"solar penguin", thou money-grabbing pervert. What shall I call thee when thou art a man. Ye frothed: > More sources? Nowadays historians can read all surviving heiroglyphics. > Could Newton? They can instantly access materials and experts all > across the world thanks to the internet. Could Newton? They can study > materials that weren't even discovered in Newton's time. Could Newton? Newton studied materials that "weren't even discovered in [his] time" the very same way scientists study materials today that don't exist. > After all, we know a _lot_ more about gravity<BITCHSLAP> Ya reckon? I have any number of scientifically verifiable cites that say gravity doesn't work as advertised. Indeed, I have as many more scientifically verifiable cites that say gravity pushes, not pulls. And where is the proof that gravity is a property of matter? And still science does not know what matter is. That's why they're building the LHC, you completely stupid dumbfuck google-groups-using tardlet. > A consensus is A Bad Thing and the only > Good Thing you can do with it is question it, challenge it and finally > break it. I can obtain consensus that you're a fuckwit. Break that, you fuckwit. The rest of your meandering gibberish and tripe was hacked.