• Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.

Testing....

J

John B. Slocomb

Flightless Bird
On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:35:00 +0200, Alias
<aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:

>John B. Slocomb wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 17:35:43 +0200, Alias
>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>
>>> XS11E wrote:
>>>> "John"<none@inuse.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> XS11E wrote:
>>>>>> "Robert Nielsen"<robertwnielsen@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not here, please. Test posts go ONLY in groups with 'test' in
>>>>>> their name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Never understood that one. How would a test message, sent to a
>>>>> test ng, guarantee a post could be made to _this_ group?
>>>>
>>>> How could it not? If it gets to the server it'll get to a newsgroup on
>>>> the server.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, there's NEVER any reason to post a test message, if you
>>>> have something to say, say it, if you have a question, ask it, if you
>>>> have an answer to someone's question, post it and if none of the above
>>>> don't post. If your post shows up on the server, it's working, if not
>>>> fix the problem(s) and post it again. Simple.
>>>>
>>>> Test messages in non-test groups are a MAJOR violation of netiquette,
>>>> we'll probably never know how many kill filed "Robert Nielsen" when
>>>> they saw his/her/it's post.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> You really like to tell people what they should or shouldn't do, don't
>>> you? How long have you had this control freak problem? Were your parents
>>> authoritative? Have you ever heard of free speech? In short, who the
>>> FUCK do you think you are telling people what to post and what not to post?

>>
>>
>> Gee, I wonder why those stupid people that invented the news groups
>> went to the bother of establishing "test" groups? Just a total waste
>> of time, I suppose.
>>
>> Or is it that Alias can't figure out what those "test" groups are for?
>>
>> "In short, who the FUCK do you think you are telling people what to
>> post and what not to post?" Now who is being authoritative?
>>
>>
>> John B. Slocomb
>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>
>You and a pedantic twit as well.



T think that I'd rather be pedantic then a hypocrite and I'm certain
that I'd rather be pedantic then an ignorant, lying, hypocrite like
Alias.
..
John B. Slocomb
(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
John B. Slocomb wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:35:00 +0200, Alias
> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>
>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 17:35:43 +0200, Alias
>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>>
>>>> XS11E wrote:
>>>>> "John"<none@inuse.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> XS11E wrote:
>>>>>>> "Robert Nielsen"<robertwnielsen@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not here, please. Test posts go ONLY in groups with 'test' in
>>>>>>> their name.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Never understood that one. How would a test message, sent to a
>>>>>> test ng, guarantee a post could be made to _this_ group?
>>>>>
>>>>> How could it not? If it gets to the server it'll get to a newsgroup on
>>>>> the server.
>>>>>
>>>>> Additionally, there's NEVER any reason to post a test message, if you
>>>>> have something to say, say it, if you have a question, ask it, if you
>>>>> have an answer to someone's question, post it and if none of the above
>>>>> don't post. If your post shows up on the server, it's working, if not
>>>>> fix the problem(s) and post it again. Simple.
>>>>>
>>>>> Test messages in non-test groups are a MAJOR violation of netiquette,
>>>>> we'll probably never know how many kill filed "Robert Nielsen" when
>>>>> they saw his/her/it's post.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You really like to tell people what they should or shouldn't do, don't
>>>> you? How long have you had this control freak problem? Were your parents
>>>> authoritative? Have you ever heard of free speech? In short, who the
>>>> FUCK do you think you are telling people what to post and what not to post?
>>>
>>>
>>> Gee, I wonder why those stupid people that invented the news groups
>>> went to the bother of establishing "test" groups? Just a total waste
>>> of time, I suppose.
>>>
>>> Or is it that Alias can't figure out what those "test" groups are for?
>>>
>>> "In short, who the FUCK do you think you are telling people what to
>>> post and what not to post?" Now who is being authoritative?
>>>
>>>
>>> John B. Slocomb
>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>
>> You and a pedantic twit as well.

>
>
> T think that I'd rather be pedantic then a hypocrite and I'm certain
> that I'd rather be pedantic then an ignorant, lying, hypocrite like
> Alias.
> .
> John B. Slocomb
> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


I don't lie. I am not a hypocrite and you can't prove otherwise but that
won't stop you from stating it like a sock puppet of Frank's over and
over again, now will it?

--
Alias
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 5/23/2010 6:24 AM, Alias wrote:
> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:35:00 +0200, Alias
>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>
>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 17:35:43 +0200, Alias
>>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> XS11E wrote:
>>>>>> "John"<none@inuse.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> XS11E wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Robert Nielsen"<robertwnielsen@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Testing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not here, please. Test posts go ONLY in groups with 'test' in
>>>>>>>> their name.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Never understood that one. How would a test message, sent to a
>>>>>>> test ng, guarantee a post could be made to _this_ group?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How could it not? If it gets to the server it'll get to a
>>>>>> newsgroup on
>>>>>> the server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Additionally, there's NEVER any reason to post a test message, if you
>>>>>> have something to say, say it, if you have a question, ask it, if you
>>>>>> have an answer to someone's question, post it and if none of the
>>>>>> above
>>>>>> don't post. If your post shows up on the server, it's working, if not
>>>>>> fix the problem(s) and post it again. Simple.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Test messages in non-test groups are a MAJOR violation of netiquette,
>>>>>> we'll probably never know how many kill filed "Robert Nielsen" when
>>>>>> they saw his/her/it's post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You really like to tell people what they should or shouldn't do, don't
>>>>> you? How long have you had this control freak problem? Were your
>>>>> parents
>>>>> authoritative? Have you ever heard of free speech? In short, who the
>>>>> FUCK do you think you are telling people what to post and what not
>>>>> to post?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gee, I wonder why those stupid people that invented the news groups
>>>> went to the bother of establishing "test" groups? Just a total waste
>>>> of time, I suppose.
>>>>
>>>> Or is it that Alias can't figure out what those "test" groups are for?
>>>>
>>>> "In short, who the FUCK do you think you are telling people what to
>>>> post and what not to post?" Now who is being authoritative?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>
>>> You and a pedantic twit as well.

