Need Win7 drivers for HP932 printer?

[Death]

Alias wrote:

> Death wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias
>>>> <aka@masked&anonymous.net.invalida> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias
>>>>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use
>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to
>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically
>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a
>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.
>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's
>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the
>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon
>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,
>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the
>>>> proprietary code either?
>>>>
>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of
>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers
>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software
>>>> house.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>
>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you
>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.
>>>
>>
>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I
>> do
>>
>
> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get
> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do
> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?
>

Software is not air.

Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime
commitment to a non-relative.

I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to
your expert opinion.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Death wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias
>>>>> <aka@masked&anonymous.net.invalida> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias
>>>>>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to
>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically
>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a
>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.
>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's
>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the
>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon
>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,
>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the
>>>>> proprietary code either?
>>>>>
>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of
>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers
>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software
>>>>> house.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>>
>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you
>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I
>>> do
>>>
>>
>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get
>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do
>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?
>>
>
> Software is not air.

We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You
wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free
except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things
than just software.

>
> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime
> commitment to a non-relative.

I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has
been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where
women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a
ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved
(pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in
D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think
about shit.

>
> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to
> your expert opinion.
>

Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.

--
Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:

> Death wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Death wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias
>>>>>> <aka@masked&anonymous.net.invalida> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias
>>>>>>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use
>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to
>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically
>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a
>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.
>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's
>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the
>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon
>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,
>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the
>>>>>> proprietary code either?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of
>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers
>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software
>>>>>> house.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>>>
>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you
>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I
>>>> do
>>>>
>>>
>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get
>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do
>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?
>>>
>>
>> Software is not air.
>
> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You
> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free
> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things
> than just software.
>

Ummm, I'm talking software.
What *you're* talking about is anyone's guess.

>>
>> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime
>> commitment to a non-relative.
>
> I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has
> been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where
> women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a
> ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved
> (pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in
> D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think
> about shit.
>

I avoid sex with people I don't know.
Has worked well for me.
You do what you want, I don't care.

>>
>> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to
>> your expert opinion.
>>
>
> Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.
>

Besides a picture of you with an ubuntu manual, what am I looking for?
It ain't "having sex", moron.
If you take a mirror to a restaurant, is that dinner for two?

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Death wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias
>>>>>>> <aka@masked&anonymous.net.invalida> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias
>>>>>>>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use
>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to
>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically
>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a
>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.
>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's
>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the
>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon
>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,
>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the
>>>>>>> proprietary code either?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of
>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers
>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software
>>>>>>> house.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you
>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I
>>>>> do
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get
>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do
>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Software is not air.
>>
>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You
>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free
>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things
>> than just software.
>>
>
> Ummm, I'm talking software.
> What *you're* talking about is anyone's guess.
>
>>>
>>> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime
>>> commitment to a non-relative.
>>
>> I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has
>> been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where
>> women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a
>> ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved
>> (pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in
>> D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think
>> about shit.
>>
>
> I avoid sex with people I don't know.

You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.

> Has worked well for me.
> You do what you want, I don't care.

No sex, eh? Sad.

>
>>>
>>> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to
>>> your expert opinion.
>>>
>>
>> Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.
>>
>
> Besides a picture of you with an ubuntu manual, what am I looking for?
> It ain't "having sex", moron.

Um, yes it is.

> If you take a mirror to a restaurant, is that dinner for two?
>

Masturbation usually only requires one person. Are you really this wet
behind the ears? You know that they say, "Safe sex is in your hands".

--
Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:

> Death wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Death wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:26:08 +0200, Alias
>>>>>>>> <aka@masked&anonymous.net.invalida> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:26:55 +0200, Alias
>>>>>>>>>> <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use
>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need to
>>>>>>>>>>> do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will automagically
>>>>>>>>>>> install the drivers. Check it out at http://www.ubuntu.com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What utter drivel. As I had previously noted Ubuntu doesn't have a
>>>>>>>>>> clue when it comes to the more modern Canon printers.
>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Canon has decided not to supply the drives. That is Canon's
>>>>>>>>> fault, not Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you saying that Ubuntu, a Linux company and devotee of the
>>>>>>>> open-source philosophy is now willing to including preparatory Canon
>>>>>>>> driver code? sort of a rat leaving a sinking ship sort of philosophy,
>>>>>>>> wouldn't you say? And Canon turned them down, wouldn't giver them the
>>>>>>>> proprietary code either?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That really says something about what Canon thinks of the future of
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu, doesn't it. that one of the larger printer manufacturers
>>>>>>>> doesn't want to be associated with this fast moving, dynamic, software
>>>>>>>> house.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb
>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Grasping straws again, eh? It's still Canon's fault, no matter how you
>>>>>>> try to spin it to bolster your ill informed opinion about Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias' philosophy...everything should be free except for what little I
>>>>>> do
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, does this mean you want to pay for the air you breath or you'll get
>>>>> a complex that people might think you're Open Source? How about sex? Do
>>>>> you pay for that, whether you do it all by yourself or with others?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Software is not air.
>>>
>>> We were talking about paying vs. free, not software but nice try. You
>>> wrote, and I quote, "Alias' philosophy...everything should be free
>>> except for what little I do". "Everything" includes a few more things
>>> than just software.
>>>
>>
>> Ummm, I'm talking software.
>> What *you're* talking about is anyone's guess.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Everyone pays for sex... be it cash, dinner and a movie, or a lifetime
>>>> commitment to a non-relative.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry to hear your love life is so sad. My experience with sex has
>>> been much different than that but I grew up in the 60s in D.C where
>>> women out number men ten to one. I guess you've never experienced a
>>> ménage à trois or sex with someone you don't know with no costs involved
>>> (pre AIDS). I also bet you don't know why men are so out numbered in
>>> D.C. either. All you know how to do is look at something brown and think
>>> about shit.
>>>
>>
>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>
> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>

