Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.
You are aware that the information in that document has *nothing* to
do with actual *exploitable bugs* in the browser software, right? It
does not even *begin* to prove the assertion "IE8 is the most secure
browser available".
Joel wrote:
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote:
>
>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>
>> http://nsslabs.com/test-reports/NSSLabs_Q12010_BrowserSEM_Summ_FINAL.pdf
>
>
> You are aware that the information in that document has *nothing* to
> do with actual *exploitable bugs* in the browser software, right? It
> does not even *begin* to prove the assertion "IE8 is the most secure
> browser available".
>
Frank has never let facts come between him and his assertions.
Joel wrote:
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote:
>
>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>
>> http://nsslabs.com/test-reports/NSSLabs_Q12010_BrowserSEM_Summ_FINAL.pdf
>
>
> You are aware that the information in that document has *nothing* to
> do with actual *exploitable bugs* in the browser software, right? It
> does not even *begin* to prove the assertion "IE8 is the most secure
> browser available".
>
Frank's reference is out-of-date. FF 3.6.2 came out today.
"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:tpngq5hkqu62e4pint6onlk1l4ird2tflr@4ax.com...
> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote:
>
>>Enjoy! I know I did!
>>
>>http://nsslabs.com/test-reports/NSSLabs_Q12010_BrowserSEM_Summ_FINAL.pdf
>
>
> You are aware that the information in that document has *nothing* to
> do with actual *exploitable bugs* in the browser software, right? It
> does not even *begin* to prove the assertion "IE8 is the most secure
> browser available".
>
> --
> Joel Crump
True, but it's a good way to start another war between Alias and his
followers and Frank and his followers. *sigh*
--
SC Tom
On 3/23/2010 71 AM, SC Tom wrote:
>
> True, but it's a good way to start another war between Alias and his
> followers and Frank and his followers. *sigh*
"SC Tom" <sc@tom.net> wrote in
news:hoacaj$m4g$1@speranza.aioe.org:
>
> "Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:tpngq5hkqu62e4pint6onlk1l4ird2tflr@4ax.com...
>> Frank <fb@amk.cmo> wrote:
>>
>>>Enjoy! I know I did!
>>>
>>>http://nsslabs.com/test-reports/NSSLabs_Q12010_BrowserSEM_S
>>>umm_FINAL.pdf
>>
>>
>> You are aware that the information in that document has
>> *nothing* to do with actual *exploitable bugs* in the
>> browser software, right? It does not even *begin* to
>> prove the assertion "IE8 is the most secure browser
>> available".
>>
>> --
>> Joel Crump
>
> True, but it's a good way to start another war between
> Alias and his followers and Frank and his followers. *sigh*
FWIW.....Ali** doesn't have followers.....Fra** has enemies, for
lack of a better term.
On 3/22/2010 11:28 PM, Joel wrote:
> Frank<fb@amk.cmo> wrote:
>
>> Enjoy! I know I did!
>>
>> http://nsslabs.com/test-reports/NSSLabs_Q12010_BrowserSEM_Summ_FINAL.pdf
>
>
> You are aware that the information in that document has *nothing* to
> do with actual *exploitable bugs* in the browser software, right? It
> does not even *begin* to prove the assertion "IE8 is the most secure
> browser available".
Care to provide any verifiable empirical data to prove your point?
You can huh!
Oops!...LOL!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.