• Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.

MS Wants a Net Tax to Combat Malware.

S

Spring Sprung

Flightless Bird
Basically because they basically can't do anything. So few people run
udungtu that there's no malware written for it.

Moreover, so few people run udungtu, there are no real business applications
(beyond office suites) written for, no serious games, no serious utilities,
nada.

Sure there's 4GB of useless spotty incomplete alphaware available for it,
all with the GPL trap, and God know what slipped into them. But they're
moslty cr*p and trash. No thanks.

You can fool some old Spaniards all of the time, and some old Spaniards some
of the time, and that's what you depend on. Happy hunting, Alias.




"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hn01pd$nhn$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> they don't have to do practically anything to keep the box secure.
>
> --
> Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Char Jackson wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:13:48 +0100, Alias
> <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote:
>
>> Like I said, three out of five infected computers means that two aren't.

>
> I was disappointed earlier in the thread when you were asked to back
> up your "3 out of 5" claim and refused. I think most of us know it's
> completely made up, just a number pulled out of the air, but it would
> have been interesting to see how you got there.


I read it on a security web site like Sophos. I did not bookmark it.

>
>> Most techies know how to secure their machines. Most users haven't a
>> clue. They want to use the computer, not configure or update it. We
>> repair computers and see infected machines every single day.

>
> Same here, but I don't base my guesses on what I see coming into the
> shop every day.


Nor are mine. The point is that the two who don't get infected are
security savvy. Most computer users are not.

> By your (apparent) logic, since the cars coming into a
> body shop are dented and crashed, it stands to reason that 3 out of 5
> cars on the road are also dented and crashed, but the drivers don't
> know it. It's just silly, especially since you refuse to tell anyone
> how you arrived at your guess.
>


You'll have to do the searching if you're really interested. I don't
feel like it.

--
Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Spring Sprung wrote:
> Basically because they basically can't do anything. So few people run
> udungtu that there's no malware written for it.
>
> Moreover, so few people run udungtu,


Only 13 MILLION.

> there are no real business
> applications (beyond office suites) written for, no serious games, no
> serious utilities, nada.


Liar.

>
> Sure there's 4GB of useless spotty incomplete alphaware available for
> it, all with the GPL trap, and God know what slipped into them. But
> they're moslty cr*p and trash. No thanks.


Liar.

>
> You can fool some old Spaniards all of the time, and some old Spaniards
> some of the time, and that's what you depend on. Happy hunting, Alias.


You really are clueless, aren't you?

>
>
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hn01pd$nhn$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> they don't have to do practically anything to keep the box secure.
>>
>> --
>> Alias

>



--
Alias
 
S

Spring Sprung

Flightless Bird
Inline:


"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hn0q3p$qpc$2@news.eternal-september.org...
> Spring Sprung wrote:
>> Basically because they basically can't do anything. So few people run
>> udungtu that there's no malware written for it.
>>
>> Moreover, so few people run udungtu,

>
> Only 13 MILLION.




Ten of those 13 million marched straight back to Windows, you know that,
Alias -- with linsux many try, few buy (proverbially that is - we all know
that they give it away for free - they give it away for free - have been for
decades - and they still can't get beyond less than one percent of
desktops - hey, even the "other" category does better than linux).


>> there are no real business applications (beyond office suites) written
>> for, no serious games, no serious utilities, nada.

>
> Liar.




I know you are but what am I?


>>
>> Sure there's 4GB of useless spotty incomplete alphaware available for it,
>> all with the GPL trap, and God know what slipped into them. But they're
>> moslty cr*p and trash. No thanks.

>
> Liar.



I know you are but what am I?


>>
>> You can fool some old Spaniards all of the time, and some old Spaniards
>> some of the time, and that's what you depend on. Happy hunting, Alias.

>
> You really are clueless, aren't you?




Not as clueless as your hoodwinked Spaniard clients.



>>
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Spring Sprung wrote:
> Inline:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hn0q3p$qpc$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Spring Sprung wrote:
>>> Basically because they basically can't do anything. So few people run
>>> udungtu that there's no malware written for it.
>>>
>>> Moreover, so few people run udungtu,

>>
>> Only 13 MILLION.

>
>
>
> Ten of those 13 million marched straight back to Windows, you know that,
> Alias -- with linsux many try, few buy (proverbially that is - we all
> know that they give it away for free - they give it away for free - have
> been for decades - and they still can't get beyond less than one percent
> of desktops - hey, even the "other" category does better than linux).


Some net stats say it's 4.5%. It depends on the stats you wish to
believe. I'm sure if you took the tea party idiots who comprise half the
USA out of the equation, it would be much higher. Oh, and I include you
as one of the clueless idiots who are too stupid to install Ubuntu.

>
>
>>> there are no real business applications (beyond office suites)
>>> written for, no serious games, no serious utilities, nada.

>>
>> Liar.

>
>
>
> I know you are but what am I?


