U
Unknown
Flightless Bird
Re: OT Re: How to code batch file?
PS Do you consider 22 icons in the system tray a clean machine???? 96
Processes running????
Are you insane?????
"Twayne" <nobody@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:uygNgG94KHA.6132@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> In news:uhFKUUx4KHA.620@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl,
> Unknown <unknown@unknown.kom> typed:
>> You must be the easiest person in the world to brainwash.
>> You keep pushing all the useless
>> application garbage, I.E. Registry cleaners, Norton,
>> Symantics. Why don't you clean up your machine and find out how great
>> a clean computer runs?
>
> My machine is already clean. It runs very well and is fast. It's kept
> clean with periodic maintenance. There are 22 icons in the system tray, 96
> processes running at the mment, per Task Manager, which we all know isn't
> accurate, Registry size is approximately 5 Meg last time I looked, with no
> orphans or entries looking for anything that doesn't exist.
> NIS, idling, is using 2 to 3% of cpu time. Doing a deep scan, just
> started, it's cpu usage is going from 3% to short bursts at 34 to 38% cpu
> occupation. I also have IE8, OE and PaintShop Pro running, which is just
> beginning to make the processor take a noticeable pause to service the
> keyboard. Killing PSP removes that; PSP is a large and powerful program.
> Oh, almost forgot; also have NetObjects Fusion 11 running and uploading a
> web site. Since closing PSP all is back to running fine. Total overall cpu
> occupation is never touching 100% and overall the peak it reached was 92%
> for a short period of time (less than one second; forgot the fiture
> already. Norton even has a little nicety where if you minimize its window,
> it lowers its own priority to keep the cpu available for other programs.
> No hogging at all, no problems.
>
> YOUR problem is that you expose your own ignorance and lack of current
> knowledge with the types of posts you make. A lot of your comments are so
> dated they aren't even close to reality anymore. All in all, your
> credibility is and has been for some time in the toilet; namely since you
> troll so much.
>
> Bye baby; go cry yourself to sleep.
>
> HTH,
>
> Twayne`
>
>
>
> "Twayne" <nobody@spamcop.net> wrote in message
>> news:%23a86sOx4KHA.4520@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> In news:lu51t55a84j6q0brhovs8vr2r3216er3en@4ax.com,
>>> WaIIy <WaIIy@(nft).invalid> typed:
>>>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:27:53 -0600, Sardine
>>>> <sardineate@myway.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Twayne wrote:
>>>>>> In news:eP0pHsh4KHA.6132@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,
>>>>>> Bob I <birelan@yahoo.com> typed:
>>>>>>> HeyBub wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Eric wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I need to consistently download patch on following
>>>>>>>>> web site, but the file name keeps changing based on
>>>>>>>>> date, for
>>>>>>>>> example
>>>>>>>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/20100421-002-x86.exe
>>>>>>>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/yyymmdd-002-x86.exe
>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any suggestions on how to code a
>>>>>>>>> batch file to download the patch based on specific
>>>>>>>>> date format?
>>>>>>>>> so I can set schedule task to run it. Does anyone
>>>>>>>>> have any suggestions? Thanks in advance for any
>>>>>>>>> suggestions Eric
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even if you ARE successful, you're asking for trouble.
>>>>>>>> Yesterday McAfee finally caught up to Symantec in the
>>>>>>>> race to slow down computers.
>>>>>>> Slow, or KILL?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No slowdown at all here, reasonably small footprint,
>>>>>> excellent speed. Actually I noticed NO difference when
>>>>>> NIS 2009 and now 2010 were installed. I think you guys
>>>>>> are behind the times. McAfee I don't know about;
>>>>>> haven't used them in years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Twayne:
>>>>>
>>>>> You are correct, NIS 2010 is so much better than the last
>>>>> several
>>>>> products I've used. In fact, NIS 2010 is the only AV
>>>>> software that I
>>>>> have ever used that works so well that I will buy it
>>>>> again when my year ends. There are a few places where it
>>>>> can be purchased for a very low price.
>>>>>
>>>>> The very worst AV I ever used was Bit Defender 2009. 2008
>>>>> was fairly
>>>>> good but 2009 required almost weekly removal and
>>>>> re-install, just to get
>>>>> it to work. Their 2010 version (thankfully I didn't try)
>>>>> has recently crashed a huge number of computers. It
>>>>> deleted thousands of files from
>>>>> any computers running Windows 7/64.
>>>>>
>>>>> Those posting here that bad mouth NIS 2009 or 2010 are
>>>>> showing their
>>>>> age, NIS once was bloated but not now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sardine
>>>>
>>>> NIS is one bloated POS, many, many agree.
>>>
>>> Many, many are ignorant of the last two year-titles of the
>>> product. That often happens to closed minds. Come back
>>> when you know what you're talking about.
