"Dave \"Crash\" Dummy" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> XS11E wrote:
>> New isn't always improved. As "Crash" pointed out, Windows 2000
>> is, in many ways, superior to later OSs. *IF* MSFT released a 64
>> bit version and improved USB support it would probably be the OS
>> of choice for many, it's smaller, lighter and MUCH faster than
>> any later version of Windows.
>
> Not only that, but I think those old, dead composers, like Bach
> and Beethoven, are better than the latest top-40 music.

I prefer the classics myself, here's one of the truly great:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UejelYnVI3U&feature=related



--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/

 

Re: alias loses again!

On 7/17/2010 1:08 PM, Alias wrote:

<--Deleted the crap from alias as a public service-->
>
> Puerto del Sol. Be there.

You don't live in Madrid and anyone who buys two new laptops with 512 &
1 gig of RAM in this day and age, obviously can't afford to travel to
Madrid. I've got a much better, fool proof plan...I'll leave a prepaid
ticked for you at the spanish airport of your choice, (can you find the
airport from where you actually live), and you can fly to Paris.
That way, we can end this diatribe and you can prove your manhood!
Ok?
No? Why? Oh...you're a fucking POS lying coward...as we all know.
Oops!
>

 

Re: alias loses again!

On 7/17/2010 1:14 PM, Alias wrote:

Definition of a "diss".

Read'em and weep, cock sucker!

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/diss

Enjoy, I know I did!

Want more? Stick around, the fun is just now beginning and you are the
one paying the tab!
Hahahah!!!

 

Re: alias loses again!

On 07/18/2010 08:11 AM, Frank wrote:
> On 7/17/2010 1:08 PM, Alias wrote:
>
> <--Deleted the crap from alias as a public service-->
>>
>> Puerto del Sol. Be there.
>
> You don't live in Madrid and anyone who buys two new laptops with 512 &
> 1 gig of RAM in this day and age, obviously can't afford to travel to
> Madrid.

False logic.

> I've got a much better, fool proof plan...I'll leave a prepaid
> ticked for you at the spanish airport of your choice, (can you find the
> airport from where you actually live), and you can fly to Paris.
> That way, we can end this diatribe and you can prove your manhood!
> Ok?
> No? Why? Oh...you're a fucking POS lying coward...as we all know.
> Oops!
>>
>

Puerto del Sol, coward. Wear a bullseye on your back so I know who it is.

--
Alias

 

alias takes it up his lying ass...again...as usual...Oops!

On 7/18/2010 35 AM, Alias wrote:
> On 07/18/2010 08:11 AM, Frank wrote:
>> On 7/17/2010 1:08 PM, Alias wrote:
>>
>> <--Deleted the crap from alias as a public service-->
>>>
>>> Puerto del Sol. Be there.
>>
>> You don't live in Madrid and anyone who buys two new laptops with 512 &
>> 1 gig of RAM in this day and age, obviously can't afford to travel to
>> Madrid.
>
> False logic.

On your part, yes!
>
>> I've got a much better, fool proof plan...I'll leave a prepaid
>> ticked for you at the spanish airport of your choice, (can you find the
>> airport from where you actually live), and you can fly to Paris.
>> That way, we can end this diatribe and you can prove your manhood!
>> Ok?
>> No? Why? Oh...you're a fucking POS lying coward...as we all know.
>> Oops!
>>>
>>
>
> Puerto del Sol, coward. Wear a bullseye on your back so I know who it is.

*COWARD*! Your day will come.
>

 

< "Gene E. Bloch" <not-me@other.invalid> wrote in message
news:1rfjdn2nxz9sl.2ang4yvcedza$.dlg@40tude.net...

You seem to be working hard to misdirect your efforts. I suggest you find
some tutorial online or buy a decent book and work from there. >

The thing is you see, I actually know where Windows 7 stores files, because
I have bought various books and read them, and have had a good look at what
the system does. Obviously, the fact that one needs to do that is ample
evidence of what I am saying.

If you don't agree, I am certain that Microsoft, and many book publishers
would be happy to pay you well for writing a couple of short paragraphs
about where files are stored.

 

On 18/07/2010 20:43, johnbee wrote:
>

>
> The thing is you see, I actually know where Windows 7 stores files,
> because I have bought various books and read them, and have had a good
> look at what the system does. Obviously, the fact that one needs to do
> that is ample evidence of what I am saying.
>
> If you don't agree, I am certain that Microsoft, and many book
> publishers would be happy to pay you well for writing a couple of short
> paragraphs about where files are stored.

