1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oop!...LOL!

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by Frank, Feb 10, 2010.

  1. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

    Frank wrote:
    > Enjoy!
    > I know I did!
    >
    > http://www.betanews.com/article/Windows-XP-WGA-validation-spyware-case-dismissed/1265835099
    >


    The court ruled that WGA is a part of XP. BFD. It did not rule that it
    or the EULA is conscionable or even address that. When they do that,
    enjoy your wank but I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

    With Google's new high speed network, Microsoft will be treated to what
    the ChromeOS can really do. I was wondering why they delayed the release
    of ChromeOS. I don't wonder any more.

    --
    Alias
     
  2. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    Alias wrote:
    > Frank wrote:
    >> Enjoy!
    >> I know I did!
    >>
    >> http://www.betanews.com/article/Windows-XP-WGA-validation-spyware-case-dismissed/1265835099
    >>

    >
    > The court ruled that WGA is a part of XP. BFD.


    Yeah, it is a BFD!
    Oops!

    It did not rule that it
    > or the EULA is conscionable or even address that.


    You *DUMB FUCK*, nor did any court ever rule that is was legal, or
    conscionable or morally right for LT to make linux by backward
    engineering unix.

    When they do that,
    > enjoy your wank but I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.


    Shove your thieving head back up your crooks ass, mf'er where it belongs.
    >
    > With Google's new high speed network, Microsoft will be treated to what
    > the ChromeOS can really do.


    Yeah...a fast browser...hahahaha...now you hold your breath cock sucker, ok!

    I was wondering why they delayed the release
    > of ChromeOS. I don't wonder any more.


    You're too stupid to understand the relevance of the courts decision.
    Ignorance and arrogance are your forte.
    Enjoy, you stupid POS!
    Oops!
     
  3. Roland Schweiger

    Roland Schweiger Flightless Bird

    Frank,
    first of all nobody is interested und your interpretation of which court
    ruled on which subject.
    Second, if your major emphasis is to use hard swearing language (which can
    be regarded as very primitive and not much above junior school), then just
    don't post anymore articles, it only annoys others.
     
  4. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

    Frank wrote:
    > Alias wrote:
    >> Frank wrote:
    >>> Enjoy!
    >>> I know I did!
    >>>
    >>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Windows-XP-WGA-validation-spyware-case-dismissed/1265835099
    >>>

    >>
    >> The court ruled that WGA is a part of XP. BFD.

    >
    > Yeah, it is a BFD!
    > Oops!


    Maybe to MS fanbois like you but ask anyone on the street how much a
    deal it is.

    >
    > It did not rule that it
    >> or the EULA is conscionable or even address that.

    >
    > You *DUMB FUCK*, nor did any court ever rule that is was legal, or
    > conscionable or morally right for LT to make linux by backward
    > engineering unix.


    You missed the point.

    >
    > When they do that,
    >> enjoy your wank but I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

    >
    > Shove your thieving head back up your crooks ass, mf'er where it belongs.
    >>
    >> With Google's new high speed network, Microsoft will be treated to
    >> what the ChromeOS can really do.

    >
    > Yeah...a fast browser...hahahaha...now you hold your breath cock sucker,
    > ok!


    You missed the point.

    >
    > I was wondering why they delayed the release
    >> of ChromeOS. I don't wonder any more.

    >
    > You're too stupid to understand the relevance of the courts decision.


    It means they can legally require WGA. Whoopti do.

    > Ignorance and arrogance are your forte.
    > Enjoy, you stupid POS!
    > Oops!


    Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.

    --
    Alias
     
  5. Kevin John Putzke

    Kevin John Putzke Flightless Bird

    "Roland Schweiger" <roland_schweiger@web.de> wrote in message
    news:hl0kk1$vpp$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    > Frank,
    > first of all nobody is interested und your interpretation of which court
    > ruled on which subject.
    > Second, if your major emphasis is to use hard swearing language (which can
    > be regarded as very primitive and not much above junior school), then just
    > don't post anymore articles, it only annoys others.
    >


    If you know that Frank uses language that you don't like then I suggest
    getting some "self control" and avoiding those posts. We are dealing with
    Alias, one of the forums most foul trolls who's main goal is to try and
    convert everyone to that INFERIOR Ubuntu that nobody wants or needs.
     