>>
>>
>> T think that I'd rather be pedantic then a hypocrite and I'm certain
>> that I'd rather be pedantic then an ignorant, lying, hypocrite like
>> Alias.
>> .
>> John B. Slocomb
>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>
> I don't lie.


You are a known and admitted liar, LIAR!

I am not a hypocrite and you can't prove otherwise but that
> won't stop you from stating it like a sock puppet of Frank's over and
> over again, now will it?


hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, you lying hypocrite over
everyone in here busting your lying ass all day every day?
Why are you here? Are you really that desperate for attention or just
stupid.
Well...?
>
 
J

John B. Slocomb

Flightless Bird
On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:24:29 +0200, Alias
<aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:

>John B. Slocomb wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:35:00 +0200, Alias
>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:


>>
>> T think that I'd rather be pedantic then a hypocrite and I'm certain
>> that I'd rather be pedantic then an ignorant, lying, hypocrite like
>> Alias.
>> .
>> John B. Slocomb
>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>
>I don't lie. I am not a hypocrite and you can't prove otherwise but that
>won't stop you from stating it like a sock puppet of Frank's over and
>over again, now will it?



You simply prove the "ignorant" portion of my statement by arguing
that you don't tell lies when nearly everyone on the group has
commented on your many lies.

Now you can take that at face value, or I can spend the morning
reviewing the archives and post every one of your lies, although I
would probably be ostracized for making gigabyte size posts.

You say that you aren't a hypocrite? Well then what do you call
someone who curses and damns something then turns around and uses the
same item?

As I once, it takes a good memory to be a successful liar and you
obviously are forgetful...

John B. Slocomb
(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
On 05/24/2010 03:26 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:
> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:24:29 +0200, Alias
> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>
>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:35:00 +0200, Alias
>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:

>
>>>
>>> T think that I'd rather be pedantic then a hypocrite and I'm certain
>>> that I'd rather be pedantic then an ignorant, lying, hypocrite like
>>> Alias.
>>> .
>>> John B. Slocomb
>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>
>> I don't lie. I am not a hypocrite and you can't prove otherwise but that
>> won't stop you from stating it like a sock puppet of Frank's over and
>> over again, now will it?

>
>
> You simply prove the "ignorant" portion of my statement by arguing
> that you don't tell lies when nearly everyone on the group has
> commented on your many lies.
>
> Now you can take that at face value, or I can spend the morning
> reviewing the archives and post every one of your lies, although I
> would probably be ostracized for making gigabyte size posts.
>
> You say that you aren't a hypocrite? Well then what do you call
> someone who curses and damns something then turns around and uses the
> same item?
>
> As I once, it takes a good memory to be a successful liar and you
> obviously are forgetful...
>
> John B. Slocomb
> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)


I have always said that I use both. I have also slammed MS for their
behavior and I have pointed out that Windows is more vulnerable than
Linux regarding malware. If it makes you happy, Linux hasn't come up
with a decent alternative to Outlook which is the main reason I use
Windows along with gaming. There's no double standard here, Mr.
Desperate to Find Fault but Not Willing to Have a Reasonable Discussion.

You can't cite one lie, much less gigabytes. Course, your accusations
are lies but you're the one that has to live with that and your
desperation not me, chum.

--
Alias
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 5/24/2010 3:51 AM, Alias wrote:
> On 05/24/2010 03:26 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:24:29 +0200, Alias
>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>
>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:35:00 +0200, Alias
>>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:

>>
>>>>
>>>> T think that I'd rather be pedantic then a hypocrite and I'm certain
>>>> that I'd rather be pedantic then an ignorant, lying, hypocrite like
>>>> Alias.
>>>> .
>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>
>>> I don't lie. I am not a hypocrite and you can't prove otherwise but that
>>> won't stop you from stating it like a sock puppet of Frank's over and
>>> over again, now will it?

>>
>>
>> You simply prove the "ignorant" portion of my statement by arguing
>> that you don't tell lies when nearly everyone on the group has
>> commented on your many lies.
>>
>> Now you can take that at face value, or I can spend the morning
>> reviewing the archives and post every one of your lies, although I
>> would probably be ostracized for making gigabyte size posts.
>>
>> You say that you aren't a hypocrite? Well then what do you call
>> someone who curses and damns something then turns around and uses the
>> same item?
>>
>> As I once, it takes a good memory to be a successful liar and you
>> obviously are forgetful...
>>
>> John B. Slocomb
>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>
> I have always said that I use both. I have also slammed MS for their
> behavior and I have pointed out that Windows is more vulnerable than
> Linux regarding malware. If it makes you happy, Linux hasn't come up
> with a decent alternative to Outlook which is the main reason I use
> Windows along with gaming. There's no double standard here, Mr.
> Desperate to Find Fault but Not Willing to Have a Reasonable Discussion.
>
> You can't cite one lie, much less gigabytes. Course, your accusations
> are lies but you're the one that has to live with that and your
> desperation not me, chum.
>

Why don't you just STFU and leave? It's obvious you're not wanted, not
needed and have no real legitimate business being in here. This is a W 7
ng, a product you don't have.
Oh and it's "chump" not "chum", sport!
 
Top