"Rob" <nomail@example.com> wrote in message
news:slrnhuqan7.vp1.nomail@xs8.xs4all.nl...
> Dan <news@worldofspack.com> wrote:
>>>> Apparently they are working on it for release after Flash 10.1 (which
>>>> is
>>>> currently in pre-release). There is a 64-bit pre-release version of
>>>> Flash
>>>> 10.1 for Linux.
>>>
>>> And that has been the status for more than two years, hasn't it?
>>> One starts to believe Flash is developed by a two-man team there.
>>
>> I have no idea. I was just reading an item on the Adobe site stating this
>> along with the note about the 64-bit Linux Flash, the article itself is
>> not
>> dated. Has 10.1 been in development for 2 years?
>
> No, but the indication that the 64-bit version would be developed in
> the future has been there for at least 2 years.
>
> It is good that the Linux version will be there first, after all 64-bit
> Linux has been around longer than 64-bit Windows, but I would think
> Windows is a larger customer base and many manufacturers install a 64-bit
> version now.
>
> Maybe they should at least develop a dummy 64-bit plugin that issues a
> clear message when flash is accessed from the 64-bit browser, indicating
> the current status of the development (fetched from their website)
> and what to do to work around the problem.
All the Linux systems I've used recently have had Flash forcibly disabled, I
agree that they should have concentrated on the Windows plugin first. Then
again, if the Linux one also runs on Mac OS X then I can see why that's
first in line - after all, Macs are the "bread and butter" of Adobe's
customer base.
--
Dan