Third grade retorts again, eh?

>
>
>>>
>>> Sure there's 4GB of useless spotty incomplete alphaware available for
>>> it, all with the GPL trap, and God know what slipped into them. But
>>> they're moslty cr*p and trash. No thanks.

>>
>> Liar.

>
>
> I know you are but what am I?


Third grade retorts again, eh?
>
>
>>>
>>> You can fool some old Spaniards all of the time, and some old
>>> Spaniards some of the time, and that's what you depend on. Happy
>>> hunting, Alias.

>>
>> You really are clueless, aren't you?

>
>
>
> Not as clueless as your hoodwinked Spaniard clients.


And exactly how many of them have you talked to, Bucko?


--
Alias
 
S

Spring Sprung

Flightless Bird
"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hn0r8k$ac$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>>> Liar.

>>
>> I know you are but what am I?

>
> Third grade retorts again, eh?


Yes. That's what a third grade accusation deserves, Alias, you know that.
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 3/7/2010 6:22 AM, Alias wrote:
> Don wrote:
>>
>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9D344D420A8CFthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>> "Don" <burnettedclothes@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:t8WdnZyvA_Tpkw7WnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>> news:hmus74$ipr$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:hmup6g$t1k$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>> Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 16:29:55 -0500, "Spring Sprung"
>>>>>>>> <spring.sprung@not.an.address.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just a general comment:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 users have a lower malware infection rate than XP users
>>>>>>>>> - mainly because, now, more malware is spread by social
>>>>>>>>> engineering than by frontal attacks and Windows 7 makes social
>>>>>>>>> engineering more difficult. Microsoft / AMD / Intel have closed
>>>>>>>>> many of the vectors of attack malware writers used to depend on,
>>>>>>>>> so they rely more on social engineering now - i.e. tricking users
>>>>>>>>> to run their stuff.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Computer infection is it still is a serious issue - more so even
>>>>>>>>> - as "organized" crime has gotten involved. But I'm not one for
>>>>>>>>> legislation / which means more taxes / then police / which means
>>>>>>>>> even more taxes / etc. etc. ... all of which disagrees with me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Instead, IMHO, the best way to fight this stuff (other than
>>>>>>>>> through hardware / software improvements), is simply to make sure
>>>>>>>>> people are aware of and informed as to why it is important to
>>>>>>>>> keep one's computer(s) uninfected and how to go about it no
>>>>>>>>> matter what operating system they are running. An ounce of
>>>>>>>>> prevention of worth a pound of cure, as the old saying goes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My computers here seem to never get infected. I watch out a bit
>>>>>>>>> and have the security settings of my and my family's software
>>>>>>>>> just a notch higher, I use the MVP hosts file on the machines
>>>>>>>>> and it weeds out innumerable and useless 3rd parties from the
>>>>>>>>> websites we visit and so on.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A tiny bit of effort goes so far has gone a long way. My
>>>>>>>>> infection rate over the last 14 years nears that of Apple uses -
>>>>>>>>> one real infection on one computer (mea culpa -- deliberately
>>>>>>>>> ignored a Windows 2000 IIS patch from Microsoft back in 2001),
>>>>>>>>> maybe a second on XP a few months later (not sure, not my fault,
>>>>>>>>> and didn't take the time to investigate -- just wiped and
>>>>>>>>> reinstalled at the suspicion), yet I've run and enjoyed Windows
>>>>>>>>> on upwards of 20 computers in the house since 1996 (turning off
>>>>>>>>> HTML & JavaScript in email probably did wonders in those days
>>>>>>>>> lol).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyway, that's a fair number of computers with four people using
>>>>>>>>> them a lot over 14 years.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> People like Alias etc. may not enjoy such a report, but it speaks
>>>>>>>>> of what one can do with Windows, if one puts just a tiny little
>>>>>>>>> effort into looking at security issues -- which should be done no
>>>>>>>>> matter which platform -- UNIX / MacOS / Windows.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I completely agree. At the moment I have five computers here, and
>>>>>>>> I've had at least two over each of the past 23 years. My infection
>>>>>>>> rate has always been zero; there's never been a single infection.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gosh two techies can keep their computers clean and expect us to
>>>>>>> take the leap in logic that their experience is universal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Better make that three pal. Not always been a techie either, but
>>>>>> wait - have never been infected either!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And you don't know anyone who's been infected either, right?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> Actually that would be correct.
>>>
>>> That, I don't believe, unless you're only in a group like the TV show
>>> 'The Big Bang Theory'.

>>
>>
>> I personally do not care what you or Alias happen to believe.

>
> If that were true, you would ignore us.


Why are you here?
>
>> And I do know quite a few folks.
>> Of course, that is not to say some whom I know have gotten themselves
>> infected, perhaps they just felt stupid and did not feel it was
>> something they needed to brag to their friends about.

>
> Sure, that must be it.