  6. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

    Kevin John Putzke wrote:
    >
    >
    > "Roland Schweiger" <roland_schweiger@web.de> wrote in message
    > news:hl0kk1$vpp$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >> Frank,
    >> first of all nobody is interested und your interpretation of which
    >> court ruled on which subject.
    >> Second, if your major emphasis is to use hard swearing language (which
    >> can be regarded as very primitive and not much above junior school),
    >> then just don't post anymore articles, it only annoys others.
    >>

    >
    > If you know that Frank uses language that you don't like then I suggest
    > getting some "self control" and avoiding those posts. We are dealing
    > with Alias, one of the forums most foul trolls who's main goal is to try
    > and convert everyone to that INFERIOR Ubuntu that nobody wants or needs.
    >
    >
    >


    Liar. You and Frank are the most foul mouthed trolls here, bar none.
    Fact: NASA uses Linux. Fact: many governments use Linux. Fact: over 10
    million home users run Ubuntu. Fact: you're a FUD spreading foul mouthed
    nymshifting LIAR.

    --
    Alias
     
  7. Bill Yanaire, ESQ

    Bill Yanaire, ESQ Flightless Bird

    "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
    news:hl1a2a$c29$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    > Kevin John Putzke wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> "Roland Schweiger" <roland_schweiger@web.de> wrote in message
    >> news:hl0kk1$vpp$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>> Frank,
    >>> first of all nobody is interested und your interpretation of which court
    >>> ruled on which subject.
    >>> Second, if your major emphasis is to use hard swearing language (which
    >>> can be regarded as very primitive and not much above junior school),
    >>> then just don't post anymore articles, it only annoys others.
    >>>

    >>
    >> If you know that Frank uses language that you don't like then I suggest
    >> getting some "self control" and avoiding those posts. We are dealing
    >> with Alias, one of the forums most foul trolls who's main goal is to try
    >> and convert everyone to that INFERIOR Ubuntu that nobody wants or needs.
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Liar. You and Frank are the most foul mouthed trolls here, bar none. Fact:
    > NASA uses Linux. Fact: many governments use Linux. Fact: over 10 million
    > home users run Ubuntu. Fact: you're a FUD spreading foul mouthed
    > nymshifting LIAR.
    >
    > --
    > Alias


    We are not talking about NASA using Linux. This forum is not a NASA forum.
    This forum is for GENERAL questions about Windows 7. The name of the forum
    even says that: alt.windows7.general. Maybe you just can't read. Most
    people coming here are individual users concerned about their desktop
    machines you idiot. Most large companies and governments have an IT
    department which deals with OS and computer issues.

    Damn, you are STUPID.
     
  8. Dave

    Dave Flightless Bird

    "Kevin John Putzke" <kevin@putzke.org> wrote in message
    news:hl19s3$h30$1@news.albasani.net...
    >
    >
    > "Roland Schweiger" <roland_schweiger@web.de> wrote in message
    > news:hl0kk1$vpp$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >> Frank,
    >> first of all nobody is interested und your interpretation of which court
    >> ruled on which subject.
    >> Second, if your major emphasis is to use hard swearing language (which
    >> can be regarded as very primitive and not much above junior school), then
    >> just don't post anymore articles, it only annoys others.
    >>

    >
    > If you know that Frank uses language that you don't like then I suggest
    > getting some "self control" and avoiding those posts. We are dealing with
    > Alias, one of the forums most foul trolls who's main goal is to try and
    > convert everyone to that INFERIOR Ubuntu that nobody wants or needs.
    >
    >
    >


    Sadly, it seems the only way to control Frank and Alias both is to killfile
    them. Tried not to do it myself as I suspect they are both very talented but
    to no avail.
    Or, your method works too, you just have to scroll through a bunch of posts
    that you know are trash.
    Dave
     
