• Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.

MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oop!...LOL!

A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> DanS wrote:
>>> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
>>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
>>>>> WGA is part of the EULA
>>>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
>>>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have
>>>> XP, open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement
>>>> link.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic
>>>> posts, why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a
>>>> Windows 7 newsgroup?
>>>
>>> Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?
>>
>> Frank's motto: "Do as I say, not as I do."
>>
> Translation: alias is a desperate lying POD linturd troll.
> Oops!...LOL!

I was talking about you, not to you.

--
Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
>>>
>>> WGA is part of the EULA
>>
>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have XP,
>> open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement link.
>>
>
> "In his denial, Judge Jones found that *WGA* was a part of Windows XP,
> not some separate software. If it had been separate, plaintiffs had
> argued, a strict interpretation of Microsoft's *EULA* should have
> prevented it from being downloaded. The typical definition of spyware
> (which may also be part of some states' legal definition) is that it
> keeps itself hidden from its user; and the judge maintained WGA not only
> announces its presence, but is part of Windows XP just like any other
> component."
>
>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic posts,
>> why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a Windows 7
>> newsgroup?
>>
> The article is about *WGA* and the *EULA*, both of which are a part of
> Windows 7.
>
> Oops!

Again, sigh, the quote above only rules that WGA is not spyware and is a
part of XP. My EULA with SP3 and all the updates has not been changed.
It does not rule that the EULA is a valid document because the court
wasn't asked to rule on that. IOW, whoopiti fucking do. Oh, and off
topic to say the least.

--
Alias
 
D

DanS

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b744bed@news.x-privat.org:

> DanS wrote:
>> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
>>>> WGA is part of the EULA
>>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
>>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have
>>> XP, open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement
>>> link.
>>>
>>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic
>>> posts, why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a
>>> Windows 7 newsgroup?
>>
>> Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?
>
> Read the article asshole!

I did. Maybe *you* should reread it, the article never mentions Windows7 at
all. Over and over again is says XP....XP.....XP.

Ergo, your post is off-topic here.

Which means, you, who cries about Alias' post being OT because they are not
about Windows 7, is also making OT posts.

Conclusion, hypocrite. Plain and simple........like you.
 
R

ray

Flightless Bird
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:52:31 -0800, Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
> news:7tj0ofFqsrU2@mid.individual.net...
>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:21:06 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Enjoy!
>>> I know I did!
>>>
>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Windows-XP-WGA-validation-spyware-
case-
>> dismissed/1265835099
>>
>> OK - that's only one of the reasons I eschew MS.
>
> So why do you have such a hard-on for this forum?

Comic relief.
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> DanS wrote:
>>>> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
>>>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
>>>>>> WGA is part of the EULA
>>>>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
>>>>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have
>>>>> XP, open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement
>>>>> link.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic
>>>>> posts, why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a
>>>>> Windows 7 newsgroup?
>>>>
>>>> Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?
>>>
>>> Frank's motto: "Do as I say, not as I do."
>>>
>> Translation: alias is a desperate lying POD linturd troll.
>> Oops!...LOL!
>
> I was talking about you, not to you.
>
Yawn.
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

DanS wrote:
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b744bed@news.x-privat.org:
>
>> DanS wrote:
>>> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
>>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
>>>>> WGA is part of the EULA
>>>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
>>>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have
>>>> XP, open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement
>>>> link.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic
>>>> posts, why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a
>>>> Windows 7 newsgroup?
>>> Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?
>> Read the article asshole!
>
> I did. Maybe *you* should reread it, the article never mentions Windows7 at
> all. Over and over again is says XP....XP.....XP.
>
> Ergo, your post is off-topic here.
>
> Which means, you, who cries about Alias' post being OT because they are not
> about Windows 7, is also making OT posts.
>
> Conclusion, hypocrite. Plain and simple........like you.

You're as desperate as your butt-fucking-buddy alias. WGA is a part of
XP, Vista, Windows 7, etc.

Live with it asshole.
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
>>>>
>>>> WGA is part of the EULA
>>>
>>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
>>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have
>>> XP, open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement link.
>>>
>>
>> "In his denial, Judge Jones found that *WGA* was a part of Windows XP,
>> not some separate software. If it had been separate, plaintiffs had
>> argued, a strict interpretation of Microsoft's *EULA* should have
>> prevented it from being downloaded. The typical definition of spyware
>> (which may also be part of some states' legal definition) is that it
>> keeps itself hidden from its user; and the judge maintained WGA not
>> only announces its presence, but is part of Windows XP just like any
>> other component."
>>
>>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic posts,
>>> why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a Windows 7
>>> newsgroup?
>>>
>> The article is about *WGA* and the *EULA*, both of which are a part of
>> Windows 7.
>>
>> Oops!
>
> Again, sigh, the quote above only rules that WGA is not spyware and is a
> part of XP. My EULA with SP3 and all the updates has not been changed.
> It does not rule that the EULA is a valid document because the court
> wasn't asked to rule on that.

