• Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.

Here is a way to boot a Windows 7 DVD on an older computer.

F

Frank

Flightless Bird
ray wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:31 -0800, Frank wrote:
>
>> ray wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:15:55 -0800, Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:
>>>
>>>> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:7r794qFqq3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:53:44 -0800, relic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>> Some of you have noticed that you cannot boot a Windows 7 DVD on
>>>>>>> your old computers. There is nothing wrong with your DVD player or
>>>>>>> your computer. This is a proper function as the Windows 7 DVD reads
>>>>>>> your BIOS on boot-up and determines that your computer is not
>>>>>>> suitable to run Windows 7.
>>>>>>> But wait...it can be done and 7 will run on a lot of older
>>>>>>> computers.
>>>>>> Do you mean to tell me there are people using computers that are
>>>>>> more than a couple years old? What a bunch of cheap bastards.
>>>>> Quite the contrary - you will find a lot of well-to-do folks who ARE
>>>>> well- to-do because they don't throw their money away.
>>>> well-to-do folks don't waste their valuable time on that INFERIOR
>>>> Ubuntu piece of crap. That is one reason they are well-to-do. They
>>>> use their time wisely. One more thing, they can afford Windows!
>>> I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to use Linux
>>> mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in town)
>>> because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap.

>> You use linux because its free and you're a free loader. You live off
>> the backs of others.

>
> frankie, that is not true, and I think you know it. I use Linux becuase
> it works. I could very easily afford anything that would work for me.


For some odd reason (ha!) I don't believe you. Especially since you
pollute MS product ng's with your linux trolling.
Why are you here? You don't use MS products and you don't even like MS.
Oh and spare me the "...I'm here to stop the FUD" crap. You're here to
spread the FUD...the linux FUD...you tell people linux is better than
Windows 7, in a Windows 7 ng, but you don't even use the product!
You're opinion about Windows 7 has no creditability at all.
>
>> Windows 7 is the very best OS available today and is all anyone needs
>> for all of their computing needs.

>
> Your opinion - not shared by many others.


Not shared by a few other liunx users. Stop lying ray-baby.

Linux is certainly every bit as
capable.

Your opinion, which is not shared by multi-millions of other Windows/Mac
users.
 
R

ray

Flightless Bird
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:34:01 -0800, Frank wrote:

> ray wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:31 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>
>>> ray wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:15:55 -0800, Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:7r794qFqq3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:53:44 -0800, relic wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>> Some of you have noticed that you cannot boot a Windows 7 DVD on
>>>>>>>> your old computers. There is nothing wrong with your DVD player
>>>>>>>> or your computer. This is a proper function as the Windows 7 DVD
>>>>>>>> reads your BIOS on boot-up and determines that your computer is
>>>>>>>> not suitable to run Windows 7.
>>>>>>>> But wait...it can be done and 7 will run on a lot of older
>>>>>>>> computers.
>>>>>>> Do you mean to tell me there are people using computers that are
>>>>>>> more than a couple years old? What a bunch of cheap bastards.
>>>>>> Quite the contrary - you will find a lot of well-to-do folks who
>>>>>> ARE well- to-do because they don't throw their money away.
>>>>> well-to-do folks don't waste their valuable time on that INFERIOR
>>>>> Ubuntu piece of crap. That is one reason they are well-to-do. They
>>>>> use their time wisely. One more thing, they can afford Windows!
>>>> I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to use Linux
>>>> mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in town)
>>>> because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap.
>>> You use linux because its free and you're a free loader. You live off
>>> the backs of others.

>>
>> frankie, that is not true, and I think you know it. I use Linux becuase
>> it works. I could very easily afford anything that would work for me.

>
> For some odd reason (ha!) I don't believe you. Especially since you
> pollute MS product ng's with your linux trolling. Why are you here? You
> don't use MS products and you don't even like MS. Oh and spare me the
> "...I'm here to stop the FUD" crap. You're here to spread the FUD...the
> linux FUD...you tell people linux is better than Windows 7, in a Windows
> 7 ng, but you don't even use the product! You're opinion about Windows 7
> has no creditability at all.


OK, frankie it's put up or shut up time. I defy you to show one instance
when I have ever said that Linux is better than win7.