  9. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

    Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:
    >
    >
    > "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
    > news:hl1a2a$c29$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >> Kevin John Putzke wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> "Roland Schweiger" <roland_schweiger@web.de> wrote in message
    >>> news:hl0kk1$vpp$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>>> Frank,
    >>>> first of all nobody is interested und your interpretation of which
    >>>> court ruled on which subject.
    >>>> Second, if your major emphasis is to use hard swearing language
    >>>> (which can be regarded as very primitive and not much above junior
    >>>> school), then just don't post anymore articles, it only annoys others.
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> If you know that Frank uses language that you don't like then I
    >>> suggest getting some "self control" and avoiding those posts. We are
    >>> dealing with Alias, one of the forums most foul trolls who's main
    >>> goal is to try and convert everyone to that INFERIOR Ubuntu that
    >>> nobody wants or needs.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>

    >>
    >> Liar. You and Frank are the most foul mouthed trolls here, bar none.
    >> Fact: NASA uses Linux. Fact: many governments use Linux. Fact: over 10
    >> million home users run Ubuntu. Fact: you're a FUD spreading foul
    >> mouthed nymshifting LIAR.
    >>
    >> --
    >> Alias

    >
    > We are not talking about NASA using Linux.


    I am.

    > This forum is not a NASA
    > forum. This forum is for GENERAL questions about Windows 7. The name of
    > the forum even says that: alt.windows7.general.


    Then why did you bring up Ubuntu? You bring it up more than anyone else.
    Can't follow your own advice or what?

    > Maybe you just can't
    > read.


    You don't believe that.

    > Most people coming here are individual users concerned about
    > their desktop machines you idiot.


    If they're really concerned, they will dump Windows for Linux.

    > Most large companies and governments
    > have an IT department which deals with OS and computer issues.


    Do you really think you're telling me something I don't already know.
    That still doesn't change the fact that if you want a stable, precise,
    malware free operating system, Windows isn't up to the task.

    >
    > Damn, you are STUPID.


    The irony!

    --
    Alias
     
  10. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

    Dave wrote:
    >
    >
    > "Kevin John Putzke" <kevin@putzke.org> wrote in message
    > news:hl19s3$h30$1@news.albasani.net...
    >>
    >>
    >> "Roland Schweiger" <roland_schweiger@web.de> wrote in message
    >> news:hl0kk1$vpp$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>> Frank,
    >>> first of all nobody is interested und your interpretation of which
    >>> court ruled on which subject.
    >>> Second, if your major emphasis is to use hard swearing language
    >>> (which can be regarded as very primitive and not much above junior
    >>> school), then just don't post anymore articles, it only annoys others.
    >>>

    >>
    >> If you know that Frank uses language that you don't like then I
    >> suggest getting some "self control" and avoiding those posts. We are
    >> dealing with Alias, one of the forums most foul trolls who's main goal
    >> is to try and convert everyone to that INFERIOR Ubuntu that nobody
    >> wants or needs.
    >>
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Sadly, it seems the only way to control Frank and Alias both is to
    > killfile them. Tried not to do it myself as I suspect they are both very
    > talented but to no avail.
    > Or, your method works too, you just have to scroll through a bunch of
    > posts that you know are trash.
    > Dave


    You're replying to Frank's sidekick troll.

    --
    Alias
     
  11. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

    Alias wrote:
    > Frank wrote:
    >> Alias wrote:
    >>> Frank wrote:
    >>>> Enjoy!
    >>>> I know I did!
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.betanews.com/article/Windows-XP-WGA-validation-spyware-case-dismissed/1265835099
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> The court ruled that WGA is a part of XP. BFD.

    >>
    >> Yeah, it is a BFD!
    >> Oops!

    >
    > Maybe to MS fanbois like you but ask anyone on the street how much a
    > deal it is.
    >

    You are that stupid aren't you.
    >>
    >> It did not rule that it
    >>> or the EULA is conscionable or even address that.

    >>
    >> You *DUMB FUCK*, nor did any court ever rule that is was legal, or
    >> conscionable or morally right for LT to make linux by backward
    >> engineering unix.

    >
    > You missed the point.
    >

    I just made a point you dumb fuck!
    >>
    >> When they do that,
    >>> enjoy your wank but I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

    >>
    >> Shove your thieving head back up your crooks ass, mf'er where it belongs.
    >>>
    >>> With Google's new high speed network, Microsoft will be treated to
    >>> what the ChromeOS can really do.

    >>
    >> Yeah...a fast browser...hahahaha...now you hold your breath cock
    >> sucker, ok!

