1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Microsoft is caught stealing again

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by Alias, Mar 17, 2010.

  1. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

  2. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

  3. Spanky de Monkey, ESQ

    Spanky de Monkey, ESQ Flightless Bird

  4. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

    Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
    >
    >
    > "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    > news:hnqttj$r3i$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>
    >>
    >> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is righteous.
    >> Fucking hypocrites.
    >>
    >> --
    >> Alias

    >
    > and you steal from Microsoft.


    No, I don't. Got proof of this libel? I didn't think so.

    > You don't have to worry about being sued.


    No one was sued. Microsoft was taken to court for *stealing*.

    > You worthless.


    Projecting again, eh?

    --
    Alias
     
  5. Spanky de Monkey, ESQ

    Spanky de Monkey, ESQ Flightless Bird

    "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    news:hnr9q3$9ll$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    > Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    >> news:hnqttj$r3i$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>>
    >>> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is righteous.
    >>> Fucking hypocrites.
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> Alias

    >>
    >> and you steal from Microsoft.

    >
    > No, I don't. Got proof of this libel? I didn't think so.


    Sorry but there is no libel. You are a fictitious character here.


    >
    >> You don't have to worry about being sued.

    >
    > No one was sued. Microsoft was taken to court for *stealing*.


    They were sued. No wonder you haven't a clue. You use Ubuntu.
     
  6. Drew

    Drew Flightless Bird

  7. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/17/2010 12:16 PM, Alias wrote:
    > Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    >> news:hnqttj$r3i$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is righteous.
    >>> Fucking hypocrites.
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> Alias

    >>
    >> and you steal from Microsoft.

    >
    > No, I don't.


    LIAR!

    Got proof of this libel? I didn't think so.

    Take us to court!
    >
    >> You don't have to worry about being sued.

    >
    > No one was sued. Microsoft was taken to court for *stealing*.


    LIAR!
    >
    >> You worthless.

    >
    > Projecting again, eh?


    Yes you are!
    Oops!
     
  8. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

    Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
    >
    >
    > "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    > news:hnr9q3$9ll$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >> Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    >>> news:hnqttj$r3i$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is righteous.
    >>>> Fucking hypocrites.
    >>>>
    >>>> --
    >>>> Alias
    >>>
    >>> and you steal from Microsoft.

    >>
    >> No, I don't. Got proof of this libel? I didn't think so.

    >
    > Sorry but there is no libel. You are a fictitious character here.


    Oh, so you've incorporated me into your fantasies and now think I don't
    exist. Get help.

    >
    >
    >>
    >>> You don't have to worry about being sued.

    >>
    >> No one was sued. Microsoft was taken to court for *stealing*.

    >
    > They were sued.


    No, they weren't. They were accused and convicted of stealing a patent.

    > No wonder you haven't a clue. You use Ubuntu.


    No wonder haven't a clue. You're clueless regardless of what OS you use.

    --
    Alias
     
  9. Alias

    Alias Flightless Bird

    Drew wrote:
    > Once again Numbnuts posts some useless information that no one here
    > would either care about or be able to change!
    >
    > "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    > news:hnqttj$r3i$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>
    >>
    >> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is righteous.
    >> Fucking hypocrites.
    >>
    >> --
    >> Alias

    >


    Once more our resident moron doesn't know that this is a NEWS group, not
    a group to hurl insults like you, Frank and the Nymshifter do whenever
    your false security is challenged.

    --
    Alias
     
  10. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/17/2010 12:39 PM, Alias wrote:
    > Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    >> news:hnr9q3$9ll$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>> Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    >>>> news:hnqttj$r3i$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>>>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is
    >>>>> righteous. Fucking hypocrites.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> --
    >>>>> Alias
    >>>>
    >>>> and you steal from Microsoft.
    >>>
    >>> No, I don't. Got proof of this libel? I didn't think so.

    >>
    >> Sorry but there is no libel. You are a fictitious character here.

    >
    > Oh, so you've incorporated me into your fantasies and now think I don't
    > exist. Get help.


    Take us to court or better yet, you get some help.
    >
    >>
    >>
    >>>
    >>>> You don't have to worry about being sued.
    >>>
    >>> No one was sued. Microsoft was taken to court for *stealing*.

    >>
    >> They were sued.

    >
    > No, they weren't.


    Yes, they were sued for patent infringement.

    They were accused and convicted of stealing a patent.

    Care to show where the term "stealing" was found in any of the court
    documents?
    No...OOPS!
    >
    >> No wonder you haven't a clue. You use Ubuntu.