My position is that ALL modern computer operating systems are crap -
compared to where they ought to be - compare to the hardware improvements
since the 80's. I also maintain that Linux, at least for most people, is
every bit as usable as any MS product.


>>
>>> Windows 7 is the very best OS available today and is all anyone needs
>>> for all of their computing needs.

>>
>> Your opinion - not shared by many others.

>
> Not shared by a few other liunx users. Stop lying ray-baby.
>
> Linux is certainly every bit as
> capable.
>
> Your opinion, which is not shared by multi-millions of other Windows/Mac
> users.


Unfortunately, most of those multi-millions have never had an opportunity
to find out, so you're wrong again.
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
ray wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:34:01 -0800, Frank wrote:
>
>> ray wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:31 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:15:55 -0800, Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:7r794qFqq3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:53:44 -0800, relic wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Some of you have noticed that you cannot boot a Windows 7 DVD on
>>>>>>>>> your old computers. There is nothing wrong with your DVD player
>>>>>>>>> or your computer. This is a proper function as the Windows 7 DVD
>>>>>>>>> reads your BIOS on boot-up and determines that your computer is
>>>>>>>>> not suitable to run Windows 7.
>>>>>>>>> But wait...it can be done and 7 will run on a lot of older
>>>>>>>>> computers.
>>>>>>>> Do you mean to tell me there are people using computers that are
>>>>>>>> more than a couple years old? What a bunch of cheap bastards.
>>>>>>> Quite the contrary - you will find a lot of well-to-do folks who
>>>>>>> ARE well- to-do because they don't throw their money away.
>>>>>> well-to-do folks don't waste their valuable time on that INFERIOR
>>>>>> Ubuntu piece of crap. That is one reason they are well-to-do. They
>>>>>> use their time wisely. One more thing, they can afford Windows!
>>>>> I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to use Linux
>>>>> mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in town)
>>>>> because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap.
>>>> You use linux because its free and you're a free loader. You live off
>>>> the backs of others.
>>> frankie, that is not true, and I think you know it. I use Linux becuase
>>> it works. I could very easily afford anything that would work for me.

>> For some odd reason (ha!) I don't believe you. Especially since you
>> pollute MS product ng's with your linux trolling. Why are you here? You
>> don't use MS products and you don't even like MS. Oh and spare me the
>> "...I'm here to stop the FUD" crap. You're here to spread the FUD...the
>> linux FUD...you tell people linux is better than Windows 7, in a Windows
>> 7 ng, but you don't even use the product! You're opinion about Windows 7
>> has no creditability at all.

>
> OK, frankie it's put up or shut up time.


So you're going to shut up or keep doing your "snake in the grass act"?

I defy you to show one instance
> when I have ever said that Linux is better than win7.


So what exactly do you mean when you say linux is better than Windows 7?
As in ..."I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to use
Linux mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in town)
because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap."
Oops!
>
> My position is that ALL modern computer operating systems are crap -
> compared to where they ought to be - compare to the hardware improvements
> since the 80's. I also maintain that Linux, at least for most people, is
> every bit as usable as any MS product.


Well that is a shift from your former position...that being that linux
was better than that Inferior MS crap.

>
>
>>>> Windows 7 is the very best OS available today and is all anyone needs
>>>> for all of their computing needs.
>>> Your opinion - not shared by many others.

>> Not shared by a few other liunx users. Stop lying ray-baby.
>>
>> Linux is certainly every bit as
>> capable.
>>
>> Your opinion, which is not shared by multi-millions of other Windows/Mac
>> users.

>
> Unfortunately, most of those multi-millions have never had an opportunity
> to find out, so you're wrong again.


Then they must certainly consider themselves as the lucky one!
Oops!...LOL!
>
 
R

ray

Flightless Bird
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:55:31 -0800, Frank wrote:

