F
Frank
Flightless Bird
On 4/1/2010 12:22 AM, Joel wrote:
> Frank<fb@tbb.moz> wrote:
>
>>> Frank's statement is presumably meant to troll
>>> the Linux people, but then again, he jumped on me for recommending
>>> Firefox over IE.
>>
>> No, I didn't.
>> I challenged your statement that FF was more secure than IE.
>
>
> Which is one of the dumbest things anyone could ever do.
No, calming FF was the most secure, as you did, was the dumbest.
>
>
>> I proved you wrong.
>
>
> Not even in the slightest.
And with verifiable, empirical data!
Oops!...LOL!
>
>
>> Live with it.
>
>
> Live with the fact that you're delusional, peculiar, and downright a
> fruitcake? Well, life isn't perfect, so I've learned to live with
> things like that.
You have problems with wanting everyone to think your smart, which is
your one BIG failing as you're rather stupid, as you've just proven.
>
>
>> It's actually as if he has something against the
>>> concept of alternatives, especially free ones (except for how he posts
>>> with Thunderbird, of course - really bright guy).
>>
>> Try reading my original statement and maybe taking that GED reading
>> comprehension course you've been contemplating.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:15:25 -0700
> From: Frank<fab@w7.crm>
> Message-ID:<4bb2e885$1@news.x-privat.org>
>
> On 3/30/2010 9:55 PM, Andrew wrote:
>
>> I guess you don't read the EULA's or pay attention to what is illegal or
>> not.
>> Open source is good for you...at least you're not breaking any laws when
>> you use it.
>
> Well that is a matter that may someday be thoroughly tested in the
> courts.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> What other conclusion could one reach, in the context of your tirades
> against Linux, and blatant foolishness about IE being more secure than
> Firefox, than that you are criticizing open-source software as somehow
> ripping off commercial software?
So why have open sores started to pay royalties huh?
Oops!
>
> If you want to clarify your "original statement", feel free - flaming
> me about taking a GED reading course isn't clarifying anything,
> retard.
Keep back pedaling, you're pretty good...and it's entertaining!
Oops!...LOL!
>
> Frank<fb@tbb.moz> wrote:
>
>>> Frank's statement is presumably meant to troll
>>> the Linux people, but then again, he jumped on me for recommending
>>> Firefox over IE.
>>
>> No, I didn't.
>> I challenged your statement that FF was more secure than IE.
>
>
> Which is one of the dumbest things anyone could ever do.
No, calming FF was the most secure, as you did, was the dumbest.
>
>
>> I proved you wrong.
>
>
> Not even in the slightest.
And with verifiable, empirical data!
Oops!...LOL!
>
>
>> Live with it.
>
>
> Live with the fact that you're delusional, peculiar, and downright a
> fruitcake? Well, life isn't perfect, so I've learned to live with
> things like that.
You have problems with wanting everyone to think your smart, which is
your one BIG failing as you're rather stupid, as you've just proven.
>
>
>> It's actually as if he has something against the
>>> concept of alternatives, especially free ones (except for how he posts
>>> with Thunderbird, of course - really bright guy).
>>
>> Try reading my original statement and maybe taking that GED reading
>> comprehension course you've been contemplating.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:15:25 -0700
> From: Frank<fab@w7.crm>
> Message-ID:<4bb2e885$1@news.x-privat.org>
>
> On 3/30/2010 9:55 PM, Andrew wrote:
>
>> I guess you don't read the EULA's or pay attention to what is illegal or
>> not.
>> Open source is good for you...at least you're not breaking any laws when
>> you use it.
>
> Well that is a matter that may someday be thoroughly tested in the
> courts.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> What other conclusion could one reach, in the context of your tirades
> against Linux, and blatant foolishness about IE being more secure than
> Firefox, than that you are criticizing open-source software as somehow
> ripping off commercial software?
So why have open sores started to pay royalties huh?
Oops!
>
> If you want to clarify your "original statement", feel free - flaming
> me about taking a GED reading course isn't clarifying anything,
> retard.
Keep back pedaling, you're pretty good...and it's entertaining!
Oops!...LOL!
>