And you use W 7?
Sure...!
>
>>
>> There will always be the careless few, that do click on that link they
>> receive in an email from an unknown sender, guaranteeing them they
>> will receive untold riches by following their instructions.
>> Most folks I know however, I think are a little brighter than that and
>> know how to practice safe computing.

>
> Never heard of drive by malware, eh? You're probably infected and don't
> even know it.


Doesn't happen with W 7. You're uninformed.
Figures!
>
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 3/7/2010 8:24 AM, Alias wrote:
> Don wrote:
>>
>> Lol, you gotta be kidding

>
> He is.
>
>> - wow.
>> I don't doubt that at all. Says a lot.
>>
>>
>>

>
> Yeah, it says Spring Sprung is a liar. Course, you latching on to the
> lies like you would grasp at straws writes volumes about you, Bucko.
>

I just love watching you get you dumb, lying, stupid, arrogant ass
brutalized in here by everyone. You're either the dumbest POS to ever
post in any ng or else you are one truly sick in the head mf'er.
So which is it, *BUCKO*?
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 3/7/2010 8:23 AM, Alias wrote:
> Spring Sprung wrote:
>> He's totally out of it Don; a couple of weeks ago he still thought you
>> had to fire up a browser and visit the http://update.microsoft.com
>> webpage to get your Windows Vista or Windows 7 updated - he didn't
>> even know you could have Windows do it for you through the update
>> utility - he didn't know. I pointed his ignorance out to him. But
>> instead of admitting anything, he backpedalled by claiming the utility
>> was actually a web browser -- it's not, although it might make some
>> use of the installed browser componentry -- but nevertheless, he had
>> thought you had to manually visit. That's how "out of it" he is. So of
>> course, in his world all computers running Windows are infected via
>> drive-by exploits. This is what he tells the grey haired Spanish women
>> in his town. Then he fscks them up by installing udungtu. Then they
>> can't even change the wallpaper without making him a call.
>>
>> Well ... we all got to make a living I suppose ... and Corey just
>> makes his by foolin' old Spaniards. Why he thinks anyone on this
>> newsgroup wants to buy his cr*p is another thing altogether.

>
> All lies. I guess when you're refuted, that's all you have left.
>


"refuted"? You think posting more lies about your last lies refutes
them?...Hahahaha...you mean like when you close your eyes you think no
can see you?...LOL!
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Spring Sprung wrote:
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hn0r8k$ac$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>>>> Liar.
>>>
>>> I know you are but what am I?

>>
>> Third grade retorts again, eh?

>
> Yes. That's what a third grade accusation deserves, Alias, you know that.


When I make one, I'll let you know. So, again, how many of my clients
have you spoken to? Ya know, the part you snipped:


> Not as clueless as your hoodwinked Spaniard clients.


And exactly how many of them have you talked to, Bucko?

--
Alias
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 3/7/2010 8:22 AM, Alias wrote:
> Don wrote:
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hn0g42$dpg$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Don wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>> news:hn0cqa$jol$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
>>>>>> message news:Xns9D344D420A8CFthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>>> "Don" <burnettedclothes@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:t8WdnZyvA_Tpkw7WnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:hmus74$ipr$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:hmup6g$t1k$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 16:29:55 -0500, "Spring Sprung"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <spring.sprung@not.an.address.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just a general comment:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 users have a lower malware infection rate than XP
>>>>>>>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - mainly because, now, more malware is spread by social
>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering than by frontal attacks and Windows 7 makes social
>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering more difficult. Microsoft / AMD / Intel have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> many of the vectors of attack malware writers used to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> depend on,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so they rely more on social engineering now - i.e. tricking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to run their stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer infection is it still is a serious issue - more so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - as "organized" crime has gotten involved. But I'm not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> legislation / which means more taxes / then police / which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> means
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even more taxes / etc. etc. ... all of which disagrees with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead, IMHO, the best way to fight this stuff (other than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> through hardware / software improvements), is simply to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> make sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people are aware of and informed as to why it is important to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep one's computer(s) uninfected and how to go about it no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter what operating system they are running. An ounce of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevention of worth a pound of cure, as the old saying goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My computers here seem to never get infected. I watch out a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and have the security settings of my and my family's software
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a notch higher, I use the MVP hosts file on the machines
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it weeds out innumerable and useless 3rd parties from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> websites we visit and so on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A tiny bit of effort goes so far has gone a long way. My
>>>>>>>>>>>>> infection rate over the last 14 years nears that of Apple
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uses -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one real infection on one computer (mea culpa -- deliberately
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored a Windows 2000 IIS patch from Microsoft back in 2001),
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a second on XP a few months later (not sure, not my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fault,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and didn't take the time to investigate -- just wiped and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reinstalled at the suspicion), yet I've run and enjoyed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on upwards of 20 computers in the house since 1996 (turning
>>>>>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTML & JavaScript in email probably did wonders in those days
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, that's a fair number of computers with four people
>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>> them a lot over 14 years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> People like Alias etc. may not enjoy such a report, but it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what one can do with Windows, if one puts just a tiny
>>>>>>>>>>>>> little
>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort into looking at security issues -- which should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> done no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter which platform -- UNIX / MacOS / Windows.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I completely agree. At the moment I have five computers
>>>>>>>>>>>> here, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've had at least two over each of the past 23 years. My
>>>>>>>>>>>> infection
>>>>>>>>>>>> rate has always been zero; there's never been a single
>>>>>>>>>>>> infection.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gosh two techies can keep their computers clean and expect us to
>>>>>>>>>>> take the leap in logic that their experience is universal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Better make that three pal. Not always been a techie either, but
>>>>>>>>>> wait - have never been infected either!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And you don't know anyone who's been infected either, right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually that would be correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That, I don't believe, unless you're only in a group like the TV
>>>>>>> show
>>>>>>> 'The Big Bang Theory'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I personally do not care what you or Alias happen to believe.
>>>>>
>>>>> If that were true, you would ignore us.
>>>>>
>>>>>> And I do know quite a few folks.
>>>>>> Of course, that is not to say some whom I know have gotten
>>>>>> themselves infected, perhaps they just felt stupid and did not
>>>>>> feel it was something they needed to brag to their friends about.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, that must be it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There will always be the careless few, that do click on that link
>>>>>> they receive in an email from an unknown sender, guaranteeing them
>>>>>> they will receive untold riches by following their instructions.
>>>>>> Most folks I know however, I think are a little brighter than that
>>>>>> and know how to practice safe computing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Never heard of drive by malware, eh? You're probably infected and
>>>>> don't even know it.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LOL, dream on linux boy!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not my dream, sonny. It's your nightmare.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias

>>
>> How is it my nightmare Corey?

>
> Who's Corey?


You.
>
> Read this:
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/techexec/2008/0303techexec1.html
>
>>
>> I have no problem with malware in my windows 7 system, just like Vista
>> before it, just like XP before that, and so on.

>
> Head, sand.
>
>>
>> So do tell, how is it my nightmare? Or is it yours? That your [sic]
>> refuted, that you are wrong hmm?

>
> Head, sand.
>
>> Is that how you prey on older not so technical savvy folks - you tell
>> them they are infected and don't know it?

>
> No. Is this your idea of refutation?
>
>> Kind of like some of these sites that give a pop up saying they are
>> probably infected, download their software or do an online scan, in
>> order to purchase something they have absolutely no need for? Do you
>> convince them of this, in order for them to pay you to install udungtu
>> [sic] on their system?

>
> Guessing isn't one of your strong points, is it?
>
>>
>> The vast majority of malware, is installed by the infected user - by
>> executing a file, clicking an unknown link, falling for the trap.

>
> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/how-to-survive-a-drive-by-malware-attack-616431


The article is about XP, not Windows 7. This a Windows 7 ng so stop
posting your up-yr-fucking-butt-too useless toy os sales fatter, ok
sheep-fucker?
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 3/7/2010 8:22 AM, Alias wrote:
> Don wrote:
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hn0g42$dpg$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Don wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>> news:hn0cqa$jol$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
>>>>>> message news:Xns9D344D420A8CFthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>>> "Don" <burnettedclothes@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:t8WdnZyvA_Tpkw7WnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:hmus74$ipr$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:hmup6g$t1k$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 16:29:55 -0500, "Spring Sprung"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <spring.sprung@not.an.address.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just a general comment:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 users have a lower malware infection rate than XP
>>>>>>>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - mainly because, now, more malware is spread by social
>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering than by frontal attacks and Windows 7 makes social
>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering more difficult. Microsoft / AMD / Intel have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> many of the vectors of attack malware writers used to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> depend on,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so they rely more on social engineering now - i.e. tricking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to run their stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer infection is it still is a serious issue - more so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - as "organized" crime has gotten involved. But I'm not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> legislation / which means more taxes / then police / which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> means
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even more taxes / etc. etc. ... all of which disagrees with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead, IMHO, the best way to fight this stuff (other than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> through hardware / software improvements), is simply to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> make sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people are aware of and informed as to why it is important to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep one's computer(s) uninfected and how to go about it no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter what operating system they are running. An ounce of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevention of worth a pound of cure, as the old saying goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My computers here seem to never get infected. I watch out a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and have the security settings of my and my family's software
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a notch higher, I use the MVP hosts file on the machines
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it weeds out innumerable and useless 3rd parties from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> websites we visit and so on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A tiny bit of effort goes so far has gone a long way. My
>>>>>>>>>>>>> infection rate over the last 14 years nears that of Apple
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uses -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one real infection on one computer (mea culpa -- deliberately
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored a Windows 2000 IIS patch from Microsoft back in 2001),
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a second on XP a few months later (not sure, not my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fault,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and didn't take the time to investigate -- just wiped and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reinstalled at the suspicion), yet I've run and enjoyed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on upwards of 20 computers in the house since 1996 (turning
>>>>>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTML & JavaScript in email probably did wonders in those days
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, that's a fair number of computers with four people
>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>> them a lot over 14 years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> People like Alias etc. may not enjoy such a report, but it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what one can do with Windows, if one puts just a tiny
>>>>>>>>>>>>> little
>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort into looking at security issues -- which should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> done no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter which platform -- UNIX / MacOS / Windows.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I completely agree. At the moment I have five computers
>>>>>>>>>>>> here, and
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've had at least two over each of the past 23 years. My
>>>>>>>>>>>> infection
>>>>>>>>>>>> rate has always been zero; there's never been a single
>>>>>>>>>>>> infection.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gosh two techies can keep their computers clean and expect us to
>>>>>>>>>>> take the leap in logic that their experience is universal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Better make that three pal. Not always been a techie either, but
>>>>>>>>>> wait - have never been infected either!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And you don't know anyone who's been infected either, right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually that would be correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That, I don't believe, unless you're only in a group like the TV
>>>>>>> show
>>>>>>> 'The Big Bang Theory'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I personally do not care what you or Alias happen to believe.
>>>>>
>>>>> If that were true, you would ignore us.
>>>>>
>>>>>> And I do know quite a few folks.
>>>>>> Of course, that is not to say some whom I know have gotten
>>>>>> themselves infected, perhaps they just felt stupid and did not
>>>>>> feel it was something they needed to brag to their friends about.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, that must be it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There will always be the careless few, that do click on that link
>>>>>> they receive in an email from an unknown sender, guaranteeing them
>>>>>> they will receive untold riches by following their instructions.
>>>>>> Most folks I know however, I think are a little brighter than that
>>>>>> and know how to practice safe computing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Never heard of drive by malware, eh? You're probably infected and
>>>>> don't even know it.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LOL, dream on linux boy!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not my dream, sonny. It's your nightmare.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias

>>
>> How is it my nightmare Corey?

>
> Who's Corey?
>
> Read this:
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/techexec/2008/0303techexec1.html
>

You read the article, you dumb fuck!

"Over a 10 month period spanning most of 2007".

Hey sheep-fucker...this is March 2010 and we're talking Window 7, you
*DUMB FUCK*!
Oops!
>>
>> I have no problem with malware in my windows 7 system, just like Vista
>> before it, just like XP before that, and so on.

>
> Head, sand.



Head, ass.
>
>>
>> So do tell, how is it my nightmare? Or is it yours? That your [sic]
>> refuted, that you are wrong hmm?

>
> Head, sand.


Head, ass.
>
>> Is that how you prey on older not so technical savvy folks - you tell
>> them they are infected and don't know it?

>
> No. Is this your idea of refutation?


Can't answer the question can you.
>
>> Kind of like some of these sites that give a pop up saying they are
>> probably infected, download their software or do an online scan, in
>> order to purchase something they have absolutely no need for? Do you
>> convince them of this, in order for them to pay you to install udungtu
>> [sic] on their system?

>
> Guessing isn't one of your strong points, is it?


Lying is your only talent, isn't it?
>
>>
>> The vast majority of malware, is installed by the infected user - by
>> executing a file, clicking an unknown link, falling for the trap.

>
> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/how-to-survive-a-drive-by-malware-attack-616431
>
>
>
 
S

Spring Sprung

Flightless Bird
"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hn0svd$7ho$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Spring Sprung wrote:
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hn0r8k$ac$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>> I know you are but what am I?
>>>
>>> Third grade retorts again, eh?

>>
>> Yes. That's what a third grade accusation deserves, Alias, you know that.

>
> When I make one, I'll let you know.


No no, it would be much easier and would save a lot of bandwidth to just let
me know when you don't.
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 3/7/2010 3:13 AM, Alias wrote:
> Zootal wrote:
>>> I completely agree. At the moment I have five computers here, and I've
>>> had at least two over each of the past 23 years. My infection rate has
>>> always been zero; there's never been a single infection.
>>>
>>>

>>
>> I've had one infection since I bought my first computer in 1984. It
>> was an unpatched clean install of Windows XP on a laptop. I connected
>> to the internet via modem without thinking, no firewall, no NAT, and
>> something nasty came in and trashed my system. I simply reinstalled,
>> installed firewall before connecting to internet, problem solved. Lost
>> some serious geek points, but at least the damage was minimal.
>>
>> A little know-how and common sense can go a long long ways. I have 8
>> computers in my house, and other then the laptop getting bit once,
>> none of them have ever been infected with anything.
>>
>> Unfortunately, there are sooo many Windows users that don't have much
>> of either (know-how or common sense), and when you combine a lack of
>> knowledge with a lack of common sense and a Microsoft operating
>> system, you are just begging for infections. I have never had anything
>> bite my linux boxes, and I've never had to use any antivirus on them
>> either (knock on wood...).
>>

>
> Like I said, three out of five infected computers means that two aren't.


