A
Alias
Flightless Bird
Death wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Jackie wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2010 126, Alias wrote:
>>>>> It would be nice if he could actually try to back anything he says up
>>>>> even he doesn't have any reliable references, because it really is like
>>>>> you say. Technical details would be good so that we can see if it even
>>>>> sounds logical or not.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OR, you could do your own research and see if what I am saying is true.
>>>> What is it about you Windows users that makes you think everyone has to
>>>> prove to you what they say is true?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, this is getting a bit ridiculous.
>>> Facts are either true or false. I have said my part on why I believe
>>> what I believe. I don't feel that you have contributed much.
>>> If you feel that I am wrong, please enlighten me. If you don't want to
>>> bother convincing me and other people on why we are wrong, I suggest we
>>> stop talking about this because the conversation is already starting to
>>> become meaningless.
>>> If you have read my previous posts, does it really sound like I need to
>>> "do my own research"? What part of what you *you* say sounds even
>>> slightly convincing?
>>> You can believe whatever you want to believe, but if you do not have any
>>> intention on enlightening us, let's end this conversation right now.
>>
>> Regardless of any proof I may give, you and John won't believe me anyway
>> so what's the point?
>>
>
> There is no point in any conversation you participate in.
> It's just Windows bashing, ubuntushitsthebed promoting, plain and
> simple.
>
>> If I have to prove that Windows is vulnerable to malware and Linux is
>> much more secure to you guys, then doing so is a futile endeavor and I'm
>> not into futile endeavors.
>>
>
> The "countdown to nothing" is a futile endeavor, dumbass.
>
Yawn. I didn't know you were so jealous of me. Oh well, the price of fame.
--
Alias
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Jackie wrote:
>>> On 5/14/2010 126, Alias wrote:
>>>>> It would be nice if he could actually try to back anything he says up
>>>>> even he doesn't have any reliable references, because it really is like
>>>>> you say. Technical details would be good so that we can see if it even
>>>>> sounds logical or not.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OR, you could do your own research and see if what I am saying is true.
>>>> What is it about you Windows users that makes you think everyone has to
>>>> prove to you what they say is true?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, this is getting a bit ridiculous.
>>> Facts are either true or false. I have said my part on why I believe
>>> what I believe. I don't feel that you have contributed much.
>>> If you feel that I am wrong, please enlighten me. If you don't want to
>>> bother convincing me and other people on why we are wrong, I suggest we
>>> stop talking about this because the conversation is already starting to
>>> become meaningless.
>>> If you have read my previous posts, does it really sound like I need to
>>> "do my own research"? What part of what you *you* say sounds even
>>> slightly convincing?
>>> You can believe whatever you want to believe, but if you do not have any
>>> intention on enlightening us, let's end this conversation right now.
>>
>> Regardless of any proof I may give, you and John won't believe me anyway
>> so what's the point?
>>
>
> There is no point in any conversation you participate in.
> It's just Windows bashing, ubuntushitsthebed promoting, plain and
> simple.
>
>> If I have to prove that Windows is vulnerable to malware and Linux is
>> much more secure to you guys, then doing so is a futile endeavor and I'm
>> not into futile endeavors.
>>
>
> The "countdown to nothing" is a futile endeavor, dumbass.
>
Yawn. I didn't know you were so jealous of me. Oh well, the price of fame.
--
Alias