Keep it up...its quite entertaining as you're trying to get to dig
yourself out of the hole you're in using a shovel.
Oops!


<--snipped the lying bullshit-->
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
ray wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:48:52 -0800, Frank wrote:
>
>> ray wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:21:06 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Enjoy!
>>>> I know I did!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Windows-XP-WGA-validation-spyware-
> case-
>>> dismissed/1265835099
>>>
>>> OK - that's only one of the reasons I eschew MS.
>> Then stop posting here, ok?
>
> Be happy to. As soon as you stop fudding Linux.

I don't fud linux. I don't use that POS worthless toy os and I doubt I
will ever again try any linux distros. Over a decade of wasting my
precious time is enough.

You on the other hand...disparage MS with your every post which has
nothing to do with liux. You're a liar, just like most all of your other
linux advocates who troll the MS ng's.
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
ray wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:52:31 -0800, Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:
>
>> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>> news:7tj0ofFqsrU2@mid.individual.net...
>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:21:06 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Enjoy!
>>>> I know I did!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Windows-XP-WGA-validation-spyware-
> case-
>>> dismissed/1265835099
>>>
>>> OK - that's only one of the reasons I eschew MS.
>> So why do you have such a hard-on for this forum?
>
> Comic relief.

More like jealousy of and contempt for, Microsoft.
Too bad huh?
 
R

ray

Flightless Bird
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:45:37 -0800, Frank wrote:

> ray wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:48:52 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>
>>> ray wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:21:06 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Enjoy!
>>>>> I know I did!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Windows-XP-WGA-validation-spyware-
>> case-
>>>> dismissed/1265835099
>>>>
>>>> OK - that's only one of the reasons I eschew MS.
>>> Then stop posting here, ok?
>>
>> Be happy to. As soon as you stop fudding Linux.
>
> I don't fud linux. I don't use that POS worthless toy os and I doubt I
> will ever again try any linux distros. Over a decade of wasting my
> precious time is enough.
>
What do you call that!

> You on the other hand...disparage MS with your every post which has
> nothing to do with liux. You're a liar, just like most all of your other
> linux advocates who troll the MS ng's.

Put up or shut up time, frankie - I've never done that and you know it.
Try to prove me wrong.
 
D

DanS

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b745cf8$1@news.x-privat.org:

> DanS wrote:
>> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b744bed@news.x-privat.org:
>>
>>> DanS wrote:
>>>> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
>>>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
>>>>>> WGA is part of the EULA
>>>>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
>>>>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have
>>>>> XP, open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement
>>>>> link.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic
>>>>> posts, why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a
>>>>> Windows 7 newsgroup?
>>>> Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?
>>> Read the article asshole!
>>
>> I did. Maybe *you* should reread it, the article never mentions
>> Windows7 at all. Over and over again is says XP....XP.....XP.
>>
>> Ergo, your post is off-topic here.
>>
>> Which means, you, who cries about Alias' post being OT because they
>> are not about Windows 7, is also making OT posts.
>>
>> Conclusion, hypocrite. Plain and simple........like you.
>
> You're as desperate as your butt-fucking-buddy alias. WGA is a part of
> XP, Vista, Windows 7, etc.

Great WGA is part of XP, yeah, that doesn't preclude the fact that
Windows7 was never mentioned in the article.

WGA is not mentioned in the Windows7 EULA either....

http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/Windows%
20Vista_Ultimate_English_36d0fe99-75e4-4875-8153-889cf5105718.pdf
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

DanS wrote:
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b745cf8$1@news.x-privat.org:
>
>> DanS wrote:
>>> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b744bed@news.x-privat.org:
>>>
>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
>>>>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
>>>>>>> WGA is part of the EULA
>>>>>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
>>>>>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have
>>>>>> XP, open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement
>>>>>> link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic
>>>>>> posts, why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a
>>>>>> Windows 7 newsgroup?
>>>>> Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?
>>>> Read the article asshole!
>>> I did. Maybe *you* should reread it, the article never mentions
>>> Windows7 at all. Over and over again is says XP....XP.....XP.
>>>
>>> Ergo, your post is off-topic here.
>>>
>>> Which means, you, who cries about Alias' post being OT because they
>>> are not about Windows 7, is also making OT posts.
>>>
>>> Conclusion, hypocrite. Plain and simple........like you.
>> You're as desperate as your butt-fucking-buddy alias. WGA is a part of
>> XP, Vista, Windows 7, etc.
>
> Great WGA is part of XP, yeah, that doesn't preclude the fact that
> Windows7 was never mentioned in the article.

WGA is not mentioned in the Windows7 EULA either....
>
> http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/Windows%
> 20Vista_Ultimate_English_36d0fe99-75e4-4875-8153-889cf5105718.pdf

Now you're getting desperate dan-o!...LOL!
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

DanS wrote:
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b745cf8$1@news.x-privat.org:
>
>> DanS wrote:
>>> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b744bed@news.x-privat.org:
>>>
>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
>>>>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
>>>>>>> WGA is part of the EULA
>>>>>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
>>>>>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have
>>>>>> XP, open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement
>>>>>> link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic
>>>>>> posts, why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a
>>>>>> Windows 7 newsgroup?
>>>>> Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?
>>>> Read the article asshole!
>>> I did. Maybe *you* should reread it, the article never mentions
>>> Windows7 at all. Over and over again is says XP....XP.....XP.
>>>
>>> Ergo, your post is off-topic here.
>>>
>>> Which means, you, who cries about Alias' post being OT because they
>>> are not about Windows 7, is also making OT posts.
>>>
>>> Conclusion, hypocrite. Plain and simple........like you.
>> You're as desperate as your butt-fucking-buddy alias. WGA is a part of
>> XP, Vista, Windows 7, etc.
>
> Great WGA is part of XP, yeah, that doesn't preclude the fact that
> Windows7 was never mentioned in the article.
>
> WGA is not mentioned in the Windows7 EULA either....
>
> http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/Windows% 20Vista_Ultimate_English_36d0fe99-75e4-4875-8153-889cf5105718.pdf

That's the Vista EULA and in Windows 7, the new name for WGA is Windows
Activation Technologies, aka WAT. Neither WGA nor WAT nor Windows
Activation Technologies is in the Windows 7 EULA. I just checked on
Microsoft's site.

--
Alias
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

DanS wrote:
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b745cf8$1@news.x-privat.org:
>
>> DanS wrote:
>>> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in news:4b744bed@news.x-privat.org:
>>>
>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
>>>>> @news.eternal-september.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
>>>>>>> WGA is part of the EULA
>>>>>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
>>>>>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have
>>>>>> XP, open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement
>>>>>> link.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic
>>>>>> posts, why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a
>>>>>> Windows 7 newsgroup?
>>>>> Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?
>>>> Read the article asshole!
>>> I did. Maybe *you* should reread it, the article never mentions
>>> Windows7 at all. Over and over again is says XP....XP.....XP.
>>>
>>> Ergo, your post is off-topic here.
>>>
>>> Which means, you, who cries about Alias' post being OT because they
>>> are not about Windows 7, is also making OT posts.
>>>
>>> Conclusion, hypocrite. Plain and simple........like you.
>> You're as desperate as your butt-fucking-buddy alias. WGA is a part of
>> XP, Vista, Windows 7, etc.
>
> Great WGA is part of XP, yeah, that doesn't preclude the fact that
> Windows7 was never mentioned in the article.
>
> WGA is not mentioned in the Windows7 EULA either....
>
> http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/Windows%
> 20Vista_Ultimate_English_36d0fe99-75e4-4875-8153-889cf5105718.pdf

BTW, that is a Vista EULA and this is a Windows 7 ng.
Oops!...LOL!
 
D

DanS

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

>>>> Ergo, your post is off-topic here.
>>>>
>>>> Which means, you, who cries about Alias' post being OT because they
>>>> are not about Windows 7, is also making OT posts.
>>>>
>>>> Conclusion, hypocrite. Plain and simple........like you.
>>> You're as desperate as your butt-fucking-buddy alias. WGA is a part of
>>> XP, Vista, Windows 7, etc.
>>
>> Great WGA is part of XP, yeah, that doesn't preclude the fact that
>> Windows7 was never mentioned in the article.
>>
>> WGA is not mentioned in the Windows7 EULA either....
>>
>> http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/Windows%
>> 20Vista_Ultimate_English_36d0fe99-75e4-4875-8153-889cf5105718.pdf
>
> BTW, that is a Vista EULA and this is a Windows 7 ng.
> Oops!...LOL!

Yes, I see that. It was a mistake on my part....

....not me trying to spread misinformation.....

....and I'm admitting I posted the wrong URL.....

But, the wrong URL only......as Alias stated, the W7 eula has not a mention
of WGA or WAT either, so your point is moot...like you.
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

DanS wrote:
>>>>> Ergo, your post is off-topic here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which means, you, who cries about Alias' post being OT because they
>>>>> are not about Windows 7, is also making OT posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Conclusion, hypocrite. Plain and simple........like you.
>>>> You're as desperate as your butt-fucking-buddy alias. WGA is a part of
>>>> XP, Vista, Windows 7, etc.
>>> Great WGA is part of XP, yeah, that doesn't preclude the fact that
>>> Windows7 was never mentioned in the article.
>>>
>>> WGA is not mentioned in the Windows7 EULA either....
>>>
>>> http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/Windows%
>>> 20Vista_Ultimate_English_36d0fe99-75e4-4875-8153-889cf5105718.pdf
>> BTW, that is a Vista EULA and this is a Windows 7 ng.
>> Oops!...LOL!
>
> Yes, I see that. It was a mistake on my part....
>
> ...not me trying to spread misinformation.....
>
> ...and I'm admitting I posted the wrong URL.....
>
> But, the wrong URL only......as Alias stated, the W7 eula has not a mention
> of WGA or WAT either, so your point is moot...like you.
>
>
>
So the Judge was incorrect huh?
I don't think so. But you're an asshole, and that is correct.
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

Frank wrote:
> DanS wrote:
>>>>>> Ergo, your post is off-topic here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which means, you, who cries about Alias' post being OT because they
>>>>>> are not about Windows 7, is also making OT posts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Conclusion, hypocrite. Plain and simple........like you.
>>>>> You're as desperate as your butt-fucking-buddy alias. WGA is a part of
>>>>> XP, Vista, Windows 7, etc.
>>>> Great WGA is part of XP, yeah, that doesn't preclude the fact that
>>>> Windows7 was never mentioned in the article.
>>>>
>>>> WGA is not mentioned in the Windows7 EULA either....
>>>>
>>>> http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/Windows%
>>>> 20Vista_Ultimate_English_36d0fe99-75e4-4875-8153-889cf5105718.pdf
>>> BTW, that is a Vista EULA and this is a Windows 7 ng.
>>> Oops!...LOL!
>>
>> Yes, I see that. It was a mistake on my part....
>>
>> ...not me trying to spread misinformation.....
>>
>> ...and I'm admitting I posted the wrong URL.....
>>
>> But, the wrong URL only......as Alias stated, the W7 eula has not a
>> mention of WGA or WAT either, so your point is moot...like you.
>>
>>
>>
> So the Judge was incorrect huh?
> I don't think so. But you're an asshole, and that is correct.

The case was about the sleazy way MS introduced WGA-N by calling it a
"critical" update when it wasn't back in 06. With the new WAT for
Windows 7, they at least are admitting it isn't necessary unless you
suspect you're a thief or have been conned by a thief. Or, if you're
like Frank, you'll download and install it and mindlessly think it won't
come up with a false positive even though it isn't going to improve
Windows 7 one iota.

--
Alias
 
B

Bill Yanaire, ESQ

Flightless Bird
Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:hl1s0t$mlu$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Frank wrote:
>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>>> Ergo, your post is off-topic here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which means, you, who cries about Alias' post being OT because they
>>>>>>> are not about Windows 7, is also making OT posts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Conclusion, hypocrite. Plain and simple........like you.
>>>>>> You're as desperate as your butt-fucking-buddy alias. WGA is a part
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> XP, Vista, Windows 7, etc.
>>>>> Great WGA is part of XP, yeah, that doesn't preclude the fact that
>>>>> Windows7 was never mentioned in the article.
>>>>>
>>>>> WGA is not mentioned in the Windows7 EULA either....
>>>>>
>>>>> http://download.microsoft.com/documents/useterms/Windows%
>>>>> 20Vista_Ultimate_English_36d0fe99-75e4-4875-8153-889cf5105718.pdf
>>>> BTW, that is a Vista EULA and this is a Windows 7 ng.
>>>> Oops!...LOL!
>>>
>>> Yes, I see that. It was a mistake on my part....
>>>
>>> ...not me trying to spread misinformation.....
>>>
>>> ...and I'm admitting I posted the wrong URL.....
>>>
>>> But, the wrong URL only......as Alias stated, the W7 eula has not a
>>> mention of WGA or WAT either, so your point is moot...like you.
>>>
>>>
>> So the Judge was incorrect huh?
>> I don't think so. But you're an asshole, and that is correct.
>
> The case was about the sleazy way MS introduced WGA-N by calling it a
> "critical" update when it wasn't back in 06. With the new WAT for Windows
> 7, they at least are admitting it isn't necessary unless you suspect
> you're a thief or have been conned by a thief. Or, if you're like Frank,
> you'll download and install it and mindlessly think it won't come up with
> a false positive even though it isn't going to improve Windows 7 one iota.
>
> --
> Alias

Why you bitching about WGA when you don't even like Microsoft? Why are you
even bitching about Microsoft anything?

How about going to the Ubuntu forum and helping those sorry sacks out who
are having trouble with their INFERIOR OS?

Oops. You can't. You know nothing about Ubuntu! LOL!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top