• Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.

Well, that's nice

M

Muad'Dib

Flightless Bird
Amelia wrote:
> On 5/1/2010 9:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all 4
>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>
> I'd rather BUY more RAM and continue running my Windows 7.
> At least I know I'll be able to boot from one day to the next.
> Amelia
>

That's funny. While I fully enjoy my win7 pro install, I NEVER worry if
Linux will boot or not. So where does your statement come from?
Actually, I don't worry about either one booting. They BOTH do a great
job for what I ask of them.

G'day
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
John B. Slocomb wrote:
> On Sat, 01 May 2010 18:01:56 +0200, Alias
> <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote:
>
>> On 05/01/2010 05:52 PM, Amelia wrote:
>>> On 5/1/2010 9:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all 4
>>>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>>
>>> I'd rather BUY more RAM and continue running my Windows 7.
>>> At least I know I'll be able to boot from one day to the next.
>>> Amelia
>>>
>>
>> If you're running 32 bit Windows 7, it doesn't matter how much RAM you
>> buy, Windows and the seven dwarfs will only recognize a bit more than
>> 3GB. Also, with Windows (of any flavor), there is *never* a guarantee
>> that you will be able to boot from one day to the next.
>>
>> That's two strikes. Care to make it three?
>
>
> Actually it is three strikes and you are out.

I know and she only needs one more. Your logic impairment is raising its
ugly head again.

>
> I assume it must be some form of mental deviation that causes you to
> continually expose your ignorance to public view.
>
> John B. Slocomb
> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

What ignorance?

--
Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Andrew wrote:
>
>
> "Frank" <fb@sr2.cmm> wrote in message news:4bdc9f1c@news.x-privat.org...
>> On 5/1/2010 7:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all 4
>>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, you can do that in Windows. In fact, it's quite easy to enable PAE.
>> I bet that fact really irritates you!
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx
>

From http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366796(VS.85).aspx

"PAE does not change the amount of virtual address space available to a
process. Each process running in 32-bit Windows is still limited to a 4
GB virtual address space."

--
Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
John B. Slocomb wrote:
> On Sat, 01 May 2010 16:36:42 +0200, Alias
> <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote:
>
>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all 4
>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>
>
> Well, the truth is out!
>
> Your much publicized career as a consultant doesn't seem to generate
> sufficient for you to up-grade your computer system to 64 bits
> although 64 bit processes have been in the marketplace for quite some
> time now.

Wrong again. This very computer is 64 bit.

>
> Or, perhaps you are the rare craftsman who works with outmoded and
> shoddy tools..... which of course results in shoddy work.
>
> John B. Slocomb
> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Wrong again. That's two strikes, care to make it three?
--
Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
ANONYMOUS wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all
>> 4 GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>
>
> I'd rather use an operating system that has many newsgroups to support
> my needs so that I don't have to gate-crash Linux-ubuntu newsgroups
> (assuming there are any out there)!

Too bad for you that Microsoft has decided to stop having news groups.

> In any case majority of Windows 7 systems these days are on 64 bit
> architecture so memory recognition is not a problem.
>
> hth

I never said it was. I was just pointing out the superiority of Ubuntu
32 bits vs. Windows 32 bits.
--
Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
On 05/01/2010 10:57 PM, Drew wrote:
> My god you have proven once again to be the biggest fuckin idiot in this
> group!!! I bet your eyes are brown too because you are so full of shit!

Actually, my eyes are green.

> The only time windows crashes is due to poor installation or poor
> maintenance.

LOL! You've never heard of malware, sonny? The fact that MS has hundreds
of thousands of web sites regarding BSODs means nothing to you?

If you believe any different you are a bigger fuckin idiot
> than even I thought.

Look in the mirror, chum.

>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hrhe9q$ddk$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all
>> 4 GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Alias
>
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
On 05/01/2010 06:18 PM, Slap wrote:
>
> "Amelia" <me@noname.com> wrote in message
> news:z7YCn.115944$kj3.90762@newsfe08.iad...
>
>>> On 5/1/2010 9:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all 4
>>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>
>> I'd rather BUY more RAM and continue running my Windows 7.
>> At least I know I'll be able to boot from one day to the next.
>> Amelia
>>
>
> You can see Alias is really quite challenged... thinking xp 32 bit and all.

It's true with Windows anything 32 bit.

>
> I'm so embarrassed by the person I block everything by 'alias' , only
> once in awhile when someone quotes him do I see he is still having
> problems in his life.

Wow, are you saying you have a problem free life?

