• Welcome to Tux Reports: Where Penguins Fly. We hope you find the topics varied, interesting, and worthy of your time. Please become a member and join in the discussions.

Are any women here, seriouslY?

G

Grenou

Flightless Bird
"Ophelia" <Ophelia@Elsinore.me.uk> wrote in message
news:8gin2qFmeiU3@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "Fred Manitoba" <fmanitoba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:i80vj0$ies$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Time to end MY topic.

-snip-
>
> Sorry chum, your topic has been highjacked:) How about my recipe for
> Yorkshire pudding ;P
> --
> --
> https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/


Ho yum ;-)

I delete most of the posts here before reading (except pink ones), it's a
shame there isn't such a thing as a virtual truncheon, I would know just
where to apply it.
:)
Grenou
 
B

bod

Flightless Bird
Grenou wrote:
>
>
> "Ophelia" <Ophelia@Elsinore.me.uk> wrote in message
> news:8gin2qFmeiU3@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>
>> "Fred Manitoba" <fmanitoba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:i80vj0$ies$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Time to end MY topic.

> -snip-
>>
>> Sorry chum, your topic has been highjacked:) How about my recipe for
>> Yorkshire pudding ;P
>> --
>> --
>> https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

>
> Ho yum ;-)
>
> I delete most of the posts here before reading (except pink ones), it's
> a shame there isn't such a thing as a virtual truncheon, I would know
> just where to apply it.
> :)
> Grenou
>
>


What are "pink ones"? ..... Do you mean gay ones...ooooor female ones?

Bod
 
O

Ophelia

Flightless Bird
"Grenou" <Iamhere@someofthetime.com> wrote in message
news:voydnVpDB724zDnRnZ2dnUVZ8uydnZ2d@bt.com...
>
>
> "Ophelia" <Ophelia@Elsinore.me.uk> wrote in message
> news:8gin2qFmeiU3@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>
>> "Fred Manitoba" <fmanitoba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:i80vj0$ies$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Time to end MY topic.

> -snip-
>>
>> Sorry chum, your topic has been highjacked:) How about my recipe for
>> Yorkshire pudding ;P
>> --
>> --
>> https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/

>
> Ho yum ;-)
>
> I delete most of the posts here before reading (except pink ones), it's a
> shame there isn't such a thing as a virtual truncheon, I would know just
> where to apply it.


nodnodnod!
--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
 
J

Just Judy

Flightless Bird
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:35:59 -0400, "Dave \"Crash\" Dummy"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>I don't know about this group, but a lot of female Usenet participants
>don't reveal their gender in order to avoid cyberstalkers. If I was a
>woman, I don't think I would advertise it.


I've been a usenet junkie since 1996 and never had a problem
with cyberkooks.

Perhaps I'm frequenting the wrong groups?
--
Judy~
http://www.frugalsites.net/911/sept11.html
 
O

Ophelia

Flightless Bird
"Just Judy" <JoodyJoodyJoody@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:sot8a6527unlih9oq15ip44f6qofh5ih5e@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:35:59 -0400, "Dave \"Crash\" Dummy"
> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>I don't know about this group, but a lot of female Usenet participants
>>don't reveal their gender in order to avoid cyberstalkers. If I was a
>>woman, I don't think I would advertise it.

>
> I've been a usenet junkie since 1996 and never had a problem
> with cyberkooks.
>
> Perhaps I'm frequenting the wrong groups?


....or probably the 'right' groups:)
--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
 
D

Dave \Crash\ Dummy

Flightless Bird
Just Judy wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:35:59 -0400, "Dave \"Crash\" Dummy"
> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> I don't know about this group, but a lot of female Usenet participants
>> don't reveal their gender in order to avoid cyberstalkers. If I was a
>> woman, I don't think I would advertise it.

>
> I've been a usenet junkie since 1996 and never had a problem
> with cyberkooks.
>
> Perhaps I'm frequenting the wrong groups?


My stalking days are long past. Would you settle for cyberdoddering?
--
Crash

"The future ain't what it used to be."
~ Yogi Berra ~
 
O

Ophelia

Flightless Bird
"Dave "Crash" Dummy" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:i821bc$6ku$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Just Judy wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:35:59 -0400, "Dave \"Crash\" Dummy"
>> <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know about this group, but a lot of female Usenet participants
>>> don't reveal their gender in order to avoid cyberstalkers. If I was a
>>> woman, I don't think I would advertise it.