    >
    > No wonder haven't a clue. You're clueless regardless of what OS you use.


    You sheep-fucker are totally clueless. You enjoy having your ass kicked
    in here by me and everyone else don't you? You don't care if you make a
    fool out of yourself do you?
    Figures!
    >
     
  11. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/17/2010 12:41 PM, Alias wrote:
    > Drew wrote:
    >> Once again Numbnuts posts some useless information that no one here
    >> would either care about or be able to change!
    >>
    >> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    >> news:hnqttj$r3i$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is righteous.
    >>> Fucking hypocrites.
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> Alias

    >>

    >
    > Once more our resident moron doesn't know that this is a NEWS group, not
    > a group to hurl insults like you, Frank and the Nymshifter do whenever
    > your false security is challenged.
    >

    hehehe...getting desperate again sheep-fucker? Too bad asshole, you'll
    just have to live the fact that the world runs on Windows and Windows 7
    is the very best OS available today.
     
  12. milt

    milt Flightless Bird

    More Alias BS

    On 3/17/2010 2:28 PM, Drew wrote:
    > Once again Numbnuts posts some useless information that no one here
    > would either care about or be able to change!
    >


    And you quoted it and replied to it, so what does that make you?
     
  13. Spanky de Monkey, ESQ

    Spanky de Monkey, ESQ Flightless Bird

    "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    news:hnrb66$f0d$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    > Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    >> news:hnr9q3$9ll$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>> Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    >>>> news:hnqttj$r3i$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>>>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>>>>
    >>>>> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is righteous.
    >>>>> Fucking hypocrites.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> --
    >>>>> Alias
    >>>>
    >>>> and you steal from Microsoft.
    >>>
    >>> No, I don't. Got proof of this libel? I didn't think so.

    >>
    >> Sorry but there is no libel. You are a fictitious character here.

    >
    > Oh, so you've incorporated me into your fantasies and now think I don't
    > exist. Get help.
    >
    >>
    >>
    >>>
    >>>> You don't have to worry about being sued.
    >>>
    >>> No one was sued. Microsoft was taken to court for *stealing*.

    >>
    >> They were sued.

    >
    > No, they weren't. They were accused and convicted of stealing a patent.


    Hey you idiot - Microsoft was ordered to pay more than $160 million. If
    that isn't being sued, then I don't know what is. They lost in court.

    If I had two chairs, put you in one chair and a rock in the other chair, I
    would probably get better responses from the rock.

    You shouldn't get so stoned. Go outside and run in traffic.
     
  14. Drew

    Drew Flightless Bird

    what news Numbnuts?? Since when is it your fucking job to tell people what
    to read !! Anyone who "might" have a interest in reading that article has
    already read it! Anyone here really does not give a fuck about what you post
    and or what you say because you insist on not posting anything intelligent.
    When you start doing said posts then I am sure someone will care about what
    you say! Until then do us all a favor and SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!



    "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    news:hnrb8c$f0d$2@news.eternal-september.org...
    > Drew wrote:
    >> Once again Numbnuts posts some useless information that no one here would
    >> either care about or be able to change!
    >>
    >> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
    >> news:hnqttj$r3i$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >>> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>>
    >>> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is righteous.
    >>> Fucking hypocrites.
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> Alias

    >>

    >
    > Once more our resident moron doesn't know that this is a NEWS group, not a
    > group to hurl insults like you, Frank and the Nymshifter do whenever your
    > false security is challenged.
    >
    > --
    > Alias
     
  15. DanS

    DanS Flightless Bird

    "Drew" <Aylen1957@invalid.nospam.net> wrote in
    news:hnrlj0$ogo$1@speranza.aioe.org:

    > what news Numbnuts?? Since when is it your fucking job to
    > tell people what to read !!


    To be completely accurate, Alias never told anyone to read
    anything.

    He posted a link. You and everyone else chooses on whether or
    not to read it.

    Don't read it then, no ones putting a gun to your head, or any
    others here, now are they ?

    Or do you click on any link offered like it's req'd ?
    (Rhetorical)

    > Anyone who "might" have a
    > interest in reading that article has already read it!


    I had an interest, and hadn't seen it before. And actually,
    I'm sure almost none of the regular readers of this group had
    seen it either. I had no idea a suit was filed, or that it
    went to court. Not everyone subscribes to the ZDNet, PCthis,
    PCthat, Computerworld, etc. newsfeeds.

    You don't find it interesting that a company accusing other
    companies, and suing other companies, of infringing on their
    IP, does so themselves ?

    My personal beliefs are that handing out patents for computer
    related items at this stage in the game, unless it's a *truly*
    revolutionary thing, are out of control.