> ray wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:34:01 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>
>>> ray wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:31 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:15:55 -0800, Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:7r794qFqq3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:53:44 -0800, relic wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Some of you have noticed that you cannot boot a Windows 7 DVD
>>>>>>>>>> on your old computers. There is nothing wrong with your DVD
>>>>>>>>>> player or your computer. This is a proper function as the
>>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 DVD reads your BIOS on boot-up and determines that
>>>>>>>>>> your computer is not suitable to run Windows 7.
>>>>>>>>>> But wait...it can be done and 7 will run on a lot of older
>>>>>>>>>> computers.
>>>>>>>>> Do you mean to tell me there are people using computers that are
>>>>>>>>> more than a couple years old? What a bunch of cheap bastards.
>>>>>>>> Quite the contrary - you will find a lot of well-to-do folks who
>>>>>>>> ARE well- to-do because they don't throw their money away.
>>>>>>> well-to-do folks don't waste their valuable time on that INFERIOR
>>>>>>> Ubuntu piece of crap. That is one reason they are well-to-do.
>>>>>>> They use their time wisely. One more thing, they can afford
>>>>>>> Windows!
>>>>>> I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to use Linux
>>>>>> mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in town)
>>>>>> because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap.
>>>>> You use linux because its free and you're a free loader. You live
>>>>> off the backs of others.
>>>> frankie, that is not true, and I think you know it. I use Linux
>>>> becuase it works. I could very easily afford anything that would work
>>>> for me.
>>> For some odd reason (ha!) I don't believe you. Especially since you
>>> pollute MS product ng's with your linux trolling. Why are you here?
>>> You don't use MS products and you don't even like MS. Oh and spare me
>>> the "...I'm here to stop the FUD" crap. You're here to spread the
>>> FUD...the linux FUD...you tell people linux is better than Windows 7,
>>> in a Windows 7 ng, but you don't even use the product! You're opinion
>>> about Windows 7 has no creditability at all.

>>
>> OK, frankie it's put up or shut up time.

>
> So you're going to shut up or keep doing your "snake in the grass act"?
>
> I defy you to show one instance
>> when I have ever said that Linux is better than win7.

>
> So what exactly do you mean when you say linux is better than Windows 7?
> As in ..."I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to use
> Linux mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in town)
> because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap." Oops!


Simply taking it back at you, frankie wankie - please read your
immediately previous comment - not the similarity.

>>
>> My position is that ALL modern computer operating systems are crap -
>> compared to where they ought to be - compare to the hardware
>> improvements since the 80's. I also maintain that Linux, at least for
>> most people, is every bit as usable as any MS product.

>
> Well that is a shift from your former position...that being that linux
> was better than that Inferior MS crap.
>
>


frankie wankie - you are an idiot. It makes absolutely no sense to claim
that any OS is 'best' or 'better' than any other. The first question is
'best for what' or 'better for what'? In this industry you may have noted
that the majority of servers on the internet run Linux, not MS - I would
assume that is because the folks in the know have ascertained that Linux
is better than MS for that particular task. Most folks play games on MS -
because they have decided it is best for them for that particular task.
Many video art professionals use MACs because they have ascertained that
it is best for their particular tasks.

If you'll read my previous comments you'll see that I did not declare the
MS was inferior crap and that Linux was not. I've already stated that
every modern OS is crap - I don't know how else to say it. You maintain
that MS is the only system that will work for anyone - you are obviously
wrong.


>>
>>>>> Windows 7 is the very best OS available today and is all anyone
>>>>> needs for all of their computing needs.
>>>> Your opinion - not shared by many others.
>>> Not shared by a few other liunx users. Stop lying ray-baby.
>>>
>>> Linux is certainly every bit as
>>> capable.
>>>
>>> Your opinion, which is not shared by multi-millions of other
>>> Windows/Mac users.

>>
>> Unfortunately, most of those multi-millions have never had an
>> opportunity to find out, so you're wrong again.

