B
Bill Yanaire
Flightless Bird
Re: alias is still foaming at the mouth over W 7...LOL!
"ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
news:8221d7F2hkU33@mid.individual.net...
> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:061 -0700, Frank wrote:
>
>> On 4/6/2010 2:50 PM, ray wrote:
>>> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 149:03 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/6/2010 2:04 PM, ray wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 136:08 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/6/2010 12:06 PM, ray wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:28:59 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/6/2010 5:16 AM, Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Windows 3.1 and DOS, what else?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey you linturd trolling POS. I see that you're still foaming at
>>>>>>>> the mouth at the overwhelming success of Windows 7, the very best
>>>>>>>> OS available today.
>>>>>>>> You'll just have to live with it *SPORT*!...LOL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I take it, then that you're trying to tell us that you believe win7
>>>>>>> is the most secure OS ever produced.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fact is, W 7 is the most secure desktop OS from MS and for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> No argument there - but that's not saying much.
>>>>
>>>> Oh and I also tested many linux distros over the last decade. Suffice
>>>> to say, I was very unimpressed.
>>>
>>> Really? You found them to be unsecure?
>>
>> I never said that. Fact is, I've never had a "security" problem with any
>> OS, no matter where they came from. If security is your phobia, and it
>> seems to be, then I suggest you refrain from ever going on line.
>
> That's what you suggested since 'secure' is the theme of this thread.
>
> But I'm constantly on line and have no problems.
>
Maybe you are too stupid to acknowledge a problem and therefore it flies
over your empty head.
"ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
news:8221d7F2hkU33@mid.individual.net...
> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:061 -0700, Frank wrote:
>
>> On 4/6/2010 2:50 PM, ray wrote:
>>> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 149:03 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/6/2010 2:04 PM, ray wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 136:08 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/6/2010 12:06 PM, ray wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 11:28:59 -0700, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/6/2010 5:16 AM, Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Windows 3.1 and DOS, what else?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey you linturd trolling POS. I see that you're still foaming at
>>>>>>>> the mouth at the overwhelming success of Windows 7, the very best
>>>>>>>> OS available today.
>>>>>>>> You'll just have to live with it *SPORT*!...LOL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I take it, then that you're trying to tell us that you believe win7
>>>>>>> is the most secure OS ever produced.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fact is, W 7 is the most secure desktop OS from MS and for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> No argument there - but that's not saying much.
>>>>
>>>> Oh and I also tested many linux distros over the last decade. Suffice
>>>> to say, I was very unimpressed.
>>>
>>> Really? You found them to be unsecure?
>>
>> I never said that. Fact is, I've never had a "security" problem with any
>> OS, no matter where they came from. If security is your phobia, and it
>> seems to be, then I suggest you refrain from ever going on line.
>
> That's what you suggested since 'secure' is the theme of this thread.
>
> But I'm constantly on line and have no problems.
>
Maybe you are too stupid to acknowledge a problem and therefore it flies
over your empty head.