58.2 F
Los Angeles
Sunday, March 3, 2024

Trump Lawyer Resigns One Day Before Trial To Begin

Joseph Tacopina has filed with the courts that he will not represent Donald J. Trump. The E. Jean Carroll civil case is schedule to begin Tuesday January 16,...

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan Issues Order RE Postponement

On May 9, 2023, a jury found Donald J. Trump liable for sexual assault and defamation. The jury awarded Ms. Carroll $5 million in damages. Seven months ago,...

ASUS Announces 2023 Vivobook Classic Series

On April 7, 2023, ASUS introduced five new models in the 2023 Vivobook Classic series of laptops. The top laptops in the series use the 13th Gen Intel® Core™...
StaffIncremental BloggerIf you met me and you asked about computers of the future,...

If you met me and you asked about computers of the future, I’d talk about cameras

I keep coming back to the notion that digital cameras should be running “full OSes” or at least OSes that the vast number of developers out there can write for.

As we’ve seen, phones have become increasingly more powerful personal computing devices and so do I think SLR cameras should be too.

Closed camera platforms don’t leverage the community as they should.

Digital cameras already have quite a range of software running on them, but as you look forward and envision the cameras being more connected, it makes complete sense for the software capabilities of the cameras themselves to become more sophisticated.

Think about it, with a software customizable camera wedding photographers could run one set of tools on their cameras, nature photographers another, and portrait photorgraphers yet a third set. I can imagine that done right even some of the firmware software could be customized, though to make cameras the most stable this may not be the most common thing to do.

Yet with all of the extensibility a common OS would give people a consistent UI or at least model for thinking in terms of how a camera running such-and-such OS works. Point is people would think more in terms of how the software and OS work on the camera than the camera itself. This makes complete sense down the road as computers running cameras and the capabilities increase.

Am I talking about Windows Embedded, an iPhonish-like permutation of OS X on an SLR or Android or some other mobile Linux? Possibly. I’m not ruling anything in or out. Cameras have special needs because of the speed at which they must operate and process images, however, seems to me there’s compelling value in terms of thinking of cameras as OS-oriented devices.

So my suggestion to Microsoft most of all is to get into the camera business. Start learning how to work with the manufacturers such as Kodak to build more open and extensible camera platforms. Will there be lots of resistance to this? I bet. But once the momentum gets going I don’t think you could hold the innovation back.

Loren
Lorenhttp://www.lorenheiny.com
Loren Heiny (1961 - 2010) was a software developer and author of several computer language textbooks. He graduated from Arizona State University in computer science. His first love was robotics.

Latest news

Related news

1 COMMENT

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
14 years ago

It would be interesting if camera manufacturers took advantage of the iPhone 3.0. Allowing apps to control the image processing chip in cameras. Similar to apps like CameraBag or Photogene, but manipulating images from DSLR’s.

This comment was originally posted on FriendFeed