    Yes, I understand companies should get rewarded for what they
    have developed, and I'm not saying they shouldn't, but come
    on, some of these things are utterly ridiculous.....

    .....for instance, U.S. patent 7,617,530, recently procured by
    MS.

    This patent somehow covers a Window that pops up with User
    names that have Admin privileges. You need to do a task under
    standard type user, UAC would kick in and show you a window of
    all user names that have the req'd privileges for the task,
    and you would pick it in the window.

    Here's a link with mumbo jumbo explaining it clearly

    http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2355877,00.asp

    What a joke. It's nothing more than a basic lookup table, that
    has been used in thousands of applications for decades, but
    the data is usernames from the system user database, instead
    of data from an application database.
     
  16. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/17/2010 5:33 PM, DanS wrote:
    > "Drew"<Aylen1957@invalid.nospam.net> wrote in
    > news:hnrlj0$ogo$1@speranza.aioe.org:
    >
    >> what news Numbnuts?? Since when is it your fucking job to
    >> tell people what to read !!

    >
    > To be completely accurate, Alias never told anyone to read
    > anything.
    >
    > He posted a link. You and everyone else chooses on whether or
    > not to read it.
    >
    > Don't read it then, no ones putting a gun to your head, or any
    > others here, now are they ?
    >
    > Or do you click on any link offered like it's req'd ?
    > (Rhetorical)
    >
    >> Anyone who "might" have a
    >> interest in reading that article has already read it!

    >
    > I had an interest, and hadn't seen it before. And actually,
    > I'm sure almost none of the regular readers of this group had
    > seen it either. I had no idea a suit was filed, or that it
    > went to court. Not everyone subscribes to the ZDNet, PCthis,
    > PCthat, Computerworld, etc. newsfeeds.
    >
    > You don't find it interesting that a company accusing other
    > companies, and suing other companies, of infringing on their
    > IP, does so themselves ?
    >
    > My personal beliefs are that handing out patents for computer
    > related items at this stage in the game, unless it's a *truly*
    > revolutionary thing, are out of control.
    >
    > Yes, I understand companies should get rewarded for what they
    > have developed, and I'm not saying they shouldn't, but come
    > on, some of these things are utterly ridiculous.....
    >
    > ....for instance, U.S. patent 7,617,530, recently procured by
    > MS.
    >
    > This patent somehow covers a Window that pops up with User
    > names that have Admin privileges. You need to do a task under
    > standard type user, UAC would kick in and show you a window of
    > all user names that have the req'd privileges for the task,
    > and you would pick it in the window.
    >
    > Here's a link with mumbo jumbo explaining it clearly
    >
    > http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2355877,00.asp
    >
    > What a joke. It's nothing more than a basic lookup table, that
    > has been used in thousands of applications for decades, but
    > the data is usernames from the system user database, instead
    > of data from an application database.
    >
    >
    >
    >

    You complete alias don't you dan-o?
     
  17. Peter Foldes

    Peter Foldes Flightless Bird

    Caution: Children at play
     
  18. LSMFT

    LSMFT Flightless Bird

  19. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/18/2010 3:30 PM, LSMFT wrote:
    > Alias wrote:
    >> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is righteous.
    >> Fucking hypocrites.
    >>

    > Microsoft is a pirate company. Bill stole CP/M to make DOS.
    >

    Wrong!
    QDOS was written by Tim Paterson of Seattle Computer Products and was
    different enough from CP/M to be considered legal.
    Microsoft bought the rights to QDOS for $50,000.
    Oops!
     
  20. Leon Manfredi

    Leon Manfredi Flightless Bird

    On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:30:26 -0400, LSMFT <boleyn7@aol.com> wrote:

    >Alias wrote:
    >> http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9171878/Microsoft_loses_106M_patent_verdict_to_VirnetX
    >>
    >>
    >> And then they say their spyware "anti piracy" software is righteous.
    >> Fucking hypocrites.
    >>




    >Microsoft is a pirate company. Bill stole CP/M to make DOS.


    A truer word was never spoken....along with having stolen many programs from others,
    and succesfully having fought off in courts, as a result of lack of funds on the part
    of those he stole from... and still robbing us blind by not finalizing the closing of
    holes in his programs..... Took a page from the auto and other industries....
    Don't make any thing that lasts long.....


    From:
    An ol' CP/M Installer, (1) CP/M HZ89, and (2) MSDOS HZ128 Kit builder,
    plus (3) Enlight Tower Abit IC7_G Towers.....
     

Share This Page