Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote:
>>>> Firefox is also Mozilla. It has a better security record than IE on
>>>> any version of Windows. Period.
>>>
>>> Prove it, with empirical data, that can be verified.
>>> Well...?
>>
>> Simple *counting* will suffice - IE has had more security holes, far
>> more frequently, than Firefox.
>
>hehehe...can't prove your point can you.
>figures!
Will you prove your assertion that there is "nothing wrong" with IE8?
Didn't think so. And it figures.
Put up, or "STFU".
>> Because I'm not going to let you promote IE over Firefox without
>> pointing out how *DUMB* that is. IE is simply not as good for general
>> use, nor as secure.
>
>Prove it or else STFU!
Make me, lame brain. You do nothing but play games and act like the
fruitcake you are, and I actually try to answer questions. You are in
no position to dictate anything.
>>>>> "IDIOT"!
>>>>
>>>> I dunno who you're quoting - I was civil, until you called me a moron.
>>>
>>> That was a compliment.
>>> Oops!
>>
>> You're the one promoting IE.
>
>Wrong dung breath. I'm simply refuting what you're saying.
You haven't refuted anything, pee pants.
>> Oops! Dipshit. You're a fuckin'
>> fruitcake, and everyone here knows it.
>
>Keep it up dipshit, as we're all enjoying watching you start foaming at
>the mouth!...LOL!
I'm quite sure that you're the one who appears to be foaming at the
mouth, with your fruitcake LOLs and oopses.
>>>>> We're talking IE8 as used in W 7.
>>>>
>>>> Ever heard of running it under an Admin account with UAC disabled?
>>>> It's no different than IE8 as used under XP, in that case - and that
>>>> is how many people, myself included, run Win7.
>>>
>>> You mean under the real admin account of the pretend one?
>>> Well...?
>>
>> *BZZT*. You dodged the point. It's because you're wrong. Deal with
>> it.
>>
>hehehe...OMG...you don't know the difference do you?
>Figures!
Well, actually, since you want to dodge the point, and talk that kind
of garbage to me, please do feel free to explain what the fuck you
meant by "pretend" account - I was nice enough to assume you meant
what you must have actually meant, but if you wanna be a stuck-up
little nerd, let's see you defend that "pretend" comment. Duh.
>> If you use UAC, fine. If you use IE, fine. Don't promote it without
>> pointing out the necessity of UAC under an Admin account, around here,
>> though, or I will point out the stupidity of it.
>
>You're the stupid one and thanks for proving it.
What, by not letting you trap me with a pointless question, designed
to dodge my point showing how wrong you were? Trust me, pussy boy,
I've dealt with much more intelligent liars than you, and beaten them
just as easily. You're dealing with a mind orders of magnitude above
yours, and you would be wise to quit replying, unless you simply enjoy
making an ass of yourself just to get attention (which wouldn't
surprise me, of course).
>>> Now get a life!
>>
>> Get a clue.
>
>You're the clueless one.
>Oops!...LOL!
You're a fruitcake beyond most I've encountered. It's actually
disturbing.
--
Joel Crump