• Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.

Notebook hangs when connected to external power supply

M

Mike De Petris

Flightless Bird
I have a Toshiba Satellite A205 - S4777 that works perfect while on
battery, but the instance i plug the charger in, it freezes. First i
thought it was a Vista-Toshiba issue but only to discover that even in
BIOS it freezes instantly when the charger is plugged in. When the
laptop is off, any attempt to power it on while the charger is plugged
in, results only in a flicker of the power led.
I tried different chargers, ANY possible power options combinations in
Vista and Win7.

If I boot from battery and enter Windows Safe Mode, or Hiren's boot
CD, or WinXP mini all works fine even if I connect the power cord,
where normal Windows and BIOS freeze istantly.

I'm even thing of giving current directly by the battery contacts...
may this be possible?

Any help or advice on possible causes or solution to this issue would
be grateful. Thank you :)
 
T

the wharf rat

Flightless Bird
In article <fd312ad0-bf0a-477f-8c5a-78b4aaa91990@e14g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Mike De Petris <mikedepetris@gmail.com> wrote:
>I have a Toshiba Satellite A205 - S4777 that works perfect while on
>battery, but the instance i plug the charger in, it freezes. First i


Short in the charger, the battery, or the charging circuits.
 
M

Mike De Petris

Flightless Bird
On Apr 24, 10:03 pm, w...@panix.com (the wharf rat) wrote:
> In article <fd312ad0-bf0a-477f-8c5a-78b4aaa91...@e14g2000yqd.googlegroups..com>,
> Mike De Petris  <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I have a Toshiba Satellite A205 - S4777 that works perfect while on
> >battery, but the instance i plug the charger in, it freezes. First i

>
>         Short in the charger, the  battery, or the charging circuits.


even if it works in safe mode or booting Hiren's CD?
 
M

Mike De Petris

Flightless Bird
On Apr 24, 10:15 pm, Mike De Petris <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 24, 10:03 pm, w...@panix.com (the wharf rat) wrote:
>
> > In article <fd312ad0-bf0a-477f-8c5a-78b4aaa91...@e14g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> > Mike De Petris  <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > >I have a Toshiba Satellite A205 - S4777 that works perfect while on
> > >battery, but the instance i plug the charger in, it freezes. First i

>
> >         Short in the charger, the  battery, or the charging circuits.

>
> even if it works in safe mode or booting Hiren's CD?


don't know what more to check!
 
B

BillW50

Flightless Bird
In
news:478f5483-c073-4247-90b4-0e2dda94f8f3@e2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com,
Mike De Petris typed on Sat, 8 May 2010 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT):
> On Apr 24, 10:15 pm, Mike De Petris <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 24, 10:03 pm, w...@panix.com (the wharf rat) wrote:
>>
>>> In article
>>> <fd312ad0-bf0a-477f-8c5a-78b4aaa91...@e14g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>>> Mike De Petris <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:

>>
>>>> I have a Toshiba Satellite A205 - S4777 that works perfect while on
>>>> battery, but the instance i plug the charger in, it freezes. First
>>>> i

>>
>>> Short in the charger, the battery, or the charging circuits.

>>
>> even if it works in safe mode or booting Hiren's CD?

>
> don't know what more to check!


Under the Device Manager, look under Batteries and find "Microsoft AC
Adapter" (hopefully you have one or similar). Right click and select
properties. Then select don't use this device and then see what happens.

I have no idea what will happen. It could start working normally. Or not
detect the AC adapter when Windows is running is my two guesses. But it
would be interesting to see what happens. But it sounds like an ACPI
driver issue to me if it is software related. Does Toshiba have Windows
7 ACPI drivers?

It is troubling that it locks up in the BIOS Setup menu too. But not
from Windows Safe Mode, Hiren's boot CD, or WinXP mini. That really
suggests a hardware problem. And it isn't the AC adapter since you have
changed this.

Yes you should be able to power the laptop through the battery
connections. Might be as simple as just using the negative and positive
connections. Although the AC adapter puts out far more voltage than what
the battery would hold. And this would most likely take out the laptop.
So I would use an AC adapter that puts out the range of the battery
voltage instead. And never connect power directly to the battery. As the
battery will burst into flames!

If it doesn't turn out to be this simple. The battery also has
connections that are related to the safety circuits within the battery.
Thus they might have to be emulated or fooled before the laptop will
take power from these connections.

I always thought a good product to come out with for those clone battery
manufactures would be fake batteries that has an AC adapter jack. And
have a voltage regulator inside to knock the voltage down to acceptable
range. Thus this would be great for those who has a damaged AC jack or
those who has a problem that it won't run off of AC but it does fine
from battery.

--
Bill
Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Windows XP SP3
 
M

Mike De Petris

Flightless Bird
On May 8, 2:51 pm, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
> I always thought a good product to come out with for those clone battery
> manufactures would be fake batteries that has an AC adapter jack. And
> have a voltage regulator inside to knock the voltage down to acceptable
> range. Thus this would be great for those who has a damaged AC jack or
> those who has a problem that it won't run off of AC but it does fine
> from battery.


oh yes that would be terribly useful

anyway I suspect some hardware failure in the power zone, I've got
some snapshots:
http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#&usg=AFQjCNH25LmnVCwySifLLHb2xQTyZIA7QQ
 
M

Mike De Petris

Flightless Bird
On May 8, 3:27 pm, Mike De Petris <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 8, 2:51 pm, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
>
> > I always thought a good product to come out with for those clone battery
> > manufactures would be fake batteries that has an AC adapter jack. And
> > have a voltage regulator inside to knock the voltage down to acceptable
> > range. Thus this would be great for those who has a damaged AC jack or
> > those who has a problem that it won't run off of AC but it does fine
> > from battery.

>
> oh yes that would be terribly useful
>
> anyway I suspect some hardware failure in the power zone, I've got
> some snapshots:http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#&usg=AFQjCNH25LmnVC...


http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#
sorry
 
B

BillW50

Flightless Bird
In
news:e0dbd045-a6cf-4988-b343-274d769c808c@b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com,
Mike De Petris typed on Sat, 8 May 2010 06:28:18 -0700 (PDT):
> On May 8, 3:27 pm, Mike De Petris <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 8, 2:51 pm, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
>>
>>> I always thought a good product to come out with for those clone
>>> battery manufactures would be fake batteries that has an AC adapter
>>> jack. And have a voltage regulator inside to knock the voltage down
>>> to acceptable range. Thus this would be great for those who has a
>>> damaged AC jack or those who has a problem that it won't run off of
>>> AC but it does fine from battery.

>>
>> oh yes that would be terribly useful
>>
>> anyway I suspect some hardware failure in the power zone, I've got
>> some
>> snapshots:http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#&usg=AFQjCNH25LmnVC...

>
> http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#
> sorry


Wow! You have it all torn apart. See those two fuselinks? One is labeled
FUSE500 and the other is labeled FUSE501? They are probably okay, but I
would ohm them anyway, as they are easy to check.

Large electrolytic capacitors are the weakest component generally. And
it looks like C520 is one of them. That is probably okay, but something
else to check.

And that first picture off to the far right. What is that? A reset
button? And is that board below the main board? And what is that thing
bottom right? That disc looking thing with a large black dot in the
center? Is that a coil? Or is it really a disc shaped object?

And right by that disc just to the left. There is a plug that looks
unplugged. Where does that go to? And where does that large plug with
two black wires and two green wires go to? I would guess to the fan. Is
that so?

--
Bill
Gateway M465e ('06 era) - Windows XP SP3
 
M

Mike De Petris

Flightless Bird
On 8 May, 16:53, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
> Innews:e0dbd045-a6cf-4988-b343-274d769c808c@b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com,
> Mike De Petris typed on Sat, 8 May 2010 06:28:18 -0700 (PDT):
>
>
>
> > On May 8, 3:27 pm, Mike De Petris <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On May 8, 2:51 pm, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:

>
> >>> I always thought a good product to come out with for those clone
> >>> battery manufactures would be fake batteries that has an AC adapter
> >>> jack. And have a voltage regulator inside to knock the voltage down
> >>> to acceptable range. Thus this would be great for those who has a
> >>> damaged AC jack or those who has a problem that it won't run off of
> >>> AC but it does fine from battery.

>
> >> oh yes that would be terribly useful

>
> >> anyway I suspect some hardware failure in the power zone, I've got
> >> some
> >> snapshots:http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#&usg=AFQjCNH25LmnVC...

>
> >http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#
> > sorry

>
> Wow! You have it all torn apart. See those two fuselinks? One is labeled
> FUSE500 and the other is labeled FUSE501? They are probably okay, but I
> would ohm them anyway, as they are easy to check.
>
> Large electrolytic capacitors are the weakest component generally. And
> it looks like C520 is one of them. That is probably okay, but something
> else to check.
>
> And that first picture off to the far right. What is that? A reset
> button? And is that board below the main board? And what is that thing
> bottom right? That disc looking thing with a large black dot in the
> center? Is that a coil? Or is it really a disc shaped object?
>
> And right by that disc just to the left. There is a plug that looks
> unplugged. Where does that go to? And where does that large plug with
> two black wires and two green wires go to? I would guess to the fan. Is
> that so?


the laptop is still apart, had little time to experiment, the two
fuses are ok will have to test capacitors, in the while I took away
the cmos battery and soldered two wires to use a standard cr2032 but
nothing changes


my idea now, is that if I am not able to find the faulty component,
that may well be a custom one, I will try to cut the connections to
the battery poles and connect using a 2-way deviator, so that in one
position the lapton can work like now, charging the battery when
switched off, or running on battery only, or trun the deviator/switch
and give voltage directly to the cutted terminals, excluding the
battery, with an external power supply, the pc should still detect the
battery charge level from other contacts of battery in place

should this work?
 
B

BillW50

Flightless Bird
Mike De Petris wrote on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 02:36:40 -0700 (PDT):
> On 8 May, 16:53, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
>> Innews:e0dbd045-a6cf-4988-b343-274d769c808c@b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com,
>> Mike De Petris typed on Sat, 8 May 2010 06:28:18 -0700 (PDT):
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 8, 3:27 pm, Mike De Petris <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On May 8, 2:51 pm, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
>>>>> I always thought a good product to come out with for those clone
>>>>> battery manufactures would be fake batteries that has an AC adapter
>>>>> jack. And have a voltage regulator inside to knock the voltage down
>>>>> to acceptable range. Thus this would be great for those who has a
>>>>> damaged AC jack or those who has a problem that it won't run off of
>>>>> AC but it does fine from battery.
>>>> oh yes that would be terribly useful
>>>> anyway I suspect some hardware failure in the power zone, I've got
>>>> some
>>>> snapshots:http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#&usg=AFQjCNH25LmnVC...
>>> http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#
>>> sorry

>> Wow! You have it all torn apart. See those two fuselinks? One is labeled
>> FUSE500 and the other is labeled FUSE501? They are probably okay, but I
>> would ohm them anyway, as they are easy to check.
>>
>> Large electrolytic capacitors are the weakest component generally. And
>> it looks like C520 is one of them. That is probably okay, but something
>> else to check.
>>
>> And that first picture off to the far right. What is that? A reset
>> button? And is that board below the main board? And what is that thing
>> bottom right? That disc looking thing with a large black dot in the
>> center? Is that a coil? Or is it really a disc shaped object?
>>
>> And right by that disc just to the left. There is a plug that looks
>> unplugged. Where does that go to? And where does that large plug with
>> two black wires and two green wires go to? I would guess to the fan. Is
>> that so?

>
> the laptop is still apart, had little time to experiment, the two
> fuses are ok will have to test capacitors, in the while I took away
> the cmos battery and soldered two wires to use a standard cr2032 but
> nothing changes
>
>
> my idea now, is that if I am not able to find the faulty component,
> that may well be a custom one, I will try to cut the connections to
> the battery poles and connect using a 2-way deviator, so that in one
> position the lapton can work like now, charging the battery when
> switched off, or running on battery only, or trun the deviator/switch
> and give voltage directly to the cutted terminals, excluding the
> battery, with an external power supply, the pc should still detect the
> battery charge level from other contacts of battery in place
>
> should this work?


Well first I think that is a pretty good idea you have myself. Although
will it work? Well I think it has a good chance to work if that means
anything. But no guarantee.

One thing worries me though. That is the difference between the battery
voltage and the power supply voltage. Your battery is most likely a
lithium battery and when wired in series, would top out at 4.2v per
cell. But batteries are not normally rated in this matter, but like 3.6V
per cell in series. Or something around this figure.

And I would really like to know the difference using the 4.2v per cell
in series vs. what the power supply puts out. Let's say you battery says
10.8v. That would be 3 x 3.6v = 10.8. Now knowing that 3 cells in series
(others could be in parallel too and don't count in this formula). So
the highest the battery would be fully charged could be as high as 12.6v.

And I would be really leery feeding anything higher than this. Although
you could probably be okay 2v higher than this and it still might be
okay. So we are talking about 14.6v now. And maybe 15.6v might be okay
too, but that is really pushing it. As I think you would be risking
something burning out. And I bet the power supply puts out more than
this, doesn't it?

So I think your best bet would be to have two supplies. One lower to
match the battery voltage and to feed that to replace the battery
voltage. And the original one to charge the battery like it does now.
They also sell power supplies that you can select the voltage and that
might be a good idea. But never miss select the correct voltage. That is
the only danger with them besides setting the wrong polarity.

Remember too, never supply external power to the battery. If you
accidentally supplied 12.6v or less to a 10.8v battery is one thing. And
not a very good idea at all since the current is so high from the
supply. But anything higher is super dangerous. As the battery (unless a
safety circuit kicks in inside of the battery) will overcharge and burst
into flames.

And once it is bursting into flames, I believe water on this fire only
makes it worse. Although I am not sure. Some sort of metal container
should contain it well (and save your house from burning down). Although
the vapors are probably dangerous too.

Now do you want to rethink all of this?

--
Bill
2 Asus EEE PC 7014G ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC
2 Asus EEE PC 7028G ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC
Windows XP SP2/SP3 ~ Xandros Linux
 
M

Mike De Petris

Flightless Bird
On Jun 30, 11:47 pm, BillW50 <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
> Mike De Petris wrote on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 02:36:40 -0700 (PDT):
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 8 May, 16:53, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
> >> Innews:e0dbd045-a6cf-4988-b343-274d769c808c@b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com,
> >> Mike De Petris typed on Sat, 8 May 2010 06:28:18 -0700 (PDT):

>
> >>> On May 8, 3:27 pm, Mike De Petris <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On May 8, 2:51 pm, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
> >>>>> I always thought a good product to come out with for those clone
> >>>>> battery manufactures would be fake batteries that has an AC adapter
> >>>>> jack. And have a voltage regulator inside to knock the voltage down
> >>>>> to acceptable range. Thus this would be great for those who has a
> >>>>> damaged AC jack or those who has a problem that it won't run off of
> >>>>> AC but it does fine from battery.
> >>>> oh yes that would be terribly useful
> >>>> anyway I suspect some hardware failure in the power zone, I've got
> >>>> some
> >>>> snapshots:http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#&usg=AFQjCNH25LmnVC...
> >>>http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#
> >>> sorry
> >> Wow! You have it all torn apart. See those two fuselinks? One is labeled
> >> FUSE500 and the other is labeled FUSE501? They are probably okay, but I
> >> would ohm them anyway, as they are easy to check.

>
> >> Large electrolytic capacitors are the weakest component generally. And
> >> it looks like C520 is one of them. That is probably okay, but something
> >> else to check.

>
> >> And that first picture off to the far right. What is that? A reset
> >> button? And is that board below the main board? And what is that thing
> >> bottom right? That disc looking thing with a large black dot in the
> >> center? Is that a coil? Or is it really a disc shaped object?

>
> >> And right by that disc just to the left. There is a plug that looks
> >> unplugged. Where does that go to? And where does that large plug with
> >> two black wires and two green wires go to? I would guess to the fan. Is
> >> that so?

>
> > the laptop is still apart, had little time to experiment, the two
> > fuses are ok will have to test capacitors, in the while I took away
> > the cmos battery and soldered two wires to use a standard cr2032 but
> > nothing changes

>
> > my idea now, is that if I am not able to find the faulty component,
> > that may well be a custom one, I will try to cut the connections to
> > the battery poles and connect using a 2-way deviator, so that in one
> > position the lapton can work like now, charging the battery when
> > switched off, or running on battery only, or trun the deviator/switch
> > and give voltage directly to the cutted terminals, excluding the
> > battery, with an external power supply, the pc should still detect the
> > battery charge level from other contacts of battery in place

>
> > should this work?

>
> Well first I think that is a pretty good idea you have myself. Although
> will it work? Well I think it has a good chance to work if that means
> anything. But no guarantee.
>
> One thing worries me though. That is the difference between the battery
> voltage and the power supply voltage. Your battery is most likely a
> lithium battery and when wired in series, would top out at 4.2v per
> cell. But batteries are not normally rated in this matter, but like 3.6V
> per cell in series. Or something around this figure.
>
> And I would really like to know the difference using the 4.2v per cell
> in series vs. what the power supply puts out. Let's say you battery says
> 10.8v. That would be 3 x 3.6v = 10.8. Now knowing that 3 cells in series
> (others could be in parallel too and don't count in this formula). So
> the highest the battery would be fully charged could be as high as 12.6v.
>
> And I would be really leery feeding anything higher than this. Although
> you could probably be okay 2v higher than this and it still might be
> okay. So we are talking about 14.6v now. And maybe 15.6v might be okay
> too, but that is really pushing it. As I think you would be risking
> something burning out. And I bet the power supply puts out more than
> this, doesn't it?
>
> So I think your best bet would be to have two supplies. One lower to
> match the battery voltage and to feed that to replace the battery
> voltage. And the original one to charge the battery like it does now.
> They also sell power supplies that you can select the voltage and that
> might be a good idea. But never miss select the correct voltage. That is
> the only danger with them besides setting the wrong polarity.
>
> Remember too, never supply external power to the battery. If you
> accidentally supplied 12.6v or less to a 10.8v battery is one thing. And
> not a very good idea at all since the current is so high from the
> supply. But anything higher is super dangerous. As the battery (unless a
> safety circuit kicks in inside of the battery) will overcharge and burst
> into flames.
>
> And once it is bursting into flames, I believe water on this fire only
> makes it worse. Although I am not sure. Some sort of metal container
> should contain it well (and save your house from burning down). Although
> the vapors are probably dangerous too.
>
> Now do you want to rethink all of this?


somebody suggests me to have a look at Intel's papares to find any
possible patch or update of the microcode, so I put the motherboard
into the scanner:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/23705027@N06/sets/72157624394316536/

On the CPU I can read:

LF80537 T5300
5648B999 SL9WE

1.73/2M/533
INTEL... copyright symbols and "06"

It would be good to try a new or even different CPU to check if it's
working...
 
B

BillW50

Flightless Bird
Mike De Petris wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 00:31:53 -0700 (PDT):
> On Jun 30, 11:47 pm, BillW50 <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
>> Mike De Petris wrote on Tue, 29 Jun 2010 02:36:40 -0700 (PDT):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 8 May, 16:53, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
>>>> Innews:e0dbd045-a6cf-4988-b343-274d769c808c@b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com,
>>>> Mike De Petris typed on Sat, 8 May 2010 06:28:18 -0700 (PDT):
>>>>> On May 8, 3:27 pm, Mike De Petris <mikedepet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On May 8, 2:51 pm, "BillW50" <Bill...@aol.kom> wrote:
>>>>>>> I always thought a good product to come out with for those clone
>>>>>>> battery manufactures would be fake batteries that has an AC adapter
>>>>>>> jack. And have a voltage regulator inside to knock the voltage down
>>>>>>> to acceptable range. Thus this would be great for those who has a
>>>>>>> damaged AC jack or those who has a problem that it won't run off of
>>>>>>> AC but it does fine from battery.
>>>>>> oh yes that would be terribly useful
>>>>>> anyway I suspect some hardware failure in the power zone, I've got
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> snapshots:http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#&usg=AFQjCNH25LmnVC...
>>>>> http://picasaweb.google.it/mikedepetris/Toshiba#
>>>>> sorry
>>>> Wow! You have it all torn apart. See those two fuselinks? One is labeled
>>>> FUSE500 and the other is labeled FUSE501? They are probably okay, but I
>>>> would ohm them anyway, as they are easy to check.
>>>> Large electrolytic capacitors are the weakest component generally. And
>>>> it looks like C520 is one of them. That is probably okay, but something
>>>> else to check.
>>>> And that first picture off to the far right. What is that? A reset
>>>> button? And is that board below the main board? And what is that thing
>>>> bottom right? That disc looking thing with a large black dot in the
>>>> center? Is that a coil? Or is it really a disc shaped object?
>>>> And right by that disc just to the left. There is a plug that looks
>>>> unplugged. Where does that go to? And where does that large plug with
>>>> two black wires and two green wires go to? I would guess to the fan. Is
>>>> that so?
>>> the laptop is still apart, had little time to experiment, the two
>>> fuses are ok will have to test capacitors, in the while I took away
>>> the cmos battery and soldered two wires to use a standard cr2032 but
>>> nothing changes
>>> my idea now, is that if I am not able to find the faulty component,
>>> that may well be a custom one, I will try to cut the connections to
>>> the battery poles and connect using a 2-way deviator, so that in one
>>> position the lapton can work like now, charging the battery when
>>> switched off, or running on battery only, or trun the deviator/switch
>>> and give voltage directly to the cutted terminals, excluding the
>>> battery, with an external power supply, the pc should still detect the
>>> battery charge level from other contacts of battery in place
>>> should this work?

>> Well first I think that is a pretty good idea you have myself. Although
>> will it work? Well I think it has a good chance to work if that means
>> anything. But no guarantee.
>>
>> One thing worries me though. That is the difference between the battery
>> voltage and the power supply voltage. Your battery is most likely a
>> lithium battery and when wired in series, would top out at 4.2v per
>> cell. But batteries are not normally rated in this matter, but like 3.6V
>> per cell in series. Or something around this figure.
>>
>> And I would really like to know the difference using the 4.2v per cell
>> in series vs. what the power supply puts out. Let's say you battery says
>> 10.8v. That would be 3 x 3.6v = 10.8. Now knowing that 3 cells in series
>> (others could be in parallel too and don't count in this formula). So
>> the highest the battery would be fully charged could be as high as 12.6v.
>>
>> And I would be really leery feeding anything higher than this. Although
>> you could probably be okay 2v higher than this and it still might be
>> okay. So we are talking about 14.6v now. And maybe 15.6v might be okay
>> too, but that is really pushing it. As I think you would be risking
>> something burning out. And I bet the power supply puts out more than
>> this, doesn't it?
>>
>> So I think your best bet would be to have two supplies. One lower to
>> match the battery voltage and to feed that to replace the battery
>> voltage. And the original one to charge the battery like it does now.
>> They also sell power supplies that you can select the voltage and that
>> might be a good idea. But never miss select the correct voltage. That is
>> the only danger with them besides setting the wrong polarity.
>>
>> Remember too, never supply external power to the battery. If you
>> accidentally supplied 12.6v or less to a 10.8v battery is one thing. And
>> not a very good idea at all since the current is so high from the
>> supply. But anything higher is super dangerous. As the battery (unless a
>> safety circuit kicks in inside of the battery) will overcharge and burst
>> into flames.
>>
>> And once it is bursting into flames, I believe water on this fire only
>> makes it worse. Although I am not sure. Some sort of metal container
>> should contain it well (and save your house from burning down). Although
>> the vapors are probably dangerous too.
>>
>> Now do you want to rethink all of this?

>
> somebody suggests me to have a look at Intel's papares to find any
> possible patch or update of the microcode, so I put the motherboard
> into the scanner:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/23705027@N06/sets/72157624394316536/
>
> On the CPU I can read:
>
> LF80537 T5300
> 5648B999 SL9WE
>
> 1.73/2M/533
> INTEL... copyright symbols and "06"
>
> It would be good to try a new or even different CPU to check if it's
> working...


Well it doesn't sound like a bad CPU to me, but who knows? I see it is
in a ZIF socket and it is easy enough to replace. You know how to work
those? See that large flathead screw? Turn it counterclockwise until it
stops. Usually it only turns 90 to 180 degrees. Then the CPU should pull
out without any resistance. If there is resistance, you didn't turn it
far enough.

I didn't notice any thermal paste on top of the CPU nor the northbridge
chip. So the heatsink should have thermal pads on them. And don't use
any thermal paste with thermal pads. All you need is to keep everything
clean and without fingerprints or anything else where they meet.

I believe my Gateway M-465e uses that same CPU. Oh that's a 533MHz front
bus? Now I wonder if I got the right RAM in mine? As I thought it was
only a 400MHz front bus and I thought I dropped in 400MHz RAM. If I did,
oops!

Oh that is a Intel Core 2 Duo Mobile Processor too! Mine is only a
single core. Those Core 2's are not cheap, not even used on eBay. Well
if you buy one and you have the same problem. I guess you can just
resell it. ;-)

--
Bill
Asus EEE PC 702G4 ~ 2GB RAM ~ 16GB-SDHC
Xandros Linux (build 2007-10-19 13:03)
 
Top