User files are stored where the USER puts them - ie CUsers/{Account
name}/Documents. Where else would they be?

 

Re: alias takes it up his lying ass...again...as usual...Oops!

On 7/18/2010 12:07 PM, Frank wrote:
> On 7/18/2010 35 AM, Alias wrote:
>> On 07/18/2010 08:11 AM, Frank wrote:
>>> On 7/17/2010 1:08 PM, Alias wrote:
>>>
>>> <--Deleted the crap from alias as a public service-->
>>>>
>>>> Puerto del Sol. Be there.
>>>
>>> You don't live in Madrid and anyone who buys two new laptops with 512 &
>>> 1 gig of RAM in this day and age, obviously can't afford to travel to
>>> Madrid.
>>
>> False logic.
>
> On your part, yes!

You are the idiot who wasted his money.
>>
>>> I've got a much better, fool proof plan...I'll leave a prepaid
>>> ticked for you at the spanish airport of your choice, (can you find the
>>> airport from where you actually live), and you can fly to Paris.
>>> That way, we can end this diatribe and you can prove your manhood!
>>> Ok?
>>> No? Why? Oh...you're a fucking POS lying coward...as we all know.
>>> Oops!
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Puerto del Sol, coward. Wear a bullseye on your back so I know who it is.
>
> *COWARD*! Your day will come.
>>
>

 

On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:59:14 +0100, Gordon wrote:

> On 18/07/2010 20:43, johnbee wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> The thing is you see, I actually know where Windows 7 stores files,
>> because I have bought various books and read them, and have had a good
>> look at what the system does. Obviously, the fact that one needs to do
>> that is ample evidence of what I am saying.
>>
>> If you don't agree, I am certain that Microsoft, and many book
>> publishers would be happy to pay you well for writing a couple of short
>> paragraphs about where files are stored.
>
> User files are stored where the USER puts them - ie CUsers/{Account
> name}/Documents. Where else would they be?

I was amused that johnbee also chose to clip a relevant part of my text
when he replied.

I think he also fails to realize that OSes are, by necessity, not quite as
easy to use as a faucet.

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

 

On 19/07/2010 23:26, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:59:14 +0100, Gordon wrote:
>
>> On 18/07/2010 20:43, johnbee wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> The thing is you see, I actually know where Windows 7 stores files,
>>> because I have bought various books and read them, and have had a good
>>> look at what the system does. Obviously, the fact that one needs to do
>>> that is ample evidence of what I am saying.
>>>
>>> If you don't agree, I am certain that Microsoft, and many book
>>> publishers would be happy to pay you well for writing a couple of short
>>> paragraphs about where files are stored.
>>
>> User files are stored where the USER puts them - ie CUsers/{Account
>> name}/Documents. Where else would they be?
>
> I was amused that johnbee also chose to clip a relevant part of my text
> when he replied.
>
> I think he also fails to realize that OSes are, by necessity, not quite as
> easy to use as a faucet.
>

But that's the whole point - they ARE! Certainly modern ones. Remember
WFWG 3.11?

 

On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:44:19 +0100, Gordon wrote:

> On 19/07/2010 23:26, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:59:14 +0100, Gordon wrote:
>>
>>> On 18/07/2010 20:43, johnbee wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The thing is you see, I actually know where Windows 7 stores files,
>>>> because I have bought various books and read them, and have had a good
>>>> look at what the system does. Obviously, the fact that one needs to do
>>>> that is ample evidence of what I am saying.
>>>>
>>>> If you don't agree, I am certain that Microsoft, and many book
>>>> publishers would be happy to pay you well for writing a couple of short
>>>> paragraphs about where files are stored.
>>>
>>> User files are stored where the USER puts them - ie CUsers/{Account
>>> name}/Documents. Where else would they be?
>>
>> I was amused that johnbee also chose to clip a relevant part of my text
>> when he replied.
>>
>> I think he also fails to realize that OSes are, by necessity, not quite as
>> easy to use as a faucet.
>>
>
> But that's the whole point - they ARE! Certainly modern ones. Remember
> WFWG 3.11?

That was the one that convinced me it was time to run Windows.

I'm hoping that, when you say that they are as easy to use as a faucet,
you're just pulling my chain. Or Microsoft's?