>
> Then they must certainly consider themselves as the lucky one!
> Oops!...LOL!
>>
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
ray wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:55:31 -0800, Frank wrote:
>
>> ray wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:34:01 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:31 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:15:55 -0800, Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:7r794qFqq3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:53:44 -0800, relic wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Some of you have noticed that you cannot boot a Windows 7 DVD
>>>>>>>>>>> on your old computers. There is nothing wrong with your DVD
>>>>>>>>>>> player or your computer. This is a proper function as the
>>>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 DVD reads your BIOS on boot-up and determines that
>>>>>>>>>>> your computer is not suitable to run Windows 7.
>>>>>>>>>>> But wait...it can be done and 7 will run on a lot of older
>>>>>>>>>>> computers.
>>>>>>>>>> Do you mean to tell me there are people using computers that are
>>>>>>>>>> more than a couple years old? What a bunch of cheap bastards.
>>>>>>>>> Quite the contrary - you will find a lot of well-to-do folks who
>>>>>>>>> ARE well- to-do because they don't throw their money away.
>>>>>>>> well-to-do folks don't waste their valuable time on that INFERIOR
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu piece of crap. That is one reason they are well-to-do.
>>>>>>>> They use their time wisely. One more thing, they can afford
>>>>>>>> Windows!
>>>>>>> I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to use Linux
>>>>>>> mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in town)
>>>>>>> because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap.
>>>>>> You use linux because its free and you're a free loader. You live
>>>>>> off the backs of others.
>>>>> frankie, that is not true, and I think you know it. I use Linux
>>>>> becuase it works. I could very easily afford anything that would work
>>>>> for me.
>>>> For some odd reason (ha!) I don't believe you. Especially since you
>>>> pollute MS product ng's with your linux trolling. Why are you here?
>>>> You don't use MS products and you don't even like MS. Oh and spare me
>>>> the "...I'm here to stop the FUD" crap. You're here to spread the
>>>> FUD...the linux FUD...you tell people linux is better than Windows 7,
>>>> in a Windows 7 ng, but you don't even use the product! You're opinion
>>>> about Windows 7 has no creditability at all.
>>> OK, frankie it's put up or shut up time.

>> So you're going to shut up or keep doing your "snake in the grass act"?
>>
>> I defy you to show one instance
>>> when I have ever said that Linux is better than win7.

>> So what exactly do you mean when you say linux is better than Windows 7?
>> As in ..."I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to use
>> Linux mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in town)
>> because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap." Oops!

>
> Simply taking it back at you, frankie wankie - please read your
> immediately previous comment - not the similarity.



>
>>> My position is that ALL modern computer operating systems are crap -
>>> compared to where they ought to be - compare to the hardware
>>> improvements since the 80's. I also maintain that Linux, at least for
>>> most people, is every bit as usable as any MS product.

>> Well that is a shift from your former position...that being that linux
>> was better than that Inferior MS crap.
>>
>>

>
> frankie wankie - you are an idiot. It makes absolutely no sense to claim
> that any OS is 'best' or 'better' than any other. The first question is
> 'best for what' or 'better for what'? In this industry you may have noted
> that the majority of servers on the internet run Linux, not MS - I would
> assume that is because the folks in the know have ascertained that Linux
> is better than MS for that particular task. Most folks play games on MS -
> because they have decided it is best for them for that particular task.
> Many video art professionals use MACs because they have ascertained that
> it is best for their particular tasks.
>
> If you'll read my previous comments you'll see that I did not declare the
> MS was inferior crap and that Linux was not. I've already stated that
> every modern OS is crap - I don't know how else to say it. You maintain
> that MS is the only system that will work for anyone - you are obviously
> wrong.
>
>
>>>>>> Windows 7 is the very best OS available today and is all anyone
>>>>>> needs for all of their computing needs.
>>>>> Your opinion - not shared by many others.
>>>> Not shared by a few other liunx users. Stop lying ray-baby.
>>>>
>>>> Linux is certainly every bit as
>>>> capable.
>>>>
>>>> Your opinion, which is not shared by multi-millions of other
>>>> Windows/Mac users.
>>> Unfortunately, most of those multi-millions have never had an
>>> opportunity to find out, so you're wrong again.

>> Then they must certainly consider themselves as the lucky one!
>> Oops!...LOL!

>


WoW! You are a real POS snake in the grass ray-baby. You and cody are
cut from the same mode of underhanded liars and both of you have
obviously been doing this (lying & trying to deceive others) all of your
lives.
cody is just more open about his lying...he doesn't give a shit about
being caught in public...whereas you on the other seem to have more
practice than he does...you are the real snake in the grass.
But neither of you are as clever as you think you are at the FUD, lying
and subterfuge you do in these MS Windows ng's!
Oops!
BTW, Windows 7 is the very best OS available toady.
Something you obviously can afford to find out!...LOL!
 