Sure I would.
If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
drop of a hat for others.
A skank is a skank.

>> Has worked well for me.
>> You do what you want, I don't care.
>
> No sex, eh? Sad.
>

I'm married, so yes...and being married for 27 years to the same woman,
I don't itch and break out in rashes.

>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't think you can have sex by yourself, I'll have to leave that to
>>>> your expert opinion.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Try looking this up in the dictionary: masturbation.
>>>
>>
>> Besides a picture of you with an ubuntu manual, what am I looking for?
>> It ain't "having sex", moron.
>
> Um, yes it is.
>

Not "all by yourself", as you put it before you changed to using the
term masturbation.

>> If you take a mirror to a restaurant, is that dinner for two?
>>
>
> Masturbation usually only requires one person. Are you really this wet
> behind the ears? You know that they say, "Safe sex is in your hands".
>

You are telling me more than I wish to know about you.
Stop changing the "terms" midstream.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:

>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>
>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>
>
> Sure I would.
> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
> drop of a hat for others.
> A skank is a skank.

I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.

--
Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:

> Death wrote:
>
>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>
>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>
>>
>> Sure I would.
>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>> drop of a hat for others.
>> A skank is a skank.
>
> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.
>

I was alive in the '60's.
Just too young.

Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.
I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
that time,too.

A shame.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Death]

Death wrote:

> Alias wrote:
>
>> Death wrote:
>>
>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>>
>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure I would.
>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>>> drop of a hat for others.
>>> A skank is a skank.
>>
>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.
>>
>
> I was alive in the '60's.
> Just too young.
>
> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.
> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
> that time,too.
>

Probably should change that to "unexpected children".
They became quite wanted after taxpayers started feeding,clothing, and
housing them.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Death wrote:
>>
>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>>
>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure I would.
>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>>> drop of a hat for others.
>>> A skank is a skank.
>>
>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.
>>
>
> I was alive in the '60's.
> Just too young.
>
> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.

Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the
sexual revolution.

> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
> that time,too.
>
> A shame.
>

Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?

--
Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:

> Death wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Death wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>>>
>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure I would.
>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>>>> drop of a hat for others.
>>>> A skank is a skank.
>>>
>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.
>>>
>>
>> I was alive in the '60's.
>> Just too young.
>>
>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.
>
> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the
> sexual revolution.
>
>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
>> that time,too.
>>
>> A shame.
>>
>
> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?
>

I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should
be complete next month).
What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?
Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?
LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.

Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Death wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure I would.
>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>>>>> drop of a hat for others.
>>>>> A skank is a skank.
>>>>
>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I was alive in the '60's.
>>> Just too young.
>>>
>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.
>>
>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the
>> sexual revolution.
>>
>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
>>> that time,too.
>>>
>>> A shame.
>>>
>>
>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?
>>
>
> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should
> be complete next month).
> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?
> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?
> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.
>
> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.
>

You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and
you come up with this shit.

--
Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:

> Death wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Death wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure I would.
>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.
>>>>>> A skank is a skank.
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was alive in the '60's.
>>>> Just too young.
>>>>
>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.
>>>
>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the
>>> sexual revolution.
>>>
>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
>>>> that time,too.
>>>>
>>>> A shame.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?
>>>
>>
>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should
>> be complete next month).
>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?
>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?
>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.
>>
>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.
>>
>
> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and
> you come up with this shit.
>

Hmmm ... higher taxes?
Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally
uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards
should pay the bill?
Hey, thanks.
Good job.
Way to look out for yourselves.
If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Frank]

On 4/24/2010 9:18 AM, Alias wrote:
> Death wrote:
>
>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>
>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>
>>
>> Sure I would.
>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>> drop of a hat for others.
>> A skank is a skank.
>
> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A
> shame.
>

I that why you have hepatitis c?
Oops!