--

Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
On 05/02/2010 02:37 AM, WaterBoy wrote:
> Glad it worked for you. Ubuntu sucks... No sound since 8.04 and spotty
> network problems with this new version. I loaded Redhat Fedora; the
> version of Redhat Fedora I'm using is months behind the new Ubuntu and
> Fedora is light years better...

No problem with sound here. Blaming Ubuntu for the fact that your sound
card isn't compatible is pretty lame.

>
> Anyone reading this is better off loading windows98 or Windows2000,
> you'll get better functionality than any flavor of Ubuntu...

Only if you want to deal with a whole slew of malware.


>
> WaterBoy
>
> On 05/01/2010 10:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all 4
>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>
>
 
W

WaterBoy

Flightless Bird
Are you really that retarted? Did you read my post? I loaded Fedora
Linux and my sound card and Network connection both work the way it
should... In fact I'm using Fedora 11, isn't this version months older
than the new UbooBoo?? So tell me how my sound card is not compatible
with any version of Ubooboo but is compatible with a distro of linux
almost a year older than the new version of your shitty OS...

I had trouble getting Thunderbird loaded on UbooBoo, but no problems on
Fedora... My network connection was spotty at best using UbooBoo, at
times it was ok and most of the time it was like getting a 56k
connection, but again, no problems using Fedora.

So tell me Alias, when is this version of UbooBoo going to "finally
shoot Windows out of the proverbial window"??? Looks like not any time
soon, just another lame UbooBoo release...

I'll stick to a real OS in Windows7 and duel boot into Fedora Linux when
I need to...

WaterBoy

On 05/02/2010 06:57 AM, Alias wrote:
> On 05/02/2010 02:37 AM, WaterBoy wrote:
>> Glad it worked for you. Ubuntu sucks... No sound since 8.04 and spotty
>> network problems with this new version. I loaded Redhat Fedora; the
>> version of Redhat Fedora I'm using is months behind the new Ubuntu and
>> Fedora is light years better...
>
> No problem with sound here. Blaming Ubuntu for the fact that your sound
> card isn't compatible is pretty lame.
>
>>
>> Anyone reading this is better off loading windows98 or Windows2000,
>> you'll get better functionality than any flavor of Ubuntu...
>
> Only if you want to deal with a whole slew of malware.
>
>
>>
>> WaterBoy
>>
>> On 05/01/2010 10:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all 4
>>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>>
>>
>
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
WaterBoy wrote:
> Are you really that retarted? Did you read my post? I loaded Fedora
> Linux and my sound card and Network connection both work the way it
> should... In fact I'm using Fedora 11, isn't this version months older
> than the new UbooBoo?? So tell me how my sound card is not compatible
> with any version of Ubooboo but is compatible with a distro of linux
> almost a year older than the new version of your shitty OS...

I suspect you neglected to configure the sound NOT to be muted.

>
> I had trouble getting Thunderbird loaded on UbooBoo, but no problems on
> Fedora... My network connection was spotty at best using UbooBoo, at
> times it was ok and most of the time it was like getting a 56k
> connection, but again, no problems using Fedora.

And I have no problems with Ubuntu.
>
> So tell me Alias, when is this version of UbooBoo going to "finally
> shoot Windows out of the proverbial window"??? Looks like not any time
> soon, just another lame UbooBoo release...

Yawn.

>
> I'll stick to a real OS in Windows7 and duel boot into Fedora Linux when
> I need to...
>
> WaterBoy

Be my guest.


>
> On 05/02/2010 06:57 AM, Alias wrote:
>> On 05/02/2010 02:37 AM, WaterBoy wrote:
>>> Glad it worked for you. Ubuntu sucks... No sound since 8.04 and spotty
>>> network problems with this new version. I loaded Redhat Fedora; the
>>> version of Redhat Fedora I'm using is months behind the new Ubuntu and
>>> Fedora is light years better...
>>
>> No problem with sound here. Blaming Ubuntu for the fact that your sound
>> card isn't compatible is pretty lame.
>>
>>>
>>> Anyone reading this is better off loading windows98 or Windows2000,
>>> you'll get better functionality than any flavor of Ubuntu...
>>
>> Only if you want to deal with a whole slew of malware.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> WaterBoy
>>>
>>> On 05/01/2010 10:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes
>>>> all 4
>>>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


--
Alias
 
W

WaterBoy

Flightless Bird
"Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
news:hrjspf$cpn$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> WaterBoy wrote:
>> Are you really that retarted? Did you read my post? I loaded Fedora
>> Linux and my sound card and Network connection both work the way it
>> should... In fact I'm using Fedora 11, isn't this version months older
>> than the new UbooBoo?? So tell me how my sound card is not compatible
>> with any version of Ubooboo but is compatible with a distro of linux
>> almost a year older than the new version of your shitty OS...
>
> I suspect you neglected to configure the sound NOT to be muted.

