J
johnbee
Flightless Bird
"Frank" <fb@tbb.moz> wrote in message news:4bec641b@news.x-privat.org...
> On 5/13/2010 15 PM, johnbee wrote:
>>
>> "Jackie" <Jackie@an.on> wrote in message
>> news:4beaa471$0$8052$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>>> Or rather call it "Office 14 and ProductXX 1".
>>
>> Just for information: I do not do much word processing, but my wife
>> does. This is the first PC I have had with Office on it, and I am not
>> much impressed, neither is Pat, and we would far rather install our old
>> Lotus Wordpro. Trouble is, it won't work under Windows 7. No doubt the
>> Microsoft screw everybody else's software it is our Operating System
>> policy. They have cut some fonts as well, though they don't cost a lot
>> each.
>
> What makes you think it's Microsoft's fault that Lotus Wordpro won't run
> on Windows 7?
Operating systems ought to be backwards compatible, to a certain extent.
> On 5/13/2010 15 PM, johnbee wrote:
>>
>> "Jackie" <Jackie@an.on> wrote in message
>> news:4beaa471$0$8052$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>>> Or rather call it "Office 14 and ProductXX 1".
>>
>> Just for information: I do not do much word processing, but my wife
>> does. This is the first PC I have had with Office on it, and I am not
>> much impressed, neither is Pat, and we would far rather install our old
>> Lotus Wordpro. Trouble is, it won't work under Windows 7. No doubt the
>> Microsoft screw everybody else's software it is our Operating System
>> policy. They have cut some fonts as well, though they don't cost a lot
>> each.
>
> What makes you think it's Microsoft's fault that Lotus Wordpro won't run
> on Windows 7?
Operating systems ought to be backwards compatible, to a certain extent.