    >
    > You missed the point.


    You didn't make a point, you dumb fuck.
    >
    >>
    >> I was wondering why they delayed the release
    >>> of ChromeOS. I don't wonder any more.

    >>
    >> You're too stupid to understand the relevance of the courts decision.

    >
    > It means they can legally require WGA. Whoopti do.


    Don't give up your day job of charging unsuspecting little old ladies
    for something that is free, cause you'd starve to death trying to be a
    court ruling interpreter!...LOL!
    >
    >> Ignorance and arrogance are your forte.
    >> Enjoy, you stupid POS!
    >> Oops!

    >
    > Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.


    Re-read the article you *DUMB FUCK*, as WGA is part of the EULA and
    guess what...IT WAS UPHELD!
    I bet that really gets your goat doesn't it sheep-fucker...seeing as how
    you hate MS and the EULA.
    Eat shit and die asshole!...LOL!
    >
     
  12. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

    Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

    Frank wrote:

    >> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.

    >
    > WGA is part of the EULA


    False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was written
    long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have XP, open
    Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement link.

    Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic posts,
    why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a Windows 7
    newsgroup?

    --
    Alias
     
  13. DanS

    DanS Flightless Bird

    Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

    Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
    @news.eternal-september.org:

    > Frank wrote:
    >
    >>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.

    >>
    >> WGA is part of the EULA

    >
    > False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was written
    > long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have XP, open
    > Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement link.
    >
    > Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic posts,
    > why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a Windows 7
    > newsgroup?


    Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?
     
  14. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

    Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

    DanS wrote:
    > Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
    > @news.eternal-september.org:
    >
    >> Frank wrote:
    >>
    >>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
    >>> WGA is part of the EULA

    >> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was written
    >> long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have XP, open
    >> Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement link.
    >>
    >> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic posts,
    >> why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a Windows 7
    >> newsgroup?

    >
    > Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?


    Frank's motto: "Do as I say, not as I do."

    --
    Alias
     
  15. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

    Alias wrote:
    > Frank wrote:
    >
    >>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.

    >>
    >> WGA is part of the EULA

    >
    > False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was written
    > long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have XP, open
    > Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement link.
    >


    "In his denial, Judge Jones found that *WGA* was a part of Windows XP,
    not some separate software. If it had been separate, plaintiffs had
    argued, a strict interpretation of Microsoft's *EULA* should have
    prevented it from being downloaded. The typical definition of spyware
    (which may also be part of some states' legal definition) is that it
    keeps itself hidden from its user; and the judge maintained WGA not only
    announces its presence, but is part of Windows XP just like any other
    component."

    > Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic posts,
    > why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a Windows 7
    > newsgroup?
    >

    The article is about *WGA* and the *EULA*, both of which are a part of
    Windows 7.

    Oops!
     
  16. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

    DanS wrote:
    > Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
    > @news.eternal-september.org:
    >
    >> Frank wrote:
    >>
    >>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
    >>> WGA is part of the EULA

    >> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was written
    >> long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have XP, open
    >> Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement link.
    >>
    >> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic posts,
    >> why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a Windows 7
    >> newsgroup?

    >
    > Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?


    Read the article asshole!
     
  17. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    Re: MS Windows WGA/EULA upheld in court ruling...Oops!...LOL!

    Alias wrote:
    > DanS wrote:
    >> Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in news:hl1g4c$5un$1
    >> @news.eternal-september.org:
    >>
    >>> Frank wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>> Oh, you lied in the subject. The court did not uphold the EULA.
    >>>> WGA is part of the EULA
    >>> False. WGA is not mentioned once in the XP EULA as the EULA was
    >>> written long before WGA was deployed or created. If you still have
    >>> XP, open Windows Explorer/Help/About Windows XP/End User Agreement link.
    >>>
    >>> Of course, after all your bleating and whining about off topic posts,
    >>> why the hell did you post an article about Windows XP in a Windows 7
    >>> newsgroup?

    >>
    >> Because Frank's the biggest hypocrite here ?

    >
    > Frank's motto: "Do as I say, not as I do."
    >

    Translation: alias is a desperate lying POD linturd troll.
    Oops!...LOL!
     
  18. ray

    ray Flightless Bird

  19. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

Share This Page