Nope, checked all the settings. In fact both came up the same way, both
distro's were muted and both needed to repoint to my internal sound card for
a default setting. The difference is, Ubooboo wouldn't get sound and Fedora
did...
>
>>
>> I had trouble getting Thunderbird loaded on UbooBoo, but no problems on
>> Fedora... My network connection was spotty at best using UbooBoo, at
>> times it was ok and most of the time it was like getting a 56k
>> connection, but again, no problems using Fedora.
>
> And I have no problems with Ubuntu.
>>
>> So tell me Alias, when is this version of UbooBoo going to "finally
>> shoot Windows out of the proverbial window"??? Looks like not any time
>> soon, just another lame UbooBoo release...
>
> Yawn.
>
>>
>> I'll stick to a real OS in Windows7 and duel boot into Fedora Linux when
>> I need to...
>>
>> WaterBoy
>
> Be my guest.

Thanks, I will!!!
>
>
>>
>> On 05/02/2010 06:57 AM, Alias wrote:
>>> On 05/02/2010 02:37 AM, WaterBoy wrote:
>>>> Glad it worked for you. Ubuntu sucks... No sound since 8.04 and spotty
>>>> network problems with this new version. I loaded Redhat Fedora; the
>>>> version of Redhat Fedora I'm using is months behind the new Ubuntu and
>>>> Fedora is light years better...
>>>
>>> No problem with sound here. Blaming Ubuntu for the fact that your sound
>>> card isn't compatible is pretty lame.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyone reading this is better off loading windows98 or Windows2000,
>>>> you'll get better functionality than any flavor of Ubuntu...
>>>
>>> Only if you want to deal with a whole slew of malware.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> WaterBoy
>>>>
>>>> On 05/01/2010 10:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes
>>>>> all 4
>>>>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
WaterBoy wrote:
>
> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hrjspf$cpn$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> WaterBoy wrote:
>>> Are you really that retarted? Did you read my post? I loaded Fedora
>>> Linux and my sound card and Network connection both work the way it
>>> should... In fact I'm using Fedora 11, isn't this version months older
>>> than the new UbooBoo?? So tell me how my sound card is not compatible
>>> with any version of Ubooboo but is compatible with a distro of linux
>>> almost a year older than the new version of your shitty OS...
>>
>> I suspect you neglected to configure the sound NOT to be muted.
>
> Nope, checked all the settings. In fact both came up the same way, both
> distro's were muted and both needed to repoint to my internal sound card
> for a default setting. The difference is, Ubooboo wouldn't get sound and
> Fedora did...

Did you check the hardware settings in the sound preferences?

--
Alias
 
D

Drew

Flightless Bird
"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hrjle1$p0j$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> On 05/01/2010 10:57 PM, Drew wrote:
>> My god you have proven once again to be the biggest fuckin idiot in this
>> group!!! I bet your eyes are brown too because you are so full of shit!
>
> Actually, my eyes are green.
>
>> The only time windows crashes is due to poor installation or poor
>> maintenance.
>
> LOL! You've never heard of malware, sonny? The fact that MS has hundreds
> of thousands of web sites regarding BSODs means nothing to you?

This does not disprove my point at all!!
>
> If you believe any different you are a bigger fuckin idiot
>> than even I thought.
>
> Look in the mirror, chum.
I do and I see intelligence I am sorry you don't.

>
>>
>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>> news:hrhe9q$ddk$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all
>>> 4 GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Aliass

Look Dumbass! I have been running windows or computers in general for
decades, never have I had any infestation of any kind ! I have never had one
of my computers blue screen at all. I use them intensively and constantly so
I stand behind my statement! Poor maintenance, poor installation and not
being careful of what you are doing are the only reasons! No wonder I do not
come here much anymore the intelligence has gone down to a unbelievably low
level. You are always here posting your bullshit that no one wants to hear
or see. If you don't understand look at the responses you get from so many
people.


>>
>
 
L

Low Dong

Flightless Bird
"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hrjle1$p0j$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> On 05/01/2010 10:57 PM, Drew wrote:
>> My god you have proven once again to be the biggest fuckin idiot in this
>> group!!! I bet your eyes are brown too because you are so full of shit!
>
> Actually, my eyes are green.

Full of fresh manure.

>
>> The only time windows crashes is due to poor installation or poor
>> maintenance.
>
> LOL! You've never heard of malware, sonny? The fact that MS has hundreds
> of thousands of web sites regarding BSODs means nothing to you?

