Only 30 More Days To Go!

[DanS]

>>>
>>> How about the millions and millions doing SQL inserts
>>> when they enter form data in a webpage or app?
>>
>> Apps home users use don't use MS SQL Server.
>
>
> I've worked on a bunch of apps for MS/HP/Spherion/Lowes
> that use SQL Express 2005/2008 to create a local database
> on the users machine and populate it with form data or data
> from imports. You can write apps that use SQL Express also
> (and if you use the webinstall wrapper you'll be using one
> of my products.)
> http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlexpress/archive/2008/11/05/announci
> ng-the-sql-express-2008-installation-package.aspx

I didn't say you can't. I missed using the word typically in
there...'home users don't *typically* use SQL Server' (or SQL
Server Express).

I myself had it installed here and had used it to develop an app
at one point.

I'm not claiming to have an real statistics, but if only 1% of
people do, that's still only 1%. According to Linux
bashers....1% might as well be zero.

 

[DanS]

>> Imagine, having an intelligent coversation with someone in
>> this newsgroup about Linux.....thanks Joel.
>>
>> This could be a first.
>
> What a stupid, self-serving comment. This is a Windows 7
> ng, not a linux ng.

Taking Linux is far more on topic than your animal sex stories
and personal attacks on Alias.

 

[Frank]

dan-o wants to hear some animal sex stories!

On 3/31/2010 4:09 PM, DanS wrote:
>>> Imagine, having an intelligent coversation with someone in
>>> this newsgroup about Linux.....thanks Joel.
>>>
>>> This could be a first.
>>
>> What a stupid, self-serving comment. This is a Windows 7
>> ng, not a linux ng.
>
> Taking Linux is far more on topic than your animal sex stories
> and personal attacks on Alias.
>

You're kissing aliases ass which makes you as much of an asshole lying
linturd troll as he is.
Oh and I'm sorry to disappoint you but I have no "animal sex stories",
nor have I ever pretended that I did so if you're looking for "animal
sex stories" you'll just have to go else where or maybe email your
sheep-fucking buddy alias as I'm sure he has many he will share with you.
And discussing linux in this Windows 7 ng is so far OT that its not even
funny.
Asshole!

 

[Joel]

DanS <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote:

>> I would be happy to see further progress, though, including
>> for Ubuntu. I have no need for MS to control so much of
>> the market. I don't see myself switching anytime soon, but
>> if others are interested in other choices (be it some form
>> of Linux, or Mac, or anything else), I encourage them to
>> investigate them.
>
>Imagine, having an intelligent coversation with someone in
>this newsgroup about Linux.....thanks Joel.
>
>This could be a first.


It does help that I actually have a fair bit of knowledge of it, and
an interest in operating systems in general. I actually found this
newsgroup via a crossposted thread with comp.os.linux.advocacy (where
a lot of them don't like me, of course, but I guess it's to be
expected - in reality, though, I am pretty balanced in my approach,
but some of them don't accept anything less than a total dismissal of
Windows).


>My take on Linux is....don't let anyone tell you what is good
>or not. Try things out yourslef, and truly give it an honest
>shot. If you don't like it, fine, I don;t care, but at least
>you tried something out for yourself.
>
>I have far more respect for that person than the one that
>would never even think about looking at it because some monkey
>boy keeps insisting 'it's crap'. And worthless, and etc.....
>
>As a matter of fact, as far as life in general, I have far
>more respect for anyone that tries and fails, at anything,
>than one that never tries at all, because they let someone
>else make up their mind for them.


Well, in this case, it doesn't even cost more than the price of a
blank CD. No reason not to, if one is at all technically inclined.

--
Joel Crump

 

[Joel]

DanS <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote:

>I only mentioned it because 2 of
>the 3 titles mentioned are packages usually cited that 'don't
>run on Linux', and the reason people will 'never' use Linux.


With regard to that argument, we will wholeheartedly agree. Adobe
fecalware and MS Office are pyrite products at 24-karat prices.

--
Joel Crump

 

[Alias]

DanS wrote:
>>> Imagine, having an intelligent coversation with someone in
>>> this newsgroup about Linux.....thanks Joel.
>>>
>>> This could be a first.
>> What a stupid, self-serving comment. This is a Windows 7
>> ng, not a linux ng.
>
> Taking Linux is far more on topic than your animal sex stories
> and personal attacks on Alias.
>

That's all Frank knows how to do. What's downright sad is that he thinks
he's being cute and clever when he does it.

--
Alias

 

[Philo P. Shagnasty]

"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalido> wrote in message
news:hp1trn$4dp$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> DanS wrote:
>>>> Imagine, having an intelligent coversation with someone in
>>>> this newsgroup about Linux.....thanks Joel.
>>>>
>>>> This could be a first.
>>> What a stupid, self-serving comment. This is a Windows 7
>>> ng, not a linux ng.
>>
>> Taking Linux is far more on topic than your animal sex stories and
>> personal attacks on Alias.
>>
>
> That's all Frank knows how to do. What's downright sad is that he thinks
> he's being cute and clever when he does it.
>
> --
> Alias

Sorry but that is just your ill informed opinion. Better head over to the
Ubuntu forum and help out those sorry sacks who believe they have a decent
OS when in reality they have SHIT.

 

[Philo P. Shagnasty]

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f8i8r5hd7vs9u12rn9tovl4f823kqn4qi7@4ax.com...
> DanS <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote:
>
>>I only mentioned it because 2 of
>>the 3 titles mentioned are packages usually cited that 'don't
>>run on Linux', and the reason people will 'never' use Linux.
>
>
> With regard to that argument, we will wholeheartedly agree. Adobe
> fecalware and MS Office are pyrite products at 24-karat prices.
>
> --
> Joel Crump

You're another retard. Probably can't afford to purchase Windows or any
Adobe product.

 

[Joel]

"Philo P. Shagnasty" <philo@shagnasty.org> wrote:

>> With regard to that argument, we will wholeheartedly agree. Adobe
>> fecalware and MS Office are pyrite products at 24-karat prices.
>
>You're another retard. Probably can't afford to purchase Windows or any
>Adobe product.


You're the original retard. I have two legal copies of Windows 7, on
my two computers. If I *were* "another retard", I could afford
Acrobat, Photoshop and MS Office, but I don't *want* them. Feel free
to be another shithead pissing your hard-earned money away to that
unnecessary crapware. I couldn't care less.

--
Joel Crump