B
BillW50
Flightless Bird
Richard Bonner wrote on Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:51:22 +0000 (UTC):
> BillW50 (BillW50@aol.kom) wrote:
>> In news:i26mae$el4$1@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca,
>> Richard Bonner typed on Wed, 21 Jul 2010 119:58 +0000 (UTC):
>
>>> BillW50 (BillW50@aol.kom) wrote:
>>>> I have one of those USB floppy drives too, but who knows why I
>>>> do though?
>>>> --
>>>> Bill
>>> *** It's convenient if one needs to get something from an old floppy
>>> backup, or when some friend shows up with a file or utility I want
>>> that is on floppy. Of course, it can be a life saver if one needs to
>>> diagnose a hard drive when no CD or USB is available.
>
>> True, but who puts things on floppy anymore? Anything important should
>> have been moved to another format by now, after all it is 2010.
>> --
>> Bill
>
> *** There is the cost of changing over those archives. I have heard
> rumblings that some businesses are unhappy with having to now move CD-ROM
> archives to DVD, a format that will in turn be obsolete in a few years
> when anything that turns will be passe and we all go to solid state
> drives.
Really? I remember taking all of the software I had for a Commodore
VIC-20 that I was using for a couple of years... well later I copied all
of them and it all fit on a single 720kb 3.5" floppy. Considering a
VIC-20 only had 3.5kb of available memory, a 3.5" floppy was like a huge
hard drive for storage.
I have 4TB worth of storage nowadays and I still have thousands of
floppies around. And if I moved it all to this storage, it won't even
make a dent in the space. So how costly could it be? As storage has been
getting larger and larger and cheaper and cheaper all of the time.
> I saw a piece on this somewhere regarding this cost to libraries.
> At least some have simply opted to maintain the devices needed to view
> film, microfilm, microfiche, floppy and CD-ROM discs.
I still have microfiche and two viewers around. I haven't used them in
decades and I don't think I ever will either.
> So to answer your question, anyone with archives on floppy discs will
> need a floppy drive, as will those with CD and DVD archives. Requests are
> dwindling, but I still get people crying for help to retrieve something or
> other off of floppy discs. I keep both 5.25 and 3.5 drives in working
> order at work and at home, as do several friends of mine.
>
> I should also mention that in my case, since DOS has remained
> compatible with itself, that I can easily run programs from the past
> quarter century up to 2010. As such, I often find usable utilities on
> floppy discs that have been given to me.
All of the programs and utilities that I left on floppies wouldn't do me
any good today anyway. As we have so much better programs and utilities
nowadays. Maybe the old archives might be interesting to look at
someday, but if they do fade away it won't be a big loss anyway.
And by the way, I haven't touched a floppy in many years. But how often
are those old floppies have become unreadable?
--
Bill
Asus EEE PC 702G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC
Xandros Linux (build 2007-10-19 13:03)
> BillW50 (BillW50@aol.kom) wrote:
>> In news:i26mae$el4$1@Kil-nws-1.UCIS.Dal.Ca,
>> Richard Bonner typed on Wed, 21 Jul 2010 119:58 +0000 (UTC):
>
>>> BillW50 (BillW50@aol.kom) wrote:
>>>> I have one of those USB floppy drives too, but who knows why I
>>>> do though?
>>>> --
>>>> Bill
>>> *** It's convenient if one needs to get something from an old floppy
>>> backup, or when some friend shows up with a file or utility I want
>>> that is on floppy. Of course, it can be a life saver if one needs to
>>> diagnose a hard drive when no CD or USB is available.
>
>> True, but who puts things on floppy anymore? Anything important should
>> have been moved to another format by now, after all it is 2010.
>> --
>> Bill
>
> *** There is the cost of changing over those archives. I have heard
> rumblings that some businesses are unhappy with having to now move CD-ROM
> archives to DVD, a format that will in turn be obsolete in a few years
> when anything that turns will be passe and we all go to solid state
> drives.
Really? I remember taking all of the software I had for a Commodore
VIC-20 that I was using for a couple of years... well later I copied all
of them and it all fit on a single 720kb 3.5" floppy. Considering a
VIC-20 only had 3.5kb of available memory, a 3.5" floppy was like a huge
hard drive for storage.
I have 4TB worth of storage nowadays and I still have thousands of
floppies around. And if I moved it all to this storage, it won't even
make a dent in the space. So how costly could it be? As storage has been
getting larger and larger and cheaper and cheaper all of the time.
> I saw a piece on this somewhere regarding this cost to libraries.
> At least some have simply opted to maintain the devices needed to view
> film, microfilm, microfiche, floppy and CD-ROM discs.
I still have microfiche and two viewers around. I haven't used them in
decades and I don't think I ever will either.
> So to answer your question, anyone with archives on floppy discs will
> need a floppy drive, as will those with CD and DVD archives. Requests are
> dwindling, but I still get people crying for help to retrieve something or
> other off of floppy discs. I keep both 5.25 and 3.5 drives in working
> order at work and at home, as do several friends of mine.
>
> I should also mention that in my case, since DOS has remained
> compatible with itself, that I can easily run programs from the past
> quarter century up to 2010. As such, I often find usable utilities on
> floppy discs that have been given to me.
All of the programs and utilities that I left on floppies wouldn't do me
any good today anyway. As we have so much better programs and utilities
nowadays. Maybe the old archives might be interesting to look at
someday, but if they do fade away it won't be a big loss anyway.
And by the way, I haven't touched a floppy in many years. But how often
are those old floppies have become unreadable?
--
Bill
Asus EEE PC 702G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC
Xandros Linux (build 2007-10-19 13:03)