X
XS11E
Flightless Bird
"Dave \"Crash\" Dummy" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> XS11E wrote:
>> New isn't always improved. As "Crash" pointed out, Windows 2000
>> is, in many ways, superior to later OSs. *IF* MSFT released a 64
>> bit version and improved USB support it would probably be the OS
>> of choice for many, it's smaller, lighter and MUCH faster than
>> any later version of Windows.
>
> Not only that, but I think those old, dead composers, like Bach
> and Beethoven, are better than the latest top-40 music.
I prefer the classics myself, here's one of the truly great:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UejelYnVI3U&feature=related
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
> XS11E wrote:
>> New isn't always improved. As "Crash" pointed out, Windows 2000
>> is, in many ways, superior to later OSs. *IF* MSFT released a 64
>> bit version and improved USB support it would probably be the OS
>> of choice for many, it's smaller, lighter and MUCH faster than
>> any later version of Windows.
>
> Not only that, but I think those old, dead composers, like Bach
> and Beethoven, are better than the latest top-40 music.
I prefer the classics myself, here's one of the truly great:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UejelYnVI3U&feature=related
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/