>
>
>
PS Do you consider 22 icons in the system tray a clean machine???? 96
Processes running????
Are you insane?????
"Twayne" <nobody@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:uygNgG94KHA.6132@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> In news:uhFKUUx4KHA.620@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl,
> Unknown <unknown@unknown.kom> typed:
>> You must be the easiest person in the world to brainwash.
>> You keep pushing all the useless
>> application garbage, I.E. Registry cleaners, Norton,
>> Symantics. Why don't you clean up your machine and find out how great
>> a clean computer runs?
>
> My machine is already clean. It runs very well and is fast. It's kept
> clean with periodic maintenance. There are 22 icons in the system tray, 96
> processes running at the mment, per Task Manager, which we all know isn't
> accurate, Registry size is approximately 5 Meg last time I looked, with no
> orphans or entries looking for anything that doesn't exist.
> NIS, idling, is using 2 to 3% of cpu time. Doing a deep scan, just
> started, it's cpu usage is going from 3% to short bursts at 34 to 38% cpu
> occupation. I also have IE8, OE and PaintShop Pro running, which is just
> beginning to make the processor take a noticeable pause to service the
> keyboard. Killing PSP removes that; PSP is a large and powerful program.
> Oh, almost forgot; also have NetObjects Fusion 11 running and uploading a
> web site. Since closing PSP all is back to running fine. Total overall cpu
> occupation is never touching 100% and overall the peak it reached was 92%
> for a short period of time (less than one second; forgot the fiture
> already. Norton even has a little nicety where if you minimize its window,
> it lowers its own priority to keep the cpu available for other programs.
> No hogging at all, no problems.
>
> YOUR problem is that you expose your own ignorance and lack of current
> knowledge with the types of posts you make. A lot of your comments are so
> dated they aren't even close to reality anymore. All in all, your
> credibility is and has been for some time in the toilet; namely since you
> troll so much.
>
> Bye baby; go cry yourself to sleep.
>
> HTH,
>
> Twayne`
>
>
>
> "Twayne" <nobody@spamcop.net> wrote in message
>> news:%23a86sOx4KHA.4520@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> In news:lu51t55a84j6q0brhovs8vr2r3216er3en@4ax.com,
>>> WaIIy <WaIIy@(nft).invalid> typed:
>>>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:27:53 -0600, Sardine
>>>> <sardineate@myway.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Twayne wrote:
>>>>>> In news:eP0pHsh4KHA.6132@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl,
>>>>>> Bob I <birelan@yahoo.com> typed:
>>>>>>> HeyBub wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Eric wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I need to consistently download patch on following
>>>>>>>>> web site, but the file name keeps changing based on
>>>>>>>>> date, for
>>>>>>>>> example
>>>>>>>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/20100421-002-x86.exe
>>>>>>>>> http://definitions.symantec.com/defs/yyymmdd-002-x86.exe
>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any suggestions on how to code a
>>>>>>>>> batch file to download the patch based on specific
>>>>>>>>> date format?
>>>>>>>>> so I can set schedule task to run it. Does anyone
>>>>>>>>> have any suggestions? Thanks in advance for any
>>>>>>>>> suggestions Eric
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even if you ARE successful, you're asking for trouble.
>>>>>>>> Yesterday McAfee finally caught up to Symantec in the
>>>>>>>> race to slow down computers.
>>>>>>> Slow, or KILL?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No slowdown at all here, reasonably small footprint,
>>>>>> excellent speed. Actually I noticed NO difference when
>>>>>> NIS 2009 and now 2010 were installed. I think you guys
>>>>>> are behind the times. McAfee I don't know about;
>>>>>> haven't used them in years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Twayne:
>>>>>
>>>>> You are correct, NIS 2010 is so much better than the last
>>>>> several
>>>>> products I've used. In fact, NIS 2010 is the only AV
>>>>> software that I
>>>>> have ever used that works so well that I will buy it
>>>>> again when my year ends. There are a few places where it
>>>>> can be purchased for a very low price.
>>>>>
>>>>> The very worst AV I ever used was Bit Defender 2009. 2008
>>>>> was fairly
>>>>> good but 2009 required almost weekly removal and
>>>>> re-install, just to get
>>>>> it to work. Their 2010 version (thankfully I didn't try)
>>>>> has recently crashed a huge number of computers. It
>>>>> deleted thousands of files from
>>>>> any computers running Windows 7/64.
>>>>>
>>>>> Those posting here that bad mouth NIS 2009 or 2010 are
>>>>> showing their
>>>>> age, NIS once was bloated but not now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sardine
>>>>
>>>> NIS is one bloated POS, many, many agree.
>>>
>>> Many, many are ignorant of the last two year-titles of the
>>> product. That often happens to closed minds. Come back
>>> when you know what you're talking about.
>
>
>
Nc7xr94KHA.4740@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl,