• Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.

Only 16 More Days to Go!

M

Muad'Dib

Flightless Bird
LD55ZRA wrote:
> Muad'Dib wrote:
>
>
>>
>> From MS Technet:
>>
>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)
>>
>>
>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows will
>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a
>> free A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be
>> seen if a) the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft
>> will properly maintain it with regards to keeping their virus
>> signature files up to date. If they do it right, you should expect
>> signature file updates at least once per day."
>>
>>
>> Next?

>
>
> They already have and it is called MSE. The link is here:
>
> <http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/>
>
> hth
>


I know, I was replying to his Dumb A** question and included a quote
right from MS Technet to show Win7 can, (And does), get them.

G'day
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 4/18/2010 9:49 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
> LD55ZRA wrote:
>> Muad'Dib wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> From MS Technet:
>>>
>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)
>>>
>>>
>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows
>>> will pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on
>>> releasing a free A/V program sometime in the near future, but it
>>> remains to be seen if a) the general public will use it, and b)
>>> whether Microsoft will properly maintain it with regards to keeping
>>> their virus signature files up to date. If they do it right, you
>>> should expect signature file updates at least once per day."
>>>
>>>
>>> Next?

>>
>>
>> They already have and it is called MSE. The link is here:
>>
>> <http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/>
>>
>> hth
>>

>
> I know, I was replying to his Dumb A** question and included a quote
> right from MS Technet to show Win7 can, (And does), get them.
>
> G'day


Hey fuck-face...you didn't provide proof of anything. Quoting one person
making a statement over 1 yr ago proves nothing...other than he can run
his mouth...like you do.
 
A

Alias

Flightless Bird
Muad'Dib wrote:
> LD55ZRA wrote:
>> Muad'Dib wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> From MS Technet:
>>>
>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)
>>>
>>>
>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows
>>> will pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on
>>> releasing a free A/V program sometime in the near future, but it
>>> remains to be seen if a) the general public will use it, and b)
>>> whether Microsoft will properly maintain it with regards to keeping
>>> their virus signature files up to date. If they do it right, you
>>> should expect signature file updates at least once per day."
>>>
>>>
>>> Next?

>>
>>
>> They already have and it is called MSE. The link is here:
>>
>> <http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/>
>>
>> hth
>>

>
> I know, I was replying to his Dumb A** question and included a quote
> right from MS Technet to show Win7 can, (And does), get them.
>
> G'day


http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2009/11/03/windows-7-vulnerable-8-10-viruses/

http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=1134

http://windows.about.com/b/2009/11/07/windows-7-vulnerable-to-viruses.htm

http://www.itpro.co.uk/blogs/daveyw/2009/11/03/80-percent-of-viruses-love-windows-7/

Need more? There's lots of them.

--
Alias
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
alias is afraid to answer my question...LOL!

On 4/19/2010 5:12 AM, Alias wrote:
> Muad'Dib wrote:
>> LD55ZRA wrote:
>>> Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> From MS Technet:
>>>>
>>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows
>>>> will pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on
>>>> releasing a free A/V program sometime in the near future, but it
>>>> remains to be seen if a) the general public will use it, and b)
>>>> whether Microsoft will properly maintain it with regards to keeping
>>>> their virus signature files up to date. If they do it right, you
>>>> should expect signature file updates at least once per day."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Next?
>>>
>>>
>>> They already have and it is called MSE. The link is here:
>>>
>>> <http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/>
>>>
>>> hth
>>>

>>
>> I know, I was replying to his Dumb A** question and included a quote
>> right from MS Technet to show Win7 can, (And does), get them.
>>
>> G'day

>
> http://www.sophos.com/blogs/chetw/g/2009/11/03/windows-7-vulnerable-8-10-viruses/
>
>
> http://www.net-security.org/malware_news.php?id=1134
>
> http://windows.about.com/b/2009/11/07/windows-7-vulnerable-to-viruses.htm
>
> http://www.itpro.co.uk/blogs/daveyw/2009/11/03/80-percent-of-viruses-love-windows-7/
>
>
> Need more? There's lots of them.
>

Hey sheep-fucker, maybe you should read those articles you posted before
posting them because a properly updated and anti-virus protected
computer running Vista/7 is very secure.
But my question, that you and mr kangaroo keep avoiding is, how many
computers running Vista/7 have you personally "cleaned"?
Well...are you man enough to answer that legitimate question?
 
M

Muad'Dib

Flightless Bird
Re: ubuntu is a POS for lying losers like alias...

Frank wrote:
> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>> "Drew" <Aylen1957@invalid.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of
>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.
>>>>
>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,
>>>> Winders
>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We are not
>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't get
>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing everything
>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over, and
>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,
>>>> MacFee,
>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others
>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were UNABLE to
>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled rendering
>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there isn't
>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with MANY
>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to TRY
>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore anymore.
>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my clients are
>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!
>>>>
>>>> G'day
>>>
>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?

>>
>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..
>>
>> From MS Technet:
>>
>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)
>>
>>
>>
>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows will
>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a free
>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen if a)
>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will properly
>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files up to
>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file updates at
>> least once per day."
>>
>>
>> Next?

>
> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7 and
> the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.
> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.
> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING
> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!
> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?
> Well....


I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my
invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is
not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I
post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you
yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply not
true...-->as has been proven.<--" Oh? where is YOUR proof? You post
nothing, even a year old true fact or ANYTHING backing up YOUR claim.

Blow it out your A** I'm done with you once again. ..Oh and munch your
own butt, as any monkey can.

G'day
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
Re: ubuntu is a POS for lying losers like alias...

On 4/19/2010 11:48 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>> "Drew" <Aylen1957@invalid.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of
>>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,
>>>>> Winders
>>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We are
>>>>> not
>>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't get
>>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing
>>>>> everything
>>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over, and
>>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,
>>>>> MacFee,
>>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others
>>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were UNABLE to
>>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled
>>>>> rendering
>>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there isn't
>>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with MANY
>>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to TRY
>>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore anymore.
>>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my clients are
>>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!
>>>>>
>>>>> G'day
>>>>
>>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?
>>>
>>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..
>>>
>>> From MS Technet:
>>>
>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows will
>>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a free
>>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen if a)
>>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will properly
>>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files up to
>>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file updates at
>>> least once per day."
>>>
>>>
>>> Next?

>>
>> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7
>> and the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.
>> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.
>> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING
>> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!
>> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?
>> Well....

>
> I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my
> invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is
> not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I
> post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you
> yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply not
> true...-->as has been proven.<--" Oh? where is YOUR proof? You post
> nothing, even a year old true fact or ANYTHING backing up YOUR claim.
>
> Blow it out your A** I'm done with you once again. ..Oh and munch your
> own butt, as any monkey can.
>
> G'day


hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, you stupid, lying POS!
Too bad...but I figured you couldn't come up with a truthful answer.
Now go fuck yourself, you cock sucking son of bitch!
 
M

Muad'Dib

Flightless Bird
Re: ubuntu is a POS for lying losers like alias...

Frank wrote:
> On 4/19/2010 11:48 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>>> "Drew" <Aylen1957@invalid.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of
>>>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,
>>>>>> Winders
>>>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We are
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't get
>>>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing
>>>>>> everything
>>>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over, and
>>>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,
>>>>>> MacFee,
>>>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others
>>>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were UNABLE to
>>>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled
>>>>>> rendering
>>>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there isn't
>>>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with MANY
>>>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to TRY
>>>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore anymore.
>>>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my clients
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> G'day
>>>>>
>>>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?
>>>>
>>>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..
>>>>
>>>> From MS Technet:
>>>>
>>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows will
>>>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a
>>>> free
>>>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen
>>>> if a)
>>>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will properly
>>>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files up to
>>>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file updates at
>>>> least once per day."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Next?
>>>
>>> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7
>>> and the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.
>>> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.
>>> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING
>>> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!
>>> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?
>>> Well....

