S
Seth
Flightless Bird
"Char Jackson" <none@none.invalid> wrote in message
news:ue62l592hicn5ejk0733aeduq59hcbbcnm@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:03:02 -0500, "Mike Hall - MVP"
> <mikehall@mvps.org> wrote:
>
>>If you think about it, all applications have their task bars at the top.
>>The
>>Windows classic menu is much faster to use if it drops DOWN.
>
> Please explain why you feel it's faster if it drops down. Obviously,
> it's not actually faster, so are you saying it's sort of an optical
> illusion? I don't understand.
Gravity...
But seriously, maybe he means faster work-wise. AS in he's used to selecting
menus form the top, so having the taskbar is a natural extension of that.
news:ue62l592hicn5ejk0733aeduq59hcbbcnm@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:03:02 -0500, "Mike Hall - MVP"
> <mikehall@mvps.org> wrote:
>
>>If you think about it, all applications have their task bars at the top.
>>The
>>Windows classic menu is much faster to use if it drops DOWN.
>
> Please explain why you feel it's faster if it drops down. Obviously,
> it's not actually faster, so are you saying it's sort of an optical
> illusion? I don't understand.
Gravity...
But seriously, maybe he means faster work-wise. AS in he's used to selecting
menus form the top, so having the taskbar is a natural extension of that.