At least with Windows you can actually use quality software programs. With
Linux, you get INFERIOR Open Source programs that are about 10 years behind
the times.


>
> If you believe any different you are a bigger fuckin idiot
>> than even I thought.
>
> Look in the mirror, chum.

GO GIMP along.

LOL!
 
L

Low Dong

Flightless Bird
Just as I thought. No intelligent comeback by Alias. You keep playing with
that shitty Ubuntu and the rest of us will get our work done with Windows.

People would rather pay for Windows and Windows applications than use FREE
Ubuntu. Imagine that! Oops.



"Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
news:hrjspf$cpn$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> WaterBoy wrote:
>> Are you really that retarted? Did you read my post? I loaded Fedora
>> Linux and my sound card and Network connection both work the way it
>> should... In fact I'm using Fedora 11, isn't this version months older
>> than the new UbooBoo?? So tell me how my sound card is not compatible
>> with any version of Ubooboo but is compatible with a distro of linux
>> almost a year older than the new version of your shitty OS...
>
> I suspect you neglected to configure the sound NOT to be muted.
>
>>
>> I had trouble getting Thunderbird loaded on UbooBoo, but no problems on
>> Fedora... My network connection was spotty at best using UbooBoo, at
>> times it was ok and most of the time it was like getting a 56k
>> connection, but again, no problems using Fedora.
>
> And I have no problems with Ubuntu.
>>
>> So tell me Alias, when is this version of UbooBoo going to "finally
>> shoot Windows out of the proverbial window"??? Looks like not any time
>> soon, just another lame UbooBoo release...
>
> Yawn.
>
>>
>> I'll stick to a real OS in Windows7 and duel boot into Fedora Linux when
>> I need to...
>>
>> WaterBoy
>
> Be my guest.
>
>
>>
>> On 05/02/2010 06:57 AM, Alias wrote:
>>> On 05/02/2010 02:37 AM, WaterBoy wrote:
>>>> Glad it worked for you. Ubuntu sucks... No sound since 8.04 and spotty
>>>> network problems with this new version. I loaded Redhat Fedora; the
>>>> version of Redhat Fedora I'm using is months behind the new Ubuntu and
>>>> Fedora is light years better...
>>>
>>> No problem with sound here. Blaming Ubuntu for the fact that your sound
>>> card isn't compatible is pretty lame.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyone reading this is better off loading windows98 or Windows2000,
>>>> you'll get better functionality than any flavor of Ubuntu...
>>>
>>> Only if you want to deal with a whole slew of malware.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> WaterBoy
>>>>
>>>> On 05/01/2010 10:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes
>>>>> all 4
>>>>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Drew wrote:
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hrjle1$p0j$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> On 05/01/2010 10:57 PM, Drew wrote:
>>> My god you have proven once again to be the biggest fuckin idiot in this
>>> group!!! I bet your eyes are brown too because you are so full of shit!
>>
>> Actually, my eyes are green.
>>
>>> The only time windows crashes is due to poor installation or poor
>>> maintenance.
>>
>> LOL! You've never heard of malware, sonny? The fact that MS has
>> hundreds of thousands of web sites regarding BSODs means nothing to you?
>
> This does not disprove my point at all!!

Um, yes , it does.

>>
>> If you believe any different you are a bigger fuckin idiot
>>> than even I thought.
>>
>> Look in the mirror, chum.
> I do and I see intelligence I am sorry you don't.

Your mirror is cracked.

>
>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
>>> news:hrhe9q$ddk$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all
>>>> 4 GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Aliass
>
> Look Dumbass! I have been running windows or computers in general for
> decades, never have I had any infestation of any kind !

BULLSHIT.

> I have never had
> one of my computers blue screen at all.

BULLSHIT.

> I use them intensively and
> constantly so I stand behind my statement!

We know you're a liar.

> Poor maintenance, poor
> installation and not being careful of what you are doing are the only
> reasons!

A flaky video card, RAM, fax modem, motherboard, etc. never go south, right?

> No wonder I do not come here much anymore the intelligence has
> gone down to a unbelievably low level.

Don't strain your arm.

> You are always here posting your
> bullshit that no one wants to hear or see.

None of which can you refute.

> If you don't understand look
> at the responses you get from so many people.

Replies from ill informed fools do not affect me one iota.

--
Alias
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Low Dong wrote:
> Just as I thought. No intelligent comeback by Alias. You keep playing
> with that shitty Ubuntu and the rest of us will get our work done with
> Windows.
>
> People would rather pay for Windows and Windows applications than use
> FREE Ubuntu. Imagine that! Oops.

