50.8 F
Los Angeles
Friday, January 27, 2023

Apple March 8, 2022 Event

Apple announced several products during their March 8, 2022, event. Studio Display Mac Studio iPad air iPhone SE iPhone 13 and 13 Pro color addition Some of the products will...

Eastman files motion for exculpatory information and continuance

In response to the January 6 Select Committee Brief to Eastman Privilege Assertions, Eastman has filed a new motion with the court. A request for the court to require...

February 2022 Employment Report

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today that total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 678,000. The unemployment rate edged down to 3.8 percent The employment number exceeded forecasts The...

Tablet PC Schools: Defining Successful Deployment

Array

A school IT person asked me recently to identify “successful” Tablet PC schools. That’s an intriguing question.

Mostly, I’ve heard people talk about any use of a Tablet PC in a school as a success. That may have been a sufficient criterion two years ago.

I wonder:

While reading case studies and anecdotes, what convinces you that you are reading about a successful deployment of one or more mobile PCs in a school?

How do you know if a school has successfully deployed mobile PCs for education? What criteria do you consider?

No standards exist yet to define “successful” deployment.

However, over 100 schools with uncounted hundreds of teachers and administrators use mobile PCs with thousands of students for probably millions of learning and administrative transactions daily. These numbers appear to continue growing.

And, 1:1 learning, paperless classrooms, etc. exist as does one Tablet PC per classroom for the teacher to use to augment tangible board and chart illustrated lectures.

The wireless function of Tablets is arguably an unparalleled tool for both learners and teachers. It allows both to develop new strategies and curricula to increase learning.

I urged the person to define success in steps.

My experience is that people below-the-threshold respond to what an administrator inspects, not just what is expected. (Sounds crass. Educators do not like this. But it’s a reasonable beginning working hypothesis to test.)

I’ve not seen data on the influence of administrators on the successful deployment of mobile PCs in schools, but I’m guessing that the more administrators use Tablets publically, the more teachers will also. (I expect a direct positive correlation.)

Principals and all other administrators should use theirs in all school meetings.

They can buy their own mobile PCs the way they buy their own cell phones and handhelds, so students and teachers get publicly supplied tools.

I’d expect them to carry theirs and use them, so people know mobile PCs can be useful with initiation, thought and effort.

I’d encourage IT and other school administrators to assist teachers to refocus from assessing instruction to measuring student learning outcomes when defining successful deployment.

Now that I’m thinking about criteria and outcomes of successful deployment, I think I’ll try to assemble a checklist of mobile PC successes. Sounds like an interesting exercise. I wonder if anyone will consider such a checklist useful?

  1. I’d find it useful. Even more useful would be a checklist of criteria to help define the success. I have 200+ tablets deployed right now in the hands of first year med students. Certainly good test scores and increases in student satisfaction could be considered successful, but what else?

Related Stories

Exit mobile version