>>
>> I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my
>> invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is
>> not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I
>> post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you
>> yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply not
>> true...-->as has been proven.<--" Oh? where is YOUR proof? You post
>> nothing, even a year old true fact or ANYTHING backing up YOUR claim.
>>
>> Blow it out your A** I'm done with you once again. ..Oh and munch your
>> own butt, as any monkey can.
>>
>> G'day

>
> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, you stupid, lying POS!
> Too bad...but I figured you couldn't come up with a truthful answer.
> Now go fuck yourself, you cock sucking son of bitch!
>


Hahaha! Who's panties are in what bunch? Looks more like YOURS. As
EVERYONE who has followed your posts says, you are as predictable as
rain with your responses.

I just cleaned yet ANOTHER Win7 machine of hijackware/ransomware last
night. You know, the one that won't let you do anything on your computer
unless you pay for their bogus antivirus program. The Client said there
was no warning at all, you know the did you start this action bit. LOL
nope just instantaneous hijacking completely bypassing UAC.

It's ok Frank, just admit it, really, the web confirms it anyway so only
dopes would believe you.. Win7 IS vulnerable to the nasties out there
EVEN with a good antivirus running.

G'day
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
Re: ubuntu is a POS for lying losers like alias...

On 4/28/2010 11:35 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> On 4/19/2010 11:48 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Drew" <Aylen1957@invalid.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of
>>>>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,
>>>>>>> Winders
>>>>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We are
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing
>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over,
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,
>>>>>>> MacFee,
>>>>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others
>>>>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were
>>>>>>> UNABLE to
>>>>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled
>>>>>>> rendering
>>>>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there isn't
>>>>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with
>>>>>>> MANY
>>>>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to
>>>>>>> TRY
>>>>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore
>>>>>>> anymore.
>>>>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my
>>>>>>> clients are
>>>>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> G'day
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..
>>>>>
>>>>> From MS Technet:
>>>>>
>>>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows will
>>>>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a
>>>>> free
>>>>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen
>>>>> if a)
>>>>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will properly
>>>>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files up to
>>>>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file updates at
>>>>> least once per day."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Next?
>>>>
>>>> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7
>>>> and the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.
>>>> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.
>>>> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING
>>>> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!
>>>> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?
>>>> Well....
>>>
>>> I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my
>>> invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is
>>> not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I
>>> post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you
>>> yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply not
>>> true...-->as has been proven.<--" Oh? where is YOUR proof? You post
>>> nothing, even a year old true fact or ANYTHING backing up YOUR claim.
>>>
>>> Blow it out your A** I'm done with you once again. ..Oh and munch your
>>> own butt, as any monkey can.
>>>
>>> G'day

>>
>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, you stupid, lying POS!
>> Too bad...but I figured you couldn't come up with a truthful answer.
>> Now go fuck yourself, you cock sucking son of bitch!
>>

>
> Hahaha! Who's panties are in what bunch? Looks more like YOURS. As
> EVERYONE who has followed your posts says, you are as predictable as
> rain with your responses.
>
> I just cleaned yet ANOTHER Win7 machine of hijackware/ransomware last
> night. You know, the one that won't let you do anything on your computer
> unless you pay for their bogus antivirus program. The Client said there
> was no warning at all, you know the did you start this action bit. LOL
> nope just instantaneous hijacking completely bypassing UAC.
>
> It's ok Frank, just admit it, really, the web confirms it anyway so only
> dopes would believe you.. Win7 IS vulnerable to the nasties out there
> EVEN with a good antivirus running.
>
> G'day

Yawn.
 
M

Muad'Dib

Flightless Bird
Re: ubuntu is a POS for lying losers like alias...