R

ray

Flightless Bird
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:56:29 -0800, Frank wrote:

> ray wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:55:31 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>
>>> ray wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:34:01 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:31 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:15:55 -0800, Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:7r794qFqq3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:53:44 -0800, relic wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of you have noticed that you cannot boot a Windows 7 DVD
>>>>>>>>>>>> on your old computers. There is nothing wrong with your DVD
>>>>>>>>>>>> player or your computer. This is a proper function as the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 DVD reads your BIOS on boot-up and determines that
>>>>>>>>>>>> your computer is not suitable to run Windows 7. But wait...it
>>>>>>>>>>>> can be done and 7 will run on a lot of older computers.
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you mean to tell me there are people using computers that
>>>>>>>>>>> are more than a couple years old? What a bunch of cheap
>>>>>>>>>>> bastards.
>>>>>>>>>> Quite the contrary - you will find a lot of well-to-do folks
>>>>>>>>>> who ARE well- to-do because they don't throw their money away.
>>>>>>>>> well-to-do folks don't waste their valuable time on that
>>>>>>>>> INFERIOR Ubuntu piece of crap. That is one reason they are
>>>>>>>>> well-to-do. They use their time wisely. One more thing, they
>>>>>>>>> can afford Windows!
>>>>>>>> I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to use Linux
>>>>>>>> mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in
>>>>>>>> town) because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap.
>>>>>>> You use linux because its free and you're a free loader. You live
>>>>>>> off the backs of others.
>>>>>> frankie, that is not true, and I think you know it. I use Linux
>>>>>> becuase it works. I could very easily afford anything that would
>>>>>> work for me.
>>>>> For some odd reason (ha!) I don't believe you. Especially since you
>>>>> pollute MS product ng's with your linux trolling. Why are you here?
>>>>> You don't use MS products and you don't even like MS. Oh and spare
>>>>> me the "...I'm here to stop the FUD" crap. You're here to spread the
>>>>> FUD...the linux FUD...you tell people linux is better than Windows
>>>>> 7, in a Windows 7 ng, but you don't even use the product! You're
>>>>> opinion about Windows 7 has no creditability at all.
>>>> OK, frankie it's put up or shut up time.
>>> So you're going to shut up or keep doing your "snake in the grass
>>> act"?
>>>
>>> I defy you to show one instance
>>>> when I have ever said that Linux is better than win7.
>>> So what exactly do you mean when you say linux is better than Windows
>>> 7? As in ..."I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to
>>> use Linux mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in
>>> town) because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap." Oops!

>>
>> Simply taking it back at you, frankie wankie - please read your
>> immediately previous comment - not the similarity.

>
>
>
>>>> My position is that ALL modern computer operating systems are crap -
>>>> compared to where they ought to be - compare to the hardware
>>>> improvements since the 80's. I also maintain that Linux, at least for
>>>> most people, is every bit as usable as any MS product.
>>> Well that is a shift from your former position...that being that linux
>>> was better than that Inferior MS crap.
>>>
>>>
>>>

>> frankie wankie - you are an idiot. It makes absolutely no sense to
>> claim that any OS is 'best' or 'better' than any other. The first
>> question is 'best for what' or 'better for what'? In this industry you
>> may have noted that the majority of servers on the internet run Linux,
>> not MS - I would assume that is because the folks in the know have
>> ascertained that Linux is better than MS for that particular task. Most
>> folks play games on MS - because they have decided it is best for them
>> for that particular task. Many video art professionals use MACs because
>> they have ascertained that it is best for their particular tasks.
>>
>> If you'll read my previous comments you'll see that I did not declare
>> the MS was inferior crap and that Linux was not. I've already stated
>> that every modern OS is crap - I don't know how else to say it. You
>> maintain that MS is the only system that will work for anyone - you are
>> obviously wrong.
>>
>>
>>>>>>> Windows 7 is the very best OS available today and is all anyone
>>>>>>> needs for all of their computing needs.
>>>>>> Your opinion - not shared by many others.
>>>>> Not shared by a few other liunx users. Stop lying ray-baby.
>>>>>
>>>>> Linux is certainly every bit as
>>>>> capable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your opinion, which is not shared by multi-millions of other
>>>>> Windows/Mac users.
>>>> Unfortunately, most of those multi-millions have never had an
>>>> opportunity to find out, so you're wrong again.
>>> Then they must certainly consider themselves as the lucky one!
>>> Oops!...LOL!