If not, then I can't come close to agreeing with you. If yes, then I'm
laughing. Ha ha (see?).

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

 

On 21/07/10 01:43, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:44:19 +0100, Gordon wrote:
>
>> On 19/07/2010 23:26, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:59:14 +0100, Gordon wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 18/07/2010 20:43, johnbee wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The thing is you see, I actually know where Windows 7 stores files,
>>>>> because I have bought various books and read them, and have had a good
>>>>> look at what the system does. Obviously, the fact that one needs to do
>>>>> that is ample evidence of what I am saying.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you don't agree, I am certain that Microsoft, and many book
>>>>> publishers would be happy to pay you well for writing a couple of short
>>>>> paragraphs about where files are stored.
>>>>
>>>> User files are stored where the USER puts them - ie CUsers/{Account
>>>> name}/Documents. Where else would they be?
>>>
>>> I was amused that johnbee also chose to clip a relevant part of my text
>>> when he replied.
>>>
>>> I think he also fails to realize that OSes are, by necessity, not quite as
>>> easy to use as a faucet.
>>>
>>
>> But that's the whole point - they ARE! Certainly modern ones. Remember
>> WFWG 3.11?
>
> That was the one that convinced me it was time to run Windows.
>
> I'm hoping that, when you say that they are as easy to use as a faucet,
> you're just pulling my chain. Or Microsoft's?
>
> If not, then I can't come close to agreeing with you. If yes, then I'm
> laughing. Ha ha (see?).
>

Well they must be easy. If my 87 year old mother-in-law can use XP.......

 

"Gordon" <gordonbparker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:i1vpv1$9fp$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> User files are stored where the USER puts them - ie CUsers/{Account
> name}/Documents. Where else would they be?

Nice effort, but an excellent demonstration of what I have been saying.
Such a directory does not even exist on my PC.

 

In article <i27hh9$rd8$1@news.eternal-september.org>, johnbrockbank@com.invalid
says...
>
> "Gordon" <gordonbparker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:i1vpv1$9fp$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> >
> > User files are stored where the USER puts them - ie CUsers/{Account
> > name}/Documents. Where else would they be?
>
> Nice effort, but an excellent demonstration of what I have been saying.
> Such a directory does not even exist on my PC.

CUsers\johnbrockbank\Documents is virtual and shows in WinExplorer as
CUsers\johnbrockbank\My Documents

 

On 21/07/10 20:24, johnbee wrote:
>
> "Gordon" <gordonbparker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:i1vpv1$9fp$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> User files are stored where the USER puts them - ie CUsers/{Account
>> name}/Documents. Where else would they be?
>
> Nice effort, but an excellent demonstration of what I have been saying.
> Such a directory does not even exist on my PC.

Don't be such a pedant. OK - I missed out the "My". Which certainly DOES
exist.

 

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:08:25 +0100, Gordon wrote:

> On 21/07/10 01:43, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:44:19 +0100, Gordon wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/07/2010 23:26, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:59:14 +0100, Gordon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 18/07/2010 20:43, johnbee wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The thing is you see, I actually know where Windows 7 stores files,
>>>>>> because I have bought various books and read them, and have had a good
>>>>>> look at what the system does. Obviously, the fact that one needs to do
>>>>>> that is ample evidence of what I am saying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you don't agree, I am certain that Microsoft, and many book
>>>>>> publishers would be happy to pay you well for writing a couple of short
>>>>>> paragraphs about where files are stored.
>>>>>
>>>>> User files are stored where the USER puts them - ie CUsers/{Account
>>>>> name}/Documents. Where else would they be?
>>>>
>>>> I was amused that johnbee also chose to clip a relevant part of my text
>>>> when he replied.
>>>>
>>>> I think he also fails to realize that OSes are, by necessity, not quite as
>>>> easy to use as a faucet.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But that's the whole point - they ARE! Certainly modern ones. Remember
>>> WFWG 3.11?
>>
>> That was the one that convinced me it was time to run Windows.
>>
>> I'm hoping that, when you say that they are as easy to use as a faucet,
>> you're just pulling my chain. Or Microsoft's?
>>
>> If not, then I can't come close to agreeing with you. If yes, then I'm
>> laughing. Ha ha (see?).
>>
>
> Well they must be easy. If my 87 year old mother-in-law can use XP.......

Yeah, but your 87-year-old mother-in-law might be a whole lot smarter than
I am

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)