• Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.

Antivirus

U

Unknown

Flightless Bird
By the way, aren't you the one that said there are two parts to a wire less
mouse
one being a dangle 'TRANSMITTER'? The part that plugs into the USB port.?
"Tom Willett" <tom@youreadaisyifyoudo.com> wrote in message
news:%23EIo8i$sKHA.1560@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
> "Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom> wrote in message
> news:-O94pFf$sKHA.6004@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> : That can only be MSE.
>
> You've got to be kidding.
>
>
 
A

apistomaster(nospam)

Flightless Bird
I used AVAST Free Edition for awhile then decided to upgrade to the
paid version and purchased a one year subscription.
Oddly, AVAST went nearly a year before reporting it had found a virus
or other malware only within the last weeks of the subscription
expiration date.
When I clicked on the buy another year of protection it did not take
me to a place where subscribing was possible.
The malware/virus AVAst bells and sirens announced finding was the
paid version of SuperAntiSpyware!
That and the last minute finding of "malware" was enough to cost
AVAST a customer.

I removed AVAST, tested the free version of Avira a few weeks and then
bought the paid version.
I find the Avira interface easier for me to understand and use than
AVAST's.

There are plenty of good anti-virus programs, free or not, so pick one
you like and one that gets good reviews by different sources.
 
U

Unknown

Flightless Bird
Re: Anti Virus

He/she asked for the BEST not what you use.
"James Parker" <noreply@dotnethelp.co.uk> wrote in message
news:eB%23tgC9uKHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >
>>What is the best free antivirus?
>>
>>
>>

>
> I use avast
>
> -----------------------------------Posted @ http://www.dotnethelp.co.uk
 
N

Nil

Flightless Bird
Re: Anti Virus

On 04 Mar 2010, "Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom> wrote in
microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:

> He/she asked for the BEST not what you use.


Thank you so much for your content-filled contribution.
 
T

Twayne

Flightless Bird
Re: Anti Virus

In news:Xns9D31C41672A3Dnilch1@130.133.4.11,
Nil <rednoise@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> typed:
> On 04 Mar 2010, "Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom> wrote in
> microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:
>
>> He/she asked for the BEST not what you use.

>
> Thank you so much for your content-filled contribution.


There is no such thing as "the best" since everyone's situation and
environment is different, as are people's impressions and opinions. What a
person uses is usually going to be what they consider the "best", or they
wouldn't be using it. It's a silly question, actually, since there are so
many variables and different areas to call the "best". Best what?

--
--
Life is the only real counselor; wisdom unfiltered
through personal experience does not become a
part of the moral tissue.
 
D

David H. Lipman

Flightless Bird
Re: Anti Virus

From: "Twayne" <nobody@spamcop.net>

| In news:Xns9D31C41672A3Dnilch1@130.133.4.11,
| Nil <rednoise@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> typed:
>> On 04 Mar 2010, "Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom> wrote in
>> microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:


>>> He/she asked for the BEST not what you use.


>> Thank you so much for your content-filled contribution.


| There is no such thing as "the best" since everyone's situation and
| environment is different, as are people's impressions and opinions. What a
| person uses is usually going to be what they consider the "best", or they
| wouldn't be using it. It's a silly question, actually, since there are so
| many variables and different areas to call the "best". Best what?

The best at...

* catching
* preventing
* mitigating
* thwarting
* removing

Malware (malicious code) while...

* using the least resources
* minimizing the performance degradation of the system
* minimizing the learning curve
* minimizing the usage settings confusion level
* maximizing its overall efficacy


--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
 
K

Ken Blake, MVP

Flightless Bird
Re: Anti Virus

On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:48:41 -0500, "David H. Lipman"
<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:

> From: "Twayne" <nobody@spamcop.net>
>
> | In news:Xns9D31C41672A3Dnilch1@130.133.4.11,
> | Nil <rednoise@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> typed:
> >> On 04 Mar 2010, "Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom> wrote in
> >> microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:

>
> >>> He/she asked for the BEST not what you use.

>
> >> Thank you so much for your content-filled contribution.

>
> | There is no such thing as "the best" since everyone's situation and
> | environment is different, as are people's impressions and opinions. What a
> | person uses is usually going to be what they consider the "best", or they
> | wouldn't be using it. It's a silly question, actually, since there are so
> | many variables and different areas to call the "best". Best what?
>
> The best at...
>
> * catching
> * preventing
> * mitigating
> * thwarting
> * removing
>
> Malware (malicious code) while...
>
> * using the least resources
> * minimizing the performance degradation of the system
> * minimizing the learning curve
> * minimizing the usage settings confusion level
> * maximizing its overall efficacy



I completely agree, Dave. The paragraph you quoted is generally
correct when talking about most application software. But it's
completely incorrect when talking about anti-virus (or other
anti-malware) software.

When it comes to protecting yourself, the issue is which product does
the best job of protection, not which you like best.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
T

Twayne

Flightless Bird
Re: Anti Virus

In news:bg82p5hdmmad6nlld86oq175goipitrdnb@4ax.com,
Ken Blake, MVP <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> typed:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:48:41 -0500, "David H. Lipman"
> <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:
>
>> From: "Twayne" <nobody@spamcop.net>
>>
>>> In news:Xns9D31C41672A3Dnilch1@130.133.4.11,
>>> Nil <rednoise@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> typed:
>>>> On 04 Mar 2010, "Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom> wrote in
>>>> microsoft.public.windowsxp.general:

>>
>>>>> He/she asked for the BEST not what you use.

>>
>>>> Thank you so much for your content-filled contribution.

>>
>>> There is no such thing as "the best" since everyone's
>>> situation and environment is different, as are people's
>>> impressions and opinions. What a person uses is usually
>>> going to be what they consider the "best", or they
>>> wouldn't be using it. It's a silly question, actually,
>>> since there are so many variables and different areas to
>>> call the "best". Best what?

>>
>> The best at...
>>
>> * catching
>> * preventing
>> * mitigating
>> * thwarting
>> * removing
>>
>> Malware (malicious code) while...
>>
>> * using the least resources
>> * minimizing the performance degradation of the system
>> * minimizing the learning curve
>> * minimizing the usage settings confusion level
>> * maximizing its overall efficacy

>
>
> I completely agree, Dave. The paragraph you quoted is
> generally correct when talking about most application
> software. But it's completely incorrect when talking about
> anti-virus (or other anti-malware) software.
>
> When it comes to protecting yourself, the issue is which
> product does the best job of protection, not which you like
> best.


Often, it turns out that one is as good as another from a scan/detect
viewpoint, but there might be vast differences in user friendliness or
results usages or how the repair is handled. There are more things to
consider with malware detectors than just the detection rate. Detection may
not be a lot of good if it also can't remove it or otherwise invalidate the
malware's intent or undo a removal which turns out to be a false hit, or a
host of other things.
Asking for people's favorites or what they like the best is a lot more
likely to bring forth good responses, but it still won't guarantee the best
for that particular querant. What it may do though is eliminate a lot of
junk by it not appearing in the responses.

HTH,

Twayne`
-
--
Life is the only real counselor; wisdom unfiltered
through personal experience does not become a
part of the moral tissue.
 
Top