Microsoft To Patch SEVENTEEN Year Old Exploit

[No Spam]

In article <hkoref$8ag$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Alias <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote:


>Try Hydravision. Hydrovision has to do with water, dumb fuck. Only nine?
>There is no limit with Ubuntu. That said, most people don't need more
>than four and Ubuntu has many more ways to switch to another desktop
>than a hot key or a click. Well, MS stole the Compiz idea and now
>they're stealing the multiple desktop idea. How innovative.

How did you get out of my kill file?
Ahh, changing your From: header.
Don't worry, that will not be a problem again.

*PLONK*

 

[No Spam]

Re: the asshole alias puts his foot into his mouth...as usual!

In article <4b703261@news.x-privat.org>
Frank <fab@m7.cum> wrote:

>Alias wrote:
<Snip>

Dude!

Can you please either kill file the dumbass or learn how to ignore him?

All you are doing is beating our kill files and forcing us to see his
drivel.

Come on man, you're much better than this.

 

[Muad'Dib]

DanS wrote:
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:hkn1p0$u7p$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>
>> Alias
>>
>> Why is Ubuntu free? How do they make money at Linux with the free
>> Ubuntu? Ubuntu has Security issues when every Ubuntu user say that is
>> a blatant lie(see link below)
>
> Every OS has security issues....even programs that run on said OS's have
> security issues.
>
> But......that is not the point. These are exploits that almost never
> happen, like a DDOS attack, or whatever. Almost no home user will ever
> experience any of that......
>
> The *far* bigger problem, and what a high percentage of Windows users has
> suffered from, or knows someone that has had problems, or is the one that
> is turned to to fix these problems, is spyware and malware that get's
> installed into users PCs w/o their knowledge and wreaks total havoc.
>
> I just yesterday cleaned up *another* Windows Vista box yesterday.......one
> that was up-to-date, with AV, and IE7. It had all the latest patches and
> the only updates that it needed were IE8 and another small update.
>
> But, I've absolutely never had to do that type of cleanup to a desktop
> Linux box, bit this is probably the 200th time I've cleaned a Windows PC.
>
> Please, if you have *any* information about spyware and malware for Linux
> that is out there now, and spreading like wildfire, by just visiting a
> website, that gets completely entwined within the Linux OS and is virtually
> impossible to remove w/o doing a clean install, please let everyone know,
> so we can start working on various removal tools now.

Yup, same here late last week. User's box up is to date. His AV, Winders
Defender (which doesn't defend S***) and UAC let Hijackware, waltz right
in undetected and it took over his computer. The Fake AV natrually was
finding multitudes of fake bad stuff and of course demanded purchase of
it's product before cleanup could take place. Same ol' same ol'. Got it
cleaned up for him and now he wants to schedule a Linux dual boot
install when I have time. Why? I did a Linux dual boot on his laptop and
he has had NO problems with infestations on it while on business trips
and booted to Linux.

G'day

 

[Alias]

Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>
>
> "Andrew" <yogig@no.spam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hkn2n8$p52$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:hkn23t$gef$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:hkmucu$bqt$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <Alias@nospam.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:hkmqbh$62e$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Alias" <Alias@nospam.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:hkmhar$md1$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>> Conor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <hkmd0p$it9$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Alias
>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8499859.stm
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's about time. Gosh, it only took them seventeen years.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thats nothing. It took the Linux brigade 25 years to patch a
>>>>>>>>>> filesystem exploit that carried over from Unix.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And that exploit is?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who cares.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, if the exploit was never used, the point, like your brain,
>>>>>>> is moot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It took them 25 years! By the way, Linux has been free for 25
>>>>>>>> years, yet most desktop users use Windows.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users don't know about Ubuntu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users don't CARE to know about Ubuntu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They have to pay for Windows and Linux is free.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users think that Windows *comes*
>>>>>>> with the computer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> News to Alias: Windows comes on most desktop/laptop/net-book
>>>>>> computers because it's all about productivity. That is where
>>>>>> Windows shines. Now if you are into wasting your time, messing
>>>>>> with cryptic line commands, getting nothing done, then by all
>>>>>> means, go to that INFERIOR Ubuntu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That should tell you all you need to know about that SHITTY
>>>>>>>> INFERIOR OS that nobody wants. LOL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Considering that those are all half truths and blatant lies, all
>>>>>>> we need to know about you is that you're a liar who spreads FUD.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WRONG. You are lying again. Tell me why after so many years is
>>>>>> Linux still rejected by most?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, nymshifter, I can't reason with someone like you who is so
>>>>> reason and logic impaired. If you can't understand plain English,
>>>>> there isn't much hope for you.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> I can't reason with an Ubuntard like yourself who can't understand
>>>> why Ubuntu is free and is on less than one percent of the desktops.
>>>
>>>
>>> I explain that above and in simple English
>>>
>>> You
>>>> can't comprehend that people just don't like the product. If they
>>>> did, Microsoft would have 2% and Linux would have 98% since it's
>>>> free and all. Since it isn't, there must be a reason and you are too
>>>> stupid to figure it out.
>>>
>>> It ain't because most people have heard of it, much less used it.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Most already know
>>>
>>> Most don't know about it.
>>>
>>>> that Linux/Ubuntu is just a TOY and most reject that toy as just that.
>>>
>>> Leap of logic, tsk, tsk.
>>>
>>> Something to play around with when you are drunk
>>>> stupid. Like yourself.
>>>
>>> I don't drink and I'm not stupid. You're not too good at this,
>>> nymshifter.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Most computer pros have heard of it, among the many flavors of Linux.
>> I worked on the Windows Team at Microsoft for more than 6 years.
>> Guess what, I had 2 Linux boxes in my office and a Sun System.
>> I had to setup SMB, and Unix Print Services (Print interop was my job.)
>> Of all the Linux Distros I used, I like Mepis and SuSE the best,
>> though none of them compared with Windows for ease of use or for
>> getting stuff done.
>> I worked at Amazon for a couple of years after that. I cannot
>> understand why they would want to pay a bunch of engineers 100K a year
>> to patch the redhat 5.3 kernel to their liking.
>> I never got that for the whole time I worked there. Oh yeah, and we
>> had Windows boxes on our doordesks so we could use MS Office / Project
>> / Visio and other productivity apps.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew
>
> Of course if you want to be productive you use Windows and their
> respective professional applications. Just like 99.999% of the
> businesses out there. They need to get their work done, not fart around
> with that Inferior Open Sores software that is about 10 years behind the
> times.
>
>
>

You're wrong again, Nymshifting liar. NASA, for example, uses Linux and
they have a lot of very precise work that needs to be done and the ain't
hardly ten years behind the times like YOU are.

--
Alias

 

[Alias]

Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:hkn25d$gef$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:hkmuhi$bqt$3@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Conor wrote:
>>>>> In article <hkmna4$827$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Gordon says...
>>>>>> Thomas Jespersen wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 13:15:06 -0000, Conor <conor@gmx.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thats nothing. It took the Linux brigade 25 years to patch a
>>>>>>>> filesystem exploit that carried over from Unix.
>>>>>>> 25 years? Linux was first introduced in 1991:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/co...read/thread/76536d1fb451ac60/b813d52cbc5a044b
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't worry - Conor has his head so far up Gate's bum that nothing
>>>>>> is too far from the truth to make a (stupid) point...
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.osnews.com/story/19731/The-25-Year-Old-UNIX-Bug
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This bug is NOT an exploit or vulnerability but thanks for playing.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>> So if there is a problem with anything Linux, you dismiss it. If
>>> anything pops up regarding Windows, it's doom and gloom in your eyes.
>>
>> Um, bugs and exploits are two different things or do you think they're
>> the same thing?
>
> Never said they were the same thing.

You just did.

> Your reading comprehension is
> lacking

The irony!

> Better put down that BOWL. Don't fill it up again.

If I were stoned and totally drunk, I would make more sense than you
cold sober.


--
Alias

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>
>>> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hkn1p0$u7p$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> Why is Ubuntu free? How do they make money at Linux with the free
>>>> Ubuntu? Ubuntu has Security issues when every Ubuntu user say that is
>>>> a blatant lie(see link below)
>>>> If you know the answers to the above please let everyone else know. I
>>>> know the exact answers BTW and I am curious if you do which I doubt
>>>>
>>>> http://www.vupen.com/english/searchengine.php
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Peter
>>> He will reply that you are ill informed and the article is false.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> There's no article when you go to that link, just a search engine.
>>
>
> Click on Linux Security Advisories, you dumbass.
> I remember the SUSE ones.
>

And you get security updates. BFD.

--
Alias

 

[Bill Yanaire, ESQ]

"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:hl0tdp$lcs$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Andrew" <yogig@no.spam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:hkn2n8$p52$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:hkn23t$gef$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hkmucu$bqt$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Alias" <Alias@nospam.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:hkmqbh$62e$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Alias" <Alias@nospam.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:hkmhar$md1$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>> Conor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <hkmd0p$it9$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Alias
>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8499859.stm
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's about time. Gosh, it only took them seventeen years.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thats nothing. It took the Linux brigade 25 years to patch a
>>>>>>>>>>> filesystem exploit that carried over from Unix.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And that exploit is?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who cares.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, if the exploit was never used, the point, like your brain, is
>>>>>>>> moot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It took them 25 years! By the way, Linux has been free for 25
>>>>>>>>> years, yet most desktop users use Windows.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users don't know about Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users don't CARE to know about Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They have to pay for Windows and Linux is free.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users think that Windows *comes* with
>>>>>>>> the computer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> News to Alias: Windows comes on most desktop/laptop/net-book
>>>>>>> computers because it's all about productivity. That is where
>>>>>>> Windows shines. Now if you are into wasting your time, messing with
>>>>>>> cryptic line commands, getting nothing done, then by all means, go
>>>>>>> to that INFERIOR Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That should tell you all you need to know about that SHITTY
>>>>>>>>> INFERIOR OS that nobody wants. LOL!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Considering that those are all half truths and blatant lies, all we
>>>>>>>> need to know about you is that you're a liar who spreads FUD.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WRONG. You are lying again. Tell me why after so many years is
>>>>>>> Linux still rejected by most?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, nymshifter, I can't reason with someone like you who is so
>>>>>> reason and logic impaired. If you can't understand plain English,
>>>>>> there isn't much hope for you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't reason with an Ubuntard like yourself who can't understand why
>>>>> Ubuntu is free and is on less than one percent of the desktops.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I explain that above and in simple English
>>>>
>>>> You
>>>>> can't comprehend that people just don't like the product. If they
>>>>> did, Microsoft would have 2% and Linux would have 98% since it's free
>>>>> and all. Since it isn't, there must be a reason and you are too stupid
>>>>> to figure it out.
>>>>
>>>> It ain't because most people have heard of it, much less used it.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Most already know
>>>>
>>>> Most don't know about it.
>>>>
>>>>> that Linux/Ubuntu is just a TOY and most reject that toy as just that.
>>>>
>>>> Leap of logic, tsk, tsk.
>>>>
>>>> Something to play around with when you are drunk
>>>>> stupid. Like yourself.
>>>>
>>>> I don't drink and I'm not stupid. You're not too good at this,
>>>> nymshifter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Most computer pros have heard of it, among the many flavors of Linux.
>>> I worked on the Windows Team at Microsoft for more than 6 years.
>>> Guess what, I had 2 Linux boxes in my office and a Sun System.
>>> I had to setup SMB, and Unix Print Services (Print interop was my job.)
>>> Of all the Linux Distros I used, I like Mepis and SuSE the best, though
>>> none of them compared with Windows for ease of use or for getting stuff
>>> done.
>>> I worked at Amazon for a couple of years after that. I cannot
>>> understand why they would want to pay a bunch of engineers 100K a year
>>> to patch the redhat 5.3 kernel to their liking.
>>> I never got that for the whole time I worked there. Oh yeah, and we had
>>> Windows boxes on our doordesks so we could use MS Office / Project /
>>> Visio and other productivity apps.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew
>>
>> Of course if you want to be productive you use Windows and their
>> respective professional applications. Just like 99.999% of the
>> businesses out there. They need to get their work done, not fart around
>> with that Inferior Open Sores software that is about 10 years behind the
>> times.
>>
>>
>>
>
> You're wrong again, Nymshifting liar. NASA, for example, uses Linux and
> they have a lot of very precise work that needs to be done and the ain't
> hardly ten years behind the times like YOU are.
>
> --
> Alias

NASA writes custom software for their business solutions. I am talking
about the Open Sores software available to the general public. You know
that also but you are being a dick.

 

[Alias]

Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:hl0tdp$lcs$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Andrew" <yogig@no.spam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hkn2n8$p52$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:hkn23t$gef$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:hkmucu$bqt$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Alias" <Alias@nospam.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:hkmqbh$62e$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" <Alias@nospam.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:hkmhar$md1$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>>>> Conor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <hkmd0p$it9$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Alias
>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8499859.stm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's about time. Gosh, it only took them seventeen years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thats nothing. It took the Linux brigade 25 years to patch a
>>>>>>>>>>>> filesystem exploit that carried over from Unix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> And that exploit is?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who cares.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well, if the exploit was never used, the point, like your
>>>>>>>>> brain, is moot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It took them 25 years! By the way, Linux has been free for
>>>>>>>>>> 25 years, yet most desktop users use Windows.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users don't know about Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users don't CARE to know about Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They have to pay for Windows and Linux is free.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users think that Windows *comes*
>>>>>>>>> with the computer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> News to Alias: Windows comes on most desktop/laptop/net-book
>>>>>>>> computers because it's all about productivity. That is where
>>>>>>>> Windows shines. Now if you are into wasting your time, messing
>>>>>>>> with cryptic line commands, getting nothing done, then by all
>>>>>>>> means, go to that INFERIOR Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That should tell you all you need to know about that SHITTY
>>>>>>>>>> INFERIOR OS that nobody wants. LOL!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Considering that those are all half truths and blatant lies,
>>>>>>>>> all we need to know about you is that you're a liar who spreads
>>>>>>>>> FUD.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WRONG. You are lying again. Tell me why after so many years is
>>>>>>>> Linux still rejected by most?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, nymshifter, I can't reason with someone like you who is so
>>>>>>> reason and logic impaired. If you can't understand plain English,
>>>>>>> there isn't much hope for you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't reason with an Ubuntard like yourself who can't understand
>>>>>> why Ubuntu is free and is on less than one percent of the desktops.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I explain that above and in simple English
>>>>>
>>>>> You
>>>>>> can't comprehend that people just don't like the product. If they
>>>>>> did, Microsoft would have 2% and Linux would have 98% since it's
>>>>>> free and all. Since it isn't, there must be a reason and you are
>>>>>> too stupid to figure it out.
>>>>>
>>>>> It ain't because most people have heard of it, much less used it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most already know
>>>>>
>>>>> Most don't know about it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> that Linux/Ubuntu is just a TOY and most reject that toy as just
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Leap of logic, tsk, tsk.
>>>>>
>>>>> Something to play around with when you are drunk
>>>>>> stupid. Like yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't drink and I'm not stupid. You're not too good at this,
>>>>> nymshifter.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Most computer pros have heard of it, among the many flavors of Linux.
>>>> I worked on the Windows Team at Microsoft for more than 6 years.
>>>> Guess what, I had 2 Linux boxes in my office and a Sun System.
>>>> I had to setup SMB, and Unix Print Services (Print interop was my job.)
>>>> Of all the Linux Distros I used, I like Mepis and SuSE the best,
>>>> though none of them compared with Windows for ease of use or for
>>>> getting stuff done.
>>>> I worked at Amazon for a couple of years after that. I cannot
>>>> understand why they would want to pay a bunch of engineers 100K a
>>>> year to patch the redhat 5.3 kernel to their liking.
>>>> I never got that for the whole time I worked there. Oh yeah, and we
>>>> had Windows boxes on our doordesks so we could use MS Office /
>>>> Project / Visio and other productivity apps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> Of course if you want to be productive you use Windows and their
>>> respective professional applications. Just like 99.999% of the
>>> businesses out there. They need to get their work done, not fart
>>> around with that Inferior Open Sores software that is about 10 years
>>> behind the times.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You're wrong again, Nymshifting liar. NASA, for example, uses Linux
>> and they have a lot of very precise work that needs to be done and the
>> ain't hardly ten years behind the times like YOU are.
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>
> NASA writes custom software for their business solutions. I am talking
> about the Open Sores software available to the general public. You know
> that also but you are being a dick.
>
>

That's one of the good things about Linux: it can be configured to one's
own specs and needs unlike Windows. You are not just talking. You're lying.

--
Alias