• Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.

Re: Delphi and the Pythoness

K

Kadaitcha Man

Flightless Bird
"solar penguin", thou money-grabbing pervert. What shall I call thee when
thou art a man. Ye frothed:

> More sources? Nowadays historians can read all surviving heiroglyphics.
> Could Newton? They can instantly access materials and experts all
> across the world thanks to the internet. Could Newton? They can study
> materials that weren't even discovered in Newton's time. Could Newton?


Newton studied materials that "weren't even discovered in [his] time" the
very same way scientists study materials today that don't exist.

> After all, we know a _lot_ more about gravity<BITCHSLAP>


Ya reckon? I have any number of scientifically verifiable cites that say
gravity doesn't work as advertised. Indeed, I have as many more
scientifically verifiable cites that say gravity pushes, not pulls.

And where is the proof that gravity is a property of matter?

And still science does not know what matter is. That's why they're
building the LHC, you completely stupid dumbfuck google-groups-using
tardlet.

> A consensus is A Bad Thing and the only
> Good Thing you can do with it is question it, challenge it and finally
> break it.


I can obtain consensus that you're a fuckwit. Break that, you fuckwit.

The rest of your meandering gibberish and tripe was hacked.
 
§

§nühw¤£f

Flightless Bird
Kadaitcha Man <anon@no.email> clouded the waters of pure thought
with news:082w0w$3k7$2@spindly-whore-bitch.org.puerto-rico:

> "solar penguin", thou money-grabbing pervert. What shall I call
> thee when thou art a man. Ye frothed:
>
>> More sources? Nowadays historians can read all surviving
>> heiroglyphics.
>> Could Newton? They can instantly access materials and experts
>> all
>> across the world thanks to the internet. Could Newton? They can
>> study materials that weren't even discovered in Newton's time.
>> Could Newton?

>
> Newton studied materials that "weren't even discovered in [his]
> time" the very same way scientists study materials today that
> don't exist.
>
>> After all, we know a _lot_ more about gravity<BITCHSLAP>

>
> Ya reckon? I have any number of scientifically verifiable cites
> that say gravity doesn't work as advertised. Indeed, I have as
> many more scientifically verifiable cites that say gravity pushes,
> not pulls.
>
> And where is the proof that gravity is a property of matter?
>

Sorry old bean but when I saw that bit I just had to interject:

gravity is a property of *mass*. The relationship is well
established.

Carry On.

--
http://home.comcast.net/~wizardofwhimsy/index.html
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
 
Top