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Death wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sure I would.
>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.
>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.
>>>>> Just too young.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.
>>>>
>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the
>>>> sexual revolution.
>>>>
>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
>>>>> that time,too.
>>>>>
>>>>> A shame.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should
>>> be complete next month).
>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?
>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?
>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.
>>>
>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.
>>>
>>
>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and
>> you come up with this shit.
>>
>
> Hmmm ... higher taxes?
> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally
> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards
> should pay the bill?
> Hey, thanks.
> Good job.
> Way to look out for yourselves.
> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.
>

Nope, not a clue. Oh well.

--
Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:

> Death wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Death wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sure I would.
>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.
>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.
>>>>>> Just too young.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the
>>>>> sexual revolution.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
>>>>>> that time,too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A shame.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should
>>>> be complete next month).
>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?
>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?
>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.
>>>>
>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and
>>> you come up with this shit.
>>>
>>
>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?
>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally
>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards
>> should pay the bill?
>> Hey, thanks.
>> Good job.
>> Way to look out for yourselves.
>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.
>>
>
> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.
>

I'd slink away, too.
LOL
You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.
You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[Frank]

On 4/24/2010 10:25 AM, Alias wrote:
> Death wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Death wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure I would.
>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.
>>>>>> A skank is a skank.
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties.
>>>>> A shame.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was alive in the '60's.
>>>> Just too young.
>>>>
>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.
>>>
>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the
>>> sexual revolution.
>>>
>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
>>>> that time,too.
>>>>
>>>> A shame.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again,
>>> eh?
>>>
>>
>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should
>> be complete next month).
>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?
>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?
>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.
>>
>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.
>>
>
> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and
> you come up with this shit.
>
Was hepatitis c one of the gifts you got that keeps on giving?
Oops!

 

[GreyCloud]

KG wrote:
> My installation or Windows 7 Home Premium will not support our full featured HP 932 printer, it has
> all the extras. Is there any way it locate signed Windows 7 drivers that will support the full
> features?

http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/...&lc=en&cc=us&dlc=en&lang=en&cc=us&submit=Go »

 

[Alias]

Death wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> Death wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.
>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.
>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.
>>>>>>> Just too young.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the
>>>>>> sexual revolution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
>>>>>>> that time,too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A shame.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should
>>>>> be complete next month).
>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?
>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?
>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and
>>>> you come up with this shit.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?
>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally
>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards
>>> should pay the bill?
>>> Hey, thanks.
>>> Good job.
>>> Way to look out for yourselves.
>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.
>>>
>>
>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.
>>
>
> I'd slink away, too.
> LOL

Who's slinking?

> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.
> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.
>

You don't know what you're talking about.

--
Alias

 

[Death]

Alias wrote:

> Death wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Death wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I avoid sex with people I don't know.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't have avoided it with the babes I'm talking about.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sure I would.
>>>>>>>>>> If they put out at the drop of a hat for you, then they put out at the
>>>>>>>>>> drop of a hat for others.
>>>>>>>>>> A skank is a skank.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I guess unless you were there, you wouldn't understand the sixties. A shame.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was alive in the '60's.
>>>>>>>> Just too young.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Seems having unwanted children became real popular during that time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Never heard of birth control pills? They were one of the reasons for the
>>>>>>> sexual revolution.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think having taxpayers foot the bill for those kids kicked in during
>>>>>>>> that time,too.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A shame.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Grasping straws in a feeble attempt to cover up your jealously again, eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a son...he's 23, and already buying a house(construction should
>>>>>> be complete next month).
>>>>>> What exactly do you think I'm jealous of?
>>>>>> Having sex with strange, drug-laced women?
>>>>>> LOL...yeah, I'm sooo jealous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems birth defects, autism, crap like that is that eras legacy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You haven't a clue as to what you enjoy now thanks to my generation and
>>>>> you come up with this shit.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm ... higher taxes?
>>>> Hmmm ... a generation of welfare dependants that believe people totally
>>>> uninvolved in risky behavior that begat lazy, free-loading bastards
>>>> should pay the bill?
>>>> Hey, thanks.
>>>> Good job.
>>>> Way to look out for yourselves.
>>>> If it felt good, you did it....damned the consequences.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nope, not a clue. Oh well.
>>>
>>
>> I'd slink away, too.
>> LOL
>
> Who's slinking?
>
>> You're funny, in a "look at that idiot talking to himself" kind of way.
>> You better kill-file me again, before I spead you like butter.
>>
>
> You don't know what you're talking about.
>

I'm dead on right.
You screw-balls ran the world into the ground.
All those nasty,drug infested little turd-droppers those skanks dropped
in hospitals left and right.
Trying to make up for that with "freesoftware is so cool"?
Global warming is scary?
Al Gore eats dirt to save the planet? LOL