You keep spreading that lie. Why? Are you that desperate?

> Most techies know how to secure their machines. Most users haven't a
> clue. They want to use the computer, not configure or update it. We
> repair computers and see infected machines every single day. That said,
> with Linux, once the box has been set up and the user has been give some
> very simple instructions, they don't have to do practically anything to
> keep the box secure.
>

Hey sheep-fucker, this is a Windows 7 ng, not an XP ng.
Got it?
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Spring Sprung wrote:
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hn0svd$7ho$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Spring Sprung wrote:
>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>> news:hn0r8k$ac$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>
>>>>>> Liar.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know you are but what am I?
>>>>
>>>> Third grade retorts again, eh?
>>>
>>> Yes. That's what a third grade accusation deserves, Alias, you know
>>> that.

>>
>> When I make one, I'll let you know.

>
> No no, it would be much easier and would save a lot of bandwidth to just
> let me know when you don't.


Nice try at covering up your lies.

Plonk

--
Alias
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 3/7/2010 10:06 AM, Alias wrote:
> Char Jackson wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:13:48 +0100, Alias
>> <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote:
>>
>>> Like I said, three out of five infected computers means that two aren't.

>>
>> I was disappointed earlier in the thread when you were asked to back
>> up your "3 out of 5" claim and refused. I think most of us know it's
>> completely made up, just a number pulled out of the air, but it would
>> have been interesting to see how you got there.

>
> I read it on a security web site like Sophos. I did not bookmark it.


LIAR!
>
>>
>>> Most techies know how to secure their machines. Most users haven't a
>>> clue. They want to use the computer, not configure or update it. We
>>> repair computers and see infected machines every single day.

>>
>> Same here, but I don't base my guesses on what I see coming into the
>> shop every day.

>
> Nor are mine. The point is that the two who don't get infected are
> security savvy. Most computer users are not.


More of your lies? You can't produce verifiable empirical data to back
up your 3 out of 5 infected claim because it is a lie. You know it and
we all know it. It a part of your sales pitch to the unsuspecting poor
spanish people you use to sale them up-yr-fucking-butt-too POS os that
is free. You are a liar and a thief.
Nice combo huh?
>
>> By your (apparent) logic, since the cars coming into a
>> body shop are dented and crashed, it stands to reason that 3 out of 5
>> cars on the road are also dented and crashed, but the drivers don't
>> know it. It's just silly, especially since you refuse to tell anyone
>> how you arrived at your guess.
>>

>
> You'll have to do the searching if you're really interested. I don't
> feel like it.


HAHAHAHA...CAN'T BACK UP YOUR LIES HUH?
Lets all act real surprised!

>
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 3/7/2010 10:57 AM, Alias wrote:
> Spring Sprung wrote:
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hn0r8k$ac$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>
>>>>> Liar.
>>>>
>>>> I know you are but what am I?
>>>
>>> Third grade retorts again, eh?

>>
>> Yes. That's what a third grade accusation deserves, Alias, you know that.

>
> When I make one, I'll let you know. So, again, how many of my clients
> have you spoken to? Ya know, the part you snipped:
>
>
> > Not as clueless as your hoodwinked Spaniard clients.

>
> And exactly how many of them have you talked to, Bucko?
>

What a sick son of a bitch you are.
 
