D
DanS
Flightless Bird
Boscoe <laughingboy47@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:gEJZn.55402$cJ6.13460@hurricane:
> On 09/07/2010 56 PM, DanS wrote:
>
>> ...."a bit of a joke, aren't they ?".....some are, most
>> not. Just as the very vocal MS users are a joke too, most
>> users are not. Do you think the Windows users (trolls)
>> here that constantly attack Linux aren't a joke too ? Or
>> rather, do you see them as intelligent, together,
>> well-spoken individuals ?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Because it's not a moderated group you will get individuals
> on here who, because of their
> own inadequacies, seem happy to destroy a Windows group
> that's here to help people. It's neither clever or mature
> but a sad fact of life. As for posting how good Linux is
> on an open Windows 7 group, what do you expect?
Actually, the thread wasn't about how good Linux is.....it was
about how a large percentage of the scanned Windows boxes were
compromised.
You were the one the interjected the linked article.
> So, Windows uses won't be flamed for posting how great
> Windows is in a Linux group?
Of course they will, but again, attitude has a lot to do with
it. Intelligent debate with facts and information get conuter
facts and counter information back. D*ckheads get sh*t back.
But, I digress......the main story here wasn't how great Linux
is (or isn't), it was about compromised Windows boxes.
news:gEJZn.55402$cJ6.13460@hurricane:
> On 09/07/2010 56 PM, DanS wrote:
>
>> ...."a bit of a joke, aren't they ?".....some are, most
>> not. Just as the very vocal MS users are a joke too, most
>> users are not. Do you think the Windows users (trolls)
>> here that constantly attack Linux aren't a joke too ? Or
>> rather, do you see them as intelligent, together,
>> well-spoken individuals ?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Because it's not a moderated group you will get individuals
> on here who, because of their
> own inadequacies, seem happy to destroy a Windows group
> that's here to help people. It's neither clever or mature
> but a sad fact of life. As for posting how good Linux is
> on an open Windows 7 group, what do you expect?
Actually, the thread wasn't about how good Linux is.....it was
about how a large percentage of the scanned Windows boxes were
compromised.
You were the one the interjected the linked article.
> So, Windows uses won't be flamed for posting how great
> Windows is in a Linux group?
Of course they will, but again, attitude has a lot to do with
it. Intelligent debate with facts and information get conuter
facts and counter information back. D*ckheads get sh*t back.
But, I digress......the main story here wasn't how great Linux
is (or isn't), it was about compromised Windows boxes.