--
Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,
Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

 

[John B. Slocomb]

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:272 +0200, Alias
<aka@masked&anonymous.net.invalida> wrote:

>John B. slocomb wrote:
>> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:23:48 +0200, Alias
>> <aka@masked&anonymous.net.invalida> wrote:
>>
>>> Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
>>>> news:hqsjr8$kf2$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:hqsdl2$e62$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>> Heywood Jablowme wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Alias" <aka@maskedandanymous.org.invalido> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:hqs3mf$v6u$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>>>> KG wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> My installation or Windows 7 Home Premium will not support our full
>>>>>>>>>> featured HP 932 printer, it has
>>>>>>>>>> all the extras. Is there any way it locate signed Windows 7 drivers
>>>>>>>>>> that will support the full
>>>>>>>>>> features?
>>>>>>>>>> *****************
>>>>>>>>>> Thank You kgsAT@msbx.net
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To reply to this email please remove the AT
>>>>>>>>>> after the kgs in the reply to address as shown above.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Never argue with the ignorant.
>>>>>>>>>> They can't tell when you've won."
>>>>>>>>> MS and HP want you to buy a new printer. Do yourself a favor and use
>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu. It's free and has no problems with HP printers. All you need
>>>>>>>>> to do is connect the printer to your computer and Ubuntu will
>>>>>>>>> automagically install the drivers. Check it out at
>>>>>>>>> http://www.ubuntu.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>>> What a fucking asshole you are. He can go to the HP site to download
>>>>>>>> Windows 7 drivers.
>>>>>>> That's one solution until he can't find the drivers for something else.
>>>>>> Do you even know how stupid that sounds? So you are saying that ditch
>>>>>> windows and install that SHITTY Ubuntu because he hasn't been to the HP
>>>>>> site where the drivers are? You really are fucked up.
>>>>> Ubuntu isn't shitty. You are.
>>>> I get enjoyment out of you being such a douche bag with your head in the
>>>> sand. Just the FACT that Ubuntu has been around for years and Ubuntu is
>>>> still on very few desktop machines is enough for me. It is you who
>>>> can't stand that FACT. It is you trying to push Ubuntu in the Windows
>>>> forum. You are desperate.
>>> Where else but a Windows forum? In the Linux forums, everyone's heard of
>>> Ubuntu. BTW, you and facts, as has already been established, is an oxymoron.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why would he want to ditch all his software
>>>>>>> The OP mentioned no software other than Windows and the 7 Dwarfs.
>>>>>> Hey shit-for-brains: If he ditched Windows for that INFERIOR Ubuntu,
>>>>>> then his software is useless isn't it? Oops.
>>>>> You mean superior.
>>>> Doesn't really matter if I think it's superior or inferior. I am happy
>>>> with the fact that Ubuntu after all these years is still a failure. I
>>>> know it drives you nuts and that makes my day!
>>> Going from zero users to around 12 million is your idea of failure?
>>> Being praised in all the computer periodicals is your idea of failure?
>>> Being available preinstalled and on display in computer stores is your
>>> idea of failure?
>>
>>
>> That is not exactly correct. When Ubuntu started they spent quite a
>> bit of time and effort to announce that Ubuntu was a distro based on
>> Debian, thus riding on the coattails of a well established distro.
>> And, it you remember version 1 it was a very thinly disguised copy of
>> debian.
>>
>> In reference to Ubuntu's 12 million total copies since they started I
>> might point out that Microsoft released Windows 7 for consumer sales
>> in October 2009. In April MS announced that they had sold some 60
>> million copies and by 2nd May 2010 an additional 30 million, for a
>> total of 90 million copies sold. That is 30 million copies a month
>> which is a monthly sales of 250% of Ubuntu's total, lifetime, all
>> time, issues.
>>
>> Not bad for a fifth rate operating system that everybody knows is no
>> good, isn't it alias?
>>
>>
>
>We are again treated to the lame boy's false logic that quantity means
>quality. I've explained how this isn't a truism but the kid keeps
>posting it again anyway.

Given that Windows is providing an operating system that satisfies 95%
of their potential users sufficiently well that they won't even
consider a FREE copy of Ubuntu to replace it, it seems obvious that
the question of "Quality" is somewhat moot in this case.

But on the question of "truisms" would you care to explain again your
statement that the Windows Directory is the Windows kernel?

I really love your truisms.... so timely; so wrong.

>
>Another example: Toyota sells a lot more cars than Rolls Royce does but
>which one would you like to inherit?

Apparently you are unaware that Rolls Royce, building the worlds best
car, went essentially bankrupt and sold out to BMW who now runs the
company.

Does that mean that BMW is a failure?

But tell us more about the Windows Directory Kernel that you have
mentioned. I'm really interested in that.


John B. Slocomb
(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)