D

Don

Flightless Bird
"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hn0jru$7ku$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Don wrote:
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hn0g42$dpg$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Don wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>> news:hn0cqa$jol$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:Xns9D344D420A8CFthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>>> "Don" <burnettedclothes@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:t8WdnZyvA_Tpkw7WnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:hmus74$ipr$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:hmup6g$t1k$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 16:29:55 -0500, "Spring Sprung"
>>>>>>>>>>>> <spring.sprung@not.an.address.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just a general comment:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 users have a lower malware infection rate than XP
>>>>>>>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - mainly because, now, more malware is spread by social
>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering than by frontal attacks and Windows 7 makes social
>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering more difficult. Microsoft / AMD / Intel have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> many of the vectors of attack malware writers used to depend
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so they rely more on social engineering now - i.e. tricking
>>>>>>>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to run their stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer infection is it still is a serious issue - more so
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - as "organized" crime has gotten involved. But I'm not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> legislation / which means more taxes / then police / which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> means
>>>>>>>>>>>>> even more taxes / etc. etc. ... all of which disagrees with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead, IMHO, the best way to fight this stuff (other than
>>>>>>>>>>>>> through hardware / software improvements), is simply to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>> people are aware of and informed as to why it is important to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep one's computer(s) uninfected and how to go about it no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter what operating system they are running. An ounce of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevention of worth a pound of cure, as the old saying goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My computers here seem to never get infected. I watch out a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and have the security settings of my and my family's software
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a notch higher, I use the MVP hosts file on the machines
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it weeds out innumerable and useless 3rd parties from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> websites we visit and so on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A tiny bit of effort goes so far has gone a long way. My
>>>>>>>>>>>>> infection rate over the last 14 years nears that of Apple
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uses -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one real infection on one computer (mea culpa -- deliberately
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored a Windows 2000 IIS patch from Microsoft back in 2001),
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a second on XP a few months later (not sure, not my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fault,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and didn't take the time to investigate -- just wiped and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reinstalled at the suspicion), yet I've run and enjoyed
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on upwards of 20 computers in the house since 1996 (turning
>>>>>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTML & JavaScript in email probably did wonders in those days
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, that's a fair number of computers with four people
>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>> them a lot over 14 years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> People like Alias etc. may not enjoy such a report, but it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what one can do with Windows, if one puts just a tiny
>>>>>>>>>>>>> little
>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort into looking at security issues -- which should be done
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter which platform -- UNIX / MacOS / Windows.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I completely agree. At the moment I have five computers here,
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've had at least two over each of the past 23 years. My
>>>>>>>>>>>> infection
>>>>>>>>>>>> rate has always been zero; there's never been a single
>>>>>>>>>>>> infection.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gosh two techies can keep their computers clean and expect us to
>>>>>>>>>>> take the leap in logic that their experience is universal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Better make that three pal. Not always been a techie either, but
>>>>>>>>>> wait - have never been infected either!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And you don't know anyone who's been infected either, right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually that would be correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That, I don't believe, unless you're only in a group like the TV
>>>>>>> show
>>>>>>> 'The Big Bang Theory'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I personally do not care what you or Alias happen to believe.
>>>>>
>>>>> If that were true, you would ignore us.
>>>>>
>>>>>> And I do know quite a few folks.
>>>>>> Of course, that is not to say some whom I know have gotten themselves
>>>>>> infected, perhaps they just felt stupid and did not feel it was
>>>>>> something they needed to brag to their friends about.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, that must be it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There will always be the careless few, that do click on that link
>>>>>> they receive in an email from an unknown sender, guaranteeing them
>>>>>> they will receive untold riches by following their instructions.
>>>>>> Most folks I know however, I think are a little brighter than that
>>>>>> and know how to practice safe computing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Never heard of drive by malware, eh? You're probably infected and
>>>>> don't even know it.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LOL, dream on linux boy!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not my dream, sonny. It's your nightmare.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias

>>
>> How is it my nightmare Corey?

>
> Who's Corey?
>
> Read this:
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/techexec/2008/0303techexec1.html
>
>>
>> I have no problem with malware in my windows 7 system, just like Vista
>> before it, just like XP before that, and so on.

>
> Head, sand.
>
>>
>> So do tell, how is it my nightmare? Or is it yours? That your [sic]
>> refuted, that you are wrong hmm?

>
> Head, sand.
>
>> Is that how you prey on older not so technical savvy folks - you tell
>> them they are infected and don't know it?

>
> No. Is this your idea of refutation?
>
>> Kind of like some of these sites that give a pop up saying they are
>> probably infected, download their software or do an online scan, in order
>> to purchase something they have absolutely no need for? Do you convince
>> them of this, in order for them to pay you to install udungtu [sic] on
>> their system?

>
> Guessing isn't one of your strong points, is it?
>
>>
>> The vast majority of malware, is installed by the infected user - by
>> executing a file, clicking an unknown link, falling for the trap.

>
> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/how-to-survive-a-drive-by-malware-attack-616431
>
>
> --
> Alias



Damn your more stupid than I thought.



--
Don
 
C

Char Jackson

Flightless Bird
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:06:21 +0100, Alias
<aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote:

>Char Jackson wrote:
>> On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:13:48 +0100, Alias
>> <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote:
>>
>>> Like I said, three out of five infected computers means that two aren't.

>>
>> I was disappointed earlier in the thread when you were asked to back
>> up your "3 out of 5" claim and refused. I think most of us know it's
>> completely made up, just a number pulled out of the air, but it would
>> have been interesting to see how you got there.

>
>I read it on a security web site like Sophos. I did not bookmark it.
>
>Nor are mine. The point is that the two who don't get infected are
>security savvy. Most computer users are not.


I buy your premise, that savvy users are less likely to be running
infected systems. It's your numbers I don't buy. I don't think they're
even close.

>You'll have to do the searching if you're really interested. I don't
>feel like it.