>>
>>

> WoW! You are a real POS snake in the grass ray-baby. You and cody are
> cut from the same mode of underhanded liars and both of you have
> obviously been doing this (lying & trying to deceive others) all of your
> lives.
> cody is just more open about his lying...he doesn't give a shit about
> being caught in public...whereas you on the other seem to have more
> practice than he does...you are the real snake in the grass. But neither
> of you are as clever as you think you are at the FUD, lying and
> subterfuge you do in these MS Windows ng's! Oops!
> BTW, Windows 7 is the very best OS available toady. Something you
> obviously can afford to find out!...LOL!


Right. That's obviously why most web hosts are still running Linux. I
wish you'd explain to me what it is that win7 would do for me that Linux
won't. It may indeed be usable after you spend several hundred dollars
and many hours setting it up to do what Linux does 'out of the box'.
 
M

MICHAEL

Flightless Bird
"Frank" <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in message news:4b4fd969$1@news.x-privat.org...
> BTW, Windows 7 is the very best OS available toady.
> Something you obviously can afford to find out!...LOL!


As much as I like Windows 7, it's a shame that people like you
are so obnoxious about it. You and Alias must live extremely sad,
boring and pitiful little lives, so that the highlight of your day are the
boners you guys get while vomit spewing your rotten bile all over this
forum and the Vista forums. The both of you are so truly pathetic, and *losers*
does not come close to adequately describing the waste of life you guys are.


-Michael
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
ray wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:56:29 -0800, Frank wrote:
>
>> ray wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:55:31 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:34:01 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:30:31 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ray wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:15:55 -0800, Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:7r794qFqq3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:53:44 -0800, relic wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some of you have noticed that you cannot boot a Windows 7 DVD
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on your old computers. There is nothing wrong with your DVD
>>>>>>>>>>>>> player or your computer. This is a proper function as the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 DVD reads your BIOS on boot-up and determines that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> your computer is not suitable to run Windows 7. But wait...it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be done and 7 will run on a lot of older computers.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you mean to tell me there are people using computers that
>>>>>>>>>>>> are more than a couple years old? What a bunch of cheap
>>>>>>>>>>>> bastards.
>>>>>>>>>>> Quite the contrary - you will find a lot of well-to-do folks
>>>>>>>>>>> who ARE well- to-do because they don't throw their money away.
>>>>>>>>>> well-to-do folks don't waste their valuable time on that
>>>>>>>>>> INFERIOR Ubuntu piece of crap. That is one reason they are
>>>>>>>>>> well-to-do. They use their time wisely. One more thing, they
>>>>>>>>>> can afford Windows!
>>>>>>>>> I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to use Linux
>>>>>>>>> mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in
>>>>>>>>> town) because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap.
>>>>>>>> You use linux because its free and you're a free loader. You live
>>>>>>>> off the backs of others.
>>>>>>> frankie, that is not true, and I think you know it. I use Linux
>>>>>>> becuase it works. I could very easily afford anything that would
>>>>>>> work for me.
>>>>>> For some odd reason (ha!) I don't believe you. Especially since you
>>>>>> pollute MS product ng's with your linux trolling. Why are you here?
>>>>>> You don't use MS products and you don't even like MS. Oh and spare
>>>>>> me the "...I'm here to stop the FUD" crap. You're here to spread the
>>>>>> FUD...the linux FUD...you tell people linux is better than Windows
>>>>>> 7, in a Windows 7 ng, but you don't even use the product! You're
>>>>>> opinion about Windows 7 has no creditability at all.
>>>>> OK, frankie it's put up or shut up time.
>>>> So you're going to shut up or keep doing your "snake in the grass
>>>> act"?
>>>>
>>>> I defy you to show one instance
>>>>> when I have ever said that Linux is better than win7.
>>>> So what exactly do you mean when you say linux is better than Windows
>>>> 7? As in ..."I can afford whatever I damned well please. I choose to
>>>> use Linux mostly (not necessarily Ubuntu - that's not the only game in
>>>> town) because it works rather than use that INFERIOR ms crap." Oops!
>>> Simply taking it back at you, frankie wankie - please read your
>>> immediately previous comment - not the similarity.