>>
>> I've been a usenet junkie since 1996 and never had a problem
>> with cyberkooks.
>>
>> Perhaps I'm frequenting the wrong groups?

>
> My stalking days are long past. Would you settle for cyberdoddering?


rofl
--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
 
V

Valorie *~~

Flightless Bird
"Ophelia" <Ophelia@Elsinore.me.uk> wrote in message
news:8gin2qFmeiU2@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "Valorie *~~" <ValMcl@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:4ca3e6a7@news.x-privat.org...
>> "Ophelia" <Ophelia@Elsinore.me.uk> wrote in message
>> news:8gh3d9FojbU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> True enough:) As for online stalkers.... been there, had that done to
>>> me. The best defence is laughter at the antics:)

>>
>> It can be very frightening when they go after you in RL. Never
>> underestimate a mentally ill reprobate.

>
> I imagine it must have been:( I hope all is well now?


Let's just say things have improved. This stalker is totally obsessed with
my husband and myself and vowed to "destroy" us any way he can. Sadly, there
isn't much the Police can or will do unless the victim is under 18.
Apparently threatening people and destroying their reputation isn't against
the law on the internet. Suing is expensive and most of these mentally ill
people have very little. You have no idea the damage someone like this man
can do to a family once they know where their victim lives.

From what I learned most Police Dept's in the USA don't even have Computer
Crime Units.

> --
> --
> https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
 
V

Valorie *~~

Flightless Bird
"Ophelia" <Ophelia@Elsinore.me.uk> wrote in message
news:8gin2qFmeiU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "Valorie *~~" <ValMcl@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:4ca3e622@news.x-privat.org...
>> "Ophelia" <Ophelia@Elsinore.me.uk> wrote in message
>> news:8gh1r8Ff9jU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Dave "Crash" Dummy" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:i7vish$boa$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Fred Manitoba" <fmanitoba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:i7roq8$lhm$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>> Is this a law of Nature that technology & women don't get along? All
>>>>>> of you guys, are GUYS. Any giulr here, ever?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't give me that YouTube video with PixieNixie, it is not
>>>>>> statistcis but exception + I suspect even her being an exception is
>>>>>> fake, Games are not high-end brain-intensive workj anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am an engineer so I have authority to say from experience - women
>>>>>> are not present in this Land of equations & abstract, analytic
>>>>>> thinking.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL well *I* am female and so is Grenou:) I don't post much but I do
>>>>> read!
>>>>
>>>> I don't know about this group, but a lot of female Usenet participants
>>>> don't reveal their gender in order to avoid cyberstalkers. If I was a
>>>> woman, I don't think I would advertise it.
>>>
>>> Do you mean online or in rl?

>>
>> Both. I have a cyber stalker who found out where I live and it became, in
>> time, a police issue. The net is full of mentally ill and malicious
>> people, not just pedophiles looking to snare our children and
>> grandchildren.

>
> Good grief! Although I did have trouble with a woman in another group.
> She made up all kinds of stories about me and my husband. He doesn't
> even post on usenet but it was done to hurt me.


Yes, my stalker did the same thing. My husband is seldom online and doesn't
use Usenet either. He's more a TV/read person. That doesn't stop these
vicious stalkers. They want to cause as much damage as they can to their
victims. I wont post in public what this stalker did and give other sick
individuals ideas. I'm sure anything you can imagine - he did.

Had those lies been believed he would
> have been unemployable. He had to send a Cease and Desist notice and was
> quite prepared to go to law. There was, for some time a 'rule' in the
> groups that what happens on usenet, stays on usenet. A gift for cruel
> and malicious people.


But if someone types in your husband's name, it will come up on any browser,
whether the stalker posted it on Usenet or almost anywhere online. If the
stalker is in another country there is nothing you can do unless prepared to
spend a lot of money. The internet is indeed a true "gift" for cruel, crazy
and malicious people.

> --
> --
> https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
 
O

Ophelia

Flightless Bird
"Valorie *~~" <ValMcl@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:4ca4a14c@news.x-privat.org...
> "Ophelia" <Ophelia@Elsinore.me.uk> wrote in message
> news:8gin2qFmeiU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>>
>> "Valorie *~~" <ValMcl@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:4ca3e622@news.x-privat.org...
>>> "Ophelia" <Ophelia@Elsinore.me.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:8gh1r8Ff9jU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Dave "Crash" Dummy" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:i7vish$boa$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Fred Manitoba" <fmanitoba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:i7roq8$lhm$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>>> Is this a law of Nature that technology & women don't get along? All
>>>>>>> of you guys, are GUYS. Any giulr here, ever?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't give me that YouTube video with PixieNixie, it is not
>>>>>>> statistcis but exception + I suspect even her being an exception is
>>>>>>> fake, Games are not high-end brain-intensive workj anyway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am an engineer so I have authority to say from experience - women
>>>>>>> are not present in this Land of equations & abstract, analytic
>>>>>>> thinking.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL well *I* am female and so is Grenou:) I don't post much but I do
>>>>>> read!
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know about this group, but a lot of female Usenet participants
>>>>> don't reveal their gender in order to avoid cyberstalkers. If I was a
>>>>> woman, I don't think I would advertise it.
>>>>
>>>> Do you mean online or in rl?
>>>
>>> Both. I have a cyber stalker who found out where I live and it became,
>>> in time, a police issue. The net is full of mentally ill and malicious
>>> people, not just pedophiles looking to snare our children and
>>> grandchildren.

>>
>> Good grief! Although I did have trouble with a woman in another group.
>> She made up all kinds of stories about me and my husband. He doesn't
>> even post on usenet but it was done to hurt me.

>
> Yes, my stalker did the same thing. My husband is seldom online and
> doesn't use Usenet either. He's more a TV/read person. That doesn't stop
> these vicious stalkers. They want to cause as much damage as they can to
> their victims. I wont post in public what this stalker did and give other
> sick individuals ideas. I'm sure anything you can imagine - he did.
>
> Had those lies been believed he would
>> have been unemployable. He had to send a Cease and Desist notice and was
>> quite prepared to go to law. There was, for some time a 'rule' in the
>> groups that what happens on usenet, stays on usenet. A gift for cruel
>> and malicious people.

>
> But if someone types in your husband's name, it will come up on any
> browser, whether the stalker posted it on Usenet or almost anywhere
> online. If the stalker is in another country there is nothing you can do
> unless prepared to spend a lot of money. The internet is indeed a true
> "gift" for cruel, crazy and malicious people.


Yes you are right! Our stalker IS in this country and we know exactly who
and where she is!! One more whiff...

We don't particularly want to waste a lot of money, but needs must when the
devil drives!


--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
 
J

Just Judy

Flightless Bird
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:55:16 -0400, "Dave \"Crash\" Dummy"
<invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>
>> I've been a usenet junkie since 1996 and never had a problem
>> with cyberkooks.
>>
>> Perhaps I'm frequenting the wrong groups?

>
>My stalking days are long past. Would you settle for cyberdoddering?


Now that's a visual that's got me giggling.


--
Judy~
http://www.frugalsites.net/911/sept11.html
 
F

felmon

Flightless Bird
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:52:35 +0100, Ophelia wrote:

> Sorry chum, your topic has been highjacked How about my recipe for
> Yorkshire pudding ;P


are we still talking sex?

Felmon
 
O

Ophelia

Flightless Bird
"felmon" <nemo@nowhere.INVALID> wrote in message
news:pan.2010.10.01.20.59.31@nowhere.INVALID...
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:52:35 +0100, Ophelia wrote:
>
>> Sorry chum, your topic has been highjacked How about my recipe for
>> Yorkshire pudding ;P

>
> are we still talking sex?


Well I dunno about you but I'm not:)
--
--
https://www.shop.helpforheroes.org.uk/
 
F

Frank

Flightless Bird
On 9/29/2010 8:07 AM, Alias wrote:
> On 09/29/2010 04:35 PM, Dave "Crash" Dummy wrote:
>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Fred Manitoba" <fmanitoba@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:i7roq8$lhm$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Is this a law of Nature that technology & women don't get along? All
>>>> of you guys, are GUYS. Any giulr here, ever?
>>>>
>>>> Don't give me that YouTube video with PixieNixie, it is not
>>>> statistcis but exception + I suspect even her being an exception is
>>>> fake, Games are not high-end brain-intensive workj anyway.
>>>>
>>>> I am an engineer so I have authority to say from experience - women
>>>> are not present in this Land of equations & abstract, analytic
>>>> thinking.
>>>
>>> LOL well *I* am female and so is Grenou:) I don't post much but I do
>>> read!

>>
>> I don't know about this group, but a lot of female Usenet participants
>> don't reveal their gender in order to avoid cyberstalkers. If I was a
>> woman, I don't think I would advertise it.

>
> I think the cyberstalkers are more into Facebook and the like than Usenet.
>

Projecting again?
 
Top