J
John B. Slocomb
Flightless Bird
On Sun, 23 May 2010 115:00 +0200, Alias
<aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>John B. Slocomb wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 175:43 +0200, Alias
>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>
>>> XS11E wrote:
>>>> "John"<none@inuse.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> XS11E wrote:
>>>>>> "Robert Nielsen"<robertwnielsen@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not here, please. Test posts go ONLY in groups with 'test' in
>>>>>> their name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Never understood that one. How would a test message, sent to a
>>>>> test ng, guarantee a post could be made to _this_ group?
>>>>
>>>> How could it not? If it gets to the server it'll get to a newsgroup on
>>>> the server.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, there's NEVER any reason to post a test message, if you
>>>> have something to say, say it, if you have a question, ask it, if you
>>>> have an answer to someone's question, post it and if none of the above
>>>> don't post. If your post shows up on the server, it's working, if not
>>>> fix the problem(s) and post it again. Simple.
>>>>
>>>> Test messages in non-test groups are a MAJOR violation of netiquette,
>>>> we'll probably never know how many kill filed "Robert Nielsen" when
>>>> they saw his/her/it's post.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You really like to tell people what they should or shouldn't do, don't
>>> you? How long have you had this control freak problem? Were your parents
>>> authoritative? Have you ever heard of free speech? In short, who the
>>> FUCK do you think you are telling people what to post and what not to post?
>>
>>
>> Gee, I wonder why those stupid people that invented the news groups
>> went to the bother of establishing "test" groups? Just a total waste
>> of time, I suppose.
>>
>> Or is it that Alias can't figure out what those "test" groups are for?
>>
>> "In short, who the FUCK do you think you are telling people what to
>> post and what not to post?" Now who is being authoritative?
>>
>>
>> John B. Slocomb
>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>
>You and a pedantic twit as well.
T think that I'd rather be pedantic then a hypocrite and I'm certain
that I'd rather be pedantic then an ignorant, lying, hypocrite like
Alias.
..
John B. Slocomb
(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
<aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>John B. Slocomb wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 175:43 +0200, Alias
>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>
>>> XS11E wrote:
>>>> "John"<none@inuse.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> XS11E wrote:
>>>>>> "Robert Nielsen"<robertwnielsen@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not here, please. Test posts go ONLY in groups with 'test' in
>>>>>> their name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Never understood that one. How would a test message, sent to a
>>>>> test ng, guarantee a post could be made to _this_ group?
>>>>
>>>> How could it not? If it gets to the server it'll get to a newsgroup on
>>>> the server.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, there's NEVER any reason to post a test message, if you
>>>> have something to say, say it, if you have a question, ask it, if you
>>>> have an answer to someone's question, post it and if none of the above
>>>> don't post. If your post shows up on the server, it's working, if not
>>>> fix the problem(s) and post it again. Simple.
>>>>
>>>> Test messages in non-test groups are a MAJOR violation of netiquette,
>>>> we'll probably never know how many kill filed "Robert Nielsen" when
>>>> they saw his/her/it's post.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You really like to tell people what they should or shouldn't do, don't
>>> you? How long have you had this control freak problem? Were your parents
>>> authoritative? Have you ever heard of free speech? In short, who the
>>> FUCK do you think you are telling people what to post and what not to post?
>>
>>
>> Gee, I wonder why those stupid people that invented the news groups
>> went to the bother of establishing "test" groups? Just a total waste
>> of time, I suppose.
>>
>> Or is it that Alias can't figure out what those "test" groups are for?
>>
>> "In short, who the FUCK do you think you are telling people what to
>> post and what not to post?" Now who is being authoritative?
>>
>>
>> John B. Slocomb
>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>
>You and a pedantic twit as well.
T think that I'd rather be pedantic then a hypocrite and I'm certain
that I'd rather be pedantic then an ignorant, lying, hypocrite like
Alias.
..
John B. Slocomb
(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)