.
> BTW, warez disappeared a long time ago. Now it's done by P2P via
> torrents. See http://www.thepiratebay.org/ for more information so the
> next time you post about this, you don't look like such fool.
And the fool you're trying to fool is ...yourself?
Oops!
BTW, you are the real fool in here troll.
>
> Joel wrote:
>> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote:
>>> Char Jackson wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 00:52:43 -0500, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They have a point. Maybe it's simply social responsibility, to "begin
>>>>> to" (if that TV lingo means anything will actually change - I'm not
>>>>> holding my breath, to be clear) put a stop to this warez trash on the
>>>>> Net. It can't get rid of it, to be sure, but what's wrong with giving
>>>>> people the option to demonstrate their commitment to safe computing?
>>>> Didn't those people demonstrate all the necessary commitment when they
>>>> bought a copy of Windows?
>>> Of course not because Windows and safe computing just don't compute.
>>
>>
>> No, *WAREZ* (including that from *counterfeiters*, which is what this
>> software is targeting) and safe computing don't compute.
>>
>
> I hate to bring the truth up but both pirated or genuine Windows and
> safe computing don't compute. There is no difference between a good
> pirated copy of Windows and a "genuine" copy other than the activation
> crap has been disabled.
>
Oh? And you must be speaking from experience, right? You're broke and
only use pirated copies of Windows is that what you're saying, right? So
you don't really have any way to compare a Genuine copy of Windows 7
with the one you pirated, is that correct?
Makes sense.
> BTW, warez disappeared a long time ago. Now it's done by P2P via
> torrents. See http://www.thepiratebay.org/ for more information so the
> next time you post about this, you don't look like such fool.
And the fool you're trying to fool is ...yourself?
Oops!
BTW, you are the real fool in here troll.
>