It's the nymshifter lying again under a new nym. Ho hum.
>
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hrjspf$cpn$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> WaterBoy wrote:
>>> Are you really that retarted? Did you read my post? I loaded Fedora
>>> Linux and my sound card and Network connection both work the way it
>>> should... In fact I'm using Fedora 11, isn't this version months older
>>> than the new UbooBoo?? So tell me how my sound card is not compatible
>>> with any version of Ubooboo but is compatible with a distro of linux
>>> almost a year older than the new version of your shitty OS...
>>
>> I suspect you neglected to configure the sound NOT to be muted.
>>
>>>
>>> I had trouble getting Thunderbird loaded on UbooBoo, but no problems on
>>> Fedora... My network connection was spotty at best using UbooBoo, at
>>> times it was ok and most of the time it was like getting a 56k
>>> connection, but again, no problems using Fedora.
>>
>> And I have no problems with Ubuntu.
>>>
>>> So tell me Alias, when is this version of UbooBoo going to "finally
>>> shoot Windows out of the proverbial window"??? Looks like not any time
>>> soon, just another lame UbooBoo release...
>>
>> Yawn.
>>
>>>
>>> I'll stick to a real OS in Windows7 and duel boot into Fedora Linux when
>>> I need to...
>>>
>>> WaterBoy
>>
>> Be my guest.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 05/02/2010 06:57 AM, Alias wrote:
>>>> On 05/02/2010 02:37 AM, WaterBoy wrote:
>>>>> Glad it worked for you. Ubuntu sucks... No sound since 8.04 and spotty
>>>>> network problems with this new version. I loaded Redhat Fedora; the
>>>>> version of Redhat Fedora I'm using is months behind the new Ubuntu and
>>>>> Fedora is light years better...
>>>>
>>>> No problem with sound here. Blaming Ubuntu for the fact that your sound
>>>> card isn't compatible is pretty lame.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone reading this is better off loading windows98 or Windows2000,
>>>>> you'll get better functionality than any flavor of Ubuntu...
>>>>
>>>> Only if you want to deal with a whole slew of malware.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> WaterBoy
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/01/2010 10:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>>>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes
>>>>>> all 4
>>>>>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>


--
Alias
 
A

Andrew

Flightless Bird
"Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
news:hrjk12$le0$2@news.eternal-september.org...
> Andrew wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Frank" <fb@sr2.cmm> wrote in message news:4bdc9f1c@news.x-privat.org...
>>> On 5/1/2010 7:36 AM, Alias wrote:
>>>> My new, clean install of 32 bit Lucid Lynx Ubuntu 10.04 recognizes all
>>>> 4
>>>> GB of my RAM. Ya can't do that with Windows, folks. 32 bit XP only
>>>> recognizes 3.5 GB.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, you can do that in Windows. In fact, it's quite easy to enable PAE.
>>> I bet that fact really irritates you!
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx
>>
>
> From http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366796(VS.85).aspx
>
> "PAE does not change the amount of virtual address space available to a
> process. Each process running in 32-bit Windows is still limited to a 4 GB
> virtual address space."
>
> --
> Alias

4GB != 3.2GB

--
Andrew
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
On 05/02/2010 04:45 PM, Low Dong wrote:
>
>
> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
> news:hrjle1$p0j$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> On 05/01/2010 10:57 PM, Drew wrote:
>>> My god you have proven once again to be the biggest fuckin idiot in this
>>> group!!! I bet your eyes are brown too because you are so full of shit!
>>
>> Actually, my eyes are green.
>
> Full of fresh manure.

More third grade personal attacks from the nymshifter. Yawn.

>
>>
>>> The only time windows crashes is due to poor installation or poor
>>> maintenance.
>>
>> LOL! You've never heard of malware, sonny? The fact that MS has
>> hundreds of thousands of web sites regarding BSODs means nothing to you?
>
> At least with Windows you can actually use quality software programs.
> With Linux, you get INFERIOR Open Source programs that are about 10
> years behind the times.

More like the other way around.

>
>
>>
>> If you believe any different you are a bigger fuckin idiot
>>> than even I thought.
>>
>> Look in the mirror, chum.
>
> GO GIMP along.
>
> LOL!
>
>

I don't use GIMP, your grade school "humor" notwithstanding. It doesn't
come installed by default anymore. We're waiting for Photoshop that will
be porting to Ubuntu soon.

--

Alias
 
C

cj@heaven.org

Flightless Bird
Re: Well, that's nice <--- another thread of nymshiftying coward trolls
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top