>>
>>
>>>>> My position is that ALL modern computer operating systems are crap -
>>>>> compared to where they ought to be - compare to the hardware
>>>>> improvements since the 80's. I also maintain that Linux, at least for
>>>>> most people, is every bit as usable as any MS product.
>>>> Well that is a shift from your former position...that being that linux
>>>> was better than that Inferior MS crap.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> frankie wankie - you are an idiot. It makes absolutely no sense to
>>> claim that any OS is 'best' or 'better' than any other. The first
>>> question is 'best for what' or 'better for what'? In this industry you
>>> may have noted that the majority of servers on the internet run Linux,
>>> not MS - I would assume that is because the folks in the know have
>>> ascertained that Linux is better than MS for that particular task. Most
>>> folks play games on MS - because they have decided it is best for them
>>> for that particular task. Many video art professionals use MACs because
>>> they have ascertained that it is best for their particular tasks.
>>>
>>> If you'll read my previous comments you'll see that I did not declare
>>> the MS was inferior crap and that Linux was not. I've already stated
>>> that every modern OS is crap - I don't know how else to say it. You
>>> maintain that MS is the only system that will work for anyone - you are
>>> obviously wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>> Windows 7 is the very best OS available today and is all anyone
>>>>>>>> needs for all of their computing needs.
>>>>>>> Your opinion - not shared by many others.
>>>>>> Not shared by a few other liunx users. Stop lying ray-baby.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux is certainly every bit as
>>>>>> capable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your opinion, which is not shared by multi-millions of other
>>>>>> Windows/Mac users.
>>>>> Unfortunately, most of those multi-millions have never had an
>>>>> opportunity to find out, so you're wrong again.
>>>> Then they must certainly consider themselves as the lucky one!
>>>> Oops!...LOL!
>>>

>> WoW! You are a real POS snake in the grass ray-baby. You and cody are
>> cut from the same mode of underhanded liars and both of you have
>> obviously been doing this (lying & trying to deceive others) all of your
>> lives.
>> cody is just more open about his lying...he doesn't give a shit about
>> being caught in public...whereas you on the other seem to have more
>> practice than he does...you are the real snake in the grass. But neither
>> of you are as clever as you think you are at the FUD, lying and
>> subterfuge you do in these MS Windows ng's! Oops!
>> BTW, Windows 7 is the very best OS available toady. Something you
>> obviously can afford to find out!...LOL!

>
> Right.


So you now accept that I am right huh?

That's obviously why most web hosts are still running Linux.

Oh, now you change the subject ray-the snake?
We're talking desktop usage in here.

I
> wish you'd explain to me what it is that win7 would do for me that Linux
> won't.


I don't really care cause you're now ray-the lying snake.

It may indeed be usable after you spend several hundred dollars
and many hours setting it up to do what Linux does 'out of the box'.

Hahaha...I see your real MS hatred clearly coming through, ray-the lying
snake.
Good! Now you can no longer hide in the grass! We all now see that you
are the POS lying asshole linux loser and the snake-in-the-grass we all
thought knew you were.
Thanks for confirming it, you POS wanker!
Oops!
 
T

Tony

Flightless Bird
Chuckcar still uses a serial mouse.

relic wrote:

> Frank wrote:
> > Some of you have noticed that you cannot boot a Windows 7 DVD on your
> > old computers. There is nothing wrong with your DVD player or your
> > computer. This is a proper function as the Windows 7 DVD reads your
> > BIOS on boot-up and determines that your computer is not suitable to
> > run Windows 7.
> > But wait...it can be done and 7 will run on a lot of older computers.

>
> Do you mean to tell me there are people using computers that are more than a
> couple years old? What a bunch of cheap bastards.


--
The Grandmaster of the CyberFROG

Come get your ticket to CyberFROG city

Nay, Art thou decideth playeth ye simpleton games. *Some* of us know proper
manners

Very few. I used to take calls from *rank* noobs but got fired the first day on
the job for potty mouth,

Hamster isn't a newsreader it's a mistake!

