69.2 F
Los Angeles
Friday, May 3, 2024

Trump Lawyer Resigns One Day Before Trial To Begin

Joseph Tacopina has filed with the courts that he will not represent Donald J. Trump. The E. Jean Carroll civil case is schedule to begin Tuesday January 16,...

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan Issues Order RE Postponement

On May 9, 2023, a jury found Donald J. Trump liable for sexual assault and defamation. The jury awarded Ms. Carroll $5 million in damages. Seven months ago,...

ASUS Announces 2023 Vivobook Classic Series

On April 7, 2023, ASUS introduced five new models in the 2023 Vivobook Classic series of laptops. The top laptops in the series use the 13th Gen Intel® Core™...
Technology CompaniesMicrosoftA huge opening for those competing in online advertising

A huge opening for those competing in online advertising

Robert Scoble pinpoints a huge problem–and thus opportunity–with Google’s online advertising model.

On their Naked Conversations book blog, they finally had to remove Google advertising. Why? Because there were too many unfocused ads that appeared. Many of them inappropriate for the business market.

Robert, this isn’t just a problem with your book blog. Most of the Tablet PC sites have the same problem. In fact, I think most sites with focused editorial content have the same problem. There are just too many unfocused ads when using Google’s ad infrastructure on a focused site. That means lost revenue. It’s not just the publishers that lose out. It’s hard for the advertisers to get their ads on sites they’d like to advertise on. Why? Because large, generic ad buyers are purchasing poorly focused ads for broad exposure. Many times over half of the ads are poorly focused.

I can see where Google’s ads are a terrific lowest-common-denominator, fallback, but when you have focused content, you want focused ads. There’s a huge opportunity for someone (and I mean a huge someone, someone like Microsoft or Yahoo or even Google) to fix this.

I can see why Google probably won’t jump to fix this. Why? Because they have huge advertisers (a.k.a. their best customers) that want these broad ads. They want to buy up keywords for just about every product out there, even if they don’t really have a product that fits that market. Further, if you remove these big ad purchases, I firmly believe ad revenue will go down. The trouble is, it should. Company XYZ that understands this will win big. Increase advertising quality. Reduce costs.

Loren
Lorenhttp://www.lorenheiny.com
Loren Heiny (1961 - 2010) was a software developer and author of several computer language textbooks. He graduated from Arizona State University in computer science. His first love was robotics.

Latest news

Related news

2 COMMENTS

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
17 years ago

Actually, the ads on naked Conversations were highly focused. They were keyed in on the word “naked.” The ads were almost entirely pornographic and that’s why we took them down. The solution would be to have a way for the ads to key on topics such as “corporate blogging,” rather than words like “Naked.”

Loren
17 years ago

Agreed, it would be best if you could hold the advertising content to the same level of quality that you want for your editorial content. Currently, with Google’s ads that’s not the case.