1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

IF XP HAD 135 updates in its history

Discussion in 'Windows 7' started by Jon Pope, Mar 24, 2010.

  1. Jon Pope

    Jon Pope Flightless Bird

    and everyone liked it. Win 7 is only 5 months old and it surpasses XP what
    gives
     
  2. LD55ZRA

    LD55ZRA Flightless Bird

    I don't bother to install any updates post SP3. PERIOD. They are useless
    and they only succeed to slow down your system.


    "Jon Pope" <IHATEU@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote in message
    news:hoeuts$adm$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    > and everyone liked it. Win 7 is only 5 months old and it surpasses XP what
    > gives
     
  3. Gordon

    Gordon Flightless Bird

    "LD55ZRA" <LD55ZRA@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    news:hof0aj$cc3$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    >
    > I don't bother to install any updates post SP3. PERIOD. They are useless
    > and they only succeed to slow down your system.
    >


    Another idiot. People like you are one of the reasons the internet is awash
    with WINDOWS viruses and malware - because you don't care twopence about
    security.
     
  4. Jon Pope

    Jon Pope Flightless Bird

    I agree with you Gordon. I just think its funny that MS says that Win 7 is
    more secure. The way things are going with 7 we might need 2700 updates in
    the 10 year history

    "Gordon" <gordonbparker@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    news:hof5ot$mij$1@news.eternal-september.org...
    >
    > "LD55ZRA" <LD55ZRA@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    > news:hof0aj$cc3$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    >>
    >> I don't bother to install any updates post SP3. PERIOD. They are
    >> useless and they only succeed to slow down your system.
    >>

    >
    > Another idiot. People like you are one of the reasons the internet is
    > awash with WINDOWS viruses and malware - because you don't care twopence
    > about security.
     
  5. Gordon

    Gordon Flightless Bird

    "Jon Pope" <IHATEU@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote in message
    news:hoffcb$810$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    > I agree with you Gordon. I just think its funny that MS says that Win 7 is
    > more secure. The way things are going with 7 we might need 2700 updates in
    > the 10 year history
    >


    Doesn't worry me about the number of updates - what DOES concern me is that
    as the security updates are issued for a specific reason - to make the OS
    more secure - people who deliberately don't install them are not just
    putting themselves at risk , but are creating a potential problem for
    others.
     
  6. Slap

    Slap Flightless Bird

    "Jon Pope" <IHATEU@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote in message
    news:hoffcb$810$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    > I agree with you Gordon. I just think its funny that MS says that Win 7 is
    > more secure. The way things are going with 7 we might need 2700 updates in
    > the 10 year history
    >


    That's why it is more secure.
    --
     
  7. DanS

    DanS Flightless Bird

    "Slap" <slap@gmail.com> wrote in
    news:rIHqn.109413$1n5.58352@newsfe04.iad:

    >
    > "Jon Pope" <IHATEU@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote in message
    > news:hoffcb$810$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    >> I agree with you Gordon. I just think its funny that MS
    >> says that Win 7 is more secure. The way things are going
    >> with 7 we might need 2700 updates in the 10 year history
    >>

    >
    > That's why it is more secure.


    Hacker exploits IE8 on Windows 7 to win Pwn2Own
    http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=5855&tag=nl.e589

    Pwn2Own hack topples Firefox on Windows
    http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=5865&tag=nl.e589

    Both brand new exploits that MS doesn't even know any technical
    details about yet...

    "ASLR+DEP are held up as significant roadblocks to thwart
    malware attacks on the newest versions of Windows but, as this
    contest shows, skilled hackers with enough motivation and
    resources can bypass those mitigations easily."

    As both hacks completely bypassed both ASLR + DEP.
     
  8. LD55ZRA

    LD55ZRA Flightless Bird

    Gordon wrote:

    >
    > "LD55ZRA" <LD55ZRA@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    > news:hof0aj$cc3$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    >
    >>
    >> I don't bother to install any updates post SP3. PERIOD. They are
    >> useless and they only succeed to slow down your system.
    >>

    >
    > Another idiot. People like you are one of the reasons the internet is
    > awash with WINDOWS viruses and malware - because you don't care
    > twopence about security.


    If the "internet is awash with WINDOWS viruses and malware" then clearly
    the updates you are installing very religiously month after month aren't
    working. and this is exactly what I am saying! Thank you for proving my
    point. You will protect your self by making sure you don't install any
    updates and instead reconfigure your Windows firewall such that no
    exceptions is allowed.

    You will learn a thing or two from me if you stop taking advice from
    Microsoft Valuable Pigs of which you are very fond of.
     
  9. LD55ZRA

    LD55ZRA Flightless Bird

    Jon Pope wrote:

    > I agree with you Gordon. I just think its funny that MS says that Win
    > 7 is more secure. The way things are going with 7 we might need 2700
    > updates in the 10 year history
    >
    >

    Another Steve Ballmer's ass licker.
     
  10. LD55ZRA

    LD55ZRA Flightless Bird

    Gordon wrote:

    >
    > what DOES concern me is that as the security updates are issued for a
    > specific reason - -


    That reason is to destabilize your system so that you rush to your local
    store and buy a new system with Windows 7 even if you don't need it
    immediately.

    > people who deliberately don't install them are not just putting
    > themselves at risk , but are creating a potential problem for others.


    Well in that case you are at fault for not being able to look after
    system. You can't blame the virus writers for infecting your system or
    for that matter blame people like me who bother with useless updates;
    Blame yourself and your advisers who told you to install all useless
    updates from Microsoft.
     
  11. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/25/2010 2:09 PM, LD55ZRA wrote:
    > Jon Pope wrote:
    >
    >> I agree with you Gordon. I just think its funny that MS says that Win
    >> 7 is more secure. The way things are going with 7 we might need 2700
    >> updates in the 10 year history
    >>
    >>

    > Another Steve Ballmer's ass licker.
    >
    >

    You've never told us who's dick your sucking...is it LT or RS or both?
    Enquiring minds want to know.
     
  12. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/25/2010 2:15 PM, LD55ZRA wrote:
    > Gordon wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> what DOES concern me is that as the security updates are issued for a
    >> specific reason - -

    >
    > That reason is to destabilize your system so that you rush to your local
    > store and buy a new system with Windows 7 even if you don't need it
    > immediately.


    Is that what you did?
    >
    >> people who deliberately don't install them are not just putting
    >> themselves at risk , but are creating a potential problem for others.

    >
    > Well in that case you are at fault for not being able to look after
    > system. You can't blame the virus writers for infecting your system or
    > for that matter blame people like me who bother with useless updates;
    > Blame yourself and your advisers who told you to install all useless
    > updates from Microsoft.


    What stupid POS you are.
    >
    >
     
  13. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/25/2010 2:08 PM, LD55ZRA wrote:
    > Gordon wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> "LD55ZRA" <LD55ZRA@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
    >> news:hof0aj$cc3$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    >>
    >>>
    >>> I don't bother to install any updates post SP3. PERIOD. They are
    >>> useless and they only succeed to slow down your system.
    >>>

    >>
    >> Another idiot. People like you are one of the reasons the internet is
    >> awash with WINDOWS viruses and malware - because you don't care
    >> twopence about security.

    >
    > If the "internet is awash with WINDOWS viruses and malware" then clearly
    > the updates you are installing very religiously month after month aren't
    > working. and this is exactly what I am saying! Thank you for proving my
    > point. You will protect your self by making sure you don't install any
    > updates and instead reconfigure your Windows firewall such that no
    > exceptions is allowed.
    >
    > You will learn a thing or two from me if you stop taking advice from
    > Microsoft Valuable Pigs of which you are very fond of.
    >
    >
    >


    You can't possible be as dumb and as stupid as you sound...can you?
     
  14. LD55ZRA

    LD55ZRA Flightless Bird

    Frank wrote:

    > You can't possible be as dumb and as stupid as you sound...can you?


    If you don't have anything better to say do you mind going away to suck
    certain Mr Ballmer's ass?
     
  15. LD55ZRA

    LD55ZRA Flightless Bird

    Frank wrote:

    >
    > What stupid POS you are.



    If you don't have anything better to say do you mind going away to suck
    certain Mr Ballmer's ass?
     
  16. LD55ZRA

    LD55ZRA Flightless Bird

    Frank wrote:

    > You've never told us who's dick your sucking...is it LT or RS or both?
    > Enquiring minds want to know.



    If you don't have anything better to say do you mind going away to suck
    certain Mr Ballmer's ass?
     
  17. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/25/2010 4:09 PM, LD55ZRA wrote:
    > Frank wrote:
    >
    >>
    >> What stupid POS you are.

    >
    >
    > If you don't have anything better to say do you mind going away to suck
    > certain Mr Ballmer's ass?


    Got your panties all in a bunch *COCK SUCKER*!
     
  18. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/25/2010 4:09 PM, LD55ZRA wrote:
    > Frank wrote:
    >
    >> You've never told us who's dick your sucking...is it LT or RS or both?
    >> Enquiring minds want to know.

    >
    >
    > If you don't have anything better to say do you mind going away to suck
    > certain Mr Ballmer's ass?
    >

    What's wrong *COCK SUCKER*, got your panties all in a bunch?
     
  19. Frank

    Frank Flightless Bird

    On 3/25/2010 4:08 PM, LD55ZRA wrote:
    > Frank wrote:
    >
    >> You can't possible be as dumb and as stupid as you sound...can you?

    >
    > If you don't have anything better to say do you mind going away to suck
    > certain Mr Ballmer's ass?
    >



    What's wrong *COCK SUCKER*, got your panties all in a bunch?
     
  20. Andrew

    Andrew Flightless Bird

    "Jon Pope" <IHATEU@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote in message
    news:hoeuts$adm$1@speranza.aioe.org...
    > and everyone liked it. Win 7 is only 5 months old and it surpasses XP what
    > gives


    It seems to me there were many more than 135 updates in it's history, even
    without counting the issues fixed in the service packs.
    Where did you come up with this number?

    I just put up a couple of Win7 boxes last week and they only had 35 or so
    updates for all software on the box, including IE, Silverlight, .NET etc.

    --
    Andrew
     

Share This Page