El-Gonzo Jackson FROGS both me and Chuckcar

Master Juba was a black man imitating a white man imitating a black man

Using my technical prowess and computer abilities to answer questions beyond the
realm of understandability

Regards Tony... Making usenet better for everyone everyday
 
L

Lord Vetinari

Flightless Bird
"ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
news:7r9fppFn4aU5@mid.individual.net...
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:57:41 -0600, Lord Vetinari wrote:
>
>> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>> news:7r8vloFn4aU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:24:06 -0600, Lord Vetinari wrote:
>>>
>>>> "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:7r794qFqq3U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:53:44 -0800, relic wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>> Some of you have noticed that you cannot boot a Windows 7 DVD on
>>>>>>> your old computers. There is nothing wrong with your DVD player or
>>>>>>> your computer. This is a proper function as the Windows 7 DVD reads
>>>>>>> your BIOS on boot-up and determines that your computer is not
>>>>>>> suitable to run Windows 7.
>>>>>>> But wait...it can be done and 7 will run on a lot of older
>>>>>>> computers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you mean to tell me there are people using computers that are
>>>>>> more than a couple years old? What a bunch of cheap bastards.
>>>>>
>>>>> Quite the contrary - you will find a lot of well-to-do folks who ARE
>>>>> well- to-do because they don't throw their money away.
>>>>
>>>> Mostly, though, people get to that point by taking others'
>>>> money...like the guy one of my coworkers described this morning. All
>>>> proud of himself, for having become wealthy, despite a lack of even
>>>> high school education, because he buys up debts, then charges the
>>>> victim usurious rates of interest. Scum.
>>>
>>> A few do. You should try a Dave Ramsey class sometime.

>>
>> Wrong. MOST do. I'm middle-aged, and have been paying attention most
>> of my life. Having grown up dirt poor, it had been my interest to
>> discover the secret...and I did find it. I could be wealthy, but I have
>> strong moral fiber in my diet. Seriously. If I were to start conning
>> people, I'd have to kill myself.

>
> It is more about managing what you have than earning more.


It really isn't so much about the money, but rather, power. For some, it's
a way to keep from feeling powerless, and for far too many, it's all about
having power over others.

> There are folks making under $50k who are doing quite well - there
> a folks making well into six figures who are still in debt.


There's always a case, where _someone_ fits into a particular category.
People making under $50k, and are doing well, those aren't all that common,
these days. As to people making six figures, or more, the more one makes,
the more one spends. In today's society, it's practically unheard of, to
not be deep in debt....especially if you make more than enough to get by on.

> I'm not asking you to 'con people' -


Show me where I accused you of that.

> I never have and I'm quite well off - thanks to good money management.


Sure, that's your story, and you'll be sticking to it, eh?
 
L

Lord Vetinari

Flightless Bird
"MICHAEL" <u158627_emrunc@dslr.net> wrote in message
news:hiot5c$6d5$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> "Frank" <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in message news:4b4fd969$1@news.x-privat.org...
>> BTW, Windows 7 is the very best OS available toady.
>> Something you obviously can afford to find out!...LOL!

>
> As much as I like Windows 7, it's a shame that people like you
> are so obnoxious about it. You and Alias must live extremely sad,
> boring and pitiful little lives, so that the highlight of your day are the
> boners you guys get while vomit spewing your rotten bile all over this
> forum and the Vista forums. The both of you are so truly pathetic, and
> *losers*
> does not come close to adequately describing the waste of life you guys
> are.


Perfect description of both of them.

You probably ought to kf them, at this point. Aren't you getting kinda
bored with them?
 
M

MICHAEL

Flightless Bird
"Lord Vetinari" <vetinari@ameritech.net> wrote in message
news:hj7jt3$9rh$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> "MICHAEL" <u158627_emrunc@dslr.net> wrote in message news:hiot5c$6d5$1@speranza.aioe.org...
>> "Frank" <fb@amk.cmo> wrote in message news:4b4fd969$1@news.x-privat.org...
>>> BTW, Windows 7 is the very best OS available toady.
>>> Something you obviously can afford to find out!...LOL!

>>
>> As much as I like Windows 7, it's a shame that people like you
>> are so obnoxious about it. You and Alias must live extremely sad,
>> boring and pitiful little lives, so that the highlight of your day are the
>> boners you guys get while vomit spewing your rotten bile all over this
>> forum and the Vista forums. The both of you are so truly pathetic, and *losers*
>> does not come close to adequately describing the waste of life you guys are.

>
> Perfect description of both of them.
>
> You probably ought to kf them, at this point. Aren't you getting kinda bored with them?


They're blocked, now. They've been useless and obnoxious posters since
I participated in the Vista beta forums. Neither one of them accomplish
anything, they are basically keyboard masturbating themselves. Almost
everyone else quickly blocks them. They are truly pathetic.


-Michael
 
Top