Frank wrote:
> On 4/28/2010 11:35 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>> On 4/19/2010 11:48 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>>>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Drew" <Aylen1957@invalid.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of
>>>>>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,
>>>>>>>> Winders
>>>>>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We are
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't
>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing
>>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over,
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,
>>>>>>>> MacFee,
>>>>>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others
>>>>>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were
>>>>>>>> UNABLE to
>>>>>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled
>>>>>>>> rendering
>>>>>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there isn't
>>>>>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with
>>>>>>>> MANY
>>>>>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to
>>>>>>>> TRY
>>>>>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore
>>>>>>>> anymore.
>>>>>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my
>>>>>>>> clients are
>>>>>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> G'day
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From MS Technet:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a
>>>>>> free
>>>>>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen
>>>>>> if a)
>>>>>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will
>>>>>> properly
>>>>>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files up to
>>>>>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file
>>>>>> updates at
>>>>>> least once per day."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Next?
>>>>>
>>>>> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7
>>>>> and the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.
>>>>> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.
>>>>> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING
>>>>> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!
>>>>> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?
>>>>> Well....
>>>>
>>>> I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my
>>>> invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is
>>>> not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I
>>>> post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you
>>>> yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply not
>>>> true...-->as has been proven.<--" Oh? where is YOUR proof? You post
>>>> nothing, even a year old true fact or ANYTHING backing up YOUR claim.
>>>>
>>>> Blow it out your A** I'm done with you once again. ..Oh and munch your
>>>> own butt, as any monkey can.
>>>>
>>>> G'day
>>>
>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, you stupid, lying POS!
>>> Too bad...but I figured you couldn't come up with a truthful answer.
>>> Now go fuck yourself, you cock sucking son of bitch!
>>>

>>
>> Hahaha! Who's panties are in what bunch? Looks more like YOURS. As
>> EVERYONE who has followed your posts says, you are as predictable as
>> rain with your responses.
>>
>> I just cleaned yet ANOTHER Win7 machine of hijackware/ransomware last
>> night. You know, the one that won't let you do anything on your computer
>> unless you pay for their bogus antivirus program. The Client said there
>> was no warning at all, you know the did you start this action bit. LOL
>> nope just instantaneous hijacking completely bypassing UAC.
>>
>> It's ok Frank, just admit it, really, the web confirms it anyway so only
>> dopes would believe you.. Win7 IS vulnerable to the nasties out there
>> EVEN with a good antivirus running.
>>
>> G'day

> Yawn.


Hahaha! "Yawn" is all you have to say? That's it? Well of course that is
it, as I have shown you that Win7 is NOT as secure as you think. And you
have yet to prove your stand that Win7 is the most secure OS ever. Fact
is, you CAN'T prove such a fallacy as it is just that, a FALLACY. As
much as I like Win7, I don't trust it any more than ANY Winders OS, and
for GOOD reason, it just plain CAN'T be trusted. You damn well know this
to be true, yet you defend the sinking ship to the end. How sad for you.

G'day
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
mr kangaroo man is a lying linux advocate...

On 5/3/2010 1:17 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>> On 4/28/2010 11:35 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>> On 4/19/2010 11:48 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/18/2010 6:53 PM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/18/2010 1:15 AM, Muad'Dib wrote:
>>>>>>>>> DanS wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Drew" <Aylen1957@invalid.nospam.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:hq2u37$ud4$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The only *fact* I know, is I've cleaned countless Windows PCs of
>>>>>>>>>> malware, over and over and over again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Haha, ain't that the truth! You -n- me both. As I stated before,
>>>>>>>>> Winders
>>>>>>>>> machines are a cash cow for me with the CONSTANT infections. We
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> talking about just careless users here, but infections that don't
>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>> caught by Winders OR AV. Bam! Infected, completely bypassing
>>>>>>>>> everything
>>>>>>>>> and installing themselves regardless. Simple as that. YES! "Over,
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> over, and over again." Eset nod32, Avast, AVG, Webroot, Nortons,
>>>>>>>>> MacFee,
>>>>>>>>> etc, etc, etc. I have cleaned machines with all of them and others
>>>>>>>>> installed where they got completely bypassed, and then were
>>>>>>>>> UNABLE to
>>>>>>>>> scan and eradicate the infection, or were completely disabled
>>>>>>>>> rendering
>>>>>>>>> them useless altogether. Many machines get so infected, there
>>>>>>>>> isn't
>>>>>>>>> really much of a choice but a complete restore. Actually as with
>>>>>>>>> MANY
>>>>>>>>> techs anymore, unless the infection is VERY minor, the trouble to
>>>>>>>>> TRY
>>>>>>>>> and clean a machine isn't worth it. I just do a full restore
>>>>>>>>> anymore.
>>>>>>>>> (Saving what I can of course) A time or two of that and my
>>>>>>>>> clients are
>>>>>>>>> eager to try a more secure OS!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> G'day
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How many Vista/7 computers have "cleaned"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Plenty, particularly Vista but Win7 too..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From MS Technet:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproui/thread/05cb2323-2c03-4d98-b2c6-39464f57ee41)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Regarding viruses, whatever could attack old versions of Windows
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> pretty much work in Windows 7. Microsoft is planning on releasing a
>>>>>>> free
>>>>>>> A/V program sometime in the near future, but it remains to be seen
>>>>>>> if a)
>>>>>>> the general public will use it, and b) whether Microsoft will
>>>>>>> properly
>>>>>>> maintain it with regards to keeping their virus signature files
>>>>>>> up to
>>>>>>> date. If they do it right, you should expect signature file
>>>>>>> updates at
>>>>>>> least once per day."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Next?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You fucking MORON! You're quoting someone who does not use Windows 7
>>>>>> and the quote comes from almost 1 yr ago.
>>>>>> And it is a statement that is simply not true...as has been proven.
>>>>>> Now, butt-munch, answer my question and be specific and NO GD LYING
>>>>>> ALLOWED...GOT IT!!!
>>>>>> Exactly how many computers running Vista/7 RTM have you "cleaned"?
>>>>>> Well....
>>>>>
>>>>> I have nothing to prove to a class A moron. I can go back through my
>>>>> invoices and count 'em up, but to go through that for a useless pig is
>>>>> not a good enough reason. You are demanding proof and really unless I
>>>>> post every invoice, it doesn't matter what I say. Furthermore, you
>>>>> yourself make this statement, "And it is a statement that is simply
>>>>> not
>>>>> true...-->as has been proven.<--" Oh? where is YOUR proof? You post
>>>>> nothing, even a year old true fact or ANYTHING backing up YOUR claim.
>>>>>
>>>>> Blow it out your A** I'm done with you once again. ..Oh and munch your
>>>>> own butt, as any monkey can.
>>>>>
>>>>> G'day
>>>>
>>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, you stupid, lying POS!
>>>> Too bad...but I figured you couldn't come up with a truthful answer.
>>>> Now go fuck yourself, you cock sucking son of bitch!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hahaha! Who's panties are in what bunch? Looks more like YOURS. As
>>> EVERYONE who has followed your posts says, you are as predictable as
>>> rain with your responses.
>>>
>>> I just cleaned yet ANOTHER Win7 machine of hijackware/ransomware last
>>> night. You know, the one that won't let you do anything on your computer
>>> unless you pay for their bogus antivirus program. The Client said there
>>> was no warning at all, you know the did you start this action bit. LOL
>>> nope just instantaneous hijacking completely bypassing UAC.
>>>
>>> It's ok Frank, just admit it, really, the web confirms it anyway so only
>>> dopes would believe you.. Win7 IS vulnerable to the nasties out there
>>> EVEN with a good antivirus running.
>>>
>>> G'day

>> Yawn.

>
> Hahaha! "Yawn" is all you have to say? That's it? Well of course that is
> it, as I have shown you that Win7 is NOT as secure as you think.


No you haven't. You have shown that even a secure computer can be
infected if it has a stupid user.
Oops!

And you
> have yet to prove your stand that Win7 is the most secure OS ever.


Utttt...hold on mr kangaroo man...I said Windows 7 is the most secure
Windows OS.
Got it?

Fact
> is, you CAN'T prove such a fallacy as it is just that, a FALLACY.


Ut oh...be careful as you're getting your panties all in a bunch!

As
> much as I like Win7, I don't trust it any more than ANY Winders OS, and
> for GOOD reason, it just plain CAN'T be trusted.


Then you're admitting that you too, like your customer, are a stupid
computer user.
How nice!

You damn well know this
> to be true, yet you defend the sinking ship to the end. How sad for you.


Sorry mr kangaroo man, but I don't have any infected Windows. Not now
and not in the pass.
Big oops!!!
>

Yeah, G'day you lying linux advocate
 
Top