I don't feel like it either, so I'll disregard your guess and use my
own guess. My guess is that less than 1 in 5 Windows boxes are
infected. That was easy. :)
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Don wrote:
>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hn0jru$7ku$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Don wrote:
>>>
>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>> news:hn0g42$dpg$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hn0cqa$jol$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
>>>>>>> message news:Xns9D344D420A8CFthisnthatroadrunnern@216.196.97.131...
>>>>>>>> "Don" <burnettedclothes@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:t8WdnZyvA_Tpkw7WnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:hmus74$ipr$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>> Don wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:hmup6g$t1k$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ken Blake, MVP wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 16:29:55 -0500, "Spring Sprung"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <spring.sprung@not.an.address.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just a general comment:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 users have a lower malware infection rate than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> XP users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - mainly because, now, more malware is spread by social
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering than by frontal attacks and Windows 7 makes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> social
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineering more difficult. Microsoft / AMD / Intel have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many of the vectors of attack malware writers used to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> depend on,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so they rely more on social engineering now - i.e.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tricking users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to run their stuff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer infection is it still is a serious issue - more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - as "organized" crime has gotten involved. But I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legislation / which means more taxes / then police / which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> means
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even more taxes / etc. etc. ... all of which disagrees
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instead, IMHO, the best way to fight this stuff (other than
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> through hardware / software improvements), is simply to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people are aware of and informed as to why it is important to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep one's computer(s) uninfected and how to go about it no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter what operating system they are running. An ounce of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevention of worth a pound of cure, as the old saying goes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My computers here seem to never get infected. I watch out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a bit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and have the security settings of my and my family's software
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a notch higher, I use the MVP hosts file on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it weeds out innumerable and useless 3rd parties from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> websites we visit and so on.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A tiny bit of effort goes so far has gone a long way. My
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> infection rate over the last 14 years nears that of Apple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uses -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one real infection on one computer (mea culpa -- deliberately
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignored a Windows 2000 IIS patch from Microsoft back in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2001),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a second on XP a few months later (not sure, not my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fault,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and didn't take the time to investigate -- just wiped and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reinstalled at the suspicion), yet I've run and enjoyed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on upwards of 20 computers in the house since 1996
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (turning off
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTML & JavaScript in email probably did wonders in those days
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lol).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, that's a fair number of computers with four people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them a lot over 14 years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> People like Alias etc. may not enjoy such a report, but it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> speaks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of what one can do with Windows, if one puts just a tiny
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effort into looking at security issues -- which should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter which platform -- UNIX / MacOS / Windows.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I completely agree. At the moment I have five computers
>>>>>>>>>>>>> here, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've had at least two over each of the past 23 years. My
>>>>>>>>>>>>> infection
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate has always been zero; there's never been a single
>>>>>>>>>>>>> infection.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Gosh two techies can keep their computers clean and expect
>>>>>>>>>>>> us to
>>>>>>>>>>>> take the leap in logic that their experience is universal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Better make that three pal. Not always been a techie either, but
>>>>>>>>>>> wait - have never been infected either!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And you don't know anyone who's been infected either, right?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually that would be correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That, I don't believe, unless you're only in a group like the TV
>>>>>>>> show
>>>>>>>> 'The Big Bang Theory'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I personally do not care what you or Alias happen to believe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If that were true, you would ignore us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I do know quite a few folks.
>>>>>>> Of course, that is not to say some whom I know have gotten
>>>>>>> themselves infected, perhaps they just felt stupid and did not
>>>>>>> feel it was something they needed to brag to their friends about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, that must be it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There will always be the careless few, that do click on that link
>>>>>>> they receive in an email from an unknown sender, guaranteeing
>>>>>>> them they will receive untold riches by following their
>>>>>>> instructions.
>>>>>>> Most folks I know however, I think are a little brighter than
>>>>>>> that and know how to practice safe computing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Never heard of drive by malware, eh? You're probably infected and
>>>>>> don't even know it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL, dream on linux boy!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not my dream, sonny. It's your nightmare.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> How is it my nightmare Corey?

>>
>> Who's Corey?
>>
>> Read this:
>>
>> http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/techexec/2008/0303techexec1.html
>>
>>>
>>> I have no problem with malware in my windows 7 system, just like
>>> Vista before it, just like XP before that, and so on.

>>
>> Head, sand.
>>
>>>
>>> So do tell, how is it my nightmare? Or is it yours? That your [sic]
>>> refuted, that you are wrong hmm?

>>
>> Head, sand.
>>
>>> Is that how you prey on older not so technical savvy folks - you tell
>>> them they are infected and don't know it?

>>
>> No. Is this your idea of refutation?
>>
>>> Kind of like some of these sites that give a pop up saying they are
>>> probably infected, download their software or do an online scan, in
>>> order to purchase something they have absolutely no need for? Do you
>>> convince them of this, in order for them to pay you to install
>>> udungtu [sic] on their system?

>>
>> Guessing isn't one of your strong points, is it?
>>
>>>
>>> The vast majority of malware, is installed by the infected user - by
>>> executing a file, clicking an unknown link, falling for the trap.

>>
>> http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/how-to-survive-a-drive-by-malware-attack-616431
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alias

>
>
> Damn your more stupid than I thought.
>
>
>


That's all you got, an insult? Figures.

--
Alias
 
Top