What's the most secure OS?

[Bill Yanaire]

Re: alias is still foaming at the mouth over W 7...LOL!

"ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
news:8221d7F2hkU33@mid.individual.net...
> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:061 -0700, Frank wrote:
>
>> On 4/6/2010 2:50 PM, ray wrote:
>>> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 149:03 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/6/2010 2:04 PM, ray wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 136:08 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/6/2010 12:06 PM, ray wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:28:59 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/6/2010 5:16 AM, Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Windows 3.1 and DOS, what else?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey you linturd trolling POS. I see that you're still foaming at
>>>>>>>> the mouth at the overwhelming success of Windows 7, the very best
>>>>>>>> OS available today.
>>>>>>>> You'll just have to live with it *SPORT*!...LOL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I take it, then that you're trying to tell us that you believe win7
>>>>>>> is the most secure OS ever produced.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fact is, W 7 is the most secure desktop OS from MS and for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> No argument there - but that's not saying much.
>>>>
>>>> Oh and I also tested many linux distros over the last decade. Suffice
>>>> to say, I was very unimpressed.
>>>
>>> Really? You found them to be unsecure?
>>
>> I never said that. Fact is, I've never had a "security" problem with any
>> OS, no matter where they came from. If security is your phobia, and it
>> seems to be, then I suggest you refrain from ever going on line.
>
> That's what you suggested since 'secure' is the theme of this thread.
>
> But I'm constantly on line and have no problems.
>
Maybe you are too stupid to acknowledge a problem and therefore it flies
over your empty head.

 

[Walt]

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 15:12:23 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>OK. But that is not what I asked. Re-read my question. As usual you keep avoiding
>the answer for either you do not know it and do not want to make yourself with your
>Ubuntu preaching look like a numnuts or you do not know the answer. I will leave
>this thread with that. No need to reply. I am out of here

Probably an unanswerable question. I don't think anyone knows for
certain. To know the answer you would have to know how many different
operating systems there are, how many of each are used, and how many
times they have been hacked in order to get a percentage.

 

[Andrew]

Any OS with User Accounts that is not connected to anything even sneakernet.

--
Andrew

 

[Martin Langsholt]

On 06/04/2010 14:16, Alias wrote:
> Windows 3.1 and DOS, what else?

Linux

 

[Carl Kaufmann]

On 2010-04-06 08:16, Alias wrote:
> Windows 3.1 and DOS, what else?

That runs on PC hardware, probably OpenBSD.