"Alias" <Alias@nospam.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:hkmqbh$62e$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Philo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <Alias@nospam.com.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:hkmhar$md1$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Conor wrote:
>>>> In article <hkmd0p$it9$1@news.eternal-september.org>, Alias says...
>>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8499859.stm
>>>>>
>>>>> It's about time. Gosh, it only took them seventeen years.
>>>>
>>>> Thats nothing. It took the Linux brigade 25 years to patch a filesystem
>>>> exploit that carried over from Unix.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And that exploit is?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>
>> Who cares.
>
> Well, if the exploit was never used, the point, like your brain, is moot.
>
>> It took them 25 years! By the way, Linux has been free for 25 years,
>> yet most desktop users use Windows.
>
> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users don't know about Ubuntu.
Most desktop/laptop/net-book users don't CARE to know about Ubuntu.
>
>> They have to pay for Windows and Linux is free.
>
> Most desktop/laptop/net-book users think that Windows *comes* with the
> computer.
News to Alias: Windows comes on most desktop/laptop/net-book computers
because it's all about productivity. That is where Windows shines. Now if
you are into wasting your time, messing with cryptic line commands, getting
nothing done, then by all means, go to that INFERIOR Ubuntu.
>
>> That should tell you all you need to know about that SHITTY INFERIOR OS
>> that nobody wants. LOL!
>
> Considering that those are all half truths and blatant lies, all we need
> to know about you is that you're a liar who spreads FUD.
>
WRONG. You are lying again. Tell